User talk:Akahddlo

Welcome!

Hello, Akahddlo, and welcome to Wikipedia! Thank you for your contributions, especially your edits to Rawalpindi. I hope you like the place and decide to stay. Here are a few links to pages you might find helpful:

You may also want to take the Wikipedia Adventure, an interactive tour that will help you learn the basics of editing Wikipedia.

Please remember to sign your messages on talk pages by typing four tildes (~~~~); this will automatically insert your username and the date. If you need help, check out Wikipedia:Questions, ask me on my talk page, or click here to ask for help on your talk page, and a volunteer should respond shortly. Again, welcome! lTopGunl (talk) 05:58, 29 January 2015 (UTC)[reply]

March 2015

Hi there! Thank you for your contributions to Wikipedia.

When editing Wikipedia, there is a field labeled "Edit summary" below the main edit box. It looks like this:

Edit summary (Briefly describe your changes)

Please be sure to provide a summary of every edit you make, even if you write only the briefest of summaries. The summaries are very helpful to people browsing an article's history.

Edit summary content is visible in:

Please use the edit summary to explain your reasoning for the edit, or a summary of what the edit changes. Thanks! 220 of ^Borg 17:51, 5 March 2015 (UTC)[reply]

June 2015

Hello, I'm Cpt.a.haddock. I noticed that you made a change to an article, Battle of Buxar, but you didn't provide a reliable source. It's been removed and archived in the page history for now, but if you'd like to include a citation and re-add it, please do so! If you need guidance on referencing, please see the referencing for beginners tutorial, or if you think I made a mistake, you can leave me a message on my talk page. Also, as someone has already mentioned, please attach an edit summary to your edits. Cpt.a.haddock (talk) 05:46, 24 June 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Hello, I'm Human3015. An edit that you recently made to Karachi seemed to be a test and has been removed. If you want more practice editing, please use the sandbox. If you think I made a mistake, or if you have any questions, you can leave me a message on my talk page. Thanks! Human3015 knock knock • 23:37, 28 June 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Please stop adding unsourced content, as you did to Kingdom of Mysore. This contravenes Wikipedia's policy on verifiability. If you continue to do so, you may be blocked from editing Wikipedia. Cpt.a.haddock (talk) 02:19, 29 June 2015 (UTC)[reply]

You may be blocked from editing without further warning the next time you add unsourced material to Wikipedia, as you did at Karachi. Yamaguchi先生 23:27, 29 June 2015 (UTC)[reply]

ArbCom elections are now open!

Hi,
You appear to be eligible to vote in the current Arbitration Committee election. The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to enact binding solutions for disputes between editors, primarily related to serious behavioural issues that the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the ability to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail. If you wish to participate, you are welcome to review the candidates' statements and submit your choices on the voting page. For the Election committee, MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 17:05, 24 November 2015 (UTC)[reply]

December 2015

Hello, I'm Worldbruce. I noticed that you made a change to an article, Bangladesh Army, but you didn't provide a reliable source. It's been removed and archived in the page history for now, but if you'd like to include a citation and re-add it, please do so! If you need guidance on referencing, please see the referencing for beginners tutorial, or if you think I made a mistake, you can leave me a message on my talk page. Thank you. Worldbruce (talk) 00:05, 23 December 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Please refrain from making unconstructive edits to Wikipedia, as you did at Second Anglo-Maratha War. Your edits appear to constitute vandalism and have been reverted or removed. If you would like to experiment, please use the sandbox. Repeated vandalism can result in the loss of editing privileges. Thank you. Philg88 ^♦talk 07:24, 25 December 2015 (UTC)[reply]

April 2016

You may be blocked from editing without further warning the next time you add unsourced material to Wikipedia. You've been doing this on many articles. Furthermore, you've already received numerous warnings about it, yet you haven't bettered your editorial pattern in the slightest, and have only continued with this highly disruptive, policy-breaking behaviour. - LouisAragon (talk) 13:14, 29 April 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Copying within Wikipedia requires proper attribution

Thank you for your contributions to Wikipedia. It appears that you copied or moved text from History of Balochistan into Quetta. While you are welcome to re-use Wikipedia's content, here or elsewhere, Wikipedia's licensing does require that you provide attribution to the original contributor(s). When copying within Wikipedia, this is supplied at minimum in an edit summary at the page into which you've copied content. It is good practice, especially if copying is extensive, to also place a properly formatted {{copied}} template on the talk pages of the source and destination. If you have copied material between pages before, even if it was a long time ago, please provide attribution for that duplication. You can read more about the procedure and the reasons at Wikipedia:Copying within Wikipedia. Thank you. — Diannaa (talk) 18:58, 9 May 2016 (UTC)[reply]

May 2016

You may be blocked from editing without further warning the next time you add unsourced material to Wikipedia. - LouisAragon (talk) 16:08, 29 May 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Problems with upload of File:Nazimuddin1.jpg

Thanks for uploading File:Nazimuddin1.jpg. You don't seem to have said where the image came from, who created it, or what the copyright status is. We require this information to verify that the image is legally usable on Wikipedia, and because most image licenses require giving credit to the image's creator.

To add this information, click on this link, then click the "Edit" tab at the top of the page and add the information to the image's description. If you need help, post your question on Wikipedia:Media copyright questions.

For more information on using images, see the following pages:

Thank you for your cooperation. --ImageTaggingBot (talk) 20:10, 7 June 2016 (UTC)[reply]

June 2016

You have been blocked indefinitely from editing for continued disruption, including persistent addition of unsourced content and a refusal to discuss said changes. Once the block has expired, you are welcome to make useful contributions. If you think there are good reasons why you should be unblocked, you may appeal this block by first reading the guide to appealing blocks, then adding the following text to the bottom of your talk page: {{unblock|reason=Your reason here ~~~~}}. Yamaguchi先生 (talk) 19:14, 8 June 2016 (UTC)[reply]

This user's unblock request has been reviewed by an administrator, who declined the request. Other administrators may also review this block, but should not override the decision without good reason (see the blocking policy).

Akahddlo (block log • active blocks • global blocks • contribs • deleted contribs • filter log • creation log • change block settings • unblock • checkuser (log))

Request reason:

I will post appropriate reference. Sometimes it's difficult to get reference since the info is well known to locals Akahddlo (talk) 19:53, 20 June 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Decline reason:

You probably should not have ignored all of those warnings you've been receiving for months. Please take the time to read our policies on copyrights, verifiability and reliable sources. If you wish to be unblock, you'll need to do a better job of convincing us that you understand why you are blocked. OhNoitsJamie ^Talk 20:38, 20 June 2016 (UTC)[reply]

If you want to make any further unblock requests, please read the guide to appealing blocks first, then use the {{unblock}} template again. If you make too many unconvincing or disruptive unblock requests, you may be prevented from editing this page until your block has expired. Do not remove this unblock review while you are blocked.

This user's unblock request has been reviewed by an administrator, who declined the request. Other administrators may also review this block, but should not override the decision without good reason (see the blocking policy).

Akahddlo (block log • active blocks • global blocks • contribs • deleted contribs • filter log • creation log • change block settings • unblock • checkuser (log))

Request reason:

I have read the guide to appealing blocks. Also read policies on copyrights, verifiability and reliable sources. Will adhere to the policies.Thank you.

Decline reason:

OK, you have paraphrased the comment fromOhnoitsjamie. But in view of your previous behavior I would like to know why you ignored previous warnings; also, what now is your understanding of a reliable source? --Anthony Bradbury^"talk" 19:47, 5 July 2016 (UTC)[reply]

If you want to make any further unblock requests, please read the guide to appealing blocks first, then use the {{unblock}} template again. If you make too many unconvincing or disruptive unblock requests, you may be prevented from editing this page until your block has expired. Do not remove this unblock review while you are blocked.

ArbCom Elections 2016: Voting now open!

Hello, Akahddlo. Voting in the 2016 Arbitration Committee elections is open from Monday, 00:00, 21 November through Sunday, 23:59, 4 December to all unblocked users who have registered an account before Wednesday, 00:00, 28 October 2016 and have made at least 150 mainspace edits before Sunday, 00:00, 1 November 2016.

The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.

If you wish to participate in the 2016 election, please review the candidates' statements and submit your choices on the voting page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 22:08, 21 November 2016 (UTC)[reply]