User talk:Airbovu

Welcome!

Hello, Airbovu, and welcome to Wikipedia! Thank you for your contributions, especially your edits to Timothé Luwawu-Cabarrot. I hope you like the place and decide to stay. Here are a few links to pages you might find helpful:

You may also want to complete the Wikipedia Adventure, an interactive tour that will help you learn the basics of editing Wikipedia. You can visit the Teahouse to ask questions or seek help.

Please remember to sign your messages on talk pages by typing four tildes (~~~~); this will automatically insert your username and the date. If you need help, check out Wikipedia:Questions, ask me on my talk page, or ask for help on your talk page, and a volunteer should respond shortly. Again, welcome! JesseRafe (talk) 17:49, 16 October 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Rollback

I've used rollback on some of your edits as you're using a 6 year old source to trump a current source. No, just no. You should probably stay away from heights and weights before you get blocked for disruption. – ².O.^Boxing 17:24, 31 January 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Common sense is to use the heights and weights people are listed at for infobox parameters that say Listed height and Listed weight. Using old sources--that you quite clearly know are wrong--because you think the official listings are wrong is disruptive and verging on vandalism. If you want to do silly things like that then you should volunteer your time at one of those celebrity height websites. – ².O.^Boxing 12:03, 1 February 2023 (UTC)[reply]

I basically agree with you, but your threatening and condescending manners don't impress anyone. The fact that you behave almost like a policeman every time you discuss or delete a poor change of information (everything is sourced, what's more) to surely flatter your ego on a f*cking website called Wikipedia leaves me doubtful about your person my dear. There are ways to talk to people who are VOLUNTEERS but surely you haven't understood them yet. May God help you! Airbovu (talk) 18:42, 1 February 2023 (UTC)[reply]

You've been told three times (the last being a warning by an admin) what the issue is. You use the correct source when it matches your opinion[1] but choose to discount it when it doesn't. At this point, nobody is looking to impress you with flowery language. Telling you the inevitable outcome of your disruption isn't a threat, my dear, it's simply telling you the inevitable outcome of your disruption. You can always carry on with your disruptive ways and see how long you keep your editing privileges. WP:Personal attacks are also a good way to find yourself blocked. And I don't believe in mythical beings, so one can't help me. Cheers though. – ².O.^Boxing 21:24, 1 February 2023 (UTC)[reply]

ArbCom 2023 Elections voter message

Hello! Voting in the 2023 Arbitration Committee elections is now open until 23:59 (UTC) on Monday, 11 December 2023. All eligible users are allowed to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once.

The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.

If you wish to participate in the 2023 election, please review the candidates and submit your choices on the voting page. If you no longer wish to receive these messages, you may add {{NoACEMM}} to your user talk page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 00:45, 28 November 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Alex Sarr

Thanks for the source at Alex Sarr. In the future, always cite your sources. Anything that is not properly sourced can be challenged and reverted. DaHuzyBru (talk) 14:15, 29 December 2023 (UTC)[reply]