User talk:Ahwiv

Salary — Preceding unsigned comment added by 2405:204:909C:7C3:FD46:D53A:7522:C92B (talk) 19:39, 13 February 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Welcome

Welcome!

Hello, Ahwiv, and welcome to Wikipedia! Thank you for your contributions. I hope you like the place and decide to stay. Here are some pages that you might find helpful:

I hope you enjoy editing here and being a Wikipedian! Please sign your messages on discussion pages using four tildes (~~~~); this will automatically insert your username and the date. If you need help, check out Wikipedia:Questions, ask me on my talk page, or ask your question on this page and then place {{helpme}} before the question. Again, welcome! Aboutmovies (talk) 12:03, 30 December 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Links

Welcome to Wikipedia. Although everyone is welcome to contribute constructively to the encyclopedia, one or more of the external links you added do not comply with our guidelines for external links and have been removed. Wikipedia is not a collection of links; nor should it be used for advertising or promotion. Since Wikipedia uses nofollow tags, external links do not alter search engine rankings. If you feel the link should be added to the article, please discuss it on the article's talk page before reinserting it. Please take a look at the welcome page to learn more about contributing to this encyclopedia. Thank you. --Ronz (talk) 17:28, 11 January 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Cedar Island Light

This is an automated message from CorenSearchBot. I have performed a web search with the contents of Cedar Island Light, and it appears to be very similar to another Wikipedia page: Cedar Point County Park. It is possible that you have accidentally duplicated contents, or made an error while creating the page— you might want to look at the pages and see if that is the case. If you are intentionally moving or duplicating content, please be sure you have followed the procedure at Wikipedia:Splitting by acknowledging the duplication of material in edit summary to preserve attribution history.

This message was placed automatically, and it is possible that the bot is confused and found similarity where none actually exists. If that is the case, you can remove the tag from the article and it would be appreciated if you could drop a note on the maintainer's talk page. CorenSearchBot (talk) 03:55, 7 February 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Horse Island (Sacketts Harbor) Light

I'm reviewing new pages. I came across this article that you created. I don't know whether you realize, but in some sense this is a negative step: it causes someone else more work than you put in it. I presume you cut-and-pasted the material. But I'm not sure whether it was from a copyrighted source. That's a big problem, because it means to fix it (or even to mark it patrolled) I would have to do research. Then, there's the task of actually fixing the non-standard formatting and content. I'm not an expert on the subject, so again, I would need to work carefully. So, if it took you 15 minutes to create the page, it would probably take me an hour to fix it. Whereas, if I had created it myself, I could have created it in 15 minutes, just as you did. But it wouldn't need another hour's work. Marking the article as "patrolled" has been avoided by other editors for days, so there's a good chance this article will just roll into the not-so-good Wiki article status, and stay there indefinitely. All that aside, the information looks interesting, and certainly better than a lot of the stubs which give the reader pretty much nothing interesting, so I'd encourage you, who probably is in the best position, to do a little more spit-and-polish. Regards, Piano non troppo (talk) 17:52, 18 February 2009 (UTC)[reply]

The text is from the USCG site, the second link on the page, and I will clean it up as my time permits. I've had a few things delay that work. Ahwiv (talk) 01:19, 19 February 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Re: Light vs Lighthouse

I will not. The discussion you linked hardly came to a definitive conclusion; you can see that the issue was re-raised in 2008, but the stated concerns were never really addressed. Furthermore, this particular article has a number of mitigating circumstances, primarily that it is a retired light and thus the Coast Guard doesn't have any authority over its name. Besides, the article is clearly about the building, not the light at its pinnacle. In sum, WP:COMMONNAME trumps a 3-year-old discussion on a talk page as far as having community support. Powers ^T 19:15, 15 June 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Proposed deletion of Burton C. Gray

The article Burton C. Gray has been proposed for deletion because, under Wikipedia policy, all newly created biographies of living persons must have at least one reference to a reliable source that directly supports material in the article.

If you created the article, please don't be offended. Instead, consider improving the article. For help on inserting references, see Referencing for beginners, or ask at the help desk. Once you have provided at least one reliable source, you may remove the {{prod blp}} tag. Please do not remove the tag unless the article is sourced. If you cannot provide such a source within ten days, the article may be deleted, but you can request that it be undeleted when you are ready to add one. France3470 (talk) 19:41, 19 October 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Disambiguation link notification (for Ahwiv)

Hi, this message is to let you know about disambiguation links you've recently created. A link to a disambiguation page is almost always unintended, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of "Did you mean..." article titles. For more information, see the FAQ or drop a line at the DPL WikiProject.

Jacob Morton (check to confirm | fix with Dab solver)

was linked to Grand Master

Any suggestions for improving this automated tool are welcome. Thanks, DPL bot (talk) 18:35, 14 November 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Speedy deletion nomination of List of Grand Line of the Grand Lodge of New York

If this is the first article that you have created, you may want to read the guide to writing your first article.
You may want to consider using the Article Wizard to help you create articles.

A tag has been placed on List of Grand Line of the Grand Lodge of New York requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia. This has been done under section A7 of the criteria for speedy deletion, because the article appears to be about a club, but it does not indicate how or why the subject is important or significant: that is, why an article about that subject should be included in an encyclopedia. Under the criteria for speedy deletion, such articles may be deleted at any time. Please see the guidelines for what is generally accepted as notable.

If you think that the page was nominated in error, contest the nomination by clicking on the button labelled "Click here to contest this speedy deletion" in the speedy deletion tag. Doing so will take you to the talk page where you can explain why you believe the page should not be deleted. You can also visit the page's talk page directly to give your reasons, but be aware that once a page is tagged for speedy deletion, it may be removed without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag yourself, but do not hesitate to add information that is consistent with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines. If the page is deleted, you can contact one of these administrators to request that the administrator userfy the page or email a copy to you. MSJapan (talk) 23:19, 29 December 2012 (UTC)[reply]

RFC at WikiProject Freemasonry

While you are not listed as a project member, I thought I would extend the courtesy of notification, as this is obviously an issue you are involved with. See: WT:WikiProject Freemasonry#Dispute over instructions at Category:Freemasons. Best - Blueboar (talk) 12:23, 6 April 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Removing "alt" from image

Thanks for your edit to Church of St John the Baptist, Frome but I wondered why you removed the "alt" label from the description of the image? Wikipedia:Accessibility dos and don'ts says it is good practice to "provide alt text and a caption for most images". My understanding this helps those use text to speech readers understand what is in the image.— Rod ^talk 07:11, 4 May 2017 (UTC)[reply]

User:Rodw The format used didn't support an alt text. didn't notice alt= parm is the proper way, but have resolved that. Thanks. Ahwiv (talk) 10:37, 4 May 2017 (UTC)[reply]

coordinates of Lancaster Cathedral

Yes, I'd just worked out that the coords have been presented in the correct way a bit further down the infobox - sorry about that. Something about the wording of your edit summary made me think you were just removing coords because the parameters weren't recognised! PamD 15:22, 15 May 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Template:Convert

I noticed your edit at Omeena County, Michigan (diff). The parameter area_total_sq_mi requires a valid number. There must be no unit because square miles is assumed from the parameter name. Also, there must be no other text. That means it is not possible to have something like 600+ sq mi. If the infobox has a parameter such as area the following convert could be used:

|area = {{convert|600|sqmi|km2|abbr=on|disp=preunit|+ }} → 600+ sq mi (1,600+ km²)

It is better to use the unit km2 rather than a superscripted unit such as km² because people learn how to use templates from seeing examples, and convert provides simple units that people can easily type. Johnuniq (talk) 08:06, 23 August 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Please fix Omeena County, Michigan because there is an error in the infobox. I have not seen the sources, so my fix would be to either remove the information or revert the last edit. Johnuniq (talk) 05:26, 24 August 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Non-breaking spaces

I just repaired a number of pages which were broken after you added non-breaking spaces to their infoboxes. Non-breaking spaces should never be added this way, even if they don’t immediately cause errors, as they are very hard for editors to recognise so might cause problems in future. If you need a non-breaking space use the HTML element or the template {{nbsp}}: see MOS:NBSP.--JohnBlackburne^words_deeds 22:05, 27 November 2017 (UTC)[reply]

@JohnBlackburne: Funny. I fixed a bunch today that someone else had created. Looking at your contributions, looks like you found the same pages I found, but I didn't fix all the problems. How did you find the issue? Ahwiv (talk) 03:17, 28 November 2017 (UTC)[reply]

The pages were in the Category:Pages with script errors, and on visiting them were displaying errors; you can still see the errors if you look at an old version such as this. A visual inspection of the wikitext looked normal, so I copied the relevant table’s source into BBEdit and turned on show invisible characters which highlighted the odd characters. Once I had done one the rest were easy--JohnBlackburne^words_deeds 03:48, 28 November 2017 (UTC)[reply]

@JohnBlackburne: Thanks. Didn't know about that category. Ahwiv (talk) 12:22, 28 November 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Port of Gdynia

I don't understand the edit summary you left for this edit. You mentioned 'unknown parameter'. Unknown to who? It is part of the template. Is it unknown to you? Fob.schools (talk) 08:08, 9 December 2017 (UTC)[reply]

@Fob.schools:Actually unknown to the template. There is a section of the template that looks for unknown parameters, and this section was not updated when you added 'locode' to the template. When I searched the template, I misspelled 'locode' so I didn't see it. I've updated the template to check for the parameter, and reverted my update to the Port of Gdynia. Ahwiv (talk) 17:21, 9 December 2017 (UTC)[reply]

remember

Dont make unnecessary changes in any articles. Recently you changed UnovaRPG. Nepallove you 04:30, 7 January 2018 (UTC) — Preceding unsigned comment added by NepalMyMotherland (talk • contribs)

@NepalMyMotherland: Yes I did change UnovaRPG, and it was a necessary change since 'wedsite' and 'website' are unknown parameters, and there is no alternative. Ahwiv (talk) 13:46, 7 January 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Actually, it would have been better to fix the typo than to delete the parameter. —C.Fred (talk) 04:36, 7 January 2018 (UTC)[reply]

@C.Fred: I would have if 'website' was a valid parameter. It isn't. No one has added it back. Ahwiv (talk) 13:43, 7 January 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Disambiguation link notification for February 27

Hi. Thank you for your recent edits. An automated process has detected that when you recently edited Radio10, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Nickerie (check to confirm | fix with Dab solver). Such links are usually incorrect, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of unrelated topics with similar titles. (Read the FAQ • Join us at the DPL WikiProject.)

It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot (talk) 09:11, 27 February 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Party of the European Left

Please see the talk page to see why I tried to change the infobox template. Thanks in advance. Ezhao02 (talk) 23:40, 19 April 2018 (UTC)[reply]

ArbCom 2018 election voter message

Hello, Ahwiv. Voting in the 2018 Arbitration Committee elections is now open until 23.59 on Sunday, 2 December. All users who registered an account before Sunday, 28 October 2018, made at least 150 mainspace edits before Thursday, 1 November 2018 and are not currently blocked are eligible to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once.

The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.

If you wish to participate in the 2018 election, please review the candidates and submit your choices on the voting page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 18:42, 19 November 2018 (UTC)[reply]

ArbCom 2018 election voter message

Hello, Ahwiv. Voting in the 2018 Arbitration Committee elections is now open until 23.59 on Sunday, 3 December. All users who registered an account before Sunday, 28 October 2018, made at least 150 mainspace edits before Thursday, 1 November 2018 and are not currently blocked are eligible to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once.

The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.

If you wish to participate in the 2018 election, please review the candidates and submit your choices on the voting page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 18:42, 19 November 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Your access to AWB may be temporarily removed

Hello Ahwiv! This message is to inform you that due to editing inactivity, your access to AutoWikiBrowser may be temporarily removed. If you do not resume editing within the next week, your username will be removed from the CheckPage. This is purely for routine maintenance and is not indicative of wrongdoing on your part. You may regain access at any time by simply requesting it at WP:PERM/AWB. Thank you! — MusikBot II ^talk 17:02, 24 September 2020 (UTC)[reply]