User talk:Albania T

User:AAA!‎

Welcome to Wikipedia. Although everyone is welcome to contribute constructively to the encyclopedia, we would like to remind you not to attack other editors, as you did on User:AAA!‎. Please comment on the contributions and not the contributors. Take a look at the welcome page to learn more about contributing to this encyclopedia. Thank you.

Indeed, from reading your user page it seems that attacking people is your plan. Veiled threats "the cold may kill a BITCH like U" is not a good idea. Please reconsider. Shenme (talk) 05:25, 22 February 2008 (UTC)[reply]

February 2008

This is the last warning you will receive for your disruptive comments.
If you continue to make personal attacks on other people as you did at User:AAA!, you will be blocked for disruption. Comment on content, not on other contributors or people. Floodamanny (talk) 13:17, 22 February 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Dude

Those "Making fun of Russia" are actually a popular joke, called Russian reversals. Also, it's only a joke about the old Russia that was ruled by communists, not present day Russia. If you don't like the joke, blame this guy, not me. Secondly, what you're doing is breaking a few rules, namely "Disruption", "No personal attacks", "Assume good faith", "Civility", and "Vandalism", so I suggest you read these pages before you continue editing. Thirdly, please don't edit other people's user pages for your own purpose. Most people do not like having other users' personal opinions on their page (that's what their talk page is for). Finally, you're on a last warning, as mentioned above. If you continue making disruptive edits or breaking any of those rules I've mentioned, you may find yourself unable to edit Wikipedia. Thank you. --AAA! (AAAA) 15:05, 22 February 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Please use an edit summary when editing

Hello. Please don't forget to provide an edit summary. Thank you. ♦Tangerines♦·Talk 04:41, 26 February 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Russian Orthodox Cathedral in Nice, France

Please stop adding that to the Russian Catholic Church page - the cathedral is Russian Orthodox, and has nothing to do with the Russian Catholic Church. InfernoXV (talk) 19:04, 5 March 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Excuse me, I'm quite well aware that there is a Russian Orthodox church in Nice, France. I've been there several times, and I know the priest there. My point is that it's Russian Orthodox, not Russian Catholic. Why are you adding it to the Russian Catholic Church page when it's not Russian Catholic, and deleting Chevetogne Abbey which is definitely Russian Catholic? InfernoXV (talk) 20:31, 5 March 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Abbeys and Monasteries are usually referred to with their location name, not the dedication - for example, Kiev Pechersk Lavra, Pochaev Lavra, Cluny Abbey, Stanbrook Abbey and so on, that's why Chevetogne Abbey is not usually referred to by its dedication Holy Cross. Брат мой, why are you being so rude? Why call me stupid and a jerk? I've been nothing but polite to you. InfernoXV (talk) 03:59, 6 March 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Look, what's your problem with Chevetogne Abbey? InfernoXV (talk) 04:30, 12 March 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Please stop removing Chevetogne Abbey from the page. It's Russian Catholic - what's your problem? InfernoXV (talk) 02:43, 14 March 2008 (UTC)[reply]

[[1]] shows quite clearly that Chevetogne Abbey is clearly a Russian Catholic community. A few points: 1) it's an Abbey, not a Cathedral. 2) It has a name - the dedication of the Russian Catholic Chapel is 'Exaltation of the Holy Cross Chapel'. 3) You are extremely rude. 4) Learn to write proper English or stay off Wikipedia. InfernoXV (talk) 13:31, 16 March 2008 (UTC)[reply]

You have called me a 'Stupid Singaporean Jerk', and I have said nothing but to point out your rudeness - and you have the nerve to call ME racist? InfernoXV (talk) 17:37, 16 March 2008 (UTC)[reply]

You have no right to tell me 'quiet'. You are rude and disruptive. InfernoXV (talk) 17:42, 16 March 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Where have I been rude and abusive? I merely said if you can't write proper English, you shouldn't be on English wikipedia. InfernoXV (talk) 17:47, 16 March 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Being able to speak English doesn't guarantee being able to write English with proper grammar and spelling. Your spelling and grammar are atrocious. InfernoXV (talk) 17:55, 16 March 2008 (UTC)[reply]

'THERE IS NOT NAME TO THE CATHEDRAL!' written at 19:18, 14 March 2008 (UTC); 'I said your warning, you better understand it!' written at 17:40, 16 March 2008 (UTC); 'Because I do not know the name of the Cathedral stupid! If you looked at all Cathedrals written, they had names! But I couldnt find a name for this one! Go back to The article and stick your eyes in it!' written at 20:33, 5 March 2008 (UTC); 'So how abouit you reaserch it jerk!' at 19:59, 5 March 2008 (UTC). You can't even spell 'racist' or 'racism'. Clearly, no only are you unable to punctuate or spell, you can't write grammatical English. I haven't been abusive at all - you've been rude from your first message. InfernoXV (talk) 18:02, 16 March 2008 (UTC)[reply]

I don't care if you're wealthy or poor, Russian or even Chechen. Leave the Russian Catholic page alone, stop removing Chevetogne Abbey from it, I'd be more than happy to never hear from you again. InfernoXV (talk) 18:10, 16 March 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Go right ahead and report me. Your behaviour is not going to be a strong supporting case. Try it. InfernoXV (talk) 18:26, 16 March 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Your recent edits

Hi there. In case you didn't know, when you add content to talk pages and Wikipedia pages that have open discussion, you should sign your posts by typing four tildes ( ~~~~ ) at the end of your comment. If you can't type the tilde character, you should click on the signature button located above the edit window. This will automatically insert a signature with your name and the time you posted the comment. This information is useful because other editors will be able to tell who said what, and when. Thank you! --SineBot (talk) 17:44, 16 March 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Personal attack and disruptive edit warning

Hello. Please refrain from attacking other editors. Edits such as [2] [3] [4] [5] [6] [7] are simply not acceptable. I don't really understand why you're removing mention of Chevetogne Abbey from the Russian Catholic Church page, since you haven't used edit summaries or the article's talk page to explain yourself, but doing so repeatedly is definitely edit warring. If you continue to edit war or attack editors, you will be blocked from editing further. Gimmetrow 22:25, 16 March 2008 (UTC)[reply]

You were warned not to make personal attacks such as this: [8]. I am not judging the merits of the edit about the abbey. It's plausible that you originally added the abbey to the list on the page [9], since the account which added it [10], stopped editing the day before this account started, but whether you are right or not the personal attacks need to stop. You can still edit this page here (your user talk page) but that's it for a day. Gimmetrow 00:43, 17 March 2008 (UTC)[reply]

You have been blocked from editing for a period of 1 day in accordance with Wikipedia's blocking policy for personal attacks. Once the block has expired, you are welcome to make constructive contributions. If you believe this block is unjustified, you may contest the block by adding the text {{unblock|your reason here}} below.

There's nothing to forgive

Богъ Проситъ. и прости мя, ради Христа.InfernoXV (talk) 12:35, 19 March 2008 (UTC)[reply]

sister cities of saint petersburgh

You added Saint Petersburgh to the list of cities sistered with Cape Town, however you provided no source for this sitering, and the Saint_Petersburg has a *lot* of unsourced sisterings. Please provide a source for these sisterings or they will be reverted as unsourced info --Enric Naval (talk) 16:47, 21 March 2008 (UTC)[reply]

As I told you, I commented again the unsourced info, but I left Osaka because I found a source on the Osaka article, and add Los Angeles, which I found by chance. Please don't add unsourced info to the wikipedia --Enric Naval (talk) 08:53, 22 March 2008 (UTC)[reply]

OK, I'll leave it uncommented for now, since you say that you need time to find sources for the list. I'll just look back to it on a few weeks to see if it has improved. Notice that the merge tag is only for adding the cities listed at the list of cities article, and it is not for deleting anything. The unrefered tag should be left in place too, so other editors can see it and try to add sources. I restored the cities that I sourced, and put them on the list together with the others, instead of replacing the list. Those cities are sourced, so please don't remove them from the list --Enric Naval (talk) 13:54, 22 March 2008 (UTC)[reply]

ArbCom elections are now open!

Hi,
You appear to be eligible to vote in the current Arbitration Committee election. The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to enact binding solutions for disputes between editors, primarily related to serious behavioural issues that the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the ability to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail. If you wish to participate, you are welcome to review the candidates' statements and submit your choices on the voting page. For the Election committee, MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 13:49, 24 November 2015 (UTC)[reply]