User talk:Aditya Prakash-080

May 2024

Please stop attacking other editors, as you did on Talk:Rajputs in Bihar. If you continue, you may be blocked from editing. Comment on content, not on other contributors or people. Level-3 warning given your long history of multiple warnings. — kashmīrī ^TALK 18:13, 18 May 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Nice Try lad , Could you confirm when the last warning was given? Or am I being stubborn or deliberately vandalizing certain articles? Aditya Prakash-080 (talk) 19:14, 18 May 2024 (UTC)[reply]

May 2024

Hello, I saw you reverted my edit without any strong base. The paragraph i removed is there for more than a year now and its been almost an year that paragraph is tagged with citation template. I do have sources that even Mohyals were priests and that practice of priesthood among Mohyal declined post 1947 like most of the Brahmins. That Paragraph i removed is baseless with no available source backing it. Wikipedia is not a place for pushing your POV but it's based on authentic sources. Unless you do not have the sources to back that baseless paragraph, don't make any changes or i'll be having no choice other than reporting you to the administrators. Munawwar Zaidi (talk) 14:51, 19 May 2024 (UTC)[reply]

First and foremost, it is not mine addition, and since you say "I do have sources that even Mohyals were Priests," it also sheds light on the fact that there were Mohyals who were not priests. Anyway, it is not my concern; I only do Vandalism prevention edits these days, and if you have proper sources, you should show them to us rather than merely stating it. Aditya Prakash-080 (talk) 15:30, 19 May 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Please refrain from making unconstructive edits to Wikipedia, as you did at List of Bhumihar Babhan. Your edits appear to be disruptive and have been or will be reverted.

If you are engaged in an article content dispute with another editor, please discuss the matter with the editor at their talk page, or the article's talk page, and seek consensus with them. Alternatively, you can read Wikipedia's dispute resolution page, and ask for independent help at one of the relevant noticeboards.
If you are engaged in any other form of dispute that is not covered on the dispute resolution page, please seek assistance at Wikipedia's Administrators' noticeboard/Incidents.

Please ensure you are familiar with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines, and please do not continue to make edits that appear disruptive. Continued disruptive editing may result in loss of editing privileges. Thank you. Ratnahastin (talk) 09:03, 28 May 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Introduction to contentious topics

You have recently edited a page related to India, Pakistan, and Afghanistan, a topic designated as contentious. This is a brief introduction to contentious topics and does not imply that there are any issues with your editing.

A special set of rules applies to certain topic areas, which are referred to as contentious topics. These are specially designated topics that tend to attract more persistent disruptive editing than the rest of the project and have been designated as contentious topics by the Arbitration Committee. When editing a contentious topic, Wikipedia’s norms and policies are more strictly enforced, and Wikipedia administrators have special powers in order to reduce disruption to the project.

Within contentious topics, editors should edit carefully and constructively, refrain from disrupting the encyclopedia, and:

adhere to the purposes of Wikipedia;
comply with all applicable policies and guidelines;
follow editorial and behavioural best practice;
comply with any page restrictions in force within the area of conflict; and
refrain from gaming the system.

Editors are advised to err on the side of caution if unsure whether making a particular edit is consistent with these expectations. If you have any questions about contentious topics procedures you may ask them at the arbitration clerks' noticeboard or you may learn more about this contentious topic here. You may also choose to note which contentious topics you know about by using the {{Ctopics/aware}} template.

Ratnahastin (talk) 09:10, 28 May 2024 (UTC)[reply]

ArbCom 2024 Elections voter message

Hello! Voting in the 2024 Arbitration Committee elections is now open until 23:59 (UTC) on Monday, 2 December 2024. All eligible users are allowed to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once.

The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.

If you wish to participate in the 2024 election, please review the candidates and submit your choices on the voting page. If you no longer wish to receive these messages, you may add {{NoACEMM}} to your user talk page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 00:52, 19 November 2024 (UTC)[reply]