User talk:Adamfosterq

February 2023

Please stop. If you continue to add inappropriate external links to Wikipedia, you may be blocked from editing. It is considered spamming and Wikipedia is not a vehicle for advertising or promotion. Because Wikipedia uses nofollow tags, additions of links to Wikipedia will not alter search engine rankings. [1] MrOllie (talk) 15:50, 22 February 2023 (UTC)[reply]

could you please tell me what and which kind of spamming I've done? share please so that I could fix it Adamfosterq (talk) 09:46, 23 February 2023 (UTC)[reply]

oh yes, I extremely sorry for that, will be much careful about that in future.

regards! Adamfosterq (talk) 11:09, 23 February 2023 (UTC)[reply]

For example, in Software portability, you added a link to a product, which is a form of advertising. If the product itself is notable then it should have its own article, to which you can then place links in other articles. 11:05, 23 February 2023 (UTC)

You may be blocked from editing without further warning the next time you insert a spam link, as you did with this edit to SiMPLE. Persistent spammers may have their websites blacklisted, preventing anyone from linking to them from all Wikimedia sites as well as potentially being penalized by search engines. Materialscientist (talk) 11:59, 23 February 2023 (UTC)[reply]

You have been blocked indefinitely from editing for abuse of editing privileges.

If you think there are good reasons for being unblocked, please read the guide to appealing blocks, then add the following text below the block notice on your talk page: {{unblock|reason=Your reason here ~~~~}}.

Materialscientist (talk) 12:00, 23 February 2023 (UTC)[reply]

This user's unblock request has been reviewed by an administrator, who declined the request. Other administrators may also review this block, but should not override the decision without good reason (see the blocking policy).

Adamfosterq (block log • active blocks • global blocks • contribs • deleted contribs • filter log • creation log • change block settings • unblock • checkuser (log))

Request reason:

I am a consistent reader and a contributor of Wikipedia, there were some mistakes mad by me by linkinkg I assure to not repeat the same mistakes in futureAdamfosterq (talk) 12:08, 23 February 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Decline reason:

This is not convincing. Why were you spamming? What about WP:COI? How can we be sure you won't spam if unblocked? Yamla (talk) 12:32, 23 February 2023 (UTC)[reply]

If you want to make any further unblock requests, please read the guide to appealing blocks first, then use the {{unblock}} template again. If you make too many unconvincing or disruptive unblock requests, you may be prevented from editing this page until your block has expired. Do not remove this unblock review while you are blocked.

Concern regarding Draft:Mr Examples

Hello, Adamfosterq. This is a bot-delivered message letting you know that Draft:Mr Examples, a page you created, has not been edited in at least 5 months. Drafts that have not been edited for six months may be deleted, so if you wish to retain the page, please edit it again or request that it be moved to your userspace.

If the page has already been deleted, you can request it be undeleted so you can continue working on it.

Thank you for your submission to Wikipedia. FireflyBot (talk) 11:01, 19 July 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Concern regarding Draft:Python Online Compiler

Hello, Adamfosterq. This is a bot-delivered message letting you know that Draft:Python Online Compiler, a page you created, has not been edited in at least 5 months. Drafts that have not been edited for six months may be deleted, so if you wish to retain the page, please edit it again or request that it be moved to your userspace.

If the page has already been deleted, you can request it be undeleted so you can continue working on it.

Thank you for your submission to Wikipedia. FireflyBot (talk) 02:03, 21 July 2023 (UTC)[reply]