User talk:Acred99
Photo's
[edit]http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Dhammayazika_Pagoda
Sorry meant this location I have more photos I spent 6 years in Myanmar 3 as a Monk. I'm not sure how to upload images and edit your sections. I'm use to dream weaver All are my images and I grant the copy right under your terms. Would you just mind a link to me though like everyone else. Matthew
File copyright problem with File:Pagan-Buphaya-pagoda-at-night-Dec-2000-02.JPG
[edit]
Thank you for uploading File:Pagan-Buphaya-pagoda-at-night-Dec-2000-02.JPG. However, it currently is missing information on its copyright status. Wikipedia takes copyright very seriously. It may be deleted soon, unless we can determine the license and the source of the file. If you know this information, then you can add a copyright tag to the image description page.
If you have uploaded other files, consider checking that you have specified their license and tagged them, too. You can find a list of files you have uploaded by following this link.
If you have any questions, please feel free to ask them at the media copyright questions page. Thanks again for your cooperation. feydey (talk) 11:24, 26 February 2009 (UTC)
File source problem with File:Pagan-Buphaya-pagoda-Dec-2000-01.JPG
[edit]Thanks for uploading File:Pagan-Buphaya-pagoda-Dec-2000-01.JPG. I noticed that the file's description page currently doesn't specify who created the content, so the copyright status is unclear. If you did not create this file yourself, you will need to specify the owner of the copyright. If you obtained it from a website, then a link to the website from which it was taken, together with a restatement of that website's terms of use of its content, is usually sufficient information. However, if the copyright holder is different from the website's publisher, their copyright should also be acknowledged.
If you have uploaded other files, consider checking that you have specified their source and tagged them, too. You can find a list of files you have uploaded by following this link. Unsourced and untagged images may be deleted one week after they have been tagged, as described on criteria for speedy deletion. If the image is copyrighted under a non-free license (per Wikipedia:Fair use) then the image will be deleted 48 hours after 11:26, 26 February 2009 (UTC). If you have any questions please ask them at the Media copyright questions page. Thank you. feydey (talk) 11:26, 26 February 2009 (UTC)
Your current uploads
[edit]The source page You give says:
All photo's and images remain the property of Asisbiz However these photo's are given Royalty Free for education purposes All commercial rights reserved.
This is not compatible with wikipedia. Please consider using our WP:OTRS ticket system if You want to use Your images in Wikipedia. For more questions please use Wikipedia:Media copyright questions. Best, feydey (talk) 11:56, 26 February 2009 (UTC)
- Please refer to Wikipedia:Media copyright questions to obtain good advice, I am quite busy, sorry. feydey (talk) 13:06, 26 February 2009 (UTC)
- Please ask in Wikipedia:Media copyright questions about using Your photos - they will give You good advice. Best, feydey (talk) 21:28, 7 March 2009 (UTC)
Your recent edits
[edit]Hi there. In case you didn't know, when you add content to talk pages and Wikipedia pages that have open discussion, you should sign your posts by typing four tildes ( ~~~~ ) at the end of your comment. If you can't type the tilde character, you should click on the signature button 
located above the edit window. This will automatically insert a signature with your name and the time you posted the comment. This information is useful because other editors will be able to tell who said what, and when. Thank you! --SineBot (talk) 12:11, 26 February 2009 (UTC)
Image copyright problem with File:Wat-Phra-Baromathat-Nakhon-Srithammarat-Apr-2001-20.JPG
[edit]Thanks for uploading File:Wat-Phra-Baromathat-Nakhon-Srithammarat-Apr-2001-20.JPG. The image has been identified as not specifying the copyright status of the image, which is required by Wikipedia's policy on images. Even if you created the image yourself, you still need to release it so Wikipedia can use it. If you don't indicate the copyright status of the image on the image's description page, using an appropriate copyright tag, it may be deleted some time in the next seven days. If you made this image yourself, you can use copyright tags like {{PD-self}} (to release all rights), {{self|CC-by-sa-3.0|GFDL}} (to require that you be credited), or any tag here - just go to the image, click edit, and add one of those. If you have uploaded other images, please verify that you have provided copyright information for them as well.
For more information on using images, see the following pages:
This is an automated notice by STBotI. For assistance on the image use policy, see Wikipedia:Media copyright questions. NOTE: once you correct this, please remove the tag from the image's page. STBotI (talk) 09:12, 9 March 2009 (UTC)
Recent activity
[edit]Hey Acred, it looks like you have really caught the bug, which is a good thing. It looks like you're now creating pages in mainspace, which is fantastic. But-t-t you need to read up a little more on how to create articles.
For instance, at Dhammikarama Burmese Temple, Burmah Lane you've astablished a claim of notability ("oldest temples") but you haven't provided any reliable sources to support that claim. That puts your article at risk of deletion and believe me, there are lots of people looking for articles to nominate for deletion. When that happens, you will get depressed, so lets work at beefing up what you've done.
The first and main thing (beyond saying why your new article subject is notable) is to put in the sources that prove the subject is notable. That means finding encyclopedia articles, magazines, news articles, books - external sources that someone can look up for themselves to see that it is an important topic and that the things you're saying are true. Let's make a silly contrast - I could take a picture of the blue-and-white motor home outside my window, create an article called The blue-and-white motor home, and say "This is one of the oldest and most important motor homes in Kitsilano". Now wouldn't you ask me to prove it? What makes that motor home a topic for an encyclopedia?
What I'm saying is that you need to pay attention to the information you're adding here and make sure that readers from around the world can understand why it's important. I'm happy to help you with the technical bits of how to do it, but the grunt-work has to come from you, you need to do the research. You can't just describe what you yourself know and have seen - we describe what the reliable sources say, not what we know.
I'll look at the new articles you've made and do what I can, but I can't promise that they won't swiftly disappear. You're the man on those puppies, it's up to you get them up to snuff. Franamax (talk) 23:27, 17 March 2009 (UTC)
Hi Franamax thanks for your help again. Though the photo says it all ie it has the date of the building on the image. I also noticed that wiki are very worried about copy right so I've been avoiding getting into the copy right arguments and just putting up images. What about the other stuff I've done is that ok? Also I could add a photo in this section about the Dutch church in Malacca: http://wikitravel.org/en/Malacca
The Dutch Christ Church is a striking red building, built in 1753 entirely of red bricks and was erected by the Dutch settlers. The church was later used by the British and converted into an Anglican Church. The church represents a fine example of Dutch colonial Church architecture. Some interesting points to note are the handmade church pews, the Brass Bible, the beautiful stain glass windows including the ‘Last Supper’, the tombstone in Armenian, and of course, the skillfully-made ceiling beams done without any joints. what do you think? see my own page http://www.asisbiz.com/Malaysia/Dutch-Christ-Church.html I cant seem to be able to insert my photo
Acred99 (talk) 05:47, 18 March 2009 (UTC)
Replacing an image uploaded by another user with another one that you have taken yourself is not good conduct. In doing so, as you did with File:Star Cruises ship.JPG, you have essentially engaged in Vandalism. When contributing a new image you should upload it under a new name (preferrably to the Wikimedia Commons) not replace an image created by someone else. I have now reverted your edit. Please consider uploading your image into Wikimedia Commons instead. Thank you. — Kjet (talk · contribs) 16:19, 24 March 2009 (UTC)
Firstly sorry for any ill feelings but this is not Vandalism it says that if you have a more up to date image then you can upload it. Which is what I did. My image was taken in 2008, shows a side view profile and was taken using a higher resolution. Maybe we should put a gallery section in because I also have another nice photo of the ship during 2009 celebrations. I respect your view that your image was up there first and have created a gallery section. I hope this meets with your approval. Matthew Acred99 (talk) 05:32, 25 March 2009 (UTC)
Speedy deletion of Sardar market
[edit]
A tag has been placed on Sardar market requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia. This has been done under section A7 of the criteria for speedy deletion, because the article appears to be about a company or corporation, but it does not indicate how or why the subject is important or significant: that is, why an article about that subject should be included in an encyclopedia. Under the criteria for speedy deletion, such articles may be deleted at any time. Please see the guidelines for what is generally accepted as notable, as well as our subject-specific notability guideline for companies and corporations.
If you think that this notice was placed here in error, you may contest the deletion by adding {{hangon}} to the top of the page that has been nominated for deletion (just below the existing speedy deletion or "db" tag), coupled with adding a note on the talk page explaining your position, but be aware that once tagged for speedy deletion, if the page meets the criterion it may be deleted without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag yourself, but don't hesitate to add information to the page that would render it more in conformance with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines. Lastly, please note that if the page does get deleted, you can contact one of these admins to request that they userfy the page or have a copy emailed to you. RadioFan (talk) 12:34, 30 March 2009 (UTC)
This page is connected to http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Jodhpur#Other the photos show the market stalls and entrance I have no idea why you would nominate this page for deletion. It also gives users the chance to update the page. Acred99 (talk) 13:23, 30 March 2009 (UTC)
- Hi Acred, got your msg on my talk page. In the case of this article, I would agree with the CSD notice and removal of the article - mostly because it's not really worthy of an encyclopedia. If the market was the oldest or largest in the country or was noted for selling certain products, maybe it would be different. If a national newspaper had reported on it for some reason connected with the market itself (i.e. not the fact that someone got shot there or a travel piece) - maybe. What you have to ask is "why would our global readership care about this place?" - and you haven't shown any reasons why they would. Articles are not just places to show photo galleries. I would love to make an article with pictures of the community gardens just across from my building - and in fact I could, because the community gardening movement in my city is widespread and has been widely commented on in newspapers, magazines and books - so I can state that it is notable and provide reliable sources to support my statement.
- I would advise you to remove the hangon tag. But in fact as I'm typing this, I see now that the page was in fact deleted anyway. Don't give up hope - but yeah, that one was a lousy idea, ;) In future, you could consider creating pages in your userspace first to polish them up a bit before moving them to mainspace. Let me know if you want to do that and I'll try to give you tips and advice. Regards! Franamax (talk) 04:29, 31 March 2009 (UTC)
File source and copyright licensing problem with File:Star Cruises ship.JPG
[edit]
Thanks for uploading File:Star Cruises ship.JPG. I noticed that the file's description page currently doesn't specify who created the content, so the copyright status is unclear. If you did not create this file yourself, you will need to specify the owner of the copyright. If you obtained it from a website, then a link to the website from which it was taken, together with a restatement of that website's terms of use of its content, is usually sufficient information. However, if the copyright holder is different from the website's publisher, their copyright should also be acknowledged.
As well as adding the source, we also need to know the terms of the license that the copyright holder has published the file under, usually done by adding a licensing tag. If you created/took the picture, audio, or video then the {{GFDL-self}} tag can be used to release it under the GFDL. If you believe the media meets the criteria at Wikipedia:Non-free content, use a tag such as {{non-free fair use in|article name}} or one of the other tags listed at Wikipedia:Image copyright tags#Fair use. See Wikipedia:Image copyright tags for the full list of copyright tags that you can use.
If you have uploaded other files, consider checking that you have specified their source and tagged them, too. You can find a list of files you have created in your upload log. Unsourced and untagged files may be deleted one week after they have been tagged, as described on criteria for speedy deletion. If the file is copyrighted under a non-free license (per Wikipedia:Fair use) then the file will be deleted 48 hours after 23:38, 3 March 2011 (UTC). If the file is already gone, you can still make a request for undeletion and ask for a chance to fix the problem. If you have any questions please ask them at the Media copyright questions page. Thank you. Magog the Ogre (talk) 23:38, 3 March 2011 (UTC)
Possibly unfree File:Pagan-Buphaya-pagoda-entrance-Dec-2000-00.JPG
[edit]
A file that you uploaded or altered, File:Pagan-Buphaya-pagoda-entrance-Dec-2000-00.JPG, has been listed at Wikipedia:Possibly unfree files because its copyright status is unclear or disputed. If the file's copyright status cannot be verified, it may be deleted. You may find more information on the file description page. You are welcome to add comments to its entry at the discussion if you object to the listing for any reason. Thank you. Deadstar (talk) 14:47, 10 February 2016 (UTC)
