User talk:Alekisok

Welcome!

Hello, Alekisok, and welcome to Wikipedia! I hope you like the place and decide to stay. Unfortunately, one or more of the pages you created, such as User:Alekisok, may not conform to some of Wikipedia's content policies and may not be retained. In short, the topic of an article must be notable and have already been the subject of publication by reliable and independent sources.

Please review Your first article for an overview of the article creation process. The Article Wizard is available to help you create an article, where it will be reviewed and considered for publication. For information on how to request a new article that can be created by someone else, see Requested articles. If you are stuck, come to the Teahouse, where experienced Wikipedians can help you through the processes.

New to Wikipedia? Please consider taking a look at our introductory tutorial or reviewing the contributing to Wikipedia page to learn the basics about editing. Below are a few other good pages about article creation.

Article development
Standard layout
Lead section
The perfect article
Task Center – need some ideas of what kind of things need doing? Go here.

I hope you enjoy editing here and being a Wikipedian! Please sign your name on talk pages using four tildes (~~~~); this will automatically produce your name and the date. If you have any questions, ask me on my talk page. You can also type {{help me}} on this page, followed by your question, and someone will show up shortly to answer your questions. Again, welcome! Blue Riband► 02:13, 19 January 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Speedy deletion nomination of User:Alekisok

A tag has been placed on User:Alekisok requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia. This has been done for the following reason:

Too much personal information?

Under the criteria for speedy deletion, pages that meet certain criteria may be deleted at any time.

If you think this page should not be deleted for this reason, you may contest the nomination by visiting the page and clicking the button labelled "Contest this speedy deletion". This will give you the opportunity to explain why you believe the page should not be deleted. However, be aware that once a page is tagged for speedy deletion, it may be deleted without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag from the page yourself, but do not hesitate to add information in line with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines. If the page is deleted, and you wish to retrieve the deleted material for future reference or improvement, then please contact the deleting administrator, or if you have already done so, you can place a request here. Blue Riband► 02:13, 19 January 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Speedy deletion nomination of User:Alekisok

Hello, and welcome to Wikipedia. A tag has been placed on User:Alekisok requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia. This has been done under section U5 of the criteria for speedy deletion, because the page appears to consist of writings, information, discussions, and/or activities not closely related to Wikipedia's goals. Please note that Wikipedia is not a free web hosting service. Under the criteria for speedy deletion, such pages may be deleted at any time.

If you think this page should not be deleted for this reason, you may contest the nomination by visiting the page and clicking the button labelled "Contest this speedy deletion". This will give you the opportunity to explain why you believe the page should not be deleted. However, be aware that once a page is tagged for speedy deletion, it may be deleted without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag from the page yourself, but do not hesitate to add information in line with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines. If the page is deleted, and you wish to retrieve the deleted material for future reference or improvement, then please contact the deleting administrator, or if you have already done so, you can place a request here. GPL93 (talk) 23:35, 2 February 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Contested deletion

This page should not be speedily deleted because I haven't done anything wrong and I am literally just using a template I found on the official wikipedia page.

Hello Alikisok, I was the one who nominated your Userpage for deletion. I'm not an administrator so I cannot see the text either but I beleive that you put in you full date of birth and you're under 18. While there's nothing wrong with being under 18 many young editors don't realize that it is never a good idea to post personal identity information online. Wikipedia does not use privacy viewing controls so your content could be seen by anybody.

Wikipedia has a long learning curve. Many new editors also don't realize that User pages and User talk pages are intended only to promote collegiality among users. Wikipedia is an encyclopedia and:

not a free webhosting service ,
not a personal website,
not a memorial or genealogy site
not a blog
not a social media site.

Nor are user pages intended to host articles, CV's/resumés or lengthy autobiographies.

As Wikipedia is an encyclopedia subjects of articles must meet notability guidelines with reliable sources which are unconnected with the subject and which provide verifiable information.

For a guideline on what you can and cannot have on a Userpage please take a look at WP:USERPAGE.
For article creation, Please use WP:AfC and/or request help at the TEAHOUSE. Blue Riband► 03:36, 3 February 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Speedy deletion nomination of User:Alekisok

Hello, and welcome to Wikipedia. A tag has been placed on User:Alekisok requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia. This has been done under section U5 of the criteria for speedy deletion, because the page appears to consist of writings, information, discussions, or activities not closely related to Wikipedia's goals. Please note that Wikipedia is not a free web hosting service. Under the criteria for speedy deletion, such pages may be deleted at any time.

If you think this page should not be deleted for this reason, you may contest the nomination by visiting the page and clicking the button labelled "Contest this speedy deletion". This will give you the opportunity to explain why you believe the page should not be deleted. However, be aware that once a page is tagged for speedy deletion, it may be deleted without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag from the page yourself, but do not hesitate to add information in line with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines. If the page is deleted, and you wish to retrieve the deleted material for future reference or improvement, then please contact the deleting administrator, or if you have already done so, you can place a request here. Hey man im josh (talk) 12:50, 31 May 2023 (UTC)[reply]

November 2023

You have been blocked indefinitely from editing because it appears that you are not here to build an encyclopedia.

If you think there are good reasons for being unblocked, please review Wikipedia's guide to appealing blocks, then add the following text to the bottom of your talk page: {{unblock|reason=Your reason here ~~~~}}. Drmies (talk) 01:41, 6 November 2023 (UTC)[reply]

This user's unblock request has been reviewed by an administrator, who declined the request. Other administrators may also review this block, but should not override the decision without good reason (see the blocking policy).

Alekisok (block log • active blocks • global blocks • contribs • deleted contribs • filter log • creation log • change block settings • unblock • checkuser (log))

Request reason:

I didn't cite my sources in my first article which was my fault, but I have now improved everything and given valid sources to prove and cite all info on my wikipedia. It was an honest mistake. 331dot (talk) 09:18, 13 November 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Decline reason:

A lack of citing sources is not why you were blocked- you seem to be here to promote yourself. Wikipedia is not a place for people to tell the world about themselves, see the autobiography policy. You won't be unblocked to, in the short term, to write about yourself, so please tell what edits you intend to make instead in a new request, I am declining this one. 331dot (talk) 09:18, 13 November 2023 (UTC)[reply]

If you want to make any further unblock requests, please read the guide to appealing blocks first, then use the {{unblock}} template again. If you make too many unconvincing or disruptive unblock requests, you may be prevented from editing this page until your block has expired. Do not remove this unblock review while you are blocked.

UTRS appeal #81023 is closed.

'm sorry, but I cannot unblock you at this time. This requires greater discussion than is possible via UTRS. Please concisely and clearly describe how your editing merited a block, what you would do differently, and what constructive edits you would make. Please read Wikipedia's Guide to appealing blocks for more information. (https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Wikipedia:Guide_to_appealing_blocks) As you still have access to your talk page, please post your unblock request to your user talk page, omitting any off-Wiki personally identifying information. If you have not already done so, please place the following at the bottom of your talk page, filling in "Your reason here "

{{unblock|reason=Your reason here ~~~~}}.

Thanks -- Deepfriedokra (talk) 08:49, 17 November 2023 (UTC)[reply]