User talk:Akashjayant1

December 2020

Hello Akashjayant1. The nature of your edits gives the impression you have an undisclosed financial stake in promoting a topic, but you have not complied with Wikipedia's mandatory paid editing disclosure requirements. Paid advocacy is a category of conflict of interest (COI) editing that involves being compensated by a person, group, company or organization to use Wikipedia to promote their interests. Undisclosed paid advocacy is prohibited by our policies on neutral point of view and what Wikipedia is not, and is an especially serious type of COI; the Wikimedia Foundation regards it as a "black hat" practice akin to black-hat search-engine optimization.

Paid advocates are very strongly discouraged from direct article editing, and should instead propose changes on the talk page of the article in question if an article exists. If the article does not exist, paid advocates are extremely strongly discouraged from attempting to write an article at all. At best, any proposed article creation should be submitted through the articles for creation process, rather than directly.

Regardless, if you are receiving or expect to receive compensation for your edits, broadly construed, you are required by the Wikimedia Terms of Use to disclose your employer, client and affiliation. You can post such a mandatory disclosure to your user page at User:Akashjayant1. The template {{Paid}} can be used for this purpose – e.g. in the form: {{paid|user=Akashjayant1|employer=InsertName|client=InsertName}}. If I am mistaken – you are not being directly or indirectly compensated for your edits – please state that in response to this message. Otherwise, please provide the required disclosure. In either case, do not edit further until you answer this message. Blablubbs|talk 15:04, 22 December 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Your submission at Articles for creation: Comrade (company) (January 6)

Your recent article submission to Articles for Creation has been reviewed! Unfortunately, it has not been accepted at this time. The reason left by Dan arndt was:

This submission's references do not show that the subject qualifies for a Wikipedia article—that is, they do not show significant coverage (not just passing mentions) about the subject in published, reliable, secondary sources that are independent of the subject (see the guidelines on the notability of organizations and companies). Before any resubmission, additional references meeting these criteria should be added (see technical help and learn about mistakes to avoid when addressing this issue). If no additional references exist, the subject is not suitable for Wikipedia.

The comment the reviewer left was:

Fails WP:NCOMPANY, requires significant coverage in multiple independent secondary sources.

Please check the submission for any additional comments left by the reviewer. You are encouraged to edit the submission to address the issues raised and resubmit when they have been resolved.

If you would like to continue working on the submission, go to Draft:Comrade (company) and click on the "Edit" tab at the top of the window.
If you now believe the draft cannot meet Wikipedia's standards or do not wish to progress it further, you may request deletion. Please go to Draft:Comrade (company), click on the "Edit" tab at the top of the window, add "{{Db-g7}}" at the top of the draft text and click the blue "publish changes" button to save this edit.
If you do not make any further changes to your draft, in 6 months, it will be considered abandoned and may be deleted.
If you need any assistance, or have experienced any untoward behavior associated with this submission, you can ask for help at the Articles for creation help desk, on the reviewer's talk page or use Wikipedia's real-time chat help from experienced editors.

Dan arndt (talk) 05:52, 6 January 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Hello, Akashjayant1! Having an article declined at Articles for Creation can be disappointing. If you are wondering why your article submission was declined, please post a question at the Articles for creation help desk. If you have any other questions about your editing experience, we'd love to help you at the Teahouse, a friendly space on Wikipedia where experienced editors lend a hand to help new editors like yourself! See you there! Dan arndt (talk) 05:52, 6 January 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Proposed deletion of Comrade (digital marketing agency)

The article Comrade (digital marketing agency) has been proposed for deletion because of the following concern:

Non-notable company, substantially identical to declined draft Draft:Comrade (company)

While all constructive contributions to Wikipedia are appreciated, pages may be deleted for any of several reasons.

You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the {{proposed deletion/dated}} notice, but please explain why in your edit summary or on the article's talk page.

Please consider improving the page to address the issues raised. Removing {{proposed deletion/dated}} will stop the proposed deletion process, but other deletion processes exist. In particular, the speedy deletion process can result in deletion without discussion, and articles for deletion allows discussion to reach consensus for deletion. davidwr/(talk)/(contribs) 17:40, 7 January 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Notability

Wikipedia is an encyclopedia for topics that are considered "notable." In short, if a topic has NOT received significant coverage from reliable sources that is independent of the subject then it should not have an article. Yes, there are articles about non-notable topics in Wikipedia, but they can and should be deleted when found.

Coverage that is from sources controlled by the topic or those who wish to promote it is generally not considered "independent" even if the source itself is normally considered "an independent source." For example, if the New York Times did what looked like a feature article on a business, but it was really based on press releases or a "friendly" interview with someone associated with the company, that particular article by the Times would be considered "not independent" and could not be used during the initial assessment of the topic's "notability."

If you have not already done so, consider reading WP:Your first article. I think it will help you in choosing notable topics to write about and in writing drafts that are likely to be accepted through the Articles for Creation (AfC) review process or which are likely to not be deleted should you choose to bypass the "AfC" process. davidwr/(talk)/(contribs) 17:52, 7 January 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Nomination of Comrade (digital marketing agency) for deletion

A discussion is taking place as to whether the article Comrade (digital marketing agency) is suitable for inclusion in Wikipedia according to Wikipedia's policies and guidelines or whether it should be deleted.

The article will be discussed at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Comrade (digital marketing agency) until a consensus is reached, and anyone, including you, is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on high-quality evidence and our policies and guidelines.

Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion notice from the top of the article.

davidwr/(talk)/(contribs) 15:00, 8 January 2021 (UTC)[reply]

January 2021

You have been blocked indefinitely from editing for advertising or self-promoting in violation of the conflict of interest and notability guidelines.

If you think there are good reasons for being unblocked, please read the guide to appealing blocks, then add the following text below the block notice on your talk page: {{unblock|reason=Your reason here ~~~~}}. MER-C 17:37, 9 January 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Concern regarding Draft:Comrade (company)

Hello, Akashjayant1. This is a bot-delivered message letting you know that Draft:Comrade (company), a page you created, has not been edited in at least 5 months. Draft space is not an indefinite storage location for content that is not appropriate for article space.

If your submission is not edited soon, it could be nominated for deletion under CSD G13. If you would like to attempt to save it, you will need to improve it. You may request userfication of the content if it meets requirements.

If the deletion has already occured, instructions on how you may be able to retrieve it are available here.

Thank you for your submission to Wikipedia. FireflyBot (talk) 16:01, 10 June 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Your draft article, Draft:Comrade (company)

Hello, Akashjayant1. It has been over six months since you last edited the Articles for Creation submission or Draft page you started, "Comrade".

In accordance with our policy that Wikipedia is not for the indefinite hosting of material deemed unsuitable for the encyclopedia mainspace, the draft has been deleted. If you plan on working on it further and you wish to retrieve it, you can request its undeletion. An administrator will, in most cases, restore the submission so you can continue to work on it.

Thanks for your submission to Wikipedia, and happy editing. Liz ^{Read! Talk!} 15:05, 8 July 2021 (UTC)[reply]