This is an archive of past discussions with User:Adambro. Do not edit the contents of this page. If you wish to start a new discussion or revive an old one, please do so on the current talk page.

→

1 March 2007

Urgent: Read

I was recently inspired by a friend's drawings. Can two bottles have a disagreement? Can a bong become addicted to nicotine? Can a clock ever be happy? Where does a toilet take a crap? 15:11, 1 March 2007 (UTC)15:11, 1 March 2007 (UTC)15:11, 1 March 2007 (UTC)15:11, 1 March 2007 (UTC)15:11, 1 March 2007 (UTC)15:11, 1 March 2007 (UTC)15:11, 1 March 2007 (UTC)15:11, 1 March 2007 (UTC)15:11, 1 March 2007 (UTC)15:11, 1 March 2007 (UTC)15:11, 1 March 2007 (UTC)15:11, 1 March 2007 (UTC)15:11, 1 March 2007 (UTC)15:11, 1 March 2007 (UTC)15:11, 1 March 2007 (UTC)15:11, 1 March 2007 (UTC)15:11, 1 March 2007 (UTC)15:11, 1 March 2007 (UTC)Zenabi 15:11, 1 March 2007 (UTC)

All important questions I'm sure but none of which I'm interested in knowing the answer to. Good luck with your quest for answers. Adambro 18:26, 23 March 2007 (UTC)

Plato

Plato and Play-Doh 4tZenabi 15:12, 1 March 2007 (UTC)

Very random indeed. Adambro 18:26, 23 March 2007 (UTC)

3 March 2007

Meadowhall Pic.

What is happening with User:Captain scarlet? I am now confused. Do I have to delete my picture I have put on wikipedia. Please clear things up for me. Kiano 19:31, 3 March 2007 (UTC)

OK, I understand, why has Captain Scarlet resolved the issue, and explained to you why he did it? Kiano 19:42, 3 March 2007 (UTC)

4 March 2007

what you keep changing my pages for? —Preceding unsigned comment added by 81.109.234.187 (talk • contribs) 11:45, 4 March 2007

I haven't changed any edits you have made, I have just made suggestions about the actions you have been making. Adambro 12:06, 4 March 2007 (UTC)

Cheers for the sanity check. I had just added a comment to the Caledonain Sleeper talk page to say I wanted to step back before it got to out of hand... let steam release etc. DrFrench 13:46, 4 March 2007 (UTC)

Editing High Resolution High Definition

I am so annoyed I had to change the description over and over again, because some n00bs just use "VandalProof" to revert it! I don't understand why you and others do not want to have a correct explanation. So what's the point of this?

Why is it sooooo hard to understand this?:

HR.HDTV = Half Resolution High Definition Television! (960x540) because it's half of the resolution of the original TransportStream [TS] (1920×1080) [960x540 = 1/2 (1820x1080)]

Tell me! I'm not a vandal, it just seems I just know this better than you do! —The preceding unsigned comment was added by 85.178.84.5 (talk) 22:07, 5 March 2007 (UTC).

I'm sorry but calling people "n00bs" and ignoring requests to discuss the edits didn't give me much confidence. Please discuss the change with other editors on the article talk page to determine the consensus. It would also help if you could provide references to support the change. Adambro 22:42, 5 March 2007 (UTC)

5 March 2007

UK Stations Infobox

Just got back from two weeks holiday in the sun and seen that there has been movement on this template with respect to the presentation of statistics. I was about to work on the the Far North Line stations to add the historical railway information. Any thoughts about reverting the stats info were appropriate? --Stewart 22:46, 5 March 2007 (UTC)

Hope you had a good holiday. I'm afraid I'm struggling to remember where we left this. I'll remind myself when I get chance and get back to you. Adambro 08:31, 7 March 2007 (UTC)

7 March 2007

Edit page

Hi there, I did not change the swindon FC page, this is a private address, and no one else would have.

Many thanks Aaron Sneddon —Preceding unsigned comment added by 82.13.40.192 (talk • contribs) 17:01, 7 March 2007

Sorry if there has been any confusion, the edits in question were made by your IP address. Could it be that this is shared or that someone else had access to your PC or whatever? There is a list of contributions from your IP. Adambro 17:40, 7 March 2007 (UTC)

Cheers, i am with Eclipse internet, its a shared IP so theres a chance it was allocated somewhere else at that point. Who are Swindon FC anyway?

Cheers Aaron

11 March 2007

Autoroute

Thanks - much neater way of linking to fr.wiki, of which I was unaware. -- roundhouse 01:36, 11 March 2007 (UTC)

12 March 2007

Your concern

I appreciate your concern, but it is extremely hard to simply ignore purile and adolescent comments directed at you when you are trying to engage in a constructive debate. Why is it that honest people are vilified for simply getting angry and expressing that anger, while the warranted object of that anger can seemingly get away with it? It seems to me to be patently unfair on those of us who try to make honest contributions Hammersfan 12/03/07, 09.30 GMT

I understand you might struggle to remain civil when other editors aren't but suggest this is essential. If you can't do this maybe you should consider taking a break from Wikipedia. Adambro 13:09, 12 March 2007 (UTC)

13 March 2007

Railway stations on the South West Coast Path

Thanks for making the new template - it has been lurking at the bottom of my "to do" list for much too long! Geof Sheppard 07:59, 13 March 2007 (UTC)

15 March 2007

Leeds Article

Hi. I noticed that you tried to get rid of the credit union plug like me, which has now reappeared. Someone also seems very intent on putting a crime section in when it doesn't seem to warrant it (see the talk page on Leeds). Anything we can do on this? Quantpole 01:13, 15 March 2007 (UTC)

18 March 2007

RE: Capt Scarlett

Hi,

I have just been looking at the issue you have raised. I have read the archived lists, looked at his page, checked the (very impressive) contributions of both of you, looked at the reverts, and studied the language, style and politeness involved so far. Before getting more involved, I want to get some more insight into your feelings currently. Is it ok for me to ask you some clarifying questions here? Jacketed 23:58, 18 March 2007 (UTC)

That would be fine. Adambro 07:19, 19 March 2007 (UTC)

On second thoughts, I have decided I wish to withdraw from this. Please see my comments at Wikipedia:Mediation Cabal/Cases/2007-03-18 User:Captain scarlet. In summary, I don't believe that continuing is constructive and I feel I can use my time on Wikipedia in more constructive ways. Adambro 09:03, 19 March 2007 (UTC)

It's difficult to keep a cool head with this user. I find his comments to be consistently provocational, despite calls for co-operation. I've tried to stay away, but he's jumping into private conversations where I'm only offering to compromise and move content forwards. I maintain this is bullying. Jhamez84 21:43, 22 March 2007 (UTC)

Do you intend to warn him, or just me? Jhamez84 21:49, 22 March 2007 (UTC)

I certainly appreciate that, I've had difficulty working with him in the past as you'll note from this section on my talk page. However, I would suggest that if your having trouble remaining civil in your discussions then you take a break from Wikipedia and let things cool off for a little while. There will always be someone else around to look after things whilst your away.

Ultimately, if Captain scarlet upsets more users he will find himself in trouble, there is nowhere to hide on Wikipedia, there's always a diff to study or a history list to look at. We should both remember why we are here, bickering with other users certainly isn't my idea of a constructive use of my time, and so I would invite you to take a moment to consider things before hitting the "Save page" button in future. Regards. Adambro 21:56, 22 March 2007 (UTC)

PS. I doubt a warning from me would be worthwhile since he has grown to ignore much of what I suggest to him, hopefully someone independent of ourselves will mention it to him. Adambro 21:56, 22 March 2007 (UTC)

23 March 2007

Emotions

I have just had an idea, and am incredibly suprised no one else has thought of it before. When people are leaving messages on wiki, it strikes me that as text cannot convey emotion, the writer of the text should leave (in brackets) the emotion they are trying to get across.

( questionable , looking for superior guidence )

Kind Regards,
Zesty Prospect 18:01, 23 March 2007 (UTC)

I think the problem with such a proposal would be the questionable value that editors emotions would have on Wikipedia. I do appreciate there are problems with communication online but don't think this could be improved by sharing our emotions. I don't think it is important myself, but maybe you could suggest a situation where it might be useful. Adambro 18:24, 23 March 2007 (UTC)

Thankyou for contributing your views, they were very interesting. A siuation where this would be usefull, well... where to start!!!

The other day I thought i had recieved a patronising comment, and instantly told the person who left it what i thought of them. It turned out that they were trying to be funny!!! How could i submit my idea to the WHOLE of wikipedia?

Thankyou for your quick, zesty response btw, it gave me new found confidence.

(optimistic skepticism)
Kind regards, Zesty Prospect 18:56, 23 March 2007 (UTC)

I'd suggest mentioning it somewhere at Wikipedia:Village pump if you would like a wider discussion on the proposal. In the situation you have described, I think the correct course of action to take if there is a possibility of misunderstanding would be to ask the other editor to clarify their comment before making any reply which assumes a possibly incorrect interpretation. Adambro 19:02, 23 March 2007 (UTC)

Infobox UK station fields

As of 14:54 25 March 2007:

Field	Number of uses
usage0203	1	0.05%
lowusage0203	17	0.92%
usage0405	2	0.11%
lowusage0405	24	1.30%
exits	29	1.57%
lowexits	29	1.57%
lowexits0405	658	35.55%
exits0405	1091	58.94%
Total	1851

As of 16:04 26 March 2007:

Field	Number of uses
usage0203	4	0.21%
lowusage0203	25	1.34%
usage0405	1016	54.51%
lowusage0405	546	29.29%
exits	29	1.56%
lowexits	29	1.56%
lowexits0405	137	7.35%
exits0405	78	4.18%
Total	1864

To do:

Move remaining lowexits0405 and exits0405 to usage format
Work through uses of exits and lowexits manually to confirm data is for 2002-2003 and convert to usage format.
Remove redundant code from template.

Adambro 15:07, 26 March 2007 (UTC)

As of 16:04 26 March 2007:

Field	Number of uses
usage0203	23
lowusage0203	56
usage0405	1100
lowusage0405	686
exits	0
lowexits	0
lowexits0405	0
exits0405	0
Total	1865

Done! Can now remove code from infobox. Adambro 18:09, 26 March 2007 (UTC)

I am puzzled. Carlisle uses exits0405 but it does not appear when What links here is selected. Am I missing something? --Stewart 22:07, 23 March 2007 (UTC)

I think it might take a few hours or so for the 'What links here' lists to populate because of how it is included in the pages by the template. I'll leave it for a while and see what happens. Hopefully it will work. I note the pages that seem to be appearing have been edited since I changed the template, I hope this isn't what is required to get them to show up otherwise it kind of defeats the object of the exercise. Maybe you have some suggestions as to how I might achieve the same counts another way? Perhaps there is a better way of doing it I wonder. Adambro 22:44, 23 March 2007 (UTC)

I think you have to wait for the Wikipedia database to be updated. When I was sorting out some redirected in templates, it could take several hours to be reflected in the What links here. That had escaped my mind when I was looking at this earlier. --Stewart 22:53, 23 March 2007 (UTC)

Ah right, okay. Well I'll leave the links in for a while and see how it goes, I don't think they're doing any harm but it could be useful to find usage of the usage fields. :) Adambro 23:02, 23 March 2007 (UTC)

24 March 2007

Standedge Tunnels

Hi Adam! I was just taking a look at the above article and noted that there are two images on it which are virtually identical, one of which is yours. I was wondering if its viable to have both on there, in view of their similar scene and point of origin? Richard Harvey 23:00, 24 March 2007 (UTC)

Ahh yes. As you'll see from the date I uploaded my image, it was prior to that of Chris Wood, but his is certainly an improvement so I would think it would be appropriate to remove mine as I don't think it adds anything additional. Adambro 23:06, 24 March 2007 (UTC)

25 March 2007

Your bot request

I have a bot request up to do tasks such as you requested, and need something to work on. Would you mind if I did at least part of the job? Gimmetrow 14:51, 25 March 2007 (UTC)

Sure might as well. I was just in the process of requesting approval to use AWB to do it myself but would welcome your assistance. I've removed the bot request from the page for this reason but I'll reinstate it. Thanks for the quick response! Cheers. Adambro 14:57, 25 March 2007 (UTC)

I would still like to do some part of this. Would the {{UK stations PTE}} instances (about 70) be OK with you? Gimmetrow 16:55, 25 March 2007 (UTC)

Yes that would be fine, let me know how you get on. Cheers. Adambro 16:58, 25 March 2007 (UTC)

60 instances done, leaving two transclusions to do by hand. Gimmetrow 17:27, 25 March 2007 (UTC)

Thanks for your help with this, just got myself approved for a trial run of User:AdambroBot, so will be doing some more myself now. Adambro 17:33, 25 March 2007 (UTC)

OK, enjoy. Let me know if you want any more done. The other two instances of UK stations PTE do not use the 0405 parameter. Gimmetrow 18:25, 25 March 2007 (UTC)

Hi Adambro - I'll be happy to approve your bot request ASAP - do you have any feedback from the trials before I do so? Note that you should wait until the bot is flaggeed before doing the run. Mart inp23 18:36, 25 March 2007 (UTC)

Work on UK Railway Station Infoboxes

Excellent work with your bot. I note that usage is being adopted in preference to exits, and you are putting some consistency into the title of the infobox. --Stewart 21:01, 25 March 2007 (UTC)

Thanks for your comments. I've looked at this issue previously and came to the conclusion that 'usage' was a much better description but the work involved in changing over to this would be quite large. There are of course benefits in doing so, namely the ability once this is complete to simplify the template which will make it easier to maintain.

I've now got this bot approved which makes this kind of change feasible.

Where the bot is changing to usage, it is also changing the template call to Infobox UK station which I think is an improvement other going through the various redirects that were being used previously. Adambro 21:33, 25 March 2007 (UTC)

hCard microformat in Infobox UK station

I can see you've been busy, but may I give you a nudge about hCard microformat in Infobox UK station, in case you've overlooked it? Cheers, Andy Mabbett 23:33, 25 March 2007 (UTC)

Apologies for the delay, I'm certainly looking into it. Just taking time to familiarise myself with the format. Adambro 07:42, 26 March 2007 (UTC)

Thank you. No apology needed! Andy Mabbett 15:45, 26 March 2007 (UTC)

If you really have given up on your wiki-break, how's this going? Andy Mabbett 22:54, 9 April 2007 (UTC)

UK stations infobox again

Hi, would you mind taking a look at my suggestion here? Thanks, --RFBailey 19:16, 26 March 2007 (UTC)

Already am doing! Will reply there in a minute with my thoughts. Adambro 19:17, 26 March 2007 (UTC)

Thanks for the encouragement: don't worry about the userspace-meddling! --RFBailey 19:36, 26 March 2007 (UTC)

Leeds

Hiya. You commented on my page (which was my IP address). I had forgotten to sign in when I made the last edit, so sorry about that. I have been trying to discuss things in the talk section but not getting much response. Quantpole 22:43, 26 March 2007 (UTC)

Station information

You're right: they have changed the address of the station information pages, fortunately to a much easier-to-understand format. I've changed the links in {{stn art lnk}} and {{Infobox UK station}}, and will do {{stn art lrnk}} next. --RFBailey 09:17, 27 March 2007 (UTC)

Actually, no they haven't: the link I originally had in the infobox wrong. The easy-to-understand links are to an old version of the station information pages, which are now out-of-date, but for some reson are still live! (This is what got me confused.) I've fixed all three templates to something which works (and is accurate). (At least, I think it does.....) --RFBailey 19:47, 28 March 2007 (UTC)

29 March 2007

WikiProject Microformats

On your return, you might like to be aware of, or even join, WikiProject Microformats. Andy Mabbett 11:40, 29 March 2007 (UTC)

User talk:Adambro/Archive 4