User talk:Alanna the Brave/Archive 2
 | This is an archive of past discussions with User:Alanna the Brave. Do not edit the contents of this page. If you wish to start a new discussion or revive an old one, please do so on the current talk page. |
| Archive 1 | Archive 2 | Archive 3 | Archive 4 | Archive 5 |
Feburary 2018 at Women in Red
 .jpg)   New:
| ||
|
(To subscribe: Women in Red/English language mailing list and Women in Red/international list. Unsubscribe: Women in Red/Opt-out list) --Rosiestep (talk) 14:32, 28 January 2018 (UTC) via MassMessaging |
Your GA nomination of Kimberly Anyadike
Hi there, I'm pleased to inform you that I've begun reviewing the article Kimberly Anyadike you nominated for GA-status according to the criteria. 
This process may take up to 7 days. Feel free to contact me with any questions or comments you might have during this period. Message delivered by Legobot, on behalf of Codyorb -- Codyorb (talk) 18:21, 13 February 2018 (UTC)
Your GA nomination of Kimberly Anyadike
The article Kimberly Anyadike you nominated as a good article has passed 
; see Talk:Kimberly Anyadike for comments about the article. Well done! If the article has not already been on the main page as an "In the news" or "Did you know" item, you can nominate it to appear in Did you know. Message delivered by Legobot, on behalf of Codyorb -- Codyorb (talk) 21:01, 13 February 2018 (UTC)
A page you started (Auður Laxness) has been reviewed!
Thanks for creating Auður Laxness, Alanna the Brave!
Wikipedia editor Enwebb just reviewed your page, and wrote this note for you:
Nice contribution!
To reply, leave a comment on Enwebb's talk page.
Learn more about page curation.
Enwebb (talk) 03:44, 16 February 2018 (UTC)
Kimberly Anyadike
Hi -- I wasn't sure if you saw that the GA nomination for Kimberly Anyadike was reopened, as the editor who promoted the article was fairly new and inexperienced at GA. I've posted a new review; the only thing that needs fixing is the lead, so if you can address that it will be promoted to GA again. Thanks. Mike Christie (talk - contribs - library) 13:23, 16 February 2018 (UTC)
Women's History Month 2018 at Women in Red
 
| ||
|
(To subscribe: Women in Red/English language mailing list and Women in Red/international list. Unsubscribe: Women in Red/Opt-out list) --Rosiestep (talk) 16:08, 20 February 2018 (UTC) via MassMessaging |
Lilli Jahn Birth citation query
Why have you added a citation for Lilli Jahn here: https://en.m.wikipedia.org/wiki/Special:MobileDiff/805959953 ? GreenAlienO 12:22, 23 February 2018 (UTC) — Preceding unsigned comment added by Serectrus (talk • contribs)
- Hi GreenAlienO/Serectrus: I'm assuming you're talking about the March 5 page? I was informed by editor Toddst1 in October 2017 that WikiProject Days of the Year have recently changed their policies regarding citation. They now require that all new additions to the births/deaths sections of "days of the year" pages be directly accompanied by a reference to a reliable source. Feel free to check in with them if you have any questions. Alanna the Brave (talk) 19:55, 23 February 2018 (UTC)
A page you started (Marguerite Porter Zwicker) has been reviewed!
Thanks for creating Marguerite Porter Zwicker, Alanna the Brave!
Wikipedia editor Enwebb just reviewed your page, and wrote this note for you:
Nice job!
To reply, leave a comment on Enwebb's talk page.
Learn more about page curation.
Enwebb (talk) 16:50, 7 March 2018 (UTC)
Ethel Rosenfield
Please go ahead and improve the article! Just because I stared it doesn't mean that I own it. --Big_iron (talk) 16:58, 7 March 2018 (UTC)
April 2018 at Women in Red
| ||
|
To subscribe: Women in Red/English language mailing list or
Women in Red/international list. To unsubscribe: Women in Red/Opt-out list. Follow us on Twitter: |
May 2018 at Women in Red
  
| ||
|
(To subscribe: Women in Red/English language mailing list and Women in Red/international list. Unsubscribe: Women in Red/Opt-out list) --Rosiestep (talk) 23:11, 29 April 2018 (UTC) via MassMessaging |
Your GA nomination of Mary Greyeyes
Hi there, I'm pleased to inform you that I've begun reviewing the article Mary Greyeyes you nominated for GA-status according to the criteria. This process may take up to 7 days. Feel free to contact me with any questions or comments you might have during this period. Message delivered by Legobot, on behalf of Auntieruth55 -- Auntieruth55 (talk) 16:41, 9 May 2018 (UTC)
Your GA nomination of Mary Greyeyes
The article Mary Greyeyes you nominated as a good article has passed ; see Talk:Mary Greyeyes for comments about the article. Well done! If the article has not already been on the main page as an "In the news" or "Did you know" item, you can nominate it to appear in Did you know. Message delivered by Legobot, on behalf of Auntieruth55 -- Auntieruth55 (talk) 14:41, 14 May 2018 (UTC)
DYK nomination of Mary Greyeyes
Hello! Your submission of Mary Greyeyes at the Did You Know nominations page has been reviewed, and some issues with it may need to be clarified. Please review the comment(s) underneath your nomination's entry and respond there as soon as possible. Thank you for contributing to Did You Know! Yoninah (talk) 22:47, 24 May 2018 (UTC)
Women in Red June Editathons
| ||
|
(To subscribe: Women in Red/English language mailing list and Women in Red/international list. Unsubscribe: Women in Red/Opt-out list) |
--Megalibrarygirl (talk) 17:15, 29 May 2018 (UTC) via MassMessaging
DYK for Mary Greyeyes
On 30 May 2018, Did you know was updated with a fact from the article Mary Greyeyes, which you recently created, substantially expanded, or brought to good article status. The fact was ... that World War II servicewoman Mary Greyeyes (pictured, left) was incorrectly labeled as an "unidentified Indian princess" in a famous Canadian Women's Army Corps publicity photo? The nomination discussion and review may be seen at Template:Did you know nominations/Mary Greyeyes. You are welcome to check how many page hits the article got while on the front page (here's how, Mary Greyeyes), and it may be added to the statistics page if the total is over 5,000. Finally, if you know of an interesting fact from another recently created article, then please feel free to suggest it on the Did you know talk page.
Cas Liber (talk · contribs) 00:41, 30 May 2018 (UTC)
Canadian source?
I have explained before the problems I have in accessing sources in Canada. I think this might be a critical item [1] and am wondering if you can access it? In light of the fact that WomenInRed's Editathons this month are Russia and LGBT, I thought that I would work on Vera Gedroitz. Maybe even shoot for GA, but cannot do that without sources. If you cannot access it, do you have any idea how I might find it? SusunW (talk) 15:40, 5 June 2018 (UTC)
- Hi SusunW: I can't access the item through that specific website, but I did a quick search elsewhere, and that paper appears to be freely available for download as a PDF at the University of Calgary website: [2]. Can you access the site? Let me know if that helps. Alanna the Brave (talk) 16:08, 5 June 2018 (UTC)
- OMG, you rock! yes I can :) SusunW (talk) 16:23, 5 June 2018 (UTC)
- Awesome -- happy to help! Alanna the Brave (talk) 17:47, 5 June 2018 (UTC)
- OMG, you rock! yes I can :) SusunW (talk) 16:23, 5 June 2018 (UTC)
Invitation to participate in study
Hello,
I am E. Whittaker, an intern at Wikimedia with the Scoring Team to create a labeled dataset, and potentially a tool, to help editors deal with incivility when they encounter it on talk pages. A full write-up of the study can be found here: m:Research:Civil_Behavior_Interviews. We are currently recruiting editors to be interviewed about their experiences with incivility on talk pages. Would you be interested in being interviewed? I am contacting you because of your involvement in Wikipedia’s Women in Red project. The interviews should take ~1 hour, and will be conducted over BlueJeans (which does allow interviews to be recorded). If, so, please email me at ewhit@umich.edu in order to schedule an interview.
Thank you Ewitch51 (talk) 19:31, 15 June 2018 (UTC)
Your GA nomination of Tina Strobos
Hi there, I'm pleased to inform you that I've begun reviewing the article Tina Strobos you nominated for GA-status according to the criteria. This process may take up to 7 days. Feel free to contact me with any questions or comments you might have during this period. Message delivered by Legobot, on behalf of Carabinieri -- Carabinieri (talk) 21:41, 16 June 2018 (UTC)
Your GA nomination of Tina Strobos
The article Tina Strobos you nominated as a good article has passed ; see Talk:Tina Strobos for comments about the article. Well done! If the article has not already been on the main page as an "In the news" or "Did you know" item, you can nominate it to appear in Did you know. Message delivered by Legobot, on behalf of Carabinieri -- Carabinieri (talk) 03:01, 19 June 2018 (UTC)
Overuse of WP Women banner
Just a heads up since I noticed the extra project tag you added to a tennis player. Consensus at Wikiproject Women is not to add an extra "WikiProject Women" box to a person if they already have a more specific sub box such as "WikiProject Women's sport." We actually had to create a bot to remove thousands of "WP Women" banner additions in the past. Thanks. Fyunck(click) (talk) 18:32, 19 June 2018 (UTC)
- Hi Fyunck(click), thanks for the heads-up -- I wasn't aware of that policy (I was under the impression editors were supposed to tag articles about women with either WP Women or WP Women's History, depending on the article subject). I'll be more careful with my tagging in the future. Alanna the Brave (talk) 21:24, 19 June 2018 (UTC)
- It's not a policy, it was discussed and agreed upon at WP Women a couple years ago that it's over-redundant if the person already has a more specific banner. Certainly, if they have no other "woman" banner at all, tag away with WP Women or add a more specific banner. Better a generalized banner than nothing at all. Thanks, and happy editing. Fyunck(click) (talk) 21:36, 19 June 2018 (UTC)
July 2018 at Women in Red
| ||
|
(To subscribe: Women in Red/English language mailing list and Women in Red/international list. Unsubscribe: Women in Red/Opt-out list) --Rosiestep (talk) 14:04, 28 June 2018 (UTC) via MassMessaging |
DYK for Vera Gedroits
On 30 June 2018, Did you know was updated with a fact from the article Vera Gedroits, which you recently created, substantially expanded, or brought to good article status. The fact was ... that Princess Vera Gedroits (pictured)—good author but indifferent poet, lesbian but married a man—was a Russian military surgeon who pioneered battlefield laparotomy? The nomination discussion and review may be seen at Template:Did you know nominations/Vera Gedroits. You are welcome to check how many page hits the article got while on the front page (here's how, Vera Gedroits), and it may be added to the statistics page if the total is over 5,000. Finally, if you know of an interesting fact from another recently created article, then please feel free to suggest it on the Did you know talk page.
Alex Shih (talk) 00:01, 30 June 2018 (UTC)
Disambiguation link notification for July 11
Hi. Thank you for your recent edits. An automated process has detected that when you recently edited Safiya Henderson-Holmes, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page New York (check to confirm | fix with Dab solver). Such links are usually incorrect, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of unrelated topics with similar titles. (Read the FAQ • Join us at the DPL WikiProject.)
It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot (talk) 09:38, 11 July 2018 (UTC)
DYK for Tina Strobos
On 12 July 2018, Did you know was updated with a fact from the article Tina Strobos, which you recently created, substantially expanded, or brought to good article status. The fact was ... that Dutch psychiatrist Tina Strobos (pictured), who rescued over 100 Jewish refugees during World War II, said that her grandmother was the only person she knew who scared the Gestapo? The nomination discussion and review may be seen at Template:Did you know nominations/Tina Strobos. You are welcome to check how many page hits the article got while on the front page (here's how, Tina Strobos), and it may be added to the statistics page if the total is over 5,000. Finally, if you know of an interesting fact from another recently created article, then please feel free to suggest it on the Did you know talk page.
Gatoclass (talk) 01:14, 12 July 2018 (UTC)
- Your hook made our all-time list with over 34,000 hits! Congratulations! Yoninah (talk) 01:25, 15 July 2018 (UTC)
- Woo-hoo! Very cool. :-D Alanna the Brave (talk) 13:23, 15 July 2018 (UTC)
Precious
biographies of women
Thank you for quality articles such as Tina Strobos, Kimberly Anyadike, Mary Greyeyes and Women Wage Peace, in collaboration and based on excellent sources, for expanding, such as Margot Fonteyn, for bravely decreasing systematic bias, - you are an awesome Wikipedian!
--Gerda Arendt (talk) 07:56, 13 July 2018 (UTC)
- Wow! Thank you very much Gerda Arendt. I appreciate it. :-) Alanna the Brave (talk) 14:07, 13 July 2018 (UTC)
- Well deserved! Thank you Gerda Arendt for your consistent recognition and encouragement of people who work on women's articles. On another note, Alanna, I have written an article that sort of mushroomed and I think it works for a GA. Ian thinks I need to add more photos, but I am always at a loss. I have found tons of photos of her on the web, but don't think any of them are usable. If I cannot add photos of her, I have no idea what photos to use. It seems to me just sticking photos of the people she worked with or the venues she played in from the wrong decades would be problematic. But, I am not particularly visual, so I have no earthly idea. Any ideas of what could be added to Eusebia Cosme? SusunW (talk) 20:00, 22 July 2018 (UTC)
- SusunW: Hmm... I did some browsing at the Commons, and found this 1940s photo of the Palacio de Bellas Artes [3] and this 1960s photo of Mexico City [4]. What do you think? I'd agree that photos of other people (e.g. celebrities she met) are not overly desirable, unless those people had a significant impact on her life. If it's not possible to add more photos of Cosme herself, then I'd suggest choosing a few images of relevant locations, landscapes, cultural/professional costumes (rumba costume? Cuban or Mexican culture?) or anything else that might give readers a better sense of Cosme's life and times. Sometimes a photo does wonders just by adding a bit of colour into a text-heavy piece (helping the reader stay engaged). Alanna the Brave (talk) 22:34, 23 July 2018 (UTC)
- Thank you so much. As I said, I am not very visual. I usually ignore the photos in an article. (I also have been known to never notice if you dye your hair a different florescent color once a week--true story). I find diddly with costumes on commons, except possibly this [5] which if I knew how to crop off their heads, I could probably use, as it is similar to [6]. SusunW (talk) 22:57, 23 July 2018 (UTC)
- It occurs to me that I can ask the Village pump to crop it ;) SusunW (talk) 13:28, 24 July 2018 (UTC)
- David Levy is a pic expert. nagualdesign is excellent but left us, sadly. Coffeandcrumbs could also help. --Gerda Arendt (talk) 13:37, 24 July 2018 (UTC)
- All good thoughts! I like that dance costume photo, although I think you could probably use it without cropping it if you wanted to, SusunW (headless photos can look a bit awkward at times). Alanna the Brave (talk) 15:23, 24 July 2018 (UTC)
- I put it in the article, I just don't like having the focus on the women, who have nothing to do with Cosme, rather than on the costume. I get that it's weird, it's a me thing, I'm guessing ;) SusunW (talk) 15:27, 24 July 2018 (UTC)
- No worries -- I find these costumes pretty spectacular, so I personally don't find the women very distracting, but I think the photo can work whichever route you choose. :-P Alanna the Brave (talk) 15:36, 24 July 2018 (UTC)
- I put it in the article, I just don't like having the focus on the women, who have nothing to do with Cosme, rather than on the costume. I get that it's weird, it's a me thing, I'm guessing ;) SusunW (talk) 15:27, 24 July 2018 (UTC)
- All good thoughts! I like that dance costume photo, although I think you could probably use it without cropping it if you wanted to, SusunW (headless photos can look a bit awkward at times). Alanna the Brave (talk) 15:23, 24 July 2018 (UTC)
- David Levy is a pic expert. nagualdesign is excellent but left us, sadly. Coffeandcrumbs could also help. --Gerda Arendt (talk) 13:37, 24 July 2018 (UTC)
- It occurs to me that I can ask the Village pump to crop it ;) SusunW (talk) 13:28, 24 July 2018 (UTC)
- Thank you so much. As I said, I am not very visual. I usually ignore the photos in an article. (I also have been known to never notice if you dye your hair a different florescent color once a week--true story). I find diddly with costumes on commons, except possibly this [5] which if I knew how to crop off their heads, I could probably use, as it is similar to [6]. SusunW (talk) 22:57, 23 July 2018 (UTC)
- SusunW: Hmm... I did some browsing at the Commons, and found this 1940s photo of the Palacio de Bellas Artes [3] and this 1960s photo of Mexico City [4]. What do you think? I'd agree that photos of other people (e.g. celebrities she met) are not overly desirable, unless those people had a significant impact on her life. If it's not possible to add more photos of Cosme herself, then I'd suggest choosing a few images of relevant locations, landscapes, cultural/professional costumes (rumba costume? Cuban or Mexican culture?) or anything else that might give readers a better sense of Cosme's life and times. Sometimes a photo does wonders just by adding a bit of colour into a text-heavy piece (helping the reader stay engaged). Alanna the Brave (talk) 22:34, 23 July 2018 (UTC)
- Well deserved! Thank you Gerda Arendt for your consistent recognition and encouragement of people who work on women's articles. On another note, Alanna, I have written an article that sort of mushroomed and I think it works for a GA. Ian thinks I need to add more photos, but I am always at a loss. I have found tons of photos of her on the web, but don't think any of them are usable. If I cannot add photos of her, I have no idea what photos to use. It seems to me just sticking photos of the people she worked with or the venues she played in from the wrong decades would be problematic. But, I am not particularly visual, so I have no earthly idea. Any ideas of what could be added to Eusebia Cosme? SusunW (talk) 20:00, 22 July 2018 (UTC)
![[3]](https://commons.wikimedia.org/wiki/File:Bellas_Artes_Mexico_City.jpg){kind=link}
![[4]](https://commons.wikimedia.org/wiki/File:STE_PCCs_at_Alamedia_Park,_Mexico_City,_DF,_Mexico_September_1966_(22063318453).jpg){kind=link}
![[5]](https://commons.wikimedia.org/wiki/File:Jerez_spanien_folklore.jpg){kind=link}
![[6]](https://i.pinimg.com/originals/5d/b6/88/5db6889865e2a6c9990ed97dd777509f.jpg){kind=link}
August 2018 at Women in Red
| ||
|
Latest headlines, news, and views on the Women in Red talkpage (Join the conversation!): (To subscribe: Women in Red/English language mailing list and Women in Red/international list. Unsubscribe: Women in Red/Opt-out list) --Rosiestep (talk) 11:22, 23 July 2018 (UTC) via MassMessaging |
Your GA nomination of Frances Gertrude McGill
Hi there, I'm pleased to inform you that I've begun reviewing the article Frances Gertrude McGill you nominated for GA-status according to the criteria. This process may take up to 7 days. Feel free to contact me with any questions or comments you might have during this period. Message delivered by Legobot, on behalf of Ceranthor -- Ceranthor (talk) 03:21, 25 July 2018 (UTC)
Your GA nomination of Frances Gertrude McGill
The article Frances Gertrude McGill you nominated as a good article has passed ; see Talk:Frances Gertrude McGill for comments about the article. Well done! If the article has not already been on the main page as an "In the news" or "Did you know" item, you can nominate it to appear in Did you know. Message delivered by Legobot, on behalf of Ceranthor -- Ceranthor (talk) 23:21, 30 July 2018 (UTC)
- Congrats! SusunW (talk) 23:27, 30 July 2018 (UTC)
- Yay! I loved working on this article -- very pleased to have it accepted as a GA. Thanks for your review, Ceranthor. :D Alanna the Brave (talk) 00:19, 31 July 2018 (UTC)
- The pleasure is mine! Let me know if you want to try to push to FA in the near future; I would be happy to help. We need more women in STEM on the Main Page. ceranthor 18:01, 31 July 2018 (UTC)
- Belated congratulations from me too. The article certainly deserves GA.--Ipigott (talk) 21:08, 4 August 2018 (UTC)
- Thanks Ipigott! Alanna the Brave (talk) 00:18, 5 August 2018 (UTC)
- Belated congratulations from me too. The article certainly deserves GA.--Ipigott (talk) 21:08, 4 August 2018 (UTC)
- The pleasure is mine! Let me know if you want to try to push to FA in the near future; I would be happy to help. We need more women in STEM on the Main Page. ceranthor 18:01, 31 July 2018 (UTC)
- Yay! I loved working on this article -- very pleased to have it accepted as a GA. Thanks for your review, Ceranthor. :D Alanna the Brave (talk) 00:19, 31 July 2018 (UTC)
- Congrats! SusunW (talk) 23:27, 30 July 2018 (UTC)
Hi, I'm RonBot, a script that checks new non-free file uploads. I have found that the subject image that you recently uploaded was more than 5% in excess of the Non-free content guideline size of 100,000 pixels. I have tagged the image for a standard reduction, which (for jpg/gif/png/svg files) normally happens within a day. Please check the reduced image, and make sure that the image is not excessively corrupted. Other files will be added to Category:Wikipedia non-free file size reduction requests for manual processing. There is a full seven-day period before the original oversized image will be hidden; during that time you might want to consider editing the original image yourself (perhaps an initial crop to allow a smaller reduction or none at all). A formula for calculation the desired size can be found at WP:Image resolution, along with instructions on how to tag the image in the rare cases that it requires an oversized image (typically about 0.2% of non-free uploads are tagged as necessarily oversized). Please contact the bot owner if you have any questions, or you can ask them at Wikipedia talk:Non-free content. RonBot (talk) 17:19, 3 August 2018 (UTC)
A barnstar for you!
|
The Original Barnstar |
| I don't do much on wikipedia these days, but do keep an eye on topics and areas of interest. I was so happy to see your article Daisy Andrews, and even more happy to see the fabulous work you are doing improving the coverage of women, and countering systemic bias. Wonderful, thank you! hamiltonstone (talk) 11:31, 4 August 2018 (UTC) |
- Aw -- thank you Hamiltonstone! I appreciate it. Alanna the Brave (talk) 14:51, 4 August 2018 (UTC)
Great article on Rinelle Harper!
Hi Alanna,
I always enjoy reading your articles. Rinelle Harper is a courageous young woman. Thanks for telling her story. MauraWen (talk) 12:13, 9 August 2018 (UTC)
A page you started (Daisy Andrews) has been reviewed!
Thanks for creating Daisy Andrews, Alanna the Brave!
Wikipedia editor Cwmhiraeth just reviewed your page, and wrote this note for you:
An interesting article.
To reply, leave a comment on Cwmhiraeth's talk page.
Learn more about page curation.
Cwmhiraeth (talk) 10:30, 16 August 2018 (UTC)
autopatrol
Just an FYI, I nominated you for this user right, which I periodically do for many member of WiR with 25 article creations. You won't notice any difference, it just means that articles you create will not go into the new page patrol. Frees up both editors from patrolling and you from worrying that someone might tag an article for speedy without being familiar with the subject matter. I have yet another meeting, but I'll be back sometime this afternoon in the event that you have questions. SusunW (talk) 13:39, 17 August 2018 (UTC)
- Thanks SusunW! I had no idea this 'autopatrol' right was an actual thing. It would certainly be useful. :) Alanna the Brave (talk) 23:45, 17 August 2018 (UTC)
Autopatrolled granted
Hi Alanna the Brave, I just wanted to let you know that I have added the "autopatrolled" permission to your account, as you have created numerous, valid articles. This feature will have no effect on your editing, and is simply intended to reduce the workload on new page patrollers. For more information on the autopatrolled right, see Wikipedia:Autopatrolled. Feel free to leave me a message if you have any questions. Happy editing! Schwede66 21:26, 18 August 2018 (UTC)
- Hi Schwede66 -- Awesome! Much appreciated. I do have one question about the edits you made to some of my articles: you altered the "date accessed" formatting for quite a few source references, and I'm not 100% sure why. Are these dates always supposed to be spelled out in full (e.g. August 18, 2018 instead of 2018-08-18) or should I just be making sure that I'm always consistent in whichever date formatting I use in my references? Thanks, Alanna the Brave (talk) 23:08, 18 August 2018 (UTC)
- I think policy is that they don't need to be formatted like that. Important is that there is consistency with date formats, e.g. using dmy in the prose and mdy for references needs to be avoided. When I review articles and mdy or dmy isn't set, I choose one depending on national preference and what's already in use, and format the references as well. The latter part is my personal preference; I find formatted dates easier to read (be they mdy or dmy) and it also avoids ambiguity (although there is an ISO standard, 2018-08-10 could be August or October...). Schwede66 23:39, 18 August 2018 (UTC)
- Just a note, if you are using the drop down templates, press on the calendar icon which appears at the end of the field "accessdate" and it will automatically fill it in. Same thing for isbn, if you input a number and press the magnifying glass, it will auto fill, though I do find you have to check the info, as sometimes it is not complete. SusunW (talk) 14:01, 19 August 2018 (UTC)
- I think policy is that they don't need to be formatted like that. Important is that there is consistency with date formats, e.g. using dmy in the prose and mdy for references needs to be avoided. When I review articles and mdy or dmy isn't set, I choose one depending on national preference and what's already in use, and format the references as well. The latter part is my personal preference; I find formatted dates easier to read (be they mdy or dmy) and it also avoids ambiguity (although there is an ISO standard, 2018-08-10 could be August or October...). Schwede66 23:39, 18 August 2018 (UTC)
(talk page stalker) My preferred mechanism is to a) Edit Special:MyPage/common.js and b) add the line importScript("User:Ohconfucius/script/MOSNUM dates.js");. When you edit an article, you then get an option "ALL dates to dmy" (British), ALL dates to mdy (US) and a veritable smorgasbord of other options. It means you can swap between UK / US date formats (which, if you're working on multiple articles in one session, is pretty common) without breaking a sweat. Ritchie333 (talk) (cont) 13:26, 20 August 2018 (UTC)
- Ritchie333 That is a really cool thing. I am extremely OCD about many things, but the order of dates doesn't really bother me. I think it has to do with living abroad for so long. Many places use different date styles, so I encounter variations in my day to day life. If I can tell the day, month and year, the order is irrelevant to me, but I know many people on WP are constantly changing date order. Good to have a tool to do it. Thanks! SusunW (talk) 14:59, 20 August 2018 (UTC)
DYK for Margot Fonteyn
On 26 August 2018, Did you know was updated with a fact from the article Margot Fonteyn, which you recently created, substantially expanded, or brought to good article status. The fact was ... that Margot Fonteyn (pictured) was The Royal Ballet's prima ballerina for 45 years, before retiring to become a cattle rancher in Panama? The nomination discussion and review may be seen at Template:Did you know nominations/Margot Fonteyn. You are welcome to check how many page hits the article got while on the front page (here's how, Margot Fonteyn), and it may be added to the statistics page if the total is over 5,000. Finally, if you know of an interesting fact from another recently created article, then please feel free to suggest it on the Did you know talk page.
Cas Liber (talk · contribs) 00:01, 26 August 2018 (UTC)
September 2018 at Women in Red
| ||
|
Latest headlines, news, and views on the Women in Red talkpage (Join the conversation!):
(To subscribe: Women in Red/English language mailing list and Women in Red/international list. Unsubscribe: Women in Red/Opt-out list) --Rosiestep (talk) 01:55, 26 August 2018 (UTC) via MassMessaging |
AfroCine: Join us for the Months of African Cinema in October!
.svg)
Greetings!
You are receiving this message because your username or portal was listed as a participant of a WikiProject that is related to Africa, the Carribean, Cinema or theatre.
This is to introduce you to a new Wikiproject called AfroCine. This new project is dedicated to improving the Wikipedia coverage of the history, works, people, places, events, etc, that are associated with the cinema, theatre and arts of Africa, African countries, the carribbean, and the diaspora. If you would love to be part of this or you're already contributing in this area, kindly list your name as a participant on the project page here.
Furthermore, In the months of October and November, the WikiProject is organizing a global on-wiki contest and edit-a-thon tagged: The Months of African Cinema. If you would love to join us for this exciting event, also list your username as a participant for this event here. In preparation for the contest, please do suggest relevant articles that need to be created or expanded in different countries, during this event!
If you have any questions, complaints, suggestions, etc., please reach out to me personally on my talkpage! Cheers!--Jamie Tubers (talk) 20:50, 5 September 2018 (UTC)
Timeline of women in science
Thanks, Alanna, for all the additions you have made to this list. It's beginning to look really useful.--Ipigott (talk) 09:44, 7 September 2018 (UTC)
- I've been having fun working on this, Ipigott. So many cool women scientists I hadn't known about before! I'm going to keep expanding the 19th/20th century sections this month, and then maybe we can add some more images. Also: Nice additions to the Middle Ages! I was struggling to find anyone from that time period. Alanna the Brave (talk) 13:55, 7 September 2018 (UTC)
October 2018 at Women in Red
| ||
|
(To subscribe: Women in Red/English language mailing list and Women in Red/international list. Unsubscribe: Women in Red/Opt-out list) --Rosiestep (talk) 14:46, 28 September 2018 (UTC) via MassMessaging |
Welcome to the Months of African Cinema!
Greetings!
The AfroCine Project welcomes you to October, the first out of the two months which has been dedicated to improving contents that centre around the cinema of Africa, the Caribbean, and the diaspora.
This is a global online edit-a-thon, which is happening in at least 5 language editions of Wikipedia, including the English Wikipedia! Join us in this exciting venture, by helping to create or expand articles which are connected to this scope. Also remember to list your name under the participants section, if you haven't done so already.
On English Wikipedia, we would be recognizing Users who are able to achieve the following:
- Overall winner (1st, 2nd, 3rd places)
- Country Winners
- Diversity winner
- High quality contributors
- Gender-gap fillers
- Page improvers
- Wikidata Translators
For further information about the contest, the recognition categories and how to participate, please visit the contest page here. For further inquiries, please leave comments on the contest talkpage or on the main project talkpage. See you around :).--Jamie Tubers (talk) 22:50, 03 October 2018 (UTC)
Help me
Hi sir I want your help of creating an article wich is previously created by master sock ips Shiwam Kumar Sriwastaw article name is Radha Krishn . One ip User is requested me for created that article, what should I do? Please help me sir see the request hare. Thank you , 🏯TheCitty✍️talk(💌contributions) 12:50, 14 October 2018 (UTC)
Get ready for November with Women in Red!
Continuing: | ||
|
Latest headlines, news, and views on the Women in Red talkpage (Join the conversation!): (To subscribe: Women in Red/English language mailing list and Women in Red/international list. Unsubscribe: Women in Red/Opt-out list) |
--Megalibrarygirl (talk) 18:40, 14 October 2018 (UTC) via MassMessaging
WikiProject Canada 10,000 Challenge award
|
The Bronze Maple Leaf Award | |
| This maple leaf is awarded to Alanna the Brave for writing nine women's biographies during the second year of The 10,000 Challenge of WikiProject Canada. Congratulations, and thank you for your contributions! Reidgreg (talk) 20:21, 2 November 2018 (UTC) |
- Aww -- thanks Reidgreg! Glad to be writing about fabulous Canadian women. Alanna the Brave (talk) 23:39, 4 November 2018 (UTC)
ArbCom 2018 election voter message
Hello, Alanna the Brave. Voting in the 2018 Arbitration Committee elections is now open until 23.59 on Sunday, 2 December. All users who registered an account before Sunday, 28 October 2018, made at least 150 mainspace edits before Thursday, 1 November 2018 and are not currently blocked are eligible to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once.
The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.
If you wish to participate in the 2018 election, please review the candidates and submit your choices on the voting page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 18:42, 19 November 2018 (UTC)
ArbCom 2018 election voter message
Hello, Alanna the Brave. Voting in the 2018 Arbitration Committee elections is now open until 23.59 on Sunday, 3 December. All users who registered an account before Sunday, 28 October 2018, made at least 150 mainspace edits before Thursday, 1 November 2018 and are not currently blocked are eligible to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once.
The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.
If you wish to participate in the 2018 election, please review the candidates and submit your choices on the voting page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 18:42, 19 November 2018 (UTC)
December 2018 at Women in Red
Continuing: | ||
|
Latest headlines, news, and views on the Women in Red talkpage (Join the conversation!): (To subscribe: Women in Red/English language mailing list and Women in Red/international list. Unsubscribe: Women in Red/Opt-out list) |
Disambiguation link notification for November 30
An automated process has detected that when you recently edited Adele Astaire, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Hutchinson (check to confirm | fix with Dab solver).
(Opt-out instructions.) --DPL bot (talk) 09:08, 30 November 2018 (UTC)
January 2019 at Women in Red
 January events:
|