User talk:Aleenf1/Archive 15

Archive 10

←

Archive 13

Archive 14

Archive 15

July 2023

You have been blocked from editing for a period of 1 week for edit warring, as you did at 2023 FIFA Women's World Cup broadcasting rights. Once the block has expired, you are welcome to make useful contributions.

During a dispute, you should first try to discuss controversial changes and seek consensus. If that proves unsuccessful, you are encouraged to seek dispute resolution, and in some cases it may be appropriate to request page protection.

If you think there are good reasons for being unblocked, please read the guide to appealing blocks, then add the following text at the bottom of your talk page: {{unblock|reason=Your reason here ~~~~}}.  Aoidh (talk) 10:29, 20 July 2023 (UTC)

This user's unblock request has been reviewed by an administrator, who declined the request. Other administrators may also review this block, but should not override the decision without good reason (see the blocking policy).

Aleenf1 (block log • active blocks • global blocks • contribs • deleted contribs • filter log • creation log • change block settings • unblock • checkuser (log))

---

Request reason:

Sorry i didn't vandalise as reported, and where is consensus the reporter said about, the reporter also engaged in edit warring without any consensus, I'm just correct what have been doing wrong. As you can see the reporter also reverted even that's error.
You can see language is not the matter, which he seems ignored, he try to warn, where he warn me about, he seems trying hard to defend his editing even that's factual error. Aleenf1 10:35, 20 July 2023 (UTC)

Decline reason:

You aren't blocked for vandalism. Additionally, your threat to evade your block, below, shows you aren't operating in good faith. Yamla (talk) 12:52, 20 July 2023 (UTC)

---

If you want to make any further unblock requests, please read the guide to appealing blocks first, then use the {{unblock}} template again. If you make too many unconvincing or disruptive unblock requests, you may be prevented from editing this page until your block has expired. Do not remove this unblock review while you are blocked.

The block is for edit warring, not for vandalism. You were just blocked for edit warring on June 28 and just made 6 reverts within 24 hours on 2023 FIFA Women's World Cup broadcasting rights, going well past WP:3RR. - Aoidh (talk) 10:40, 20 July 2023 (UTC)

@Aoidh: Even is correct the wrong things count as edit warring, good job you, ignore my request. You all getting horror by letting someone bypass. --Aleenf1 10:43, 20 July 2023 (UTC)

@Aoidh: Getting hard to get the things right back the correct way with right things, looks like i have to let it turn bad and erosive. What is the point of MOS and rules. --Aleenf1 10:47, 20 July 2023 (UTC)

Yes, it's edit warring even if you believe that you are correct. There are exceptions to 3RR but believing you are correct is not one of them. Per WP:Edit warring: Claiming "My edits were right, so it wasn't edit warring" is not a valid defense. I should also note that you are aware of 3RR, as you warned another editor of it before immediately continuing to edit war one minute later. If you have a disagreement with another editor the solution is to seek dispute resolution using something like WP:3O, WP:DRN, or WP:RFC, not by edit-warring. - Aoidh (talk) 10:48, 20 July 2023 (UTC)

@Aoidh: Is the reporter also seeking dispute resolution? While i'm talking on talk page, he just one way song, its okay, the editor also might aware but you let it go, good job, you claimed he is "unaware". --Aleenf1 10:52, 20 July 2023 (UTC)

Do you have a diff showing that the other editor was or should have been aware of 3RR before they made those reverts? - Aoidh (talk) 10:56, 20 July 2023 (UTC)

@Aoidh: The truth is with this block, you can let people put wrong things and run away, while people need to cleanup the messed punished, good luck Wikipedia. Hope you find yourself great with your administrator ship. And maybe is time for me to put the note after 18 years. --Aleenf1 10:59, 20 July 2023 (UTC)

You see where is ANT1 come from, a Greek broadcaster showing in Cyprus? Where is Venezuela broadcaster come from, i check not even the broadcaster making that path, while keep rolling back to defend, is he even check his edit? Or just come to defend his edit, what a ridiculous... --Aleenf1 11:04, 20 July 2023 (UTC)

Even i'm rolling back, i'm still re-add the legit entry he added, not just blatantly revert. Bullshit all. --Aleenf1 11:05, 20 July 2023 (UTC)

@Aoidh: Is it unaware or is it defending? Please speak to me, if is it unaware why know to report? How you judge people of unawareness? Please see Talk:2023 FIFA Women's World Cup broadcasting rights, at least an editor warn about, is it he "unaware" as you mentioned. --Aleenf1 11:23, 20 July 2023 (UTC)

Respectfully, I am not sure what you're asking me. If you're asking why I told the other editor on their talk page that I did not block them because they appeared to not know about 3RR, it is because I could find no evidence that they were ever previously warned about or mentioned 3RR and therefore may very well have not known about it, reinforced by the fact that they did not make any further reverts after being made aware of 3RR. By contrast you are demonstrably aware of 3RR as you warned them of it while making reverts yourself, and have been blocked for edit warring previously. - Aoidh (talk) 11:37, 20 July 2023 (UTC)

@Aoidh: Talk:2023 FIFA Women's World Cup broadcasting rights, that's talk, and you mentioned "unaware", good job. You are fooling me by saying "unaware" while that's mention of avoid edit war on article talk page. Fully respect your perspective. Okay, i let it go. Thanks for your blocking. My job done --Aleenf1 11:42, 20 July 2023 (UTC)

If you're referring to this edit that mentions "edit war" in passing without any mention of 3RR or elaboration on what edit warring is, I saw that and that is a far cry from being notified about WP:3RR. Once the editor was notified of 3RR, they stopped reverting. You did not. - Aoidh (talk) 11:48, 20 July 2023 (UTC)

@Aoidh: "Once the editor was notified of 3RR", do i been notified? Okay your point is right and other people are wrong, administrator knowing how to punished people only. I hope more hoax information added. My wishes always come true. --Aleenf1 11:54, 20 July 2023 (UTC)

You were aware of edit warring by virtue of your previous blocks for edit warring (and this), and of 3RR specifically by virtue of this edit and the fact that your archives have a history. You don't need to be notified every time you edit war, especially when you're warning others of it while doing it. - Aoidh (talk) 12:03, 20 July 2023 (UTC)

@Aoidh: I'm pleasantly happy i'm revert to correct the messed, yet still convicted. Happily to let go after all, with admin says they are "unaware", and can keep the wrong things inside, even it was factually error. Hope god bless your adminship. As i said, is no longer matter for me, i seen lot of ridiculous, and now even getting ridiculous. --Aleenf1 12:10, 20 July 2023 (UTC)

No need unblocks, i will only edit on IP now, even you can make it permanent. Bye. --Aleenf1 11:44, 20 July 2023 (UTC)

@Yamla: If i want to evade, i will evade, knowledge has no room for factual error, even i'm been blocked for 3RR. Whether is good faith or not. If those blocked can make an article getting better, than you can keep blocking. --Aleenf1 13:41, 20 July 2023 (UTC)

If you can get complacency by blocking, go ahead, Wikipedia can be choose to be better or more hoax. --Aleenf1 13:46, 20 July 2023 (UTC)

Such archaic policy no longer working and just making a lot of right things undone, a right things are never stop by a block or time. Whether you see this as a threat, nothere, whatever. --Aleenf1 14:05, 20 July 2023 (UTC)