User talk:Albert-bell

This is Albert-bell's talk page, where you can send them messages and comments.

Put new text under old text. Click here to start a new topic.
New to Wikipedia? Welcome! Learn to edit; get help.

Your submission at Articles for creation: sandbox (October 4)

Your recent article submission to Articles for Creation has been reviewed! Unfortunately, it has not been accepted at this time. The reason left by GreenMeansGo was:

This submission appears to read more like an advertisement than an entry in an encyclopedia. Encyclopedia articles need to be written from a neutral point of view, and should refer to a range of independent, reliable, published sources, not just to materials produced by the creator of the subject being discussed. This is important so that the article can meet Wikipedia's verifiability policy and the notability of the subject can be established. If you still feel that this subject is worthy of inclusion in Wikipedia, please rewrite your submission to comply with these policies.

Please check the submission for any additional comments left by the reviewer. You are encouraged to edit the submission to address the issues raised and resubmit when they have been resolved.

If you would like to continue working on the submission, go to User:Albert-bell/sandbox and click on the "Edit" tab at the top of the window.
If you need any assistance, you can ask for help at the Articles for creation help desk or on the reviewer's talk page.
You can also use Wikipedia's real-time chat help from experienced editors.

GMG ^talk 13:11, 4 October 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Hello! Albert-bell, I noticed your article was declined at Articles for Creation, and that can be disappointing. If you are wondering why your article submission was declined, please post a question at the Articles for creation help desk. If you have any other questions about your editing experience, we'd love to help you at the Teahouse, a friendly space on Wikipedia where experienced editors lend a hand to help new editors like yourself! See you there! GMG ^talk 13:11, 4 October 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Your submission at Articles for creation: sandbox (October 4)

Your recent article submission to Articles for Creation has been reviewed! Unfortunately, it has not been accepted at this time. The reason left by John from Idegon was:

This submission appears to read more like an advertisement than an entry in an encyclopedia. Encyclopedia articles need to be written from a neutral point of view, and should refer to a range of independent, reliable, published sources, not just to materials produced by the creator of the subject being discussed. This is important so that the article can meet Wikipedia's verifiability policy and the notability of the subject can be established. If you still feel that this subject is worthy of inclusion in Wikipedia, please rewrite your submission to comply with these policies.

The comment the reviewer left was:

Please do not resubmit until you have addressed the issues noted in the previous decline. Also, please format your citations to inline citations and make yourself aware of the source quality required by WP:MEDRS.

Please check the submission for any additional comments left by the reviewer. You are encouraged to edit the submission to address the issues raised and resubmit when they have been resolved.

If you would like to continue working on the submission, go to User:Albert-bell/sandbox and click on the "Edit" tab at the top of the window.
If you need any assistance, you can ask for help at the Articles for creation help desk or on the reviewer's talk page.
You can also use Wikipedia's real-time chat help from experienced editors.

John from Idegon (talk) 17:51, 4 October 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Your submission at Articles for creation: sandbox (October 9)

Your recent article submission to Articles for Creation has been reviewed! Unfortunately, it has not been accepted at this time. The reason left by Whispering was:

Please address the issues stated below before resubmitting thank you.

Please check the submission for any additional comments left by the reviewer. You are encouraged to edit the submission to address the issues raised and resubmit when they have been resolved.

If you would like to continue working on the submission, go to User:Albert-bell/sandbox and click on the "Edit" tab at the top of the window.
If you need any assistance, you can ask for help at the Articles for creation help desk or on the reviewer's talk page.
You can also use Wikipedia's real-time chat help from experienced editors.

Whispe ring 21:48, 9 October 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Your submission at Articles for creation: sandbox (October 10)

Your recent article submission to Articles for Creation has been reviewed! Unfortunately, it has not been accepted at this time. The reason left by John from Idegon was:

This submission appears to read more like an advertisement than an entry in an encyclopedia. Encyclopedia articles need to be written from a neutral point of view, and should refer to a range of independent, reliable, published sources, not just to materials produced by the creator of the subject being discussed. This is important so that the article can meet Wikipedia's verifiability policy and the notability of the subject can be established. If you still feel that this subject is worthy of inclusion in Wikipedia, please rewrite your submission to comply with these policies.

The comment the reviewer left was:

Again, do not resubmit until you have addressed all the issues listed in previous decline notices

Please check the submission for any additional comments left by the reviewer. You are encouraged to edit the submission to address the issues raised and resubmit when they have been resolved.

If you would like to continue working on the submission, go to User:Albert-bell/sandbox and click on the "Edit" tab at the top of the window.
If you need any assistance, you can ask for help at the Articles for creation help desk or on the reviewer's talk page.
You can also use Wikipedia's real-time chat help from experienced editors.

John from Idegon (talk) 13:42, 10 October 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Your submission at Articles for creation: Spinal Traction (Orthopedic) Method Detensor (October 11)

Your recent article submission to Articles for Creation has been reviewed! Unfortunately, it has not been accepted at this time. The reason left by I dream of horses was:

This submission is not adequately supported by reliable sources. Reliable sources are required so that information can be verified. If you need help with referencing, please see Referencing for beginners and Citing sources.

The comment the reviewer left was:

Removing all but one sources isn't going help the draft get accepted.

Please check the submission for any additional comments left by the reviewer. You are encouraged to edit the submission to address the issues raised and resubmit when they have been resolved.

If you would like to continue working on the submission, go to Draft:Spinal Traction (Orthopedic) Method Detensor and click on the "Edit" tab at the top of the window.
If you need any assistance, you can ask for help at the Articles for creation help desk or on the reviewer's talk page.
You can also use Wikipedia's real-time chat help from experienced editors.

I dream of horses If you reply here, please ping me by adding {{U|I dream of horses}} to your message (talk to me) (My edits) @ 03:03, 11 October 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Albert, this is getting a bit annoying. On Wikipedia, there is no DEADLINE. In the past week, you've submitted this draft and it has been declined 5 times, on two occasions, twice in one day. Ask the reviewers for help and wait for them to answer. Everyone here is a volunteer, and most reviewers also have other self assigned duties around Wikipedia besides AfC review, not to mention RL commitments that must come first. Since you've radically changed the article since you enquired at my talk page, my answers would no longer apply. In a week, this draft has gone from a draft on a medical treatment to a draft on a medical device. Be advised that creating an article on a medical topic, be it a device or a treatment, is probably one if the most difficult tasks a Wikipedian can undertake. I've been here six years and consider myself a very competent Wikipedian, but I do not have the chops to write a medical article, or even edit an existing one. My suggestion would be to read talk pages on medical articles, ask for assistance at WikiProject Medicine, and let this sit for a while until you figure out what you are doing. Edit articles, perhaps attempt to create a non-medical article, read deletion discussions pertaining to medicine, and come back to this when you are better prepared. I've been sailing since I was seven, so nearly 55 years. I'm pretty good at that too; but even with all the experience I have at it, I wouldn't try to single hand from San Diego to Hawaii even if I could afford it. Measure your steps, and live to battle another day! Draft articles are safe from deletion for at least six months, and you will be warned prior to deletion. You've got all the time in the world. John from Idegon (talk) 07:05, 11 October 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Your submission at Articles for creation: Spinal Traction (Orthopedic) Method Detensor (October 11)

Your recent article submission to Articles for Creation has been reviewed! Unfortunately, it has not been accepted at this time. The reason left by John from Idegon was:

This submission is not adequately supported by reliable sources. Reliable sources are required so that information can be verified. If you need help with referencing, please see Referencing for beginners and Citing sources.

The comment the reviewer left was:

There is absolutely no indication of notability here. You have a patent, a primary source that does not show notability in any way. A single research paper that has been read by less than 200 people and only cited by three is contributory to notability, but not much. And again, you're rapid resubmittal is to the point where it is disruptive. This draft needs serious work. I've left some suggestions on your talk page. Please do not resubmit this anytime soon. There is no DEADLINE

Please check the submission for any additional comments left by the reviewer. You are encouraged to edit the submission to address the issues raised and resubmit when they have been resolved.

If you would like to continue working on the submission, go to Draft:Spinal Traction (Orthopedic) Method Detensor and click on the "Edit" tab at the top of the window.
If you need any assistance, you can ask for help at the Articles for creation help desk or on the reviewer's talk page.
You can also use Wikipedia's real-time chat help from experienced editors.

John from Idegon (talk) 15:40, 11 October 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Your submission at Articles for creation: Spinal Traction (Orthopedic) Method Detensor (October 12)

Your recent article submission to Articles for Creation has been reviewed! Unfortunately, it has not been accepted at this time. The reason left by John from Idegon was:

Adding a non WP:MEDRS source does not help show notability. You still have not made your references inline. And you do not resubmit your draft for review each time you make a small change. This draft needs substantial improvement before it is even near ready to be considered for publication. Let this serve as your final warning: Do not resubmit this draft for review unless or until you've made substantial improvement to it. If you haven't yet, read WP:My first article. Seek assistance at the Teahouse and WT:WikiProject Medicine. You are not as of this point listening to the good advice being given you and your repeated resubmittal without addressing the concerns stated in previous decline messages is disruptive. It will stop, either by your choice or by your editing privileges being suspended.

Please check the submission for any additional comments left by the reviewer. You are encouraged to edit the submission to address the issues raised and resubmit when they have been resolved.

If you would like to continue working on the submission, go to Draft:Spinal Traction (Orthopedic) Method Detensor and click on the "Edit" tab at the top of the window.
If you need any assistance, you can ask for help at the Articles for creation help desk or on the reviewer's talk page.
You can also use Wikipedia's real-time chat help from experienced editors.

John from Idegon (talk) 01:51, 12 October 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Draft:Spinal Traction (Orthopedic) Method Detensor

Sorry, but I've tagged the draft for deletion. While you may not be connected to the company that produces this product, it's clear that your intention is to promote the product, even though the product has no indicator of notability. So please kindly do not submit the draft again, thanks. Alex Shih ^Talk 04:32, 18 October 2017 (UTC)[reply]

October 2017

I'm Sorry, but I or another admin have deleted content from your user space. Spinal Traction (orthopedic) Floor Mat Detensor has been deleted.

User pages and User talk pages are intended only to promote collegiality among users. They are not to be used as a soapbox for writings not connected with the editorial process on Wikipedia. While we appreciate that you enjoy using Wikipedia, please note that Wikipedia is an encyclopedia and not a free webhosting service. Wikipedia is not a place to post personal content, host personal websites, or do things that are not directly related to adding to or improving the encyclopedia . Using Wikipedia for promotional purposes is intensely frowned upon. Doing so can lead to users being blocked from editing. Inappropriate/non conforming material may be deleted at any time. More information is available at THIS PAGE.

User sandboxess should not contain promotional material or material unconnected with improving Wikipedia.

User space is not intended to contain articles. Please use the Article_wizard for drafting articles, or use the Articles for creation process. Subjects of encyclopedia articles must have significant verifiable information from reliable sources unconnected with the subject.

You might want to look at Wikipedia:Userboxes#Gallery as a means of telling colleagues about yourself.

This message is not meant to discourage you from editing Wikipedia but rather to remind you that the ultimate goal of this website is to build an encyclopedia. Thank you. Dlohcierekim (talk) 05:41, 18 October 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Dlohcierekim (talk) 05:41, 18 October 2017 (UTC)[reply]