User talk:AkhtarHussain83

Disruptive editing, per a complaint at WP:AN3

You have been blocked indefinitely from editing for Disruptive editing. If you think there are good reasons why you should be unblocked, you may appeal this block by first reading the guide to appealing blocks, then adding the following text to the bottom of your talk page: {{unblock|reason=Your reason here ~~~~}}.

The full report is at at the edit warring noticeboard. Thank you, EdJohnston (talk) 21:23, 21 March 2016 (UTC)[reply]

This user's unblock request has been reviewed by an administrator, who declined the request. Other administrators may also review this block, but should not override the decision without good reason (see the blocking policy).

AkhtarHussain83 (block log • active blocks • global blocks • contribs • deleted contribs • filter log • creation log • change block settings • unblock • checkuser (log))

Request reason:

I do not understand how come User:EdJohnston claimed I've been doing any disruptive editing. The article Guru Arjan I blocked was rarely touched by me in days and I particiapted in the discussions. If I've been blocked because of my reverts, then edit-warring wasn't my intention at all. In case I am at mistake, please accept my apology. I never had any intention of any edit-warring and I didn't even have any idea I did. Nor I understand why the additional reason of possible sock has been added that too just because I made an edit to the article. I ask the administrators to unblock me please.

Decline reason:

I really made an effort here for you. The blocking admin is correct that your activity is very suspicious. Our policy allows us to block based on behavioural evidence in addition to technical evidence. I feel that there is cause for concern. The offer the blocking admin made was to allow you to continue editing in other areas of the encyclopedia. Since you have declined the offer I am going to decline this unblock request. HighInBC 15:17, 6 April 2016 (UTC)[reply]

If you want to make any further unblock requests, please read the guide to appealing blocks first, then use the {{unblock}} template again. If you make too many unconvincing or disruptive unblock requests, you may be prevented from editing this page until your block has expired. Do not remove this unblock review while you are blocked.

New unblock request

This user's unblock request has been reviewed by an administrator, who declined the request. Other administrators may also review this block, but should not override the decision without good reason (see the blocking policy).

AkhtarHussain83 (block log • active blocks • global blocks • contribs • deleted contribs • filter log • creation log • change block settings • unblock • checkuser (log))

Request reason:

User:EdJohnston claimed I've been doing disruptive editing and he blocked me based on that reason and also that I'm a possible sock. However none of those blames were true and there was no evidence. The article Guru Arjan I was blocked for was rarely touched by me in days and I participated in the discussions. If I've been blocked because of my reverts, then edit-warring wasn't my intention at all. He thinks me to be a sock puppet simply because I restored an edit of someone which was recently removed, even though there's no rule prohibiting it. User:HighInBC declined my previous unblock because I didn't accept User:EdJohnston's condition of not editing Sikhism-related articles. I simply declined because a topic ban is too far gone for such a thing and I don't think there's no rule that says I have to accept it even when the charges aren't correct. I have no intention to do any disruptive edit as I already told, but the others simply won't accept it.

Decline reason:

This account is a sockpuppet of KahnJohn27 and cannot be unblocked. Vanjagenije (talk) 15:15, 18 April 2016 (UTC)[reply]

If you want to make any further unblock requests, please read the guide to appealing blocks first, then use the {{unblock}} template again. If you make too many unconvincing or disruptive unblock requests, you may be prevented from editing this page until your block has expired. Do not remove this unblock review while you are blocked.