User talk:Adilazeezbukhari
Potential COI
[edit]Hello, please advise whether you know, or are in fact, the subject of the article Sheikh Asif, which you have authored? I am also aware that you have uploaded an image, File:SheikhAsifSrinagar.jpg, and classed it as "own work", which implies either that, 1) you know or are the subject, or 2) you have uploaded this without permission. Please clarify this. Thanks. Bungle (talk • contribs) 17:22, 6 November 2022 (UTC)
- @Bungle you are wrong in that one
- i did not imply that this is my own work
- i choose it is not my own work and comes under a creative common license
- please check again Adilazeezbukhari (talk) 17:26, 6 November 2022 (UTC)
- Yes you're right, you didn't class this as own work. However, this is my suspicion and you will need to clarify why you believe it is creative commons licensed, as there is no indication of this. Usually uploads of individuals on new articles with no clear copyright attributes tends to be own work, and in this instance someone has already tagged the image for deletion for lack of a clear rationale. You'll still need to clarify this. Bungle (talk • contribs) 18:41, 6 November 2022 (UTC)
Blocked as a sockpuppet
[edit]
Wikipedia's technical logs indicate that this user account has been or may be used abusively as a sockpuppet of User:Shawntheshipper per the evidence presented at Wikipedia:Sockpuppet investigations/Thamesinfotech. It has been blocked indefinitely from editing to prevent abuse.
Note that multiple accounts are allowed, but not for illegitimate reasons, and any contributions made while evading blocks or bans may be reverted or deleted.
If you think there are good reasons why you should be unblocked, you should review the guide to appealing blocks, and then appeal your block by adding the following text below this notice:
Administrators: Checkusers have access to confidential system logs not accessible by the public or by administrators due to the Wikimedia Foundation's privacy policy. You must not loosen or remove this block, or issue an IP block exemption, without consulting with a checkuser or the Arbitration Committee. Administrators who undo checkuser blocks without permission from a checkuser or the Arbitration Committee may be summarily desysopped. Girth Summit (blether) 06:17, 7 November 2022 (UTC)
Note that multiple accounts are allowed, but not for illegitimate reasons, and any contributions made while evading blocks or bans may be reverted or deleted.
If you think there are good reasons why you should be unblocked, you should review the guide to appealing blocks, and then appeal your block by adding the following text below this notice:
{{unblock|Your reason here ~~~~}}. Note that anything you post in your unblock request will be public, so you may alternatively use the Unblock Ticket Request System to submit an appeal if it contains information that must be private.Administrators: Checkusers have access to confidential system logs not accessible by the public or by administrators due to the Wikimedia Foundation's privacy policy. You must not loosen or remove this block, or issue an IP block exemption, without consulting with a checkuser or the Arbitration Committee. Administrators who undo checkuser blocks without permission from a checkuser or the Arbitration Committee may be summarily desysopped.