User talk:Ahmed 313-326

List of Prime Ministers of Pakistan

Hello ahmed 313-326, you made changes to the above article which destroyed its status at FLC. So, I request you not to do the same. If you have any questions I can help you and you're always appreciate to contribute to Wikipedia. Thans, Zia Khan 22:54, 3 January 2013 (UTC)[reply]

January 2013

Hello! Thank you for your contributions to English Wikipedia.

In your edits at List of Prime Ministers of Pakistan and other articles, I notice that you are not providing edit summaries to explain the reasons for your edits. Edit summaries are valuable as a tool for communicating with other contributors. Also, if you have concerns about the information in this or any other article, it may be helpful to use the article talk page (for example, Talk:List of Prime Ministers of Pakistan) to open a discussion with other contributors. Communication can help avoid misunderstandings -- or smoothe things over when misunderstandings do occur. Thank you. --Orlady (talk) 22:18, 5 January 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Welcome!

Hello, Ahmed 313-326, and welcome to Wikipedia! Thank you for your contributions. I hope you like the place and decide to stay. Here are some pages that you might find helpful:

Please remember to sign your messages on talk pages by typing four tildes (~~~~); this will automatically insert your username and the date. If you need help, check out Wikipedia:Questions, ask me on my talk page, or ask your question on this page and then place {{help me}} before the question. Again, welcome! --RJFF (talk) 00:54, 6 January 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Maintenance templates

On Wikipedia, many editors fond maintenance templates on top of articles helpful. They call attention to problems and possibilities of improving the article. Please don't remove them without specifying a reason, as you have done at Islamic democracy. Thank you. --RJFF (talk) 00:54, 6 January 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Disambiguation link notification for January 6

Hi. Thank you for your recent edits. Wikipedia appreciates your help. We noticed though that when you edited Pakistan Tehreek-e-Insaf, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Islamic society (check to confirm | fix with Dab solver). Such links are almost always unintended, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of "Did you mean..." article titles. Read the FAQ • Join us at the DPL WikiProject.

It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot (talk) 11:41, 6 January 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Jamaat-e-Islami‎

Hi, I would like to know what bothers you to the next page Jamaat-e-Islami‎ you are removing valuable information, you could try to explain :) ,thank you Carliitaeliza TALK 18:34, 10 January 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Disambiguation link notification for January 13

Hi. Thank you for your recent edits. Wikipedia appreciates your help. We noticed though that you've added some links pointing to disambiguation pages. Such links are almost always unintended, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of "Did you mean..." article titles. Read the FAQ • Join us at the DPL WikiProject.

Islamism (check to confirm | fix with Dab solver)

added links pointing to Malay and Opposition

Bangladesh Nationalist Party (check to confirm | fix with Dab solver)

added a link pointing to Opposition

It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot (talk) 11:48, 13 January 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Islamism

Hello. I have noticed that you are making a very large number of changes to the article Islamism without providing any edit summaries. The sheer volume of edits, many of which are small but for which you do not cite sources, and the lack of edit summaries or discussion make it very hard for other users to follow what you are doing. I see you have been told about this before, and have not altered your behavior. Once again, please leave edit summaries so that others can understand what you are thinking. Sincerely,TheTimesAreAChanging (talk) 20:35, 13 January 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Your recent edits

Hello. In case you didn't know, when you add content to talk pages and Wikipedia pages that have open discussion, you should sign your posts by typing four tildes ( ~~~~ ) at the end of your comment. You could also click on the signature button or located above the edit window. This will automatically insert a signature with your username or IP address and the time you posted the comment. This information is useful because other editors will be able to tell who said what, and when they said it. Thank you. --SineBot (talk) 20:57, 13 January 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Messages

Hi,the user talk page is for talk about articles,edits and all related with Wikipedia,feel free to answer here or user talk page corresponding,don't ignore messages,I left you a message above about an article you edited,thanks Carliitaeliza TALK 19:21, 18 January 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Edit Summaries

Haven't you agreed to leave edit summaries? Why aren't you? How am I supposed to know why you deleted 6,000 bytes from Muhammad Zia-ul-Haq, unless you leave a short explanation?TheTimesAreAChanging (talk) 01:18, 27 January 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Disambiguation link notification for January 28

Hi. Thank you for your recent edits. Wikipedia appreciates your help. We noticed though that when you edited Pakistan Tehreek-e-Insaf, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Central Executive Committee (check to confirm | fix with Dab solver). Such links are almost always unintended, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of "Did you mean..." article titles. Read the FAQ • Join us at the DPL WikiProject.

It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot (talk) 11:47, 28 January 2013 (UTC)[reply]

WikiProject Pakistan

Welcome!

Hello! You look like someone who might be interested in joining the Pakistan WikiProject and so I thought I'd drop you a line and invite you! We'd love to have you help us :-) Mar4d (talk) 00:24, 1 February 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Hi, and welcome to Wikipedia. I'm from WikiProject Pakistan. We're a group of editors working to improve Wikipedia's coverage of Pakistan.

There are a variety of interesting things to do within the project; you're free to participate however much—or little—you like:

You can give your input at project's main discussion page and keep it on your watchlist: Wikipedia talk:Notice board for Pakistan-related topics.
You can !vote and work on saving articles that are up for deletion at Wikipedia:WikiProject Deletion sorting/Pakistan.
Want to know how good our articles are? The assessment department is working on rating the quality of every Pakistan article in Wikipedia.
Can you code? The automation department uses automated and semi-automated methods to perform batch tasks that would be tedious to do manually.
Please participate in any of our descendant workgroups that might interest you.
Add your name in the members at Wikipedia:WikiProject Pakistan/Members. There's also a user box template which you can put on your user page to identify yourself as a member: {{User WikiProject Pakistan}}

If you have any questions, please don't hesitate to ask me or at the Wikiproject Pakistan noticeboard and we'll be happy to help you. Again, welcome! We are looking forward to see you around!

Mar4d (talk) 00:24, 1 February 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Edit summaries

I noticed that you have recently done a lot of work on Islam and secularism, and I appreciate it. But I also noticed you deleted the section called "Secular women". As you don't seem to leave edit summaries I am curious to know what your rationale for deleting this apparently well-sourced section? Also please make it a habit of using edit summaries, especially when you do major overhauls of articles like you did with this one. --Saddhiyama (talk) 16:24, 1 February 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Citation needed

Hello Ahmed 313-326,

Wikipedia is based on WP:Verifiability. This means that every non-trivial statement should be supported by a reliable source. If another user finds a statement that is not supported by a source, they may tag it with a ^{[citation needed]} note. This is helpful, because other users will be called to attention and, if they know where to look for an appropriate source, add a citation to support the statement. On the other hand, if no source can be found after some time, the statement should be removed, because it is not verifiable. Please do not remove ^{[citation needed]} tags, because they are helpful to other editors and to the Wikipedia project. Thank you. --RJFF (talk) 19:09, 5 February 2013 (UTC)[reply]

February 2013

Please refrain from making unconstructive edits to Wikipedia, as you did at Spread of Islam. Your edits appear to constitute vandalism and have been reverted or removed. If you would like to experiment, please use the sandbox. Thank you. Runehelmet (talk) 12:53, 6 February 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Edit summaries

Edit summary (Briefly describe your changes)

This is a minor edit Watch this page

By publishing changes, you agree to the Terms of Use, and you irrevocably agree to release your contribution under the CC BY-SA 4.0 License and the GFDL. You agree that a hyperlink or URL is sufficient attribution under the Creative Commons license.

Publish changes Show preview Show changes Cancel

The edit summary field appears above the "Save page" button

Please do fill in the edit summary field below the editing box to explain your edits to other users. Otherwise, it is difficult to other users to understand why you make a certain edit, especially when removing content. Thank you. Kind regards. --RJFF (talk) 12:53, 6 February 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Disambiguation link notification for February 7

Hi. Thank you for your recent edits. Wikipedia appreciates your help. We noticed though that when you edited Secularism in Pakistan, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Media (check to confirm | fix with Dab solver). Such links are almost always unintended, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of "Did you mean..." article titles. Read the FAQ • Join us at the DPL WikiProject.

It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot (talk) 11:26, 7 February 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Re: FJP

Hello Ahmed 313-326,

the founding statement of the FJP may call the party Islamic democratic. However, it is not a third-party source and therefore not a reliable source in terms of Wikipedia's guidelines. Wikipedia requires sources that are independent from the subject of the article. Kind regards --RJFF (talk) 13:39, 8 February 2013 (UTC)[reply]

I would be really thankful if you could start using the edit summary field below the editing field to explain your edits, especially if you delete lots of content. --RJFF (talk) 13:51, 8 February 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Sources

Hello Ahmed 313-326,

I would like to ask you to please re-read Wikipedia's policies and guidelines, especially Wikipedia:Verifiability. Every statement that is not trivial needs to be supported by a reliable source. And only third-party sources are usually reliable. First-party claims by the subjects of articles are not reliable. Im UMNO presents itself as democratic is irrelevant as long as third-party sources doubt this. And there are serious doubts if Hamas is democratic. So please don't just dismiss these doubts, but either provide strong, reliable (i.e. secondary and independent) sources or discuss the issue on the talk page to find a consensual solution. --RJFF (talk) 19:27, 8 February 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Hello Ahmed 313-326,

there are no sources cited to verify that the Bosnian SDA or the Malaysian UMNO is Islamist (I've checked the source you cited, it does not contain a commitment to Islamism). Please understand that it is not acceptable on Wikipedia to add content that is not supported by reliable sources, especially if other users call attention to the lack of sources and disagree with including the unsourced content. If you re-enter the contentious statements without adequate sources, you risk to trigger an edit-war, which has to be avoided at any rate. Kind regards. --RJFF (talk) 21:01, 9 February 2013 (UTC)[reply]

By the way, according to Wikipedia's rules, it is always the user who wants to include a certain statement, who is in charge of providing a source, not the user who criticises the unsourced information. (Wikipedia:Verifiability#Burden of evidence. --RJFF (talk) 21:07, 9 February 2013 (UTC)[reply]

March 2013

Please stop your disruptive editing. If you continue to vandalize Wikipedia, as you did at National Assembly (Pakistan), you may be blocked from editing. Until new assembly is convened after elections, don't change the template. Burhan Ahmed | Penny for your thoughts? 13:03, 23 March 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Welcome, and thank you for your attempt to lighten up Wikipedia. However, this is an encyclopedia and the articles are intended to be serious, so please don't make joke edits, as you did to National Assembly (Pakistan)‎. Readers looking for accurate information will not find them amusing. If you'd like to experiment with editing, try the sandbox, where you are given a good deal of freedom in what you write. Please discuss before reverting others' edits! The Article's talk page would be best for it! Faizan (talk) 10:30, 24 March 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Why have you deleted the term "theodemocracy"?

Your edits have, among other things, eliminated the term "theodemocracy" that Maududi used. there is plenty of evidence this concept was important to his ideas (see here) --BoogaLouie (talk) 19:59, 16 April 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Modudi never talked about "theodemocracy". In "Khilafet o mlookiat" he has condemned the whole idea of distinct institution of clergy in Islam. he was simply a Islamist democrat" not a "theodemocrat". --Ahmed 313-326 (talk) 01:45, 17 April 2013 (UTC)[reply]

see reply on talk page --BoogaLouie (talk) 19:50, 18 April 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Deletion of citations

Hello, Ahmed 313-326. You have new messages at Talk:Islamism#Deletion_of_citations.
You can remove this notice at any time by removing the {{Talkback}} or {{Tb}} template.

Why did you delete these citations from the Islamism article without even an edit summary? --BoogaLouie (talk) 19:28, 21 April 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Hello, Ahmed 313-326. You have new messages at Talk:Islamism#.22theodemocracy.22.
You can remove this notice at any time by removing the {{Talkback}} or {{Tb}} template.

Please answer questions about your deletion --20:44, 26 April 2013 (UTC)

Unexplained deletions

Please stop your disruptive editing. Why have you made another unexplained deletion of sourced material while ignoring questions from editors on the Islamism talk page? --BoogaLouie (talk) 21:51, 1 May 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Hello! There is a DR/N request you may have interest in.

This message is being sent to you let you know of a discussion at the Wikipedia:Dispute resolution noticeboard regarding a content dispute discussion you may have participated in. Content disputes can hold up article development and make editing difficult for editors. You do not need to participate however, you are invited to help find a resolution. The thread is "Islamism". Please join us to help form a consensus. Thank you! EarwigBot ^{operator / talk} 00:01, 8 May 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Unsourced content

Please do not add or change content, as you did to Pakistan Muslim League (N), Pakistan Peoples Party and List of political parties in Pakistan without verifying it by citing a reliable source. Please review the guidelines at Wikipedia:Citing sources and take this opportunity to add references to the article. Thank you. --RJFF (talk) 11:01, 15 May 2013 (UTC)[reply]

PML N

Please don't remove content from Pakistan Muslim League (N) again. Faizan -Let's talk! 15:58, 15 May 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Edit summary (Briefly describe your changes)

This is a minor edit Watch this page

By publishing changes, you agree to the Terms of Use, and you irrevocably agree to release your contribution under the CC BY-SA 4.0 License and the GFDL. You agree that a hyperlink or URL is sufficient attribution under the Creative Commons license.

Publish changes Show preview Show changes Cancel

The edit summary field appears above the "Save page" button

Hello Ahmed 313-326,

On Faizan's talk page you write that "References do not prove the points." I don't understand what you mean by that. The cited sources explicitly says that PMLN has "conservative Islamic affiliations". Or do you mean that we should generally not go by references? It would be important that you start providing edit summaries by filling in the little box below the editing field to explain your edits to other users and avoid conflicts or even edit wars. In this case, with more than 2 users involved, it would be even better to take the issue to the respective article's talk page, where there is more space to exchange arguments and discuss in detail. I am convinced that you want to contribute to Wikipedia in a constructive way. But to achieve this, you have to "play by the rules", respect Wikipedia's policies and guidelines, accept that other users may have a different opinion and enter into dialogue with them. Wikipedia is a community project, so if you only try to get your own way, you will not be successful. Instead, you should start to interact with other users to find consensus, or at least a solution that is acceptable for everyone.

Kind regards. --RJFF (talk) 18:31, 15 May 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Agreed with RJFF. I think that you should read WP:NPOV. Faizan -Let's talk! 05:21, 16 May 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Edit warring

Your recent editing history at List of political parties in Pakistan, Pakistan Peoples Party and Pakistan Muslim League (N) shows that you are currently engaged in edit wars. Being involved in an edit war can result in you being blocked from editing—especially if you violate the three-revert rule, which states that an editor must not perform more than three reverts on a single page within a 24-hour period. Undoing another editor's work—whether in whole or in part, whether involving the same or different material each time—counts as a revert. Also keep in mind that while violating the three-revert rule often leads to a block, you can still be blocked for edit warring—even if you don't violate the three-revert rule—should your behavior indicate that you intend to continue reverting repeatedly.

To avoid being blocked, instead of reverting please consider using the article's talk page to work toward making a version that represents consensus among editors. See BRD for how this is done. You can post a request for help at a relevant noticeboard or seek dispute resolution. In some cases, you may wish to request temporary page protection. --RJFF (talk) 17:49, 15 May 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Disambiguation link notification for May 19

Hi. Thank you for your recent edits. Wikipedia appreciates your help. We noticed though that when you edited Jamaat-e-Islami, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Balance (check to confirm | fix with Dab solver). Such links are almost always unintended, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of "Did you mean..." article titles. Read the FAQ • Join us at the DPL WikiProject.

It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot (talk) 22:51, 19 May 2013 (UTC)[reply]

RfC at Talk:Islamism

There's a RfC at Talk:Islamism#Unexplained_deletions directly involving you. --BoogaLouie (talk) 19:48, 23 May 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Here's notifying you -- since you have made no comment to defend your deletions -- that a consensus has been reached to restore your deletions at the Islamism article. ---BoogaLouie (talk) 14:44, 4 June 2013 (UTC)[reply]

PML-N

How about listing both Pakistani nationalism and Punjabi nationalism in the infobox as a compromise? I appreciate your efforts in improving the article, but I tend to disagree as far as this article is concerned. The PML-N generally has its origins and stronghold in Punjab. Even today, most of its seats came from Punjab, the leadership is mostly from Punjab, and the party and it's leaders (especially Shahbaz Sharif) has wide appeal in Punjab province. The party has in the past relied on the Punjabi masses for its political strength in Pakistan. So in my opinion, it should be mentioned in the ideology section of the infobox. Removing it is like denying that the Pakistan Peoples Party does not have Sindhi leanings or the MQM is not inspired by Muhajir nationalism (for the record, I believe that the Peoples Party and MQM articles should also list Sindhi nationalism and Muhajir nationalism in their infobox). It's not about creating ethnic divisions, it's generally got to do with acknowledging where these parties draw the majority of their votebanks from, and it is a fact that provinces and ethnic communities play the most important role in this.

I have not watchlisted your talk page, so if you plan to reply to me here, please let me know on my talk page. Mar4d (talk) 07:12, 5 June 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Deletion

Please do not remove content or templates from pages on Wikipedia, as you did to Muttahida Qaumi Movement, without giving a valid reason for the removal in the edit summary. Your content removal does not appear constructive and has been reverted. Please make use of the sandbox if you'd like to experiment with test edits. Thank you. --RJFF (talk) 23:35, 6 June 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Final warning

This is it. You've been warned half a dozen times across a large number of pages about edit warring. And now you're doing it again at Jat people. And looking over some of the comments, it looks like your edit warring is done simply because of your own opinions, not based upon what is in sources. You simply cannot edit Wikipedia this way. Furthermore, you're doing it on articles in topics under discretionary sanctions--all articles related to caste in India and related countries are subject to sanctions, as are all articles related to India and Pakistan. Even one more instance of problematic behavior on your part, and I'm going to recommend you be blocked or topic banned. Qwyrxian (talk) 00:23, 6 July 2013 (UTC)[reply]

ArbCom elections are now open!

Hi,
You appear to be eligible to vote in the current Arbitration Committee election. The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to enact binding solutions for disputes between editors, primarily related to serious behavioural issues that the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the ability to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail. If you wish to participate, you are welcome to review the candidates' statements and submit your choices on the voting page. For the Election committee, MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 16:58, 24 November 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Asian 10,000 Challenge invite

Hi. The Wikipedia:WikiProject Asia/The 10,000 Challenge has recently started, based on the UK/Ireland Wikipedia:The 10,000 Challenge and Wikipedia:WikiProject Africa/The 10,000 Challenge. The idea is not to record every minor edit, but to create a momentum to motivate editors to produce good content improvements and creations and inspire people to work on more countries than they might otherwise work on. There's also the possibility of establishing smaller country or regional challenges for places like South East Asia, Japan/China or India etc, much like Wikipedia:The 1000 Challenge (Nordic). For this to really work we need diversity and exciting content and editors from a broad range of countries regularly contributing. At some stage we hope to run some contests to benefit Asian content, a destubathon perhaps, aimed at reducing the stub count would be a good place to start, based on the current Wikipedia:WikiProject Africa/The Africa Destubathon which has produced near 200 articles in just three days. If you would like to see this happening for Asia, and see potential in this attracting more interest and editors for the country/countries you work on please sign up and being contributing to the challenge! This is a way we can target every country of Asia, and steadily vastly improve the encyclopedia. We need numbers to make this work so consider signing up as a participant! Thank you. --Ser Amantio di Nicolao^{Che dicono a Signa?}_{Lo dicono a Signa.} 01:01, 20 October 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Requesting edit examination and opinion

Greetings,

Please do visit Talk:Cynthia D. Ritchie#Slander of Benazir Bhutto to examine discussed edits, if you find topic interested requesting your opinion, there.

For neutrality purpose opinion request is being made to users who significantly edited different sides of Pakistani political spectrum articles.

Thanks and regards

Bookku (talk) 12:14, 7 February 2021 (UTC)[reply]