User talk:Afonka Bida

Welcome!

Hello, Afonka Bida, and welcome to Wikipedia! Thank you for your contributions. I hope you like the place and decide to stay. Here are a few links to pages you might find helpful:

You may also want to take the Wikipedia Adventure, an interactive tour that will help you learn the basics of editing Wikipedia.

Please remember to sign your messages on talk pages by typing four tildes (~~~~); this will automatically insert your username and the date. If you need help, check out Wikipedia:Questions, ask me on my talk page, or click here to ask for help on your talk page, and a volunteer should respond shortly. Again, welcome! Fiddle Faddle 11:11, 26 March 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Speedy deletion of The Political Quarterly

A tag has been placed on The Political Quarterly requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia. This has been done under section A7 of the criteria for speedy deletion, because the article appears to be about a person or group of people, but it does not indicate how or why the subject is notable: that is, why an article about that subject should be included in an encyclopedia. Under the criteria for speedy deletion, articles that do not indicate the subject's importance or significance may be deleted at any time. Please see the guidelines for what is generally accepted as notable, as well as our subject-specific notability guideline for biographies.

If you think that this notice was placed here in error, you may contest the deletion by adding {{hangon}} to the top of the page that has been nominated for deletion (just below the existing speedy deletion or "db" tag), coupled with adding a note on the talk page explaining your position, but be aware that once tagged for speedy deletion, if the article meets the criterion it may be deleted without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag yourself, but don't hesitate to add information to the article that would would render it more in conformance with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines. Lastly, please note that if the article does get deleted, you can contact one of these admins to request that a copy be emailed to you. Tiggerjay (talk) 00:32, 25 April 2008 (UTC)[reply]

FYI

I agree with many of the concerns you expressed in your column on wikipedia speedy deletion.

You have probably noticed that The Political Quarterly was re-instated, about a day after it was deleted. But you are completely correct that it reflects poorly on the wikipedia that quality control volunteers so unfamiliar with basic political science that they didn't recognize Leon Trotsky and Benito Mussolini were passing judgment on whether the article should remain.

I commented on the deleting administrator's lapse in not restoring the comment where you defended the article. I'd like to read your defense.

I also noted a couple of small exaggerations in your column. When you wrote that your defense of the article was "dismissed within two minutes" -- did you mean that User:Tiggerjay dismissed it withing two minutes? As a new contributor you couldn't be expected to know this, but his or her opinion carries no more weight than yours. One of the small, and possibly insignificant exaggerations in your column is that the article wasn't deleted for another four hours. FWIW Tiggerjay hasn't contributed to the wikipedia in over six months.

I am a bit more concerned over a comment the administrator who deleted the article made, when questioned about his or her choice to concur with the nominator. I think we should hold the wikipedia's administrators to a higher standard. It appears from the following comment that the administrator who deleted the article may not have noticed your {{hangon}} -- or chose not to read the defense you offered on the talk page:

I went back and reread the article and I realized I read it wrong, for some reason I thought it was about the man who created it. I went and restored the article as you are correct it doesn't meet A7, so of course feel free to go and improve. Sorry for the mix-up, Im an idiot sometimes :-)

Anyhow, your column raised some excellent points. Thanks for writing it. Cheers! Geo Swan (talk) 22:59, 16 March 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Hello, Afonka Bida. You have new messages at Cordless Larry's talk page.
You can remove this notice at any time by removing the {{Talkback}} or {{Tb}} template.

Message to Geo Swan

Geoff - sorry to take so long to respond to your kind message on my Talk page - I don't do Wikipedia edits very often and so rarely see my Talk. To be honest I find the Wiki interface rather baffling compared to email or blogs. Thank you for your kind comments about my PC Pro column, which you correctly surmised was in no way an attack on the Wikipedia ideal, of which I'm a great admirer. I can't find my defence against the Political Quarterly speedy deletion in its history, so it's quite possible that I entered it wrongly or in the wrong place: it was simply an explanation of who Trotsky and Mussolini were, and that they were not my friends!

All the best Dick P

Aha, found it!

This was the defence against quick deletion that I put up:

Talk: The Political Quarterly.

This article is not about "a person or group of people" but about an institution, namely a 75 year old political magazine of considerable influence and significance. It was founded, edited by and contributed to by various influential political figures who have their own Wikipedia entries, including Leonard Woolf, Leon Trotsky and Benito Mussolini.

July 2013

Hello, and welcome to Wikipedia. This is a message letting you know that one of your recent edits to Piano Grande has been undone by an automated computer program called ClueBot NG.

ClueBot NG makes very few mistakes, but it does happen. If you believe the change you made was constructive, please read about it, report it here, remove this message from your talk page, and then make the edit again.
For help, take a look at the introduction.
The following is the log entry regarding this message: Piano Grande was changed by Afonka Bida (u) (t) ANN scored at 0.968305 on 2013-07-25T20:08:13+00:00 . Thank you. ClueBot NG (talk) 20:08, 25 July 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Your submission at Articles for creation: Rosemary Bailey (March 26)

Your recent article submission to Articles for Creation has been reviewed! Unfortunately, it has not been accepted at this time. The reason left by Timtrent was:

The content of this submission includes material that does not meet Wikipedia's minimum standard for inline citations. Please cite your sources using footnotes. For instructions on how to do this, please see Referencing for beginners. Thank you.

Please check the submission for any additional comments left by the reviewer. You are encouraged to edit the submission to address the issues raised and resubmit when they have been resolved.

If you would like to continue working on the submission, go to Draft:Rosemary Bailey and click on the "Edit" tab at the top of the window.
If you need any assistance, you can ask for help at the Articles for creation help desk or on the reviewer's talk page.
You can also get real-time chat help from experienced editors.

Fiddle Faddle 11:08, 26 March 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Hello! Afonka Bida, I noticed your article was declined at Articles for Creation, and that can be disappointing. If you are wondering or curious about why your article submission was declined please post a question at the Articles for creation help desk. If you have any other questions about your editing experience, we'd love to help you at the Teahouse, a friendly space on Wikipedia where experienced editors lend a hand to help new editors like yourself! See you there!

Your submission at Articles for creation: Rosemary Bailey (March 27)

Your recent article submission to Articles for Creation has been reviewed! Unfortunately, it has not been accepted at this time. The reason left by Flat Out was:

The content of this submission includes material that does not meet Wikipedia's minimum standard for inline citations. Please cite your sources using footnotes. For instructions on how to do this, please see Referencing for beginners. Thank you.

Please check the submission for any additional comments left by the reviewer. You are encouraged to edit the submission to address the issues raised and resubmit when they have been resolved.

If you would like to continue working on the submission, go to Draft:Rosemary Bailey and click on the "Edit" tab at the top of the window.
If you need any assistance, you can ask for help at the Articles for creation help desk or on the reviewer's talk page.
You can also get real-time chat help from experienced editors.

Flat Out let's discuss it 05:50, 27 March 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Hi Flat Out - thanks for taking the time to review my submission. It would help me make the piece conformable to standards if you could tell me which citations are causing the failure

best regards Afonka Bida (talk) 11:44, 27 March 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Your submission at Articles for creation: Rosemary Bailey (April 15)

Your recent article submission to Articles for Creation has been reviewed! Unfortunately, it has not been accepted at this time. The reason left by Wikiisawesome was:

The content of this submission includes material that does not meet Wikipedia's minimum standard for inline citations. Please cite your sources using footnotes. For instructions on how to do this, please see Referencing for beginners. Thank you.

Please check the submission for any additional comments left by the reviewer. You are encouraged to edit the submission to address the issues raised and resubmit when they have been resolved.

If you would like to continue working on the submission, go to Draft:Rosemary Bailey and click on the "Edit" tab at the top of the window.
If you need any assistance, you can ask for help at the Articles for creation help desk or on the reviewer's talk page.
You can also get real-time chat help from experienced editors.

wia (talk) 13:41, 15 April 2015 (UTC)[reply]

File copyright problem with File:Supro ozark-s.jpg

Thank you for uploading File:Supro ozark-s.jpg. However, it is currently missing information on its copyright and licensing status. Wikipedia takes copyright very seriously. It may be deleted soon, unless we can verify that it has an acceptable license status and a verifiable source. Please add this information by editing the image description page. You may refer to the image use policy to learn what files you can or cannot upload on Wikipedia. The page on copyright tags may help you to find the correct tag to use for your file. If the file is already gone, you can still make a request for undeletion and ask for a chance to fix the problem.

Please also check any other files you may have uploaded to make sure they are correctly tagged. Here is a list of your uploads.

If you have any questions, please feel free to ask them at the media copyright questions page. Thanks again for your cooperation. Vladlen Manilov ✉ / 11:00, 10 July 2022 (UTC)[reply]