User talk:Ahivarn

Demographics of India

Hi Ahivarn. Do you mind me asking whether you are a Hindu nationalist? I may be misunderstanding, but the edit you recently made to Demographics of India seemed out of place in that article. It might be better in an article on ethnic origins of modern Indians. It seemed, although well sourced, to be "thumping the tub" for a Hindu nationalist agenda. If so, it would not be NPOV, and would be better expressed in some place other than an encyclopedia. AWhiteC (talk) 18:41, 6 September 2010 (UTC)[reply]

well, you sound amusing. Certainly, you are a follower of Islam or Xianity. I am not Hindu nationalist; my addition is well sourced and it's sad that for politically motivated reasons; Indians are forced to think they are foreigners or outsiders. My thinking has nothing to do with religion. But the Aryan myth propagated by west europe certainly has many victims and i was simply trying to provide the correct picture. anyway, all of those who think they are gonna gain dividing Indians; I think they will get back what they are supplying to us.Ahivarn (talk) 18:48, 6 September 2010 (UTC)[reply]

My reading of Haplogroup R1a (Y-DNA) is that there it more likely originates in northern India than eastern Europe, but that there is still uncertainty, also that if northern India is the point of origin, that fact is not incompatible with a later Aryan migration from the western steppes to the Indus Valley region. It would therefore surely be better to keep this controversy out of Demographics of India which is not explicitly about the ethnic origins of modern Indians. AWhiteC (talk) 21:12, 7 September 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Jesus Sutras

Your edits left the article in a confused and inconsistent state regarding Alopen, and in any case, the references concerning the Nestorian Stele are given in the main Nestorian Stele article... AnonMoos (talk) 14:22, 15 September 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Warnings

Note: Always remember to substitute user warning templates. For help on user warnings, see the WikiProject on User Warnings.
Older warnings may have been removed, but are still visible in the page history.
[Admin: block | unblock / Info: contribs | page moves | block log | block list]

Blocked

You have been blocked from editing for 24 hours for violating our policy on civil behavior (specifically, here, in which you intentionally taunted another user and placed a blatantly untrue warning on his page). You may resume constructive editing after the block expires, but continued disruption will result in longer blocks without further warning. Kafziel ^{Complaint Department} 16:06, 15 September 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Reverted edits as Kayastha

Greetings, you brought up some good points at Kayastha, but they were completely unfootnoted on a paged where we're working hard to apply proper referencing, so I reverted them all. Also, you removed half of the quote with no explanation, and removed mention of Muslim Kayasthas, both of which seem suspect. If you can cite/footnote the modifications you want to make (to reputable sources, not just some random website), that'd be great. But don't remove material, especially controversial material, without explanation. Please provide a clear Edit Summary (in the box under your editing window) with every edit you make. MatthewVanitas (talk) 05:57, 28 April 2011 (UTC)[reply]

October 2014

Hi there! Thank you for your contributions to Wikipedia.

When editing Wikipedia, there is a field labeled "Edit summary" below the main edit box. It looks like this:

Edit summary (Briefly describe your changes)

I noticed your recent edit to Islam in Germany does not have an edit summary.Also incude a source for your edit.

Edit summary content is visible in:

Please use the edit summary to explain your reasoning for the edit, or a summary of what the edit changes. Thanks! Physicsmathftw (talk) 13:34, 29 October 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Reference Errors on 8 November

Hello, I'm ReferenceBot. I have automatically detected that an edit performed by you may have introduced errors in referencing. It is as follows:

On the Sayyid page, your edit caused a broken reference name (help). (Fix | Ask for help)

Please check this page and fix the errors highlighted. If you think this is a false positive, you can report it to my operator. Thanks, ReferenceBot (talk) 00:35, 9 November 2014 (UTC)[reply]

ArbCom elections are now open!

Hi,
You appear to be eligible to vote in the current Arbitration Committee election. The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to enact binding solutions for disputes between editors, primarily related to serious behavioural issues that the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the ability to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail. If you wish to participate, you are welcome to review the candidates' statements and submit your choices on the voting page. For the Election committee, MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 14:10, 24 November 2015 (UTC)[reply]

ArbCom 2017 election voter message

Hello, Ahivarn. Voting in the 2017 Arbitration Committee elections is now open until 23.59 on Sunday, 10 December. All users who registered an account before Saturday, 28 October 2017, made at least 150 mainspace edits before Wednesday, 1 November 2017 and are not currently blocked are eligible to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once.

The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.

If you wish to participate in the 2017 election, please review the candidates and submit your choices on the voting page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 18:42, 3 December 2017 (UTC)[reply]

ArbCom 2018 election voter message

Hello, Ahivarn. Voting in the 2018 Arbitration Committee elections is now open until 23.59 on Sunday, 2 December. All users who registered an account before Sunday, 28 October 2018, made at least 150 mainspace edits before Thursday, 1 November 2018 and are not currently blocked are eligible to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once.

The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.

If you wish to participate in the 2018 election, please review the candidates and submit your choices on the voting page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 18:42, 19 November 2018 (UTC)[reply]

ArbCom 2018 election voter message

Hello, Ahivarn. Voting in the 2018 Arbitration Committee elections is now open until 23.59 on Sunday, 3 December. All users who registered an account before Sunday, 28 October 2018, made at least 150 mainspace edits before Thursday, 1 November 2018 and are not currently blocked are eligible to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once.

The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.

If you wish to participate in the 2018 election, please review the candidates and submit your choices on the voting page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 18:42, 19 November 2018 (UTC)[reply]

November 2018

Please refrain from making unconstructive edits to Wikipedia, as you did at Ruhollah Khomeini. Your edits appear to be disruptive and have been or will be reverted.

If you are engaged in an article content dispute with another editor, please discuss the matter with the editor at their talk page, or the article's talk page, and seek consensus with them. Alternatively, you can read Wikipedia's dispute resolution page, and ask for independent help at one of the relevant notice boards.
If you are engaged in any other form of dispute that is not covered on the dispute resolution page, please seek assistance at Wikipedia's Administrators' noticeboard/Incidents.

Please ensure you are familiar with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines, and please do not continue to make edits that appear disruptive. Continual disruptive editing may result in loss of editing privileges. - LouisAragon (talk) 23:03, 23 November 2018 (UTC)[reply]

January 2019

Please do not add or change content, as you did at Ted Bundy, without citing a reliable source. Please review the guidelines at Wikipedia:Citing sources and take this opportunity to add references to the article. Thank you. David J Johnson (talk) 12:19, 4 January 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Hello, I'm Utcursch. I noticed that you recently removed content from Kal Bhairav temple, Ujjain without adequately explaining why. In the future, it would be helpful to others if you described your changes to Wikipedia with an accurate edit summary. If this was a mistake, don't worry; the removed content has been restored. If you would like to experiment, please use the sandbox. If you think I made a mistake, or if you have any questions, you can leave me a message on my talk page. Thanks. utcursch | talk 13:57, 4 January 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Hello, I'm Joshua Jonathan. I wanted to let you know that one or more of your recent contributions to Chinese Buddhism have been undone because they did not appear constructive. If you would like to experiment, please use the sandbox. If you have any questions, you can ask for assistance at the Help Desk. Thanks. Joshua Jonathan -Let's talk! 18:35, 4 January 2019 (UTC)[reply]

April 2019

Please do not add or change content, as you did at Urmila Matondkar, without citing a reliable source. Please review the guidelines at Wikipedia:Citing sources and take this opportunity to add references to the article. Thank you. Fylindfotberserk (talk) 14:01, 7 April 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Please stop adding unsourced content, as you did on List of Apollo astronauts. This violates Wikipedia's policy on verifiability. If you continue to do so, you may be blocked from editing Wikipedia. --- Coffeeandcrumbs 20:18, 22 April 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Sorry Ahivarn (talk) 18:57, 23 April 2019 (UTC)[reply]

You may be blocked from editing without further warning the next time you add unsourced material to Wikipedia, as you did at Gyanvapi Mosque. utcursch | talk 20:21, 26 April 2019 (UTC)[reply]

May 2019

You have been blocked indefinitely from editing for Continuing to add unsourced and making major changes in sourced text,.

If you think there are good reasons for being unblocked, please read the guide to appealing blocks, then add the following text below the block notice on your talk page: {{unblock|reason=Your reason here ~~~~}}. Doug Weller talk 18:38, 2 May 2019 (UTC)[reply]