User talk:Aggie80/Archive 5

This is an archive of past discussions about User:Aggie80. Do not edit the contents of this page. If you wish to start a new discussion or revive an old one, please do so on the current talk page.

Archive 1

←

Archive 3

Archive 4

Archive 5

On phoebli sandbox

Hi, I was wondering why a sandbox keeps getting rejected, I am writing it for myself. Phoebli (talk) 23:34, 22 March 2014 (UTC)

You keep clicking on Submit for Review. That puts it in the queue for review.The Ukulele Dude - Aggie80 (talk) 23:46, 22 March 2014 (UTC)

Peter Laverty Article

Hi, I remembered I had bookmarked my article and have now read your comments. I will delete all unpublished and unverifiable material and resubmit soon. You raise the question of 'notability'. I don't find this a problem. If your refer to Wiki page for Art Gallery of New South Wales you will see all past Directors except two, Laverty being one of them, have a Wikipedia page. And if you look at other art museums/galleries such as MOMA in New York city you would find the same. The conclusion I draw is if someone reaches the position of Director in an internationally prominent art gallery or museum he/she has a notability that satisfies Wikipedia rules. I trust this is sufficient explanation. regards Iantomferry (talk) 00:54, 23 March 2014 (UTC)

Notability may not be a problem, as long as you can provide the independent references, which are totally lacking in the original submission. References to support the awards and positions are important. But also do take some time to work on the grammar. The Ukulele Dude - Aggie80 (talk) 01:13, 23 March 2014 (UTC)

Dear Aggie80, Help?

Dear Aggie80, I am Xiuyue, nice to talk to you! First of all, I want to thank you for your efficiency and adaptability in dealing with my request for review. But I got a rejection and I'm afraid I don't get an elaboration on the reason. I have tried to get into contact with the reviewer. While I am waiting for his/her reply, I notice that you can also help me.So I come to you, thank you for your precious time.So could you please help me review my article and tell me the reason why does it failed to be published? Or could you please give me some suggestions about editing? Publishing an article, collecting audience response and then write an paper on audience study is an important assignment of my course Popular Culture and Technology at University of Massachusetts Boston. It dues at mid-April. I really appreciate if you can help me in this case of emergency! BTW, I am an exchange student from China. I do apologize if my expression is not clear enough. If you have any further questions, please feel free to contact me! Wish you all the best! Yours, Xiuyue link: https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Wikipedia_talk:Articles_for_creation/diaosi my user name: Mindhunter333 Mindhunter333 (talk) 12:49, 23 March 2014 (UTC)

I had to look to figure it out, but when it was first submitted, there was no content, it was blank, that's why it was rejected. Since then the article has been created and now it will need to be reviewed. The issue is that there are over 1000 articles waiting to be reviewed and only a dozen or so volunteers working on the reviews. I see that a someone ran a couple of cleanup scripts on the article, so it is working through the process. We will get to it eventually! The Ukulele Dude - Aggie80 (talk) 13:09, 23 March 2014 (UTC)

Dear Aggie80, Thank you very much! I have finally get my article published though it is still an orphan and requested further polishing of language and erection of grammar.Anyway, I am so excited! I really appreciate your devotion to this volunteer work! Thank you so so much! Wish you all the best~ Yours, Xiuyue Mindhunter333 (talk) 20:23, 23 March 2014 (UTC)

Dear Aggie80, Thank you so much! I have noticed the improvement you have done to my article. Really appreciate your help! Your feedback is inspiring too. When I put "hillbilly" and "redneck" here, I do not use them as a exact equation in meaning.You may have noticed that according to the survey, 40% Chinese identified themselves as diaosi, so "diaosi" is really a huge word. Various people feel this word can represent some traits of them -- not only the high-educated geeks who are overly intellectual, but also the people who are with mediocre education background. I think what hillbilly and redneck may find diaosi reckon to their personality is diaosi's inferior status in the society. They are all poor and lack the opportunity to adjust into the higher society. Diaosi are despised by "gaofushuai" (tall, rich, handsome)while hillbilly and redneck are despised by WASPs. Maybe, I should also emphasize the diaosi who are not familiar with technology or computer in this article. But the assignment requires us to leave the article alone once being published and to observing how audience think about it, even edit it. All in all, your feedback is really precious.Please allow me to cover your contributions in my paper! Hope genuinely more participation from you in this paper. Wish you all the best, Yours, Xiuyue Mindhunter333 (talk) 00:39, 24 March 2014 (UTC)

Thanks

Thanks for your suggestions on review of my article. 16.11.Rguru (talk) 14:15, 23 March 2014 (UTC).

Hello Sir, My article Victims' rights in India is only an extension of legal interpretations in Indian context only. I strongly feel that it will supplement other Wiki-article such as Victims' rights, Women's rights, etc which deal only with the laws of a particular land. The tag explains that it has no universal contents. As you have guessed , this article is not a primary(Original) research work of mine.About the word lacuna , I admit your suggestion and edited to make it fit for Wikipedia . I certainly want to enrich Wikipedia with this article and hence Awaiting your acceptance . 16.11.Rguru (talk) 01:05, 24 March 2014 (UTC)

clarification

Dear AGGIE80

Can you please clarify where copyright material was used in the submission since all this is my work or work done by the members of the veg-itrade consortium. Many thanks.

With best regards,

Benedikt — Preceding unsigned comment added by Bjsas (talk • contribs) 13:59, 24 March 2014 (UTC)

Any copyright material, including that done by you or Veg-I-Trade cannot be used unless you provide authorization to Wikipedia allowing free distribution of said material. See WP:DCP for what it means to donate the rights to Wikipedia.14:15, 24 March 2014 (UTC)

Junior Writers Awards

Hi Aggie80, thanks you for your suggestion. We have updated. This charity awards is the first time hold, so not much information. It will hold every year and will add more information later. Thanks (121.202.23.184 (talk) 05:18, 23 March 2014 (UTC))

Hi Aggie80, thank you for your suggestion again. Please review the page again. (60.246.245.91 (talk) 02:56, 25 March 2014 (UTC))

Draft:Reliance Foundation

Dear Aggie80, you denied the submission for Reliance Foundation by stating it non-notability content which don't have reliable evidence. I would like to let you that in the references I have added reliable references such news articles from Times of India, a national newspaper company and [[1]]. It is requested, please reviews the references and let me know what else I can improve in that. Thank you!. D Mi^™ 10:55, 25 March 2014 (UTC)

Thanks for moving my article on Lois Etherington Betteridge

Hi, Aggie80: This article is my first Wikipedia submission, so I am new to the AfC process. Took me a couple of days to figure out how my article had got moved, but thanks! Mary K McIntyre (talk) 14:48, 25 March 2014 (UTC)

Hellfreaks wiki unable to add

"Kitty in a basket" is added and I tried to add "the Hellfreaks" with the same type references and notability. That gets rejected and I get absolutely NO reason for as to why besides the notability is incorrect. ANYONE that knows wikipedia knows it is not reliable anyway, the University I work with FORBIDS the use of it, since your page on the "Rolling Stones" has over 25 false or potentially incorrect data just from one glance. You guys need to get it together over there. There is not ONE thing wrong with that article at all, not one since you all never name one. If the band isn't "Big" enough then Kitty in a casket isn't either, I want that reviewer to review my submission since they clearly don't mind adding a freaking page of text.

Youtube adds stuff all the time and with WAY bigger files than freaking text. Your review system is ridiculous, and your text editor is archaic.

RE-REVIEW it and allow it since it is VERIFIED and correct or write me a reason not links to your junk help articles that help no one. What a messy site. — Preceding unsigned comment added by BRMJ (talk • contribs) 00:01, 26 March 2014 (UTC)

Please be civil. You obviously want the article on the site. "Kitty in a basket" doesn't exist. "Kitty in a Casket" has been flagged for the same reason "The Hellfreaks" has been declined. It lacks any independent references and the ability to meet any of the requirements for notability for a musical group. And without signing your articles, no one knows how to get in touch with you.The Ukulele Dude - Aggie80 (talk) 00:12, 26 March 2014 (UTC)

Wikipedia talk:Articles for creation/Shifu Damian Mohler ‎

Hello,

I have been working on the Article about Shifu Damian Mohler for months and it's still not accepted. I always got the same answers about the notability of the subjects...

Meanwhile, the sources are independant and I can find people on wikipedia which have been accepted with less reliable sources than my own article.

Please help me to complete mine. The subject is going to be the head of European Martial Arts Council and he needs to have such an article.

>Thanks for your understanding

Achampen — Preceding unsigned comment added by Achampen (talk • contribs) 06:47, 26 March 2014 (UTC)

So (at the beginning of sentences)

Thank you for your review of this article.

I do not see in Wikipedia:What Wikipedia is not that Wikipedia is "not a grammar book", by which I take it you mean that it does not deal with grammar subjects.

I note the existence of English modal verbs, Syntactic ambiguity, Quirky subject, Thou, Shall and will, Like, Possessive etc., so I think grammar subjects are allowed.

However, as well as grammar, I see the article as a contribution to Applied linguistics, Sociological linguistics and Discourse analysis.

The use of "So" in such a way is a sociological phenomenon, and I think it would be of interest to the general reader.

A very similar article is: High rising terminal, along with the very similar section Like As a discourse particle, filler, hedge, or speech disfluency. Also there are Valleyspeak and Sexy baby voice.

Discourse particle and Discourse marker are also of interest - perhaps my article could be part of these, but it would rather overpower them at the moment. Myrvin (talk) 09:50, 28 March 2014 (UTC)

Lrzarlino

Thank you for helping me. I am only 13 and the robots on this site never give you a change to learn without being kicked off into the abyss. I appreciate your help. My father is sick and tired of the oppression and is taking a break. There is one editor that has tagged our computer so when we try and let people know about our invention like the rest of the world does on Wikipedia he shuts us down. We have reached out to Jimmy Wales. Do you know him? Luke Lrzarlino (talk) 18:58, 28 March 2014 (UTC)

Inventions must be notable and must have independent sources to back them up. Advertising is not allowed. Such things as email addresses and accounts and even phone numbers are not a part of wikipedia. You have much too much personal information on your sandbox, things that could result in being targeted by hackers. There are not many robots on the site, most of it is done by the hundreds of volunteer editors. No, I do not know Jimmy Whales.The Ukulele Dude - Aggie80 (talk) 19:17, 28 March 2014 (UTC)

Jimmy Wales sorry. I was thinking of the big shots in vegas. Let's talk about personal information on and informational web site like this one. Every url has traffic based on content. The last time I checked this site is in the top ten in the US & World. When someone is dead every detail you can find is on the page but when you a living only the companies with tons of money are allowed to put the brand they own this site. Why is that? When my dad first started brending the sync system which was new technology at the time everyone was cool with it. After a while then it became advertising? I don't get it. Gmail Autopilot™ by CADIE accounts over 20% which of the traffic to this site. How do write about that fact? Luke Lrzarlino (talk) 23:07, 28 March 2014 (UTC)

Help with correcting declined article

Hi there, thanks for reviewing my article. I'm a bit new to all this so any help would be greatly appreciated.

You mentioned this is an original theory. The investment theory of creativity has been recognized in the literature since 1991. The theory is widely accepted e.g. see http://www.craigkunce.com/creativity_investing.html , http://www.kent.edu/ehhs/oaa/dissertations/upload/beinejeffery.pdf , http://livingwithlivewires.com/the-investment-theory-of-creativity. Also, Wikipedia references to the investment theory multiple times within https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Creativity . Within google scholar the investment theory is cited by 661 sources...

Does this information give any bearing to the review?

Ok cheers, any thoughts much appreciated - Thomas Friar (talk) 09:54, 30 March 2014 (UTC)

About resubmit

Hi, Aggie80. Thanks for pointing out my problems. I've already modified, and I think it looks better now. I hope it does not like an original research/essay again. ^o^ I've already resubmitted my contribution. This is the requirement of my class and what I submitted is my initial contribution. I know that my references are not enough, and I'll try to add more scholars' viewpoints in my contribution. Thank you for further helping! Yangtana Li (talk) 19:01, 30 March 2014 (UTC)

User:JBBare/sandbox

Thanks for reviewing my submission. I'm working to address the issues before submitting again. You noted that there was "No independent, third-party references to confirm or establish it." I had included references to the assertions and publications listed, so I my understanding is that you were looking for some other kind of reference. Can you tell me more about what you're looking for here?

The key word there is Independent. Your own website just doesn't work. Your own publications are not appropriate as references either. Organizations that you are directly involved in are not really independent either. So if there are independent references in there, I didn't get that far after going through the first bunch. And WP:CHEAT and WP:REFB will give you some of the formatting to make this look like the other Wikipedia entries. And as pointed out, writing your own entry is also a violation. See WP:COI The Ukulele Dude - Aggie80 (talk) 17:53, 31 March 2014 (UTC)

Rejected Content- Abu Dhabi Technology Development Committee

Dear Aggie80,

Thank you for reviewing my article, but I don't understand the reason behind your decision. you mentioned that it violates copy rights. However, the content was developed by TDC and I linked the content to their website.

Please advise how can I submit the article again so it would be published.

Best regards, Hiba — Preceding unsigned comment added by Hibaconsultant (talk • contribs) 05:10, 2 April 2014 (UTC)

That is the issue. It was developed by TDC and they hold the copyright. Unless they are willing to release the material under the terms required by Wikipedia, it cannot be used. The articles on this site must be independent and original content fully referenced with third-party, independent sources.The Ukulele Dude - Aggie80 (talk) 11:22, 2 April 2014 (UTC)

help make me a page

hi, thanks for reviewing my latest page, you marked it for deletion, i am very new to this and would love your help creating a good article, plz reply. thanks — Preceding unsigned comment added by Yesson20 (talk • contribs) 20:41, 2 April 2014 (UTC)

Your article wasn't marked for deletion, just that it was no where near being ready for Wikipedia. The first problem is meeting WP:NMusic notability requirements. With no awards, no chart time, no sales records and no major record label it's pretty difficult to justify an article. If notability can be shown, it has to be supported by independent sources unrelated to the subject. Sales sites like iTunes are not sufficient. And there is the problem of submitting an article on yourself, that is a Conflict of Interest WP:COI.The Ukulele Dude - Aggie80 (talk) 21:06, 2 April 2014 (UTC)

I have added more info, can you please review it once more? here: https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/User:Yesson20/sandbox

Hello can you please tell me What kind of grammar work I need for my article. — Preceding unsigned comment added by Farshad001 (talk • contribs) 06:42, 3 April 2014 (UTC)

Aggie80, you declined my recent submission for https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/User:Abens605/sandbox stating This submission's references do not adequately evidence the subject's notability. What do you suggest I cite to reference the nobility? This is my first submission and I guess I am confused. I thought the reference showing it is the fourth largest in the state showed its nobility. I also researched other school districts on Wikipedia to ensure I was following protocol. Please look at the Cedar Rapids, Iowa school district article. Abens605 (talk) 20:56, 3 April 2014 (UTC)

Serial Concatenated Convolutional Codes

Thank you for your feedback. I have uploaded and linked to Figures.

Mrcodeguy (talk) 23:19, 3 April 2014 (UTC)

Please guide

Sir, I have added the available reference to the article Arjuna Gamang along with a stub tamplet. Please guide me to reach at further secondary reference sources in this regard. Hpsatapathy (talk) 01:56, 4 April 2014 (UTC)

What you have listed as further reading should be used as references to support the main body of the article. WP:REFB provides the basics on how to do inline citations and what references are good.The Ukulele Dude - Aggie80 (talk) 11:24, 4 April 2014 (UTC)

Sir, thanks for the kind guidance. Hpsatapathy (talk) 12:33, 4 April 2014 (UTC)

A barnstar for you!

	The Original Barnstar
	Thanks. Hpsatapathy (talk) 12:36, 4 April 2014 (UTC)

Neoclassical Mischiefism

Hello Aggie80,

Please know that I've updated the draft of "Neoclassical Mischiefism" with an external link of an article regarding on my artwork. Please publish the article as it's important from the standpoint of art history documentation. This is not for artwork promotion but giving the name to something that will need it and and a record that does need to be documented from the timing/art history perspective. I've been told by various sources in the NYC art realm this is something I need to do to document and name the style, and as you can see, a credible source has been included in the link resubmission. Thanks for your attention in publishing it. Kind Regards, Brian — Preceding unsigned comment added by Crudcharger (talk • contribs) 13:54, 4 April 2014 (UTC)

I cannot get to the article cited (perhaps my firewall prevents it). However, one article is not the significant coverage necessary to establish a neologism. See specifically WP:NEO and that Wikipedia is not a place to try and establish such terms.The Ukulele Dude - Aggie80 (talk) 14:22, 4 April 2014 (UTC)

Remodelers Council

Hi Aggie80,

Thank you for reviewing my article on the Remodelers Council. I cited the NAHB Remodelers Council site and they are the ones that established the Remodelers Councils in the USA. I have also cited the Building Industry Association's page that they (BIA) built for us. It states that that we are BIA on the site. I cannot figure out your objections. Those are the sponsors for the Remodelers councils and they are National organizations that both state that we are a part of their organizations. I gave you their pages so you have them on the site and they are the sources. I gave you the NAHB site that states that they formed the Remodelers Council and the ties to the NAHB on the NAHB site. So what is missing? Please advise. (Terryakiwiki (talk) 18:39, 4 April 2014 (UTC))

The problem is exactly as you said, they created the subject and/or created those sites for you. They are not independent sources, they have a vested interest in the organization. WP:REFB helps with the basics of what references are considered reliable and independent. What is needed to establish notability are other organizations or news sources that find the subject notable enough to talk about them.The Ukulele Dude - Aggie80 (talk) 19:26, 4 April 2014 (UTC)

Hi Aggie80,

I will contact the 150 Remodelers council Across the USA about your comments so that we can fix them. I will give them your address so that you may address the concerns with ALL 150 councils. I am sure that you can figure out who is noteable then. — Preceding unsigned comment added by Terryakiwiki (talk • contribs) 19:34, 4 April 2014 (UTC)

With 150 councils, you should be able to find some sources that reference the organization other than members of the subject organization. Surely they have held conferences that have been reported on, awards that they have won and other items. The Ukulele Dude - Aggie80 (talk) 19:40, 4 April 2014 (UTC)

Please clarify

Sir, Thanks for the move. In fact, I am not quite clear about the fate of my article Arjuna Gamang. Whether it is pending for further review or stepping towards deletion process ? How can I participate in the process to develop the article ? Please clarify . Hpsatapathy (talk) 01:06, 5 April 2014 (UTC)

Currently the article shows that it is up for review. You have added several references, now it will be re-reviewed.The Ukulele Dude - Aggie80 (talk) 01:10, 5 April 2014 (UTC)

Thanks for the immediate clarification Sir, Hpsatapathy (talk) 01:16, 5 April 2014 (UTC)

 Mr Aggge80

I like to write my wiki and also like to good wiki bud i make some mistake pls help me to do and tell me to how i can correct way to go? — Preceding unsigned comment added by SjElle (talk • contribs) 01:19, 6 April 2014 (UTC)

Draft:All Power Labs

You commented on the page I created for All Power Labs. Thanks so much for that helpful comment. The page was reviewed and rejected by Hasteur, and since then I have significantly updated it to address yours and Hasteur's comments. His response to my resubmittal was that it was an unspoken rule that another editor should confirm his judgment that it was now appropriate, and make the approval. Are you capable of doing this? Nesdon (talk) 19:58, 6 April 2014 (UTC)

Thaddeus Rutkowski

Aggie - Could you please elaborate about what I would need for the Thaddeus Rutkowski article you rejected? I thought we referenced every fact. Why are the sources "unreliable?"-Randi Hoffman

Your references are not solid ones, there are so many links to Wikipedia (not an acceptable reference) that if there are other good ones in there they are totally overwhelmed. Links to sales sites and publishers carrying the books are not independent (Amazon, Red Books, Coffeehouse Press, etc.). Read WP:REFB to understand the difference between a Wikilink and a good third party reference. The best ones are going to be to the awards that were actually won. I'll try to send a TB notice, but the comment wasn't signed. And be careful! There are now two versions of the article, do not use the one in your Sandbox, use: Wikipedia talk:Articles for creation/Thaddeus Rutkowski The Ukulele Dude - Aggie80 (talk) 16:28, 7 April 2014 (UTC)

This is helpful. But the one recommended for deletion is the extra one, right? I do get another chance to revise this? -Randi — Preceding unsigned comment added by Randihoffman (talk • contribs) 16:58, 7 April 2014 (UTC)

Yes, I marked the one in your Sandbox for deletion to avoid confusion. You can work on the other version. The Ukulele Dude - Aggie80 (talk) 17:15, 7 April 2014 (UTC)

Citations added

Hello - added citations. NBC Nebraskanative (talk) 20:12, 7 April 2014 (UTC)

Wiki Page Topic Confusion

Dear Aggie80,

I am not very experienced with wikipedia yet so I figured this was the best way to contact you, I hope it is suitable. Three days ago you had reviewed my page on Inter-Crater Plains on Mercury, it was rejected. I believe there was a little bit of a misunderstanding and I was not clear with my topic of choice. It is stated my topic already exists, being called "Geology of Mercury" however that is not what my topic is on. I think this may be due to my somewhat lengthy summary of the geology of Mercury just as a quick introduction to the planet in general. Perhaps i need to focus it more on the actual inter-crater plains than the geologic history which is precisely what I thought I've done. I've looked up my topic and cannot find a page on it. If there are some adjustments I could make any suggestions from you would be fantastic.

Kind regards, Ryan — Preceding unsigned comment added by Rfox8 (talk • contribs) 22:59, 7 April 2014 (UTC)

Prof Irfan Shahid

Article removed for space conservation.

— Preceding unsigned comment added by Abusheeth (talk • contribs) 09:25, 9 April 2014 (UTC)

A talk page is not the place to submit an article.11:47, 9 April 2014 (UTC)

Declined Submission: Maroma, Please help

Hello Aggie80,

I am writing to you regarding my article on the company Maroma, a unit of Aravinda Trust. As you can probably tell this is my first wiki article.

I must thank you for your review, it was clear and very timely! Thank you for your efficiency and time, it is much appreciated.

I can make some small changes, like mentioning the products, but regarding the references, i am having a minor issue obtaining the articles other than through the company website. On their website they have published scanned copies of the articles that were written about them from Local (Indian) newspapers and magazines, unfortunately the articles are difficult to trace online as they were scans of physical articles. I did a lot of research, and found that very often the websites of the newspaper/magazines did not have all their articles in their archives. Sometimes i found the link to the article but the link was broken.

I may be able to get my hands on the actual physical copies of some of the articles. I don't know if that helps?

I have received a few of the physical articles, and will be getting more. — Preceding unsigned comment added by Thejokebro (talk • contribs) 07:20, 9 April 2014 (UTC)

Please advise? I am eager and want to complete my article.

Thank you in advance

Thejokebro (talk) 04:46, 9 April 2014 (UTC)

If you can provide the citation for the articles, they can be used. See WP:REFB for the formatting. If there are none available, it may be that the company cannot meet notability requirements. The Ukulele Dude - Aggie80 (talk) 11:50, 9 April 2014 (UTC)

De-Box

Had tried to create an entry for the term De-Box its been rejected but i cant see the comments to resolve the issues Pls advice thanks Kirti Karmarkar Anand (talk) 12:43, 9 April 2014 (UTC)

It's right there at User:Kirti Karmarkar Anand/sandbox with comments. The Ukulele Dude - Aggie80 (talk) 12:52, 9 April 2014 (UTC)

Siege (rapper) article

Hello,

I do understand your decline of this page but there are a number of artists who are on Wikipedia who do not possess nearly the level of references that his article does. In any event, most independent artists never chart or release music via traditional channels-- thus I think it is unfair that you would not consider this article worthy of submission. I will keep an eye out for any progress and update it, and hopefully by then the article could be approved. Thank you for your input.

-WallyBachman82 — Preceding unsigned comment added by Wally Bachman82 (talk • contribs) 07:53, 10 April 2014 (UTC)

And it is possible that the other articles need to be tagged and removed. Just because an article is in main space doesn't mean it belongs there!The Ukulele Dude - Aggie80 (talk) 11:39, 10 April 2014 (UTC)

Alice Piper

I would like to know how many sources are necessary to establish the legitimacy of Alice Piper? I see your point about writing about the case rather than the person, and I will certainly submit an article about her case in the future. However, I think it is truly important to recognize her as an individual first, as there are too few native American heroes that have been recognized, and her time to be recognized is long overdue. Furthermore, she is now finally being honored with a statue. The case is indeed important, but her courage as an individual to fight a system of racism and injustice 90 years ago this June was quite ahead of her time. Again I ask, good sir, what would satisfy you in terms of references? Tsteele71 (talk) 02:21, 11 April 2014 (UTC)

The requirements for notability can be seen at WP:PEOPLE. References that support her meeting any of the criteria there will do it. The basic requirements for references can be found at WP:REFB. Note that it is the criteria that have to be met and satisfied, not me. The Ukulele Dude - Aggie80 (talk) 02:28, 11 April 2014 (UTC)

sir i like to be a good wikipidean pl help me to do — Preceding unsigned comment added by SjElle (talk • contribs) 04:20, 11 April 2014 (UTC)

https://www.google.co.in/search?q=yogu+thala&source=lnms&tbm=isch&sa=X&ei=4stHU6GFAYLOrQf-2ICwBg&ved=0CAYQ_AUoAQ&biw=1280&bih=886#facrc=_&imgdii=_&imgrc=A036OKBIEGZIWM%253A%3BO0WURQjCQJvmWM%3Bhttp%253A%252F%252Fprofile.ak.fbcdn.net%252Fhprofile-ak-frc1%252Ft1.0-1%252Fs200x200%252F1904261_446425408823553_565434904_n.jpg%3Bhttp%253A%252F%252Fmbasic.facebook.com%252Fyogu.thala%3B200%3B200 — Preceding unsigned comment added by Yogu Thala (talk • contribs) 11:14, 11 April 2014 (UTC)

AFD

Thought I'd let you know that I've closed this AFD. User drafts should be nominated for deletion at WP:MFD. I should aldo let you know that rejecting a submission yourself (three times in a few days) and then nominating the draft for deletion might not be considered particularly good-faith. Perhaps get some outside input to ensure a new user that the community has had a chance to review their work rather than just one person. Otherwise, keep up the good work. Stalwart111 13:37, 11 April 2014 (UTC)

If they can't be bothered to even attempt to make a viable change to the references to establish notability, who reviews it doesn't much matter. I'll nominate at MFD. The Ukulele Dude - Aggie80 (talk) 13:40, 11 April 2014 (UTC)

Sir Aggie80, I am writing to you regarding my article pl help me and i will obey your inst --112.135.229.152 (talk) 15:25, 11 April 2014 (UTC)

A barnstar for you!

		The Teamwork Barnstar
		A barnstar to you for re-reviewing 25 or more user reviews during the WikiProject Articles for creation March 2014 Backlog Elimination Drive. Thanks for your work to improve Wikipedia! Posted by Northamerica1000 (talk) on 11:09, 12 April 2014 (UTC) using MediaWiki message delivery (talk), on behalf of WikiProject Articles for creation

comment

Dear Aggie80,

My piece has been rejected because of non verifiable sources.

https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/User:Wjpierce3/sandbox

I have added sources since my first submission. Do I need more?

We are a new ONLINE school and as of now we do not have newspaper, magazine, etc. articles to cite. A local blog has recognized us. Two schools use us but all their material is online and I cited them.

Thank you for any help you can give me.

Wjpierce3 (talk) 18:07, 11 April 2014 (UTC)Wendy

— Preceding unsigned comment added by Wjpierce3 (talk • contribs) 18:04, 11 April 2014 (UTC)

Blogs are not considered reliable sources. Two mentions from clients doesn't really do it either. Until things like articles, rankings from neutral parties, reviews of the system, etc., it may be WP:TOOSOON to establish notability. Wikipedia doesn't have a crystal ball and we don't know if the school will even survive another year. The Ukulele Dude - Aggie80 (talk) 18:35, 11 April 2014 (UTC)

Aggie80

Thanks for the input. What makes this site verifiable? https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Fisher_More_Academy Just curious. The magazine is written by them so it isn't an outside source.

Thanks! Wjpierce3 (talk) 21:18, 11 April 2014 (UTC)Wendy

It isn't verifiable, which is why it has flags on it, which if are not resolved in a timely manner will result in the article being deleted.The Ukulele Dude - Aggie80 (talk) 13:35, 12 April 2014 (UTC)

Help with editing

Hi, Aggie80! Thank you for reviewing my article about the European Fashion Council. I am fairly new to making contributions to Wikipedia and any help and comments are appreciated! I noticed you commented that the article about the European Fashion Council has an issue with conflict of interest. Can you, please, let me know what I need to do or change in the article so I could solve the issue? Thank you in advance! I will be looking forward to your reply/suggestion. :) Best regards Gsefcgs (talk) 12:43, 1 April 2014 (UTC)

Regarding the COI, you need to fill in your information on your user page and explain exactly what your connection with the EFC is. The full information can be found on WP:COI. Review it and decide which of the options makes the most sense for you. The Ukulele Dude - Aggie80 (talk) 12:27, 31 March 2014 (UTC)

Hi, Aggie80! Thank you for your reply! :) I followed your instructions and explained exactly what my connection with the EFC is on my user page. I also requested a new username, because this one is too long and am currently waiting for a bureaucrats to officially change my username. I also read the WP:COI page and now I understand what possibly happened there. If you have any other comments regarding my very first contribution to Wikipedia, please, feel free to share them with me. Cheers Gsefcgs (talk) 12:43, 1 April 2014 (UTC)

Hi, Aggie80, again! :) Sorry to bother you again.. I got my new username! (although for me it is not so much new, because I have been using it for ages on other sites. lol) Please, let me know if you still find any issues like the COI and if the COI is now cleared. :) Thank you in advance! Cheers, Gsefcgs (talk) 12:40, 14 April 2014 (UTC)

Diving at the 2014 Commonwealth Games

I can understand why you might tag this page as 'too soon', but it is a common practice with major sporting competitions to create these articles in the lead up to the event instead of after the event. For the Olympics the equivalent articles were created in excess of one year before the Games, so I think three and a half months is sufficiently close enough to the event to create these articles. Rubaisport (talk) 00:55, 13 April 2014 (UTC)

Hi Aggie,

Could you kindly let me know how to improve the article so that it is appropriate for publishing? My article is User:Brianbclan/sandbox (April 14). Thank you.

Regards, Brian — Preceding unsigned comment added by Brianbclan (talk • contribs) 18:44, 14 April 2014 (UTC)

The Silver Wiki Award!

		The Silver Wiki Award
		Congratulations, you have earned The Silver Wiki Award for having performed the second highest number of reviews during the WikiProject Articles for creation March 2014 Backlog Elimination Drive. Thanks for your work to improve Wikipedia! Posted by Northamerica1000 (talk) on 01:33, 15 April 2014 (UTC)</nowiki>, on behalf of WikiProject Articles for creation

James Hay Partnership

Hia,

I've tried to do my page again but its does not seem to let me submit again?

Could you help please?

Regards, Chris — Preceding unsigned comment added by C5mea (talk • contribs) 16:26, 16 March 2014 (UTC)

Still needs a lot of cleanup on the reference formatting, it's wonky with the links in the body instead of being in the footnotes. Harder to read that way. You should be able to click the 'resubmit' button in the boxes, let me know if that does not work.The Ukulele Dude - Aggie80 (talk) 16:42, 16 March 2014 (UTC)

Hia,

I've managed to re-submit now, I think the links should all be working better - let me know what you think?

Many thanks, Chris — Preceding unsigned comment added by C5mea (talk • contribs) 21:26, 16 March 2014 (UTC)

Hia,

I've submitted again a few weeks ago but nothing seems to be happening? should I worry or just keep waiting?

Many thanks, Chris C5mea (talk) 21:26, 14 April 2014 (UTC)

Hang in there! There is just a backlog and it can be hard to work through all the submissions. The Ukulele Dude - Aggie80 (talk) 02:00, 15 April 2014 (UTC)

Carlton Black

Hi Aggie80, thanks for your review of my article about Carlton Black. I have added some more to the article, to try to make him more noteworthy, but there's not a whole heap of stuff out there on him unfortunately. He's a bit of a Sugarman - created some songs and then got lost in the mists of time and is being discovered a bit now - hence I wanted to give him his due. Let me know what you think. PaukiPKK (talk) 17:06, 15 April 2014 (UTC)PaukiPKK

Hi Aggie80 - upon reflection, I think the answer is simple: the article should be about the song, not the composer Carlton Black! From looking at my article it is clear that the song is the notable/famous thing, not the songwriter! (Poor Carlton!) 153.46.244.84 (talk) 10:46, 16 April 2014 (UTC)PaukiPKK

How do I submit a page in greek wikipedia ?

There doesn't seem to be such "option" ion the menu. (upper right corner) — Preceding unsigned comment added by Ak8978 (talk • contribs) 14:32, 16 April 2014 (UTC)

help with notability?

Hello,

I have no idea how to move forward after my articale has been rejected based on notability. Can you help?SmGallery1516 (talk) 17:04, 16 April 2014 (UTC)

Here are some links that might help identify Sarah Myerscough Gallery?

Peter Secord St.Catharines City Councillor.

Thank you for reviewing my article. Can you please indicate to me which parts need citation or reference.Rick Andres (talk) 04:43, 8 April 2014 (UTC)

All of them! As a living person, the statements need to be validated with some sort of reference. See WP:REFB for the basics regarding formatting and types of sources. There has to be some source to confirm he is a member of the council, perhaps a profile in the paper, which is the only real claim to notability he has. Without that he probably can't meet WP:NOTE. The Ukulele Dude - Aggie80 (talk) 11:45, 8 April 2014 (UTC)

  hi sir

please help me to do — Preceding unsigned comment added by 112.134.109.8 (talk) 12:58, 8 April 2014 (UTC) I have added references and resubmitted the article for review.Rick Andres (talk) 19:22, 16 April 2014 (UTC)

Wikipedia talk:Articles for creation/Leonardo Hotels

You previously declined Wikipedia talk:Articles for creation/Leonardo Hotels. It has been reworked and copied to mainspace. I have deleted the mainspace article due to its tone and history, but you might find it salvagable. Just take a look again. Agathoclea (talk) 09:31, 17 April 2014 (UTC)

Reversism

Hi Aggie, I am looking for additional documentation. Henry has written a book on Reversism, but if I understand you correctly, his own book on the topic, or his own website on the topic, would be insufficient. I would require documentation from beyond his own realm...right? 173.163.41.45 (talk) 18:55, 17 April 2014 (UTC)

That sums it up. Need evidence that the term is accepted in the art world and used regularly with a clear definition and understanding. Not that it wasn't 'rejected' it was declined. The Ukulele Dude - Aggie80 (talk) 18:57, 17 April 2014 (UTC)