User talk:Mindhunter333
Your submission at Articles for creation: User:Mindhunter333/sandbox (February 21)
[edit]Please read the comments left by the reviewer on your submission. You are encouraged to edit the submission to address the issues raised and resubmit when they have been resolved.
- If you would like to continue working on the submission, you can find it at Wikipedia talk:Articles for creation/Mindhunter333/sandbox.
- To edit the submission, click on the "Edit" tab at the top of the window.
- If you need any assistance, you can ask for help at the Articles for creation help desk, or on the .
contributions to Wikipedia!
- Please remember to link to the submission!
- You can also get real-time chat help from experienced editors.
the article you created
[edit]Hi, I write here to confirm that you have created an article on wiki as a component of your American Popular Culture and Technology course.
You have indeed submitted an article, and now that the article has been declined, you should analyse further the audience's reception. The reception is that the submission was declined, so you should analyse that.
Good luck! --Demiurge1000 (talk) 23:13, 22 March 2014 (UTC)
Talkback
[edit]Message added 13:14, 23 March 2014 (UTC). You can remove this notice at any time by removing the {{Talkback}} or {{Tb}} template.
The Ukulele Dude - Aggie80 (talk) 13:14, 23 March 2014 (UTC)
You are more than welcome to continue making quality contributions to Wikipedia. Note that because you are a logged-in user, you can create articles yourself, and don't have to post a request. However, you may continue submitting work to Articles for Creation if you prefer.
- If you have any questions, you are welcome to ask at the help desk.
- If you would like to help us improve this process, please consider .
Thank you for helping improve Wikipedia!
Roger (Dodger67) (talk) 14:31, 23 March 2014 (UTC)Diaosi
[edit]Congratulations on getting your article published! I spent a bit of time on the first couple of paragraphs, tweaking the grammar and formatting. I also have linked the article in Geek, so it isn't entirely an orphan any more. Some feedback to consider: I would like to suggest that 'Hillbilly' and 'Redneck' are not really synonymous in my mind. In English these would not be the same, as these terms are more associated with groups that typically are not using technology much.The Ukulele Dude - Aggie80 (talk) 21:17, 23 March 2014 (UTC)
A discussion is taking place as to whether the article Diaosi is suitable for inclusion in Wikipedia according to Wikipedia's policies and guidelines or whether it should be deleted.
The article will be discussed at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Diaosi until a consensus is reached, and anyone is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on high-quality evidence and our policies and guidelines.
Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion notice from the top of the article. DP 00:43, 24 March 2014 (UTC)
- Here is one place where you will find some feedback, be sure and include it in your summary! So far it has all been favorable. The Ukulele Dude - Aggie80 (talk) 14:41, 24 March 2014 (UTC)
- The discussion resulted in an overwhelming agreement that the article does stay! The Ukulele Dude - Aggie80 (talk) 00:15, 8 April 2014 (UTC)
Class results
[edit]Love to hear how the class project worked out! As you are aware, there was no question in anyone's mind that the article needed to be kept and the nomination for deletion was turned down. The Ukulele Dude - Aggie80 (talk) 00:14, 8 April 2014 (UTC)
Your draft article, User:Mindhunter333/sandbox
[edit]Hello Mindhunter333. It has been over six months since you last edited your WP:AFC draft article submission, entitled "sandbox".
The page will shortly be deleted. If you plan on editing the page to address the issues raised when it was declined and resubmit it, simply {{db-afc}}
or {{db-g13}}
code. Please note that Articles for Creation is not for indefinite hosting of material deemed unsuitable for the encyclopedia mainspace.
If your submission has already been deleted by the time you get there, and you want to retrieve it, copy this code: {{subst:Refund/G13|User:Mindhunter333/sandbox}}
, paste it in the edit box at this link, click "Save page", and an administrator will in most cases undelete the submission.
Thanks for your submission to Wikipedia, and happy editing. JMHamo (talk) 18:35, 28 August 2014 (UTC)
A discussion is taking place as to whether the article Diaosi is suitable for inclusion in Wikipedia according to Wikipedia's policies and guidelines or whether it should be deleted.
The article will be discussed at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Diaosi (2nd nomination) until a consensus is reached, and anyone is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on high-quality evidence and our policies and guidelines.
Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion notice from the top of the article. ProgrammingGeek (Page! • Talk! • Contribs!) 01:32, 19 December 2016 (UTC)