User talk:Albinjose636

September 2020

Hello, I'm Cyphoidbomb. I noticed that you added or changed content in an article, Alina Padikkal, but you didn't provide a reliable source. It's been removed and archived in the page history for now, but if you'd like to include a citation and re-add it, please do so. You can have a look at the tutorial on citing sources. If you think I made a mistake, you can leave me a message on my talk page. Diffs: [1] If you want to build an article about this person, start at Draft:Alina Padikkal so you can build it into an article with proper structure. Be sure to read our general notability guideline so you don't waste time building an article about someone the Wikipedia community won't think is notable. Also, be sure to read Referencing for Beginners, as all content you add is going to need to be attributed to reliable sources. Cyphoidbomb (talk) 19:08, 22 September 2020 (UTC)

Once again, please work on this article at Draft:Alina Padikkal, not on the redirected article. It appears you already created this, but you had it in the wrong place, since you misspelled her last name. Cyphoidbomb (talk) 21:45, 22 September 2020 (UTC)

Since I've noticed that you created another draft article on your user page, I have moved it to your sandbox at User:Albinjose636/sandbox. I'm fairly concerned that you're going to get confused since you have worked on this article in at least four different places. Cyphoidbomb (talk) 21:56, 22 September 2020 (UTC)

Please solve my issue Albinjose636 (talk) 09:55, 23 September 2020 (UTC)

Alina Padikkal

Alina Padikkal Albinjose636 (talk) 19:44, 22 September 2020 (UTC)

Please remove Albinjose636 (talk) 10:22, 23 September 2020 (UTC)

September 2020

You have been blocked indefinitely from editing for persistently making disruptive edits. Unfortunately, you have have made a number of problematic mistakes related to your creation of an article on Alina Padikkal, including creating article drafts in multiple places and moving your sandbox to an improbable location. I've tried to tell you where the article should be built, but you seem unreceptive to that information. It also looks like you may have previously had an account as Amaljosep19, but generally you seem very confused about how or where to edit, and I'm concerned that this confusion is going to result in the encylopedia continuing to be damaged. Since you are also not communicating, that's additionally problematic. Sorry.

If you think there are good reasons for being unblocked, please read the guide to appealing blocks, then add the following text below the block notice on your talk page: {{unblock|reason=Your reason here ~~~~}}.  Cyphoidbomb (talk) 09:49, 23 September 2020 (UTC)

Sockpuppet investigation

An editor has opened an investigation into sockpuppetry by you. Sockpuppetry is the use of more than one Wikipedia account in a manner that contravenes community policy. The investigation is being held at Wikipedia:Sockpuppet investigations/Albinjose636, where the editor who opened the investigation has presented their evidence. Please make sure you make yourself familiar with the guide to responding to investigations, and then feel free to offer your own evidence or to submit comments that you wish to be considered by the Wikipedia administrator who decides the result of the investigation. If you have been using multiple accounts (in a manner contrary to Wikipedia policy), please go to the investigation page and verify that now. Leniency is usually shown to those who promise not to do so again, or who did so unwittingly, but the abuse of multiple accounts is taken very seriously by the Wikipedia community.

Fiddle Faddle 14:02, 6 October 2020 (UTC)

Iam not using Albinjose636 (talk) 14:11, 6 October 2020 (UTC)

Sockpuppet investigation

An editor has opened an investigation into sockpuppetry by you. Sockpuppetry is the use of more than one Wikipedia account in a manner that contravenes community policy. The investigation is being held at Wikipedia:Sockpuppet investigations/Albinjose636, where the editor who opened the investigation has presented their evidence. Please make sure you make yourself familiar with the guide to responding to investigations, and then feel free to offer your own evidence or to submit comments that you wish to be considered by the Wikipedia administrator who decides the result of the investigation. If you have been using multiple accounts (in a manner contrary to Wikipedia policy), please go to the investigation page and verify that now. Leniency is usually shown to those who promise not to do so again, or who did so unwittingly, but the abuse of multiple accounts is taken very seriously by the Wikipedia community.

Fiddle Faddle 20:27, 10 October 2020 (UTC)