User talk:Akibalogh

You may wish to consider using a Wizard to help you create articles. See the Article Wizard.

Thank you.

The article Calpont has been speedily deleted from Wikipedia. This was done because the article, which appeared to be about a real person, individual animal, organization (band, club, company, etc.), or web content, did not indicate how or why the subject is notable, that is, why an article about that subject should be included in Wikipedia. Under the criteria for speedy deletion, articles that do not indicate the notability of the subject may be deleted at any time. If you can indicate why the subject is really notable, you are free to re-create the article, making sure to cite any verifiable sources.

Please see the guidelines for what is generally accepted as notable, and for specific types of articles, you may want to check out our criteria for biographies, for web sites, for musicians, or for companies. Feel free to leave a note on my talk page if you have any questions about this. NawlinWiki (talk) 15:56, 13 December 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Proposed deletion of Calpont

The article Calpont has been proposed for deletion because of the following concern:

No evidence of notability. Apart from one "reference" which does not appear to mention Calpont, we have unreliable sources (blog, YouTube), the company's own site, and business promotion sites.

While all contributions to Wikipedia are appreciated, content or articles may be deleted for any of several reasons.

You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the {{proposed deletion/dated}} notice, but please explain why in your edit summary or on the article's talk page.

Please consider improving the article to address the issues raised. Removing {{proposed deletion/dated}} will stop the proposed deletion process, but other deletion processes exist. In particular, the speedy deletion process can result in deletion without discussion, and articles for deletion allows discussion to reach consensus for deletion. JamesBWatson (talk) 11:54, 9 January 2012 (UTC)[reply]

JamesBWatson: I understand your concern but disagree with some of your assertions.

For example, Merv Adrian is a VP at Gartner. His opinion is not a "business promotion" site. (Referencing: http://www.enterpriseirregulars.com/28857/calpont%E2%80%99s-infinidb-%E2%80%93-another-adbms-insurgent-arises/ )
The CODiE Awards are highly-valued in the industry (Referencing: http://www.siia.net/codies/2011/finalist_detail.asp?id=9 )

I've added additional resources that demonstrate the novelty of Calpont's database and have removed the proposed deletion tag.

Links added:

Blog review of InfiniDB http://rpbouman.blogspot.com/2009/10/calpont-opens-up-infinidb-open-source.html
Case study and product review on Information Management magazine http://www.information-management.com/issues/21_3/calpont-infinidb-10020717-1.html
Overview of InfiniDB technology on CMS Wire http://www.cmswire.com/cms/enterprise-cms/infinidb-20-supports-big-data-analytics-009089.php
Benchmark of InfiniDB performance http://www.business-intelligence.net/blog/calpont-infinidb-2-0-benchmark-review-with-bert-scalzo
User experiences with InfiniDB CE: http://www.tableausoftware.com/support/forum/topic/experiences-infinidb ; http://survivalguides.wordpress.com/category/it-survival/linux/infinidb/ ;

Problems with upload of File:MarketMuse Logo.png

Thanks for uploading File:MarketMuse Logo.png. You don't seem to have said where the image came from, who created it, or what the copyright status is. We require this information to verify that the image is legally usable on Wikipedia, and because most image licenses require giving credit to the image's creator.

To add this information, click on this link, then click the "Edit" tab at the top of the page and add the information to the image's description. If you need help, post your question on Wikipedia:Media copyright questions.

For more information on using images, see the following pages:

Thank you for your cooperation. --ImageTaggingBot (talk) 19:30, 18 September 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Your submission at Articles for creation: MarketMuse (September 30)

Your recent article submission to Articles for Creation has been reviewed! Unfortunately, it has not been accepted at this time. The reason left by Jcc was:

This submission's references do not adequately show the subject's notability. Wikipedia requires significant coverage (not just mere mentions) about the subject in published, reliable, secondary sources that are independent of the subject—see the guidelines on the notability of organizations and companies, the golden rule and learn about mistakes to avoid when addressing this issue. Please improve the submission's referencing (see Wikipedia:Referencing for beginners and Help:Introduction to referencing/1), so that the information is verifiable, and there is clear evidence of why the subject is notable and worthy of inclusion in an encyclopedia. If additional reliable sources cannot be found for the subject, then it may not be suitable for Wikipedia at this time.

The comment the reviewer left was:

Hello, thank you for writing this article! I have a few concerns about it and wanted to discuss them with you:

I’m a bit concerned that this company might not be notable enough to qualify for a Wikipedia article. That link goes to a guide, but basically any coverage of a company on here is supposed to be based on being covered in reliable sources, like newspapers, in the form of full articles and not just things like business listings.
A lot of it reads like a press release or promotional copy, not a factual encyclopaedia article.

Are there any extra citations you can add from reliable sources like news articles about this company demonstrating that it's notable?

Since the article reads like you might be marketing the company, you also should look at this, an automated text on editing if you have a conflict of interest. All the best, any questions just let me know and I'll try to help.

Please check the submission for any additional comments left by the reviewer. You are encouraged to edit the submission to address the issues raised and resubmit when they have been resolved.

If you would like to continue working on the submission, go to Draft:MarketMuse and click on the "Edit" tab at the top of the window.
If you need any assistance, you can ask for help at the Articles for creation help desk or on the reviewer's talk page.
You can also use Wikipedia's real-time chat help from experienced editors.

jcc (tea and biscuits) 10:35, 30 September 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Hello! Akibalogh, I noticed your article was declined at Articles for Creation, and that can be disappointing. If you are wondering why your article submission was declined, please post a question at the Articles for creation help desk. If you have any other questions about your editing experience, we'd love to help you at the Teahouse, a friendly space on Wikipedia where experienced editors lend a hand to help new editors like yourself! See you there! jcc (tea and biscuits) 10:35, 30 September 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Your submission at Articles for creation: MarketMuse (November 18)

Your recent article submission to Articles for Creation has been reviewed! Unfortunately, it has not been accepted at this time. The reason left by Triptothecottage was:

This submission's references do not adequately show the subject's notability. Wikipedia requires significant coverage (not just mere mentions) about the subject in published, reliable, secondary sources that are independent of the subject—see the guidelines on the notability of organizations and companies, the golden rule and learn about mistakes to avoid when addressing this issue. Please improve the submission's referencing (see Wikipedia:Referencing for beginners and Help:Introduction to referencing/1), so that the information is verifiable, and there is clear evidence of why the subject is notable and worthy of inclusion in an encyclopedia. If additional reliable sources cannot be found for the subject, then it may not be suitable for Wikipedia at this time.

The comment the reviewer left was:

The improvements are all well and good, but nothing added here shows notability. Please read the guideline carefully.

Please check the submission for any additional comments left by the reviewer. You are encouraged to edit the submission to address the issues raised and resubmit when they have been resolved.

If you would like to continue working on the submission, go to Draft:MarketMuse and click on the "Edit" tab at the top of the window.
If you need any assistance, you can ask for help at the Articles for creation help desk or on the reviewer's talk page.
You can also use Wikipedia's real-time chat help from experienced editors.

Triptothecottage (talk) 11:08, 18 November 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Draft:MarketMuse concern

Hi there, I'm HasteurBot. I just wanted to let you know that Draft:MarketMuse, a page you created, has not been edited in 5 months. The Articles for Creation space is not an indefinite storage location for content that is not appropriate for articlespace.

If your submission is not edited soon, it could be nominated for deletion. If you would like to attempt to save it, you will need to improve it.

You may request Userfication of the content if it meets requirements.

If the deletion has already occured, instructions on how you may be able to retrieve it are available at WP:REFUND/G13.

Thank you for your attention. HasteurBot (talk) 01:33, 19 April 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Your draft article, Draft:MarketMuse

Hello, Akibalogh. It has been over six months since you last edited the Articles for Creation submission or Draft page you started, "MarketMuse".

In accordance with our policy that Wikipedia is not for the indefinite hosting of material deemed unsuitable for the encyclopedia mainspace, the draft has been nominated for deletion. If you plan on working on it further, or editing it to address the issues raised if it was declined, simply edit the submission and remove the {{db-afc}}, {{db-draft}}, or {{db-g13}} code.

If your submission has already been deleted by the time you get there, and you wish to retrieve it, you can request its undeletion by following the instructions at this link. An administrator will, in most cases, restore the submission so you can continue to work on it.

Thanks for your submission to Wikipedia, and happy editing. HasteurBot (talk) 02:01, 19 May 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Your submission at Articles for creation: DLC.Link (March 8)

Your recent article submission to Articles for Creation has been reviewed. Unfortunately, it has not been accepted at this time. The reason left by Chaotic Enby was:

This submission reads more like an essay than an encyclopedia article. Submissions should summarise information in secondary, reliable sources and not contain opinions or original research. Please write about the topic from a neutral point of view in an encyclopedic manner.

The comment the reviewer left was:

Most of the article is not about DLC.Link and appears to talk about the history of Bitcoin, which should at best be given a sentence to summarize the context needed to understand what DLC.Link does. Also, the citation format is completely non-standard and should be fixed.

Please check the submission for any additional comments left by the reviewer. You are encouraged to edit the submission to address the issues raised and resubmit after they have been resolved.

If you would like to continue working on the submission, go to Draft:DLC.Link and click on the "Edit" tab at the top of the window.
If you do not edit your draft in the next 6 months, it will be considered abandoned and may be deleted.
If you need any assistance, or have experienced any untoward behavior associated with this submission, you can ask for help at the Articles for creation help desk, on the reviewer's talk page or use Wikipedia's real-time chat help from experienced editors.

Chaotıċ Enby (talk · contribs) 23:27, 8 March 2024 (UTC)[reply]