User talk:Albert Dawkins

This user is sailing their yacht in real life and may not respond swiftly to queries.

Disambiguation link notification for October 11

Hi. Thank you for your recent edits. Wikipedia appreciates your help. We noticed though that when you edited Sami Yusuf, you added links pointing to the disambiguation pages English, MBC and ARTE (check to confirm | fix with Dab solver). Such links are almost always unintended, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of "Did you mean..." article titles. Read the FAQ • Join us at the DPL WikiProject.

It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot (talk) 11:15, 11 October 2017 (UTC)[reply]

PROD nomination.

I've nominated Pixhug for deletion. My concern is "Not a notable app. The only reference that isn't a re-gurgitated press release is [1], which is launch publicity that doesn't suggest notability." power~enwiki (π, ν) 19:39, 16 October 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Proposed deletion of Samir Tabar

The article Samir Tabar has been proposed for deletion because of the following concern:

Product of an undisclosed paid editing sockfarm; see Wikipedia:Sockpuppet investigations/Liborbital.

While all constructive contributions to Wikipedia are appreciated, pages may be deleted for any of several reasons.

You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the {{proposed deletion/dated}} notice, but please explain why in your edit summary or on the article's talk page.

Please consider improving the page to address the issues raised. Removing {{proposed deletion/dated}} will stop the proposed deletion process, but other deletion processes exist. In particular, the speedy deletion process can result in deletion without discussion, and articles for deletion allows discussion to reach consensus for deletion. GAB^gab 19:50, 17 October 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Unblock

This user's unblock request has been reviewed by an administrator, who declined the request. Other administrators may also review this block, but should not override the decision without good reason (see the blocking policy).

Albert Dawkins (block log • active blocks • global blocks • contribs • deleted contribs • filter log • creation log • change block settings • unblock • checkuser (log))

Request reason:

Wikipedia:Sockpuppet investigations/Liborbital are irrelvant and not related to me. Blocked for socking? I read the whole investigations and they are inconclusive of allegations on my socking. In fact, the blocking admin has taken a punitive action of blocking me over "UPE" in Samir Tabar and Pixhug. This is not justice. these investigations don't confer that I am a sock and that my edits are paid. Please unlock me.

Decline reason:

Your editing has so many connections to that of some other editors, most notably Mfarazbaig, that it is clear that there is a connection which you are not disclosing. The editor who uses the pseudonym "JamesBWatson" (talk) 11:49, 18 October 2017 (UTC)[reply]

If you want to make any further unblock requests, please read the guide to appealing blocks first, then use the {{unblock}} template again. If you make too many unconvincing or disruptive unblock requests, you may be prevented from editing this page until your block has expired. Do not remove this unblock review while you are blocked.

I don't even know who Liborbital is. How can I be labeled as his sock? My edits are legitimate and their quality can be confirmed. Please reconsider kindly. Albert Dawkins (talk) 20:25, 17 October 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Checkuser indicates you're using a proxy - can you explain this? Max Semenik (talk) 21:13, 17 October 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Hi Max! No, I never used any VPN or proxy. I have a local popular dynamic broadband connection, which keeps changing IP address on every on and off. It is possible that the users in question, Mfarazbaig or Zalam4u used the same IP. But I never used any virtual network. Please give me a chance sir. Albert Dawkins (talk) 22:09, 17 October 2017 (UTC)[reply]

This user's unblock request has been reviewed by an administrator, who declined the request. Other administrators may also review this block, but should not override the decision without good reason (see the blocking policy).

Albert Dawkins (block log • active blocks • global blocks • contribs • deleted contribs • filter log • creation log • change block settings • unblock • checkuser (log))

Request reason:

Please review the investigations. Or initiate new one specifically for me, nowhere the investigation confirms my socking, it says that I am "possible" only sock because of the busy IP ranges. There is no behavioral resemblance with anyone including Mfarazbaig. I never used any proxy too. Please review

Decline reason:

There is now evidence that you have continued to sock with another account after this one was blocked in order to create what is an obvious commissioned work. TonyBallioni (talk) 00:56, 24 October 2017 (UTC)[reply]

If you want to make any further unblock requests, please read the guide to appealing blocks first, then use the {{unblock}} template again. If you make too many unconvincing or disruptive unblock requests, you may be prevented from editing this page until your block has expired. Do not remove this unblock review while you are blocked.

That still does not prove that I am a sock. You can carry out investigation for the article. I am genuinely interested in these topics and he is a gold medalist. Albert Dawkins (talk) 20:41, 18 October 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Speedy deletion nomination of Llywelyn, Prince of Cymru

If this is the first article that you have created, you may want to read the guide to writing your first article.
You may want to consider using the Article Wizard to help you create articles.

A tag has been placed on Llywelyn, Prince of Cymru, requesting that it be deleted from Wikipedia. This has been done under two or more of the criteria for speedy deletion, by which pages can be deleted at any time, without discussion. If the page meets any of these strictly-defined criteria, then it may soon be deleted by an administrator. The reasons it has been tagged are:

It appears to be about a person, organization (band, club, company, etc.), individual animal, or web content, but it does not indicate how or why the subject is important or significant: that is, why an article about that subject should be included in an encyclopedia. (See section A7 of the criteria for speedy deletion.) Such articles may be deleted at any time. Please see the guidelines for what is generally accepted as notable.
It appears to be about something made up, and it does not indicate how or why the subject is important or significant: that is, why an article about that subject should be included in an encyclopedia. (See section A11 of the criteria for speedy deletion.)

If you think this page should not be deleted for this reason, you may contest the nomination by visiting the page and clicking the button labelled "Contest this speedy deletion". This will give you the opportunity to explain why you believe the page should not be deleted. However, be aware that once a page is tagged for speedy deletion, it may be removed without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag from the page yourself, but do not hesitate to add information in line with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines. If the page is deleted, and you wish to retrieve the deleted material for future reference or improvement, then please contact the deleting administrator, or if you have already done so, you can place a request here. Dysklyver 20:54, 18 October 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Orphaned non-free image File:Duke Kunshan University logo.jpeg

⚠

Thanks for uploading File:Duke Kunshan University logo.jpeg. The image description page currently specifies that the image is non-free and may only be used on Wikipedia under a claim of fair use. However, the image is currently not used in any articles on Wikipedia. If the image was previously in an article, please go to the article and see why it was removed. You may add it back if you think that that will be useful. However, please note that images for which a replacement could be created are not acceptable for use on Wikipedia (see our policy for non-free media).

Note that any non-free images not used in any articles will be deleted after seven days, as described in section F5 of the criteria for speedy deletion. Thank you. --B-bot (talk) 17:14, 21 October 2017 (UTC)[reply]