User talk:Aknel3ova

Aknel3ova, you are invited to the Teahouse!

Hi Aknel3ova! Thanks for contributing to Wikipedia. Come join other new editors at the Teahouse! The Teahouse is a space where new editors can get help from other new editors. These editors have also just begun editing Wikipedia; they may have had similar experiences as you. Come share your experiences, ask questions, and get advice from your peers. I hope to see you there! Nathan2055 (I'm a Teahouse host)

Visit the Teahouse

This message was delivered automatically by your robot friend, HostBot (talk) 16:30, 1 November 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Your submission at Articles for creation: ORBIS PICTUS PLAY (November 3)

Your recent article submission to Articles for Creation has been reviewed! The submission has not been accepted because it included copyrighted information, which is not permitted on Wikipedia. You are welcome to write an article on the subject, but please do not use copyrighted work.

The existing submission may be deleted at any time. Copyrighted work cannot be allowed to remain on Wikipedia.

If you need any assistance, you can ask for help at the Articles for creation help desk or on the reviewer's talk page.
You can also get real-time chat help from experienced editors.

Ahecht (TALK
PAGE) 19:10, 3 November 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Your submission at Articles for creation: ORBIS PICTUS PLAY (December 23)

Your recent article submission to Articles for Creation has been reviewed! Unfortunately, it has not been accepted at this time. The reason left by Mz7 was:

You have added more sources, but you have not addressed the problem which the previous decline highlighted: you need to rewrite the article entirely from your own words. Wikipedia takes copyright violations very seriously. We cannot accept copyrighted content taken from websites or printed sources. The submission is also written in a promotional tone; while rewriting, please be mindful of our neutral point of view policy.

You are encouraged to edit the submission to address the issues raised and resubmit when they have been resolved.

If you would like to continue working on the submission, go to Draft:ORBIS PICTUS PLAY and click on the "Edit" tab at the top of the window.
If you need any assistance, you can ask for help at the Articles for creation help desk or on the reviewer's talk page.
You can also get real-time chat help from experienced editors.

Mz7 (talk) 22:00, 23 December 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Copyright problem: Draft:ORBIS PICTUS PLAY

Hello, and welcome to Wikipedia! We welcome and appreciate your contributions, such as Draft:ORBIS PICTUS PLAY, but we regretfully cannot accept copyrighted text or images borrowed from either web sites or printed material. This article appears to contain material copied from http://www.orbis-pictus.com/en/about-the-project-orbis-pictus-play-p95.html, http://www.orbis-pictus.com/en/sensorium---introduction-p291.html, http://www.orbis-pictus.com/en/golem---petr-nikl-p225.html, and maybe others, and therefore to constitute a violation of Wikipedia's copyright policies. The copyrighted text has been or will soon be deleted. While we appreciate contributions, we must require all contributors to understand and comply with our copyright policy. Wikipedia takes copyright violations very seriously, and persistent violators are liable to be blocked from editing.

If you believe that the article is not a copyright violation, or if you have permission from the copyright holder to release the content freely under license allowed by Wikipedia, then you should do one of the following:

If you have permission from the author to release the text under the Creative Commons Attribution-ShareAlike License (CC-BY-SA), leave a message explaining the details at Draft talk:ORBIS PICTUS PLAY and send an email with confirmation of permission to "permissions-en (at) wikimedia (dot) org". Make sure you quote the exact page name, Draft:ORBIS PICTUS PLAY, in your email. See Wikipedia:Requesting copyright permission for instructions.
If you own the copyright to the material: send an e-mail from an address associated with the original publication to permissions-en(at)wikimedia(dot)org or a postal message to the Wikimedia Foundation permitting re-use under the Creative Commons Attribution-ShareAlike License and GNU Free Documentation License, and note that you have done so on Draft talk:ORBIS PICTUS PLAY. See Wikipedia:Donating copyrighted materials for instructions.
If a note on the original website states that re-use is permitted "under the Creative Commons Attribution-ShareAlike License (CC-BY-SA), version 3.0", or that the material is released into the public domain, or if you have strong reason to believe it is, leave a note at Draft talk:ORBIS PICTUS PLAY with a link to where we can find that note or your explanation of why you believe the content is free for reuse.

It may also be necessary for the text be modified to have an encyclopedic tone and to follow Wikipedia article layout. For more information on Wikipedia's policies, see Wikipedia's policies and guidelines.

If you would like to begin working on a new version of the article you may do so at this temporary page. Leave a note at Draft talk:ORBIS PICTUS PLAY saying you have done so and an administrator will move the new article into place once the issue is resolved.

Thank you, and please feel welcome to continue contributing to Wikipedia. Happy editing! Mz7 (talk) 22:35, 23 December 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Your submission at Articles for creation: ORBIS PICTUS PLAY (February 24)

Your recent article submission to Articles for Creation has been reviewed! Unfortunately, it has not been accepted at this time. The reason left by Onel5969 was:

This submission does not appear to be written in the formal tone expected of an encyclopedia article. Entries should be written from a neutral point of view, and should refer to a range of independent, reliable, published sources. Please rewrite your submission in a more encyclopedic format. Please make sure to avoid peacock terms, that are designed to promote or show-off the subject.

Please check the submission for any additional comments left by the reviewer. You are encouraged to edit the submission to address the issues raised and resubmit when they have been resolved.

If you would like to continue working on the submission, go to Draft:ORBIS PICTUS PLAY and click on the "Edit" tab at the top of the window.
If you need any assistance, you can ask for help at the Articles for creation help desk or on the reviewer's talk page.
You can also get real-time chat help from experienced editors.

Onel5969 (talk) 22:38, 24 February 2015 (UTC)[reply]

AfC notification: Draft:ORBIS PICTUS PLAY has a new comment

I've left a comment on your Articles for Creation submission, which can be viewed at Draft:ORBIS PICTUS PLAY. Thanks! Roger (Dodger67) (talk) 14:55, 23 March 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Your submission at Articles for creation: ORBIS PICTUS PLAY (March 24)

Your recent article submission to Articles for Creation has been reviewed! Unfortunately, it has not been accepted at this time. The reason left by Flat Out was:

This submission appears to read more like an advertisement than an entry in an encyclopedia. Encyclopedia articles need to be written from a neutral point of view, and should refer to a range of independent, reliable, published sources, not just to materials produced by the creator of the subject being discussed. This is important so that the article can meet Wikipedia's verifiability policy and the notability of the subject can be established. If you still feel that this subject is worthy of inclusion in Wikipedia, please rewrite your submission to comply with these policies.

Please check the submission for any additional comments left by the reviewer. You are encouraged to edit the submission to address the issues raised and resubmit when they have been resolved.

If you would like to continue working on the submission, go to Draft:ORBIS PICTUS PLAY and click on the "Edit" tab at the top of the window.
If you need any assistance, you can ask for help at the Articles for creation help desk or on the reviewer's talk page.
You can also get real-time chat help from experienced editors.

Flat Out let's discuss it 12:22, 24 March 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Teahouse talkback: you've got messages!

Hello, Aknel3ova. Your question has been answered at the Teahouse Q&A board. Feel free to reply there!
Please note that all old questions are archived after 2-3 days of inactivity. Message added by w.carter-Talk 22:21, 29 April 2015 (UTC). (You can remove this notice at any time by removing the {{teahouse talkback}} template).[reply]

AfC notification: Draft:Orbis Pictus Play has a new comment

I've left a comment on your Articles for Creation submission, which can be viewed at Draft:Orbis Pictus Play. Thanks! FoCuSandLeArN (talk) 17:06, 15 May 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Your submission at Articles for creation: Orbis Pictus Play (June 15)

Your recent article submission to Articles for Creation has been reviewed! Unfortunately, it has not been accepted at this time. The reason left by Accents was:

This submission does not appear to be written in the formal tone expected of an encyclopedia article. Entries should be written from a neutral point of view, and should refer to a range of independent, reliable, published sources. Please rewrite your submission in a more encyclopedic format. Please make sure to avoid peacock terms, that are designed to promote or show-off the subject.

Please check the submission for any additional comments left by the reviewer. You are encouraged to edit the submission to address the issues raised and resubmit when they have been resolved.

If you would like to continue working on the submission, go to Draft:Orbis Pictus Play and click on the "Edit" tab at the top of the window.
If you need any assistance, you can ask for help at the Articles for creation help desk or on the reviewer's talk page.
You can also get Wikipedia's Live Help real-time chat help from experienced editors.

Accents 05:36, 15 June 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Draft:Orbis Pictus Play concern

Hi there, I'm HasteurBot. I just wanted to let you know that Draft:Orbis Pictus Play, a page you created, has not been edited in 6 months. The Articles for Creation space is not an indefinite storage location for content that is not appropriate for articlespace.

If your submission is not edited soon, it could be nominated for deletion. If you would like to attempt to save it, you will need to improve it.

You may request Userfication of the content if it meets requirements.

If the deletion has already occured, instructions on how you may be able to retrieve it are available at WP:REFUND/G13.

Thank you for your attention. HasteurBot (talk) 01:31, 16 December 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Your draft article, Draft:Orbis Pictus Play

Hello, Aknel3ova. It has been over six months since you last edited your Articles for Creation draft article submission, "Orbis Pictus Play".

In accordance with our policy that Articles for Creation is not for the indefinite hosting of material deemed unsuitable for the encyclopedia mainspace, the draft has been nominated for deletion. If you plan on working on it further, or editing it to address the issues raised if it was declined, simply edit the submission and remove the {{db-afc}} or {{db-g13}} code.

If your submission has already been deleted by the time you get there, and you wish to retrieve it, you can request its undeletion by following the instructions at this link. An administrator will, in most cases, restore the submission so you can continue to work on it.

Thanks for your submission to Wikipedia, and happy editing. The StormCatcher (talk) (contribs) 10:06, 19 December 2015 (UTC)[reply]