User talk:AlasdairEdits

If I have left you a message: please answer on your talk page, as I am watching it.
If you leave me a message: I will answer on my talk page, so please add it to your watchlist.
Please click here to leave me a new message.

Archives

This page has archives. Sections older than 31 days may be automatically archived by when more than 4 sections are present.

Fixed your talk page archiving

Hi! I took the liberty of fixing the auto-archiving settings at the top of this page. --rchard2scout (talk) 13:58, 4 February 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Thanks! AlasdairEdits (talk) 14:12, 4 February 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Proposed deletion of List of litigation involving the Electronic Frontier Foundation

The article List of litigation involving the Electronic Frontier Foundation has been proposed for deletion because of the following concern:

Just a list of mostly non-notable court cases. Fails WP:IINFO

While all constructive contributions to Wikipedia are appreciated, pages may be deleted for any of several reasons.

You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the {{proposed deletion/dated}} notice, but please explain why in your edit summary or on the article's talk page.

Please consider improving the page to address the issues raised. Removing {{proposed deletion/dated}} will stop the proposed deletion process, but other deletion processes exist. In particular, the speedy deletion process can result in deletion without discussion, and articles for deletion allows discussion to reach consensus for deletion. Ten Pound Hammer • ^{(What did I screw up now?)} 14:32, 8 April 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Nomination of List of litigation involving the Electronic Frontier Foundation for deletion

A discussion is taking place as to whether the article List of litigation involving the Electronic Frontier Foundation is suitable for inclusion in Wikipedia according to Wikipedia's policies and guidelines or whether it should be deleted.

The article will be discussed at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/List of litigation involving the Electronic Frontier Foundation until a consensus is reached, and anyone, including you, is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on high-quality evidence and our policies and guidelines.

Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion notice from the top of the article.

Ten Pound Hammer • ^{(What did I screw up now?)} 16:40, 8 April 2022 (UTC)[reply]

J. M. W. Turner

Hi, I was looking at Turner's page and noticed that there were some issues with the references. Although it was 12 years ago, you posted on the talk page that you borrowed/purchased some books on him, Turner in his time in particular. I was wondering if you still had that book and would be interested in sorting out the citing of various versions of the book. Specifically, in the "General and cited sources" section the revised edition is cited, but isn't used at all with harv citing, but the "New" edition is cited six times, the "01" edition (based on the publishing date, maybe the same thing as the New edition) once, and the 1987 H. N. Abrams (illustrated reprint edition based on google books) once as well. I hope you have a great day and happy holidays ayakanaa ( t · c ) 05:14, 27 December 2023 (UTC)[reply]

I do have this book still - i'll have a look after the holidays, thanks! AlasdairEdits (talk) 08:28, 27 December 2023 (UTC)[reply]