Jump to content

User talk:Akash Dahariya

Page contents not supported in other languages.
From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia

Welcome!

Hello, Akash Dahariya! Welcome to Wikipedia! Thank you for your contributions. You may benefit from following some of the links below, which will help you get the most out of Wikipedia. If you have any questions you can ask me on my talk page, or place {{helpme}} on your talk page and ask your question there. Please remember to sign your name on talk pages by clicking or by typing four tildes "~~~~"; this will automatically produce your name and the date. If you are already excited about Wikipedia, you might want to consider being "adopted" by a more experienced editor or joining a WikiProject to collaborate with others in creating and improving articles of your interest. Click here for a directory of all the WikiProjects. Finally, please do your best to always fill in the edit summary field when making edits to pages. Happy editing! CAPTAIN RAJU (talk) 09:16, 10 October 2015 (UTC)[reply]
Getting Started
Getting Help
Policies and Guidelines
The Community
Things to do
Miscellaneous

Talkback

[edit]
Hello, Akash Dahariya. You have new messages at DESiegel's talk page.
Message added 12:59, 12 March 2016 (UTC). You can remove this notice at any time by removing the {{Talkback}} or {{Tb}} template.[reply]

DES (talk) 12:59, 12 March 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Your user page

[edit]

A user page is not the place for the draft of an article about yourself. See WP:UPNOT for details. I have therefore moved the content to User:Akash Dahariya/Autobio and marked it as a draft article. More over, people are strongly discouraged from writing about themselves or their own projects on Wikipedia. See WP:AUTOBIO and WP:COI for more details. DES (talk) 13:08, 12 March 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Your submission at Articles for creation: Autobio (March 13)

[edit]
Your recent article submission to Articles for Creation has been reviewed! Unfortunately, it has not been accepted at this time. The reason left by Anarchyte was:
This submission's references do not adequately show the subject's notability. Wikipedia requires significant coverage about the subject in reliable sources that are independent of the subject—see the guidelines on the notability of people and the golden rule. Please improve the submission's referencing (see Wikipedia:Referencing for beginners), so that the information is verifiable, and there is clear evidence of why the subject is notable and worthy of inclusion in an encyclopedia. If additional reliable sources cannot be found for the subject, then it may not be suitable for Wikipedia at this time.
Please check the submission for any additional comments left by the reviewer. You are encouraged to edit the submission to address the issues raised and resubmit when they have been resolved.
Anarchyte (work | talk) 08:59, 13 March 2016 (UTC)[reply]


Teahouse logo
Hello! Akash Dahariya, I noticed your article was declined at Articles for Creation, and that can be disappointing. If you are wondering why your article submission was declined, please post a question at the Articles for creation help desk. If you have any other questions about your editing experience, we'd love to help you at the Teahouse, a friendly space on Wikipedia where experienced editors lend a hand to help new editors like yourself! See you there! Anarchyte (work | talk) 08:59, 13 March 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Your submission at Articles for creation: Autobio (March 14)

[edit]
Your recent article submission to Articles for Creation has been reviewed! Unfortunately, it has not been accepted at this time. The reason left by DESiegel was:
This submission's references do not adequately show the subject's notability. Wikipedia requires significant coverage about the subject in reliable sources that are independent of the subject—see the guidelines on the notability of people and the golden rule. Please improve the submission's referencing (see Wikipedia:Referencing for beginners), so that the information is verifiable, and there is clear evidence of why the subject is notable and worthy of inclusion in an encyclopedia. If additional reliable sources cannot be found for the subject, then it may not be suitable for Wikipedia at this time.
 The comment they left was:
Your only significant changes since this was last reviewed and declined were to 'remove two reference citations. Currently this has only a single citation, to a self-published primary source. To be accepted, It would need multiple independent published reliable sources. That is it needs published discussion from mainstream magazines, newspapers, or online sources (or other sources of similar quality) with a reputation for fact-checking and accuracy, that are in no way affiliated with the subject, and that discuss the subject in some detail. See WP:NBIO.
Please check the submission for any additional comments left by the reviewer. You are encouraged to edit the submission to address the issues raised and resubmit when they have been resolved.
DES (talk) 13:02, 14 March 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Speedy deletion nomination of SKD Academy of Dramatic Arts

[edit]

If this is the first article that you have created, you may want to read the guide to writing your first article.

You may want to consider using the Article Wizard to help you create articles.

A tag has been placed on SKD Academy of Dramatic Arts requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia. This has been done under section A7 of the criteria for speedy deletion, because the article appears to be about an organization or company, but it does not credibly indicate how or why the subject is important or significant: that is, why an article about that subject should be included in an encyclopedia. Under the criteria for speedy deletion, such articles may be deleted at any time. Please read more about what is generally accepted as notable.

If you think this page should not be deleted for this reason, you may contest the nomination by visiting the page and clicking the button labelled "Contest this speedy deletion". This will give you the opportunity to explain why you believe the page should not be deleted. However, be aware that once a page is tagged for speedy deletion, it may be removed without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag from the page yourself, but do not hesitate to add information in line with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines. If the page is deleted, and you wish to retrieve the deleted material for future reference or improvement, then please contact the deleting administrator. DES (talk) 13:16, 14 March 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Teahouse talkback: you've got messages!

[edit]
Hello, Akash Dahariya. Your question has been answered at the Teahouse Q&A board. Feel free to reply there!
Please note that all old questions are archived after 2-3 days of inactivity. Message added by DES (talk) 13:25, 14 March 2016 (UTC). (You can remove this notice at any time by removing the {{teahouse talkback}} template).[reply]

Proposed deletion of SKD Academy of Dramatic Arts

[edit]

The article SKD Academy of Dramatic Arts has been proposed for deletion because of the following concern:

No indication of notability.

While all constructive contributions to Wikipedia are appreciated, content or articles may be deleted for any of several reasons.

You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the {{proposed deletion/dated}} notice, but please explain why in your edit summary or on the article's talk page.

Please consider improving the article to address the issues raised. Removing {{proposed deletion/dated}} will stop the proposed deletion process, but other deletion processes exist. In particular, the speedy deletion process can result in deletion without discussion, and articles for deletion allows discussion to reach consensus for deletion. —teb728 t c 23:24, 14 March 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Your submission at Articles for creation: Akash Dahariya (March 17)

[edit]
Your recent article submission to Articles for Creation has been reviewed! Unfortunately, it has not been accepted at this time. The reason left by MatthewVanitas was:
A couple things:
  • You really need to read WP:Autobio to understand why writing your own article is a very bad idea.
  • Your article is not at all ready to publish, because you haven't provided any evidence of Dahariya's significance. Have any newspapers or film journals discussed his work, his impact, his attributes? If he just happens to have been in a couple films, that simple fact is not at all enough to justify an article.
But seriously, I would just give this up and write some other article about Indian film, maybe there's a famous director or actor in the past who lacks an article (or lacks an article on English Wikipedia but has one in other languages). That way you can be contributing, learning and teaching others about Indian film. But writing your own autobio is really just a bad idea.
Please check the submission for any additional comments left by the reviewer. You are encouraged to edit the submission to address the issues raised and resubmit when they have been resolved.
MatthewVanitas (talk) 10:41, 17 March 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Speedy deletion nomination of Ajeet Vishwakarma

[edit]

If this is the first article that you have created, you may want to read the guide to writing your first article.

You may want to consider using the Article Wizard to help you create articles.

A tag has been placed on Ajeet Vishwakarma requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia. This has been done under section A7 of the criteria for speedy deletion, because the article appears to be about a person or group of people, but it does not credibly indicate how or why the subject is important or significant: that is, why an article about that subject should be included in an encyclopedia. Under the criteria for speedy deletion, such articles may be deleted at any time. Please read more about what is generally accepted as notable.

If you think this page should not be deleted for this reason, you may contest the nomination by visiting the page and clicking the button labelled "Contest this speedy deletion". This will give you the opportunity to explain why you believe the page should not be deleted. However, be aware that once a page is tagged for speedy deletion, it may be removed without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag from the page yourself, but do not hesitate to add information in line with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines. If the page is deleted, and you wish to retrieve the deleted material for future reference or improvement, then please contact the deleting administrator. HappyValleyEditor (talk) 09:35, 23 April 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Managing a conflict of interest

[edit]

Information icon Hello, Akash Dahariya. We welcome your contributions, but if you have an external relationship with the people, places, or things you have written about in the article Dinesh Soi, you may have a conflict of interest (COI). Editors with a COI may be unduly influenced by their connection to the topic, and it is important when editing Wikipedia articles that such connections be completely transparent. See the conflict of interest guideline and FAQ for organizations for more information. In particular, we ask that you please:

  • avoid editing or creating articles related to you and your family, friends, school, company, club, or organization, as well as any competing companies' projects or products;
  • instead, you are encouraged to propose changes on the Talk pages of affected article(s) (see the {{request edit}} template);
  • when discussing affected articles, disclose your COI (see WP:DISCLOSE);
  • avoid linking to the Wikipedia article or to the website of your organization in other articles (see WP:SPAM);
  • exercise great caution so that you do not violate Wikipedia's content policies.

In addition, you must disclose your employer, client, and affiliation with respect to any contribution for which you receive, or expect to receive, compensation (see WP:PAID).

Please take a few moments to read and review Wikipedia's policies regarding conflicts of interest, especially those pertaining to neutral point of view, sourcing and autobiographies. Please clarify how you know "Dinesh Soi" Lemongirl942 (talk) 07:44, 31 May 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Nomination of Dinesh Soi for deletion

[edit]

A discussion is taking place as to whether the article Dinesh Soi is suitable for inclusion in Wikipedia according to Wikipedia's policies and guidelines or whether it should be deleted.

The article will be discussed at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Dinesh Soi until a consensus is reached, and anyone is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on high-quality evidence and our policies and guidelines.

Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion notice from the top of the article. Lemongirl942 (talk) 07:48, 31 May 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Managing a conflict of interest

[edit]

Information icon Hello, Akash Dahariya. We welcome your contributions, but if you have an external relationship with the people, places, or things you have written about in the article Ajeet Vishwakarma, you may have a conflict of interest (COI). Editors with a COI may be unduly influenced by their connection to the topic, and it is important when editing Wikipedia articles that such connections be completely transparent. See the conflict of interest guideline and FAQ for organizations for more information. In particular, we ask that you please:

  • avoid editing or creating articles related to you and your family, friends, school, company, club, or organization, as well as any competing companies' projects or products;
  • instead, you are encouraged to propose changes on the Talk pages of affected article(s) (see the {{request edit}} template);
  • when discussing affected articles, disclose your COI (see WP:DISCLOSE);
  • avoid linking to the Wikipedia article or to the website of your organization in other articles (see WP:SPAM);
  • exercise great caution so that you do not violate Wikipedia's content policies.

In addition, you must disclose your employer, client, and affiliation with respect to any contribution for which you receive, or expect to receive, compensation (see WP:PAID).

Please take a few moments to read and review Wikipedia's policies regarding conflicts of interest, especially those pertaining to neutral point of view, sourcing and autobiographies. Please clarify how you know the subject. Lemongirl942 (talk) 07:51, 31 May 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Nomination of Ajeet Vishwakarma for deletion

[edit]

A discussion is taking place as to whether the article Ajeet Vishwakarma is suitable for inclusion in Wikipedia according to Wikipedia's policies and guidelines or whether it should be deleted.

The article will be discussed at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Ajeet Vishwakarma until a consensus is reached, and anyone is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on high-quality evidence and our policies and guidelines.

Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion notice from the top of the article. Lemongirl942 (talk) 07:52, 31 May 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Conflict of Interest

[edit]

I have reported you to the Conflict of Interest noticeboard. As you appear to be involved in Bollywood yourself, you can NOT edit any articles about others within the Bollywood area. You need to stop editing them now, or you may be risking a block from editing. 1.125.48.81 (talk) 11:24, 4 June 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Shadows Fall

[edit]

Hello... can you explain why you just removed several hundred links to Shadows Fall? Your edit summary says "unwanted links", but this is not a good enough explanation. Why is this unwanted, who doesn't want it, and what Wikipedia policy are citing for this action? NinjaRobotPirate (talk) 06:51, 6 June 2016 (UTC)[reply]

More importantly why was this done at such a fast rate? And how was this done? --Lemongirl942 (talk) 07:04, 6 June 2016 (UTC)[reply]
Repeating the above; they're a known rock band and this fast reversion suggests WP:IDONTLIKEIT. Please explain. Nate • (chatter) 07:13, 6 June 2016 (UTC)[reply]
New user, so I suspect it could be a sock of some banned user. – Sabbatino (talk) 07:56, 6 June 2016 (UTC)[reply]
I url you put on that page are not reliable links and also doesn't explain the nobility of the page.Akki98 08:01, 6 June 2016 (UTC)
You clearly have no place on Wikipedia as you don't know the policies and can barely communicate in English. – Sabbatino (talk) 08:42, 6 June 2016 (UTC)[reply]
I'm going to bring this up on ANI so someone who can do so can mass-rollback (consider this your official notice of such); your answer as to why you removed the links is unacceptable. Nate • (chatter) 09:34, 6 June 2016 (UTC)[reply]
Never mind the above; thank you @Sabbatino: for doing the mass-rollback. But Akash, please account for how you changed 200+ links in less than three minutes. Nate • (chatter) 09:38, 6 June 2016 (UTC)[reply]
@Mrschimpf: No problem. I had time so decided to revert everything myself. – Sabbatino (talk) 11:47, 6 June 2016 (UTC)[reply]
[edit]

Hi. Thank you for your recent edits. Wikipedia appreciates your help. We noticed though that when you edited Ghasidas, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Central University. Such links are almost always unintended, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of "Did you mean..." article titles. Read the FAQ • Join us at the DPL WikiProject.

It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot (talk) 10:24, 6 June 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Removing Categories

[edit]

I have reverted some of your edits where you removed categories that should not have been. Given your previous work, it is clear your are not here to create an encyclopedia but rather to be disruptive. It would be in your best interests to close this account and move on as you have shown no indication of any understanding of the rules here, and you haven't even bothered to ask for help that I've seen on a brief look. 101.182.110.216 (talk) 12:40, 6 June 2016 (UTC)[reply]

This is advice, not an order. 101.182.110.216 (talk) 06:53, 7 June 2016 (UTC)[reply]

You also asked which pages were wrong on another's talk page (the wrong talk page as well as it happens). All of them in the main space since your already reverted removal of links to Shadows Fall noted above. All of them were wrong and disruptive. 101.182.110.216 (talk) 06:58, 7 June 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Excuse me, already (talk) reverted the edit from Shadows Falls page.I very much feel guilty about that.I had done all of this mistakely on shadow falls page.from Then, I work seriously.Akki98 07:04, 7 June 2016 (UTC)[reply]

I am referring to all the main space edits SINCE that time. 101.182.110.216 (talk) 07:23, 7 June 2016 (UTC)[reply]

And that includes your two most recent edits. They were wrong and disruptive. 101.182.110.216 (talk) 07:25, 7 June 2016 (UTC)[reply]

June 2016

[edit]

Please assume good faith in your dealings with other editors, which you did not on User talk:101.182.110.216. Assume that they are here to improve rather than harm Wikipedia. Muffled Pocketed 07:16, 7 June 2016 (UTC)[reply]

ok sir.Akash Dahariya (talk) 07:20, 7 June 2016 (UTC)[reply]

I'm not your boss either Muffled Pocketed 07:23, 7 June 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Conflict of Interest again

[edit]

You are involved in Bollywood yourself - this is the core of conflict of interest - so you can't create ANY articles involving it. Not now and not ever no matter what. This is in answer to your question to AKS.9955. You need to forget it and move on to other subjects. 101.182.105.59 (talk) 07:52, 12 June 2016 (UTC)[reply]

ArbCom Elections 2016: Voting now open!

[edit]

Hello, Akash Dahariya. Voting in the 2016 Arbitration Committee elections is open from Monday, 00:00, 21 November through Sunday, 23:59, 4 December to all unblocked users who have registered an account before Wednesday, 00:00, 28 October 2016 and have made at least 150 mainspace edits before Sunday, 00:00, 1 November 2016.

The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.

If you wish to participate in the 2016 election, please review the candidates' statements and submit your choices on the voting page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 22:08, 21 November 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Your draft article, Draft:Akash Dahariya

[edit]

Hello, Akash Dahariya. It has been over six months since you last edited your Articles for Creation draft article submission, "Akash Dahariya".

In accordance with our policy that Articles for Creation is not for the indefinite hosting of material deemed unsuitable for the encyclopedia mainspace, the draft has been nominated for deletion. If you plan on working on it further, or editing it to address the issues raised if it was declined, simply edit the submission and remove the {{db-afc}} or {{db-g13}} code.

If your submission has already been deleted by the time you get there, and you wish to retrieve it, you can request its undeletion by following the instructions at this link. An administrator will, in most cases, restore the submission so you can continue to work on it.

Thanks for your submission to Wikipedia, and happy editing. TopCipher (talk) 14:32, 30 March 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Retrieved from "https://en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=User_talk:Akash_Dahariya&oldid=1079149068"