User talk:Ahmedelsayedaly

Physical Therapy

Whether or not WHO considers PT an Allied health profession (PT is listed in that article), other major sources do. There may even be some country that doesn't, but English sources do and this is the English Wikipedia.

The editorial community here is united in maintaining this properly sourced information, so if you want to change it, you'll have to present multiple very reliable sources that contradict that view, and you'll have to do this in a discussion at the article's talk page. Until then, your edits will be treated as vandalism, and you will be blocked if you persist. You must have a consensus for making such a change.

FYI, here is an example of WHO classification of phyisiotherapists as "Allied health" personnel: "Major categories of allied health personnel are physiotherapists, occupational therapists, medical laboratory technicians,..." (p. 6)

If they aren't "allied health personnel", then what are they? They aren't alternative medicine, so what are they? -- Valjean (talk) 18:36, 7 September 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Stop your attempts to remove "allied health" from the PT article. -- Valjean (talk) 16:45, 25 February 2022 (UTC)[reply]

They are health care professionals and physical therapy is an independent healthcare profession NOT allied, all newer versions of WHO publications consider it as a healthcare profession Ahmedelsayedaly (talk) 01:40, 9 September 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Being "allied" health care professionals does not mean they are not "health care professionals". Please provide the RS to back your claim, and don't remove the RS that contradict your claim. This article is not limited to India or wherever you're from.

You must discuss this on the article's talk page and get a consensus to make your change, otherwise you'll get blocked. -- Valjean (talk) (PING me) 01:58, 9 September 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Vandalism at Physical Therapy

Please stop your disruptive editing. If you continue to vandalize Wikipedia, as you did at Physical Therapy, you may be blocked from editing.

Stop your attempts to remove "allied health" from the PT article. You have been warned before, so this is vandalism, a blockable offense. -- Valjean (talk) (PING me) 04:29, 6 September 2022 (UTC)[reply]

September 2022

Hello, I'm MrOllie. Wikipedia is written by people who have a wide diversity of opinions, but we try hard to make sure articles have a neutral point of view. Your recent edit to 2022 United Nations Climate Change Conference seemed less than neutral and has been removed. If you think this was a mistake, or if you have any questions, you can leave me a message on my talk page. Thank you. MrOllie (talk) 20:20, 15 September 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Blocked

You have been blocked indefinitely from editing for abuse of editing privileges.

If you think there are good reasons for being unblocked, please read the guide to appealing blocks, then add the following text below the block notice on your talk page: {{unblock|reason=Your reason here ~~~~}}.

Graham87 09:15, 2 October 2022 (UTC)[reply]

F u graham If you have a mind and made little search you will find that Glasgow Caledonian University already offering DPT degree And how you saying that it's not important while all the article is about DPT !! Do you haven't a human brain?? https://www.gcu.ac.uk/study/courses/postgraduate-doctor-of-physiotherapy-pre-registration-glasgow Ahmedelsayedaly (talk) 23:06, 4 October 2022 (UTC)[reply]

This user's unblock request has been reviewed by an administrator, who declined the request. Other administrators may also review this block, but should not override the decision without good reason (see the blocking policy).

Ahmedelsayedaly (block log • active blocks • global blocks • contribs • deleted contribs • filter log • creation log • change block settings • unblock • checkuser (log))

Request reason:

the information is true https://www.gcu.ac.uk/study/courses/postgraduate-doctor-of-physiotherapy-pre-registration-glasgow If not unblocked i'll make a complaint against that member Ahmedelsayedaly (talk) 23:08, 4 October 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Decline reason:

You clearly don't have the temperament required to edit in effectively in this collaborative environment. Jezebel's Ponyo^{bons mots} 23:11, 4 October 2022 (UTC)[reply]

If you want to make any further unblock requests, please read the guide to appealing blocks first, then use the {{unblock}} template again. If you make too many unconvincing or disruptive unblock requests, you may be prevented from editing this page until your block has expired. Do not remove this unblock review while you are blocked.

This user's unblock request has been reviewed by an administrator, who declined the request. Other administrators may also review this block, but should not override the decision without good reason (see the blocking policy).

Ahmedelsayedaly (block log • active blocks • global blocks • contribs • deleted contribs • filter log • creation log • change block settings • unblock • checkuser (log))

Request reason:

all edits are valid and true, but admin Garaham87 abuse users and reverse any good edit which have too many sources on web and some of reversed edits everybody in the world know that's is a fact he just miss use of his role as an admin Ahmedelsayedaly (talk) 10:26, 5 October 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Decline reason:

I am declining your unblock request because it does not address the reason for your block, or because it is inadequate for other reasons. To be unblocked, you must convince the reviewing administrator(s) that

the block is not necessary to prevent damage or disruption to Wikipedia, or
the block is no longer necessary because you
1. understand what you have been blocked for,
2. will not continue to cause damage or disruption, and
3. will make useful contributions instead.

Please read the guide to appealing blocks for more information. Yamla (talk) 10:41, 5 October 2022 (UTC)[reply]

If you want to make any further unblock requests, please read the guide to appealing blocks first, then use the {{unblock}} template again. If you make too many unconvincing or disruptive unblock requests, you may be prevented from editing this page until your block has expired. Do not remove this unblock review while you are blocked.