User talk:EnjoyLife1

Welcome!

Hello and welcome to Wikipedia. Thank you for your contributions. I hope you like the place and decide to stay. The following links will help you begin editing on Wikipedia:

Please bear these points in mind while editing Wikipedia:

Respect copyrights – do not copy and paste text or images directly from other websites.
Maintain a neutral point of view – this is one of Wikipedia's core policies.
Take particular care while adding biographical material about a living person to any Wikipedia page and follow Wikipedia's Biography of Living Persons policy. Particularly, controversial and negative statements should be referenced with multiple reliable sources.
No edit warring or abuse of multiple accounts.
If you are testing, please use the Sandbox to do so.
Do not add troublesome content to any article, such as: copyrighted text, libel, advertising or promotional messages, and text that is not related to an article's subject; doing so will result in your account or IP being blocked from editing.
Do not use talk pages as discussion or forum pages as Wikipedia is not a forum.

The Wikipedia tutorial is a good place to start learning about Wikipedia. If you have any questions, see the help pages, add a question to the village pump or ask me on my talk page. By the way, you can sign your name on Talk and discussion pages using four tildes, like this: ~~~~ (the software will replace them with your signature and the date). Again, welcome! —C.Fred (talk) 20:22, 6 June 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Teahouse talkback: you've got messages!

Hello, EnjoyLife1. Your question has been answered at the Teahouse Q&A board. Feel free to reply there!
Please note that all old questions are archived after 2-3 days of inactivity. Message added by DES ^(talk)_{DESiegel Contribs} 23:53, 12 May 2020 (UTC). (You can remove this notice at any time by removing the {{teahouse talkback}} template).[reply]

Nicki Minaj

Can you guys please change Nicki Minaj photo on her Wikipedia page from 2010 to a updated one every other celeb has a updated photo Nicki Minaj needs one Ahshion1 (talk) 08:32, 6 June 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Yes that’s why i asked can somebody change the photo for me because i can’t do it Ahshion1 (talk) 18:54, 6 June 2020 (UTC)[reply]

The photo must be under a free license. You can't just find a picture online and claim it to be under a free license; you must have evidence of the license. —C.Fred (talk) 00:55, 7 June 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Image without license

Unspecified source/license for File:Nicki.Jpeg

Thanks for uploading File:Nicki.Jpeg. The image has been identified as not specifying the copyright status of the image, which is required by Wikipedia's policy on images. Even if you created the image yourself, you still need to release it so Wikipedia can use it. If you don't indicate the copyright status of the image on the image's description page, using an appropriate copyright tag, it may be deleted some time after the next seven days. If you made this image yourself, you can use copyright tags like {{PD-self}} (to release all rights), {{self|cc-by-sa-4.0}} (to require that you be credited), or any tag here - just go to the image, click edit, and add one of those. If you have uploaded other images, please verify that you have provided copyright information for them as well.

For more information on using images, see the following pages:

This is an automated notice by MifterBot. For assistance on the image use policy, see Wikipedia:Media copyright questions. NOTE: Once you correct this, please remove the tag from the image's page. --MifterBot ^{(Talk • Contribs • Owner)} 19:45, 6 June 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Unspecified source/license for File:Lauren.jpeg

Thanks for uploading File:Lauren.jpeg. The image has been identified as not specifying the copyright status of the image, which is required by Wikipedia's policy on images. Even if you created the image yourself, you still need to release it so Wikipedia can use it. If you don't indicate the copyright status of the image on the image's description page, using an appropriate copyright tag, it may be deleted some time after the next seven days. If you made this image yourself, you can use copyright tags like {{PD-self}} (to release all rights), {{self|cc-by-sa-4.0}} (to require that you be credited), or any tag here - just go to the image, click edit, and add one of those. If you have uploaded other images, please verify that you have provided copyright information for them as well.

For more information on using images, see the following pages:

This is an automated notice by MifterBot. For assistance on the image use policy, see Wikipedia:Media copyright questions. NOTE: Once you correct this, please remove the tag from the image's page. --MifterBot ^{(Talk • Contribs • Owner)} 19:46, 6 June 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Unspecified source/license for File:Nicki.jpeg

Thanks for uploading File:Nicki.jpeg. The image has been identified as not specifying the copyright status of the image, which is required by Wikipedia's policy on images. Even if you created the image yourself, you still need to release it so Wikipedia can use it. If you don't indicate the copyright status of the image on the image's description page, using an appropriate copyright tag, it may be deleted some time after the next seven days. If you made this image yourself, you can use copyright tags like {{PD-self}} (to release all rights), {{self|cc-by-sa-4.0}} (to require that you be credited), or any tag here - just go to the image, click edit, and add one of those. If you have uploaded other images, please verify that you have provided copyright information for them as well.

For more information on using images, see the following pages:

This is an automated notice by MifterBot. For assistance on the image use policy, see Wikipedia:Media copyright questions. NOTE: Once you correct this, please remove the tag from the image's page. --MifterBot ^{(Talk • Contribs • Owner)} 19:46, 6 June 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Speedy deletion of File:Nicki.jpeg

The page File:Nicki.jpeg has been speedily deleted from Wikipedia. This was done under section F9 of the criteria for speedy deletion, because the file appeared to be a blatant copyright infringement of https://www.biography.com/musician/nicki-minaj. For legal reasons, we cannot accept copyrighted text or images taken from other web sites or printed material, and as a consequence, your addition has been deleted. Wikipedia takes copyright violations very seriously and persistent violators will be blocked from editing.

If the image belongs to you, and you want to allow Wikipedia to use it — which means allowing other people to use it for any reason — then you must verify that externally by one of the processes explained at Wikipedia:Donating copyrighted materials. The same holds if you are not the owner but have their permission. If you are not the owner and do not have permission, see Wikipedia:Requesting copyright permission for how you may obtain it. You might want to look at Wikipedia's copyright policy for more details, or ask a question here.

Please do not recreate the material without addressing these concerns, but do not hesitate to add information in line with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines. If you think this page should not have been deleted for this reason, you may contact the deleting administrator, or if you have already done so, you may open a discussion at Wikipedia:Deletion Review —C.Fred (talk) 20:24, 6 June 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Ok well since your deleting work why don’t you add a new photo her wikepedia page that people has been asking for ever Ahshion1 (talk) 20:26, 6 June 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Because finding a free image of her is not on my priority list. —C.Fred (talk) 20:36, 6 June 2020 (UTC)[reply]

(edit conflict) The files are being deleted because you are putting the Wikimedia Foundation in a legally culpable position by uploading copyrighted images. If there are no new free images available for an article then we use the ones we have that include the required licensing. Period. Please read the policies being provided to you in the messages above if you will be editing here.-- Jezebel's Ponyo^{bons mots} 20:38, 6 June 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Also, please stop marking all of your edits as minor. Minor denotes edits that are simple typo corrections or reversion or vandalism. Any edit that changes the meaning of an article is not a minor edit, even if it only concerns a single word. See Help:Minor Edit.-- Jezebel's Ponyo^{bons mots} 20:41, 6 June 2020 (UTC)[reply]

June 2020

Please do not add or change content without citing a reliable source. Please review the guidelines at Wikipedia:Citing sources and take this opportunity to add references to the article. Thank you. Cornerstonepicker (talk) 02:40, 7 June 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Actually those are all reliable sources. It’s public and where i got the information is reliable sources that are articles. So you need to do your research on a artist before you write me. Thank you and i will be writing it again and citing the source Ahshion1 (talk) 02:43, 7 June 2020 (UTC)[reply]

You did not provide a reliable source with the claim from Forbes. You can't just cite the entire website; you need to cite the specific article/webpage where the statistic is found. —C.Fred (talk) 03:00, 7 June 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Further, chartdata.org is on the list of website to avoid, per WP:BADCHARTS. —C.Fred (talk) 03:02, 7 June 2020 (UTC)[reply]

It’s pretty obvious you cowards have a issue with Nicki Minaj that you keep trying to take away her accomplishments. Ahshion1 (talk) 02:45, 7 June 2020 (UTC)[reply]

If multiple editors are informing you that you are not using reliable sources (i.e. sourcing meeting WP:RS, not just whatever you can find online) to support your edits, the correct response is to listen to what they say and educate yourself, not to lash out. Any more of this type of behaviour will likely lead to a block, so you'd be better served by reading through the guidelines and policies that are being pointed out to you.-- Jezebel's Ponyo^{bons mots} 19:52, 7 June 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Image without license

Unspecified source/license for File:NickiNew.jpg

Thanks for uploading File:NickiNew.jpg. The image has been identified as not specifying the copyright status of the image, which is required by Wikipedia's policy on images. Even if you created the image yourself, you still need to release it so Wikipedia can use it. If you don't indicate the copyright status of the image on the image's description page, using an appropriate copyright tag, it may be deleted some time after the next seven days. If you made this image yourself, you can use copyright tags like {{PD-self}} (to release all rights), {{self|cc-by-sa-4.0}} (to require that you be credited), or any tag here - just go to the image, click edit, and add one of those. If you have uploaded other images, please verify that you have provided copyright information for them as well.

For more information on using images, see the following pages:

This is an automated notice by MifterBot. For assistance on the image use policy, see Wikipedia:Media copyright questions. NOTE: Once you correct this, please remove the tag from the image's page. --MifterBot ^{(Talk • Contribs • Owner)} 05:45, 7 June 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Further research showed this image is a wire photo and not under a free license. It has been speedy deleted. —C.Fred (talk) 15:39, 7 June 2020 (UTC)[reply]

June 2020

Please stop your disruptive editing. If you continue to add unsourced or poorly sourced content, you may be blocked from editing. Cornerstonepicker (talk) 21:15, 10 June 2020 (UTC)[reply]

November 2022

Please stop your disruptive editing. If you continue to add unsourced or poorly sourced content, as you did at Lauren London, you may be blocked from editing.

thefamouspeople.com is not reliable, and cannot be used as a source in Wikipedia. bonadea contributions talk 15:15, 14 November 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Please stop your disruptive editing. If you continue to vandalize Wikipedia, as you did at Mariah Carey, you may be blocked from editing.

December 2022

Please stop attacking other editors, as you did on Nicki Minaj. If you continue, you may be blocked from editing. Comment on content, not on other contributors or people. PHShanghai | they/them (talk) 10:53, 17 December 2022 (UTC)[reply]

You currently appear to be engaged in an edit war. This means that you are repeatedly changing content back to how you think it should be although other editors disagree. Users are expected to collaborate with others, to avoid editing disruptively, and to try to reach a consensus, rather than repeatedly undoing other users' edits once it is known that there is a disagreement.

Points to note:

Edit warring is disruptive regardless of how many reverts you have made;
Do not edit war even if you believe you are right.

If you find yourself in an editing dispute, use the article's talk page to discuss controversial changes and work towards a version that represents consensus among editors. You can post a request for help at an appropriate noticeboard or seek dispute resolution. In some cases, it may be appropriate to request temporary page protection. If you engage in an edit war, you may be blocked from editing. FMSky (talk) 00:45, 18 December 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Don't use misleading edit summaries

Hello and welcome to Wikipedia. Constructive contributions to Wikipedia are appreciated, but a recent edit of yours has an edit summary that appears to be inadequate, inaccurate, or inappropriate. The summaries are helpful to people browsing an article's history, so it is important that you use edit summaries that accurately tell other editors what you did. Feel free to use the sandbox to make test edits. Thank you. SNUGGUMS (talk / edits) 23:04, 17 December 2022 (UTC)[reply]

You have been blocked from editing for a period of 1 week for persistent additional of unsourced and poorly-sourced content to BLPs and long-term edit warring. Once the block has expired, you are welcome to make useful contributions.

If you think there are good reasons for being unblocked, please read the guide to appealing blocks, then add the following text below the block notice on your talk page: {{unblock|reason=Your reason here ~~~~}}. Ponyo^{bons mots} 17:22, 19 December 2022 (UTC)[reply]

January 2023

Please stop adding unreferenced or poorly referenced biographical content, especially if controversial, to articles or any other Wikipedia page, as you did at Lauren London. Content of this nature could be regarded as defamatory and is in violation of Wikipedia policy. If you continue, you may be blocked from editing Wikipedia. --Hipal (talk) 21:03, 20 January 2023 (UTC)[reply]

How can i be blocked for editing something that’s a reliable source from her BIRTH DATE? I don’t see you or anyone else trying to make her page better and it’s all reliable sources EnjoyLife1 (talk) 21:09, 20 January 2023 (UTC)[reply]

You have been blocked from editing for a period of one month for the continued use of poor sourcing in BLPs and persistent edit warring despite a previous block for the same behaviour. This will be your last timed block; if you cannot understand the requirements for reliable sourcing and continue to edit war to add and restore disputed content, the next block will be indefinite. Once the block has expired, you are welcome to make useful contributions.

If you think there are good reasons for being unblocked, please read the guide to appealing blocks, then add the following text below the block notice on your talk page: {{unblock|reason=Your reason here ~~~~}}. Ponyo^{bons mots} 21:29, 20 January 2023 (UTC)[reply]

ArbCom 2023 Elections voter message

Hello! Voting in the 2023 Arbitration Committee elections is now open until 23:59 (UTC) on Monday, 11 December 2023. All eligible users are allowed to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once.

The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.

If you wish to participate in the 2023 election, please review the candidates and submit your choices on the voting page. If you no longer wish to receive these messages, you may add {{NoACEMM}} to your user talk page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 00:59, 28 November 2023 (UTC)[reply]

ArbCom 2024 Elections voter message

Hello! Voting in the 2024 Arbitration Committee elections is now open until 23:59 (UTC) on Monday, 2 December 2024. All eligible users are allowed to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once.

The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.

If you wish to participate in the 2024 election, please review the candidates and submit your choices on the voting page. If you no longer wish to receive these messages, you may add {{NoACEMM}} to your user talk page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 00:46, 19 November 2024 (UTC)[reply]