User talk:Ace of Spades/Archives/2010/February
This is an archive of past discussions about User:Ace of Spades. Do not edit the contents of this page. If you wish to start a new discussion or revive an old one, please do so on the current talk page. |
The Military history WikiProject Newsletter : XLVII (January 2010)
The January 2010 issue of the Military history WikiProject newsletter has been published. You may read the newsletter, change the format in which future issues will be delivered to you, or unsubscribe from this notification by following the link. Thank you.
This has been an automated delivery by BrownBot (talk) 03:34, 5 February 2010 (UTC)
Username change
I have real doubts that this username is appropriate. Given the ubiquitous nature of Wikipe-tan images and how they are used, I think this is a poor choice for a username. Cute, but not well advised in my opinion. I have read Wikipedia:Changing_username/Usurpations#Ace_of_Spades_.E2.86.92_Wikipe-tan. I understand the plea, but I have to agree that this name does carry a different connotation than a non-wikipedia associated username. I may raise this issue elsewhere, but wanted to get your input first. --Hammersoft (talk) 17:33, 5 February 2010 (UTC)
- That, of course, would be true... I, however, have made no formal claim that I have any affiliation with the official mascot nor do I intend to do so, for that of course would cause most of the confusion. Thanks. ♠ 18:08, 5 February 2010 (UTC)
- For what it's worth, I think "Ace of Spades" is a much cooler name and lends itself to that nice signature you have. But the change is already done, so, eh. –xenotalk 18:12, 5 February 2010 (UTC)
- Yeah... no regrets, I hope. If the change is more disruptive than not, though, I'm willing to step back. Thanks. ♠ 18:15, 5 February 2010 (UTC)
Message
Fine I'll stop using bad language while I'm editing Wikipedia. Is it okay for me to add more details in Disturbia(synopsis)?
- It's ok, as long as your edits are constructive. Thank you. --Wikipe-tan (talk) 17:03, 6 February 2010 (UTC)
Continue Message
Ok. Also I wasn't trying to edit Drmies's talk page. I was trying to send him a message. Stop sending me a message.
End of drunkenness
Yes, I think I've gotten most of my sanity back, special thanks to those people who helped sort out the SUL mess. It would be a great idea to never do that again. Lesson learned. ♠ 23:48, 6 February 2010 (UTC)
- In honour of Babe Ruth being the ENWP POTD and for your adventures in net-result not changing name, per your own request [1], i would like you to bat yourself about a little bit with this Chinook Salmon.
- Much appreciated (and deserved). Thanks for your help. ♠ 00:22, 7 February 2010 (UTC)
Wait...what?
Are you Ace of Spades? The Arbiter★★★ 17:05, 6 February 2010 (UTC)
- That was fast. Yes, I am the one with many, many changing names. If this name change causes too many problems though, I'll be taking my old name back. --Wikipe-tan (talk) 17:07, 6 February 2010 (UTC)
- Ace of Spades is an awesome name...what happened? The Arbiter★★★ 17:09, 6 February 2010 (UTC)
- I know it is... let's just say people do crazy things due to boredom. I can always get renamed back though.--Wikipe-tan (talk) 17:10, 6 February 2010 (UTC)
- It is a good name, and an awesome record as well. Drmies (talk) 17:10, 6 February 2010 (UTC)
- I thought about changing my name....how would I get everyone to know who I am, though? The Arbiter★★★ 17:11, 6 February 2010 (UTC)
- (edit conflict) Aw, you guys are making me want to take the name back, say something like "Hey, I was drunk when I made that usurpation request." Ha, tell you what, I probably will in the near future. And yes, you can get your name changed at WP:CHU, your old name will redirect to your new one. --Wikipe-tan (talk) 17:13, 6 February 2010 (UTC)
- Don't you remember me? I'm the one that helped you with this. The Arbiter★★★ 17:20, 6 February 2010 (UTC)
- Of course I do, I haven't forgotten you. But now I'm sitting here wondering why I got this name change. Makes me want to go to CHU and take my old name back "Per WP:EUI, reason six." --Wikipe-tan (talk) 17:23, 6 February 2010 (UTC)
- Easy on the drink, now. :) The Arbiter★★★ 01:47, 10 February 2010 (UTC)
- Of course I do, I haven't forgotten you. But now I'm sitting here wondering why I got this name change. Makes me want to go to CHU and take my old name back "Per WP:EUI, reason six." --Wikipe-tan (talk) 17:23, 6 February 2010 (UTC)
- Don't you remember me? I'm the one that helped you with this. The Arbiter★★★ 17:20, 6 February 2010 (UTC)
- It is a good name, and an awesome record as well. Drmies (talk) 17:10, 6 February 2010 (UTC)
- I know it is... let's just say people do crazy things due to boredom. I can always get renamed back though.--Wikipe-tan (talk) 17:10, 6 February 2010 (UTC)
- Ace of Spades is an awesome name...what happened? The Arbiter★★★ 17:09, 6 February 2010 (UTC)
The Arbiter★★★ has bought you a pint! Sharing a pint is a great way to bond with other editors after a day of hard work. Spread the WikiLove by buying someone else a pint, whether it be someone with whom you have collaborated or had disagreements. Cheers!
Do you really need this? lol. The Arbiter★★★ 01:49, 10 February 2010 (UTC)
- Well, I've been staggering around drunk for long enough already. :) But maybe. Thanks. ♠ 02:16, 10 February 2010 (UTC)
Patrolling
Hi - I've been one or two steps behind you on a bunch of CSDs recently which were still showing as unpatrolled and I am wondering if you did something to the standard twinlke config which might be preventing it from marking pages as patrolled. Any thoughts? Thanks. 7 03:12, 10 February 2010 (UTC) (no need for talkback notes - I'm watching - thanks)
- Whoa... should be fixed now. Sorry about that. ♠ 03:15, 10 February 2010 (UTC)
- Thanks. Keep up the good work. 7 03:29, 10 February 2010 (UTC)
- Thanks, you too. ♠ 03:31, 10 February 2010 (UTC)
- Thanks. Keep up the good work. 7 03:29, 10 February 2010 (UTC)
The Wikipedia:Trading card game project needs your help in choosing the rules, which is essential for developing everything else of the game. Please consider !voting for a set of rules here. You may voice your opinion about a particular set here. Also, if you have a new idea on what the rules could be, you are encouraged to propose a new set of rules (instructions can be found at the !voting page). Thank you, ♠TomasBat 02:41, 16 February 2010 (UTC)
Note: You are receiving this message because you signed your name at the project's list of members.