Jump to content

User talk:Agwin

Page contents not supported in other languages.
From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia
This blocked user's request to have autoblock on their IP address lifted has been reviewed by an administrator, who declined the request.
Agwin (block logactive blocksglobal blockscontribsdeleted contribsfilter logcreation logchange block settingsunblockcheckuser (log))
... (talk · contribs · deleted contribs · nuke contribs · logs · filter log · block user · block log)

Block message:

original block message


Decline reason: Blocked directly. — Vassyana 18:23, 30 August 2007 (UTC)[reply]

This blocked user's request to have autoblock on their IP address lifted has been reviewed by an administrator, who declined the request.
Agwin (block logactive blocksglobal blockscontribsdeleted contribsfilter logcreation logchange block settingsunblockcheckuser (log))
... (talk · contribs · deleted contribs · nuke contribs · logs · filter log · block user · block log)

Block message:

original block message


Decline reason: You have been blocked directly as stated in your block log. Since you have not provided a reason for being unblocked, your request has been declined. You may provide a reason for being unblocked by adding {{unblock | your reason here}} to the bottom of your talk page, but you should read our guide to appealing blocks first. Yamla 18:31, 30 August 2007 (UTC)[reply]

This user's unblock request has been reviewed by an administrator, who declined the request. Other administrators may also review this block, but should not override the decision without good reason (see the blocking policy).

Agwin (block logactive blocksglobal blockscontribsdeleted contribsfilter logcreation logchange block settingsunblockcheckuser (log))


Request reason:

I would like to appologize to CambrideBayWeather. When I saw my name on his talk page it freaked me out. I have no idea who he is and it just scared me. It was just freaky.

Decline reason:

(edit conflict with protection) An apology is not a reason for unblock, see here. Also, you seem to violate WP:SOCK as Agwin12193 (talk · contribs · deleted contribs · nuke contribs · logs · filter log · block user · block log).— Sandstein 18:39, 30 August 2007 (UTC)[reply]


If you want to make any further unblock requests, please read the guide to appealing blocks first, then use the {{unblock}} template again. If you make too many unconvincing or disruptive unblock requests, you may be prevented from editing this page until your block has expired. Do not remove this unblock review while you are blocked.

Reply to your comment on my talk page

[edit]

Fair enough. You were reverting your friend's vandalism on Tiger, so I retract my uw-vandal4im warning to you. However, you weren't blocked for that, you were blocked for reasons described here.

You're also requesting an unblock the wrong way; please see Wikipedia:Appealing a block, and make sure to address the reason you were blocked. --barneca (talk) 18:27, 30 August 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Agwin, you can't unblock yourself. Again, please slow down, and read Wikipedia:Appealing a block. --barneca (talk) 18:28, 30 August 2007 (UTC)[reply]

protected

[edit]

Page protected due to unblock tag abuse SWATJester Denny Crane. 18:37, 30 August 2007 (UTC)[reply]