User talk:Adventghuyt

Adventghuyt, you are invited to the Teahouse!

Hi Adventghuyt! Thanks for contributing to Wikipedia.
Be our guest at the Teahouse! The Teahouse is a friendly space where new editors can ask questions about contributing to Wikipedia and get help from experienced editors like Worm That Turned (talk).

Visit the Teahouse

We hope to see you there!

Delivered by HostBot on behalf of the Teahouse hosts

16:08, 29 March 2020 (UTC)

Edits on Olympics articles

You have removed relevant content from reliable and notable sources from multiple articles. I replaced the content as I believe that it improves the articles, however I would prefer to avoid an edit war. If you see issues, please try to fix problems rather than delete sourced content. Lastchapter (talk) 16:50, 1 April 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Copying within Wikipedia requires attribution

Thank you for your contributions to Wikipedia. It appears that you copied or moved text from Colonialism and the Olympic Games into 1904 Summer Olympics. While you are welcome to re-use Wikipedia's content, here or elsewhere, Wikipedia's licensing does require that you provide attribution to the original contributor(s). When copying within Wikipedia, this is supplied at minimum in an edit summary at the page into which you've copied content, disclosing the copying and linking to the copied page, e.g., copied content from [[page name]]; see that page's history for attribution. It is good practice, especially if copying is extensive, to also place a properly formatted {{copied}} template on the talk pages of the source and destination. The attribution has been provided for this situation, but if you have copied material between pages before, even if it was a long time ago, please provide attribution for that duplication. You can read more about the procedure and the reasons at Wikipedia:Copying within Wikipedia. Thank you. If you are the sole author of the prose that was copied, attribution is not required. — Diannaa (talk) 12:59, 3 April 2020 (UTC)[reply]

BOLD, revert, discuss cycle

Hi. Welcome to editing Wikipedia. I noticed that after a couple of your changes were reverted you reverted them back to your version. Instead of reverting, the best practice at this stage is to discuss. Please use the article's talk page to work toward making a version that represents consensus among editors. See Wikipedia:BOLD, revert, discuss cycle for how this is done.--SaskatchewanSenator (talk) 09:07, 5 April 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Hi, thanks for reaching out! Yes, I acted improperly and I'm sorry for that. Adventghuyt (talk) 10:47, 5 April 2020 (UTC)[reply]