User talk:Aca1291

Announcement

dms closed until 19 january Aca1291 (talk) 17:54, 17 January 2022 (UTC)[reply]

January 2022

Your ability to edit this talk page has been revoked as an administrator has identified your talk page edits as inappropriate and/or disruptive.

(block log • active blocks • global blocks • autoblocks • contribs • deleted contribs • abuse filter log • creation log • change block settings • unblock • checkuser (log))

If you think there are good reasons for being unblocked, you should read the guide to appealing blocks, then contact administrators by submitting a request to the Unblock Ticket Request System.
Please note that there could be appeals to the unblock ticket request system that have been declined leading to the post of this notice.

DrKay (talk) 18:54, 17 January 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Hello, I'm AssumeGoodWraith. This is a notice to let you know that one or more of your recent contributions to 2021 Finnish municipal elections were reverted. – AssumeGoodWraith (talk | contribs) 09:40, 20 January 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Administrators

Apologies for my disruptive editing, inappropiate use of talk page, and personal attacks on administrators. I swear that I will not do this again. Aca1291 (talk) 08:13, 20 January 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Speedy deletion nomination of Wikipedia:RedWarn/2020/June

If this is the first article that you have created, you may want to read the guide to writing your first article.
You may want to consider using the Article Wizard to help you create articles.

Hello, and welcome to Wikipedia. This is a notice that the page you created, Wikipedia:RedWarn/2020/June, was tagged as a test page under section G2 of the criteria for speedy deletion and has been or soon may be deleted. Please use the sandbox for any other tests you want to do. Take a look at the welcome page if you would like to learn more about contributing to our encyclopedia.

If you think this page should not be deleted for this reason, you may contest the nomination by visiting the page and clicking the button labelled "Contest this speedy deletion". This will give you the opportunity to explain why you believe the page should not be deleted. However, be aware that once a page is tagged for speedy deletion, it may be deleted without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag from the page yourself, but do not hesitate to add information in line with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines. If the page is deleted, and you wish to retrieve the deleted material for future reference or improvement, then please contact the deleting administrator, or if you have already done so, you can place a request here. --Minorax^«¦talk¦» 16:00, 6 February 2022 (UTC)[reply]

February 2022

Why did you create a userpage for User:Rankedchoicevoter? And why did you remove a warning left 5 years ago on another user's Talk page? Both of your edits are disruptive.--Bbb23 (talk) 16:16, 6 February 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Local election information

Hello,

Rather than getting into an edit war, I should explain the reasons why I'm using a different system for covering local elections.

I realize that the "Election results" template looks better, with the seat distribution image and the colour coding for the lists. There are, however, two reasons why I'm not using it myself.

The first is that it doesn't allow for the full names of the electoral lists to be included. This may not be the most important detail, but it still strikes me as encyclopedic.

The second reason is probably the more important one. The electoral threshold isn't three per cent (formerly five per cent) of valid votes but of all votes, and the template doesn't allow both numbers to be listed. Usually, this isn't the most important thing ... but sometimes it is. The LDP fell below the threshold in the 2012 Belgrade election because of the difference between the percentages.

I could probably find a way of modifying the template (or creating a derivative template) to accommodate these points, if need be. This is something I've been thinking about for a while. One way or the other, it would probably make sense to bring other editors into the discussion as well. CJCurrie (talk) 08:01, 11 February 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Belgrade elections in 2013

On a separate point, you've written that there weren't any elections in Belgrade's municipalities in 2013. I'm sorry, but that's just incorrect. Click on numbers 27 and 71 of that year's official gazette for proof. CJCurrie (talk) 08:09, 11 February 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Actually, you can make full names of electoral lists if you want in infobox Election results Aca1291 (talk) 08:21, 11 February 2022 (UTC)[reply]

You lose the colour coding some of time, though, which defeats part of the purpose. Though maybe I can try to work around this.

Btw, I think I know the reason for the confusion about the 2013 Belgrade results. The 2013 results aren't listed in the official government returns for the 2016 cycle, but that's only because Voždovac and Zemun also held elections in 2016, and the official report only covers the most recent election results in each municipality. The Official Gazette for Belgrade covers the 2013 results, as I mentioned above.

The official returns are very helpful, but they don't provide all of the information (i.e., they don't break down vote totals for different GG lists in same municipality, and they don't provide the full list names). I find you need to go to the city/municipal gazettes to get the full story.

Anyway, I can experiment with the 2013 results page to try to get in all of the relevant information while still keeping the more visually appealing templates. If it works out, I could change the other local election pages as well. CJCurrie (talk) 08:35, 11 February 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Ok... Aca1291 (talk) 08:38, 11 February 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Update: I've modified the 2013 Vrbas template to try to get the best of both worlds. More context is available here. CJCurrie (talk) 09:53, 11 February 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Ok Aca1291 (talk) 10:40, 11 February 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Gay

What was meant by this edit? [1]Graham Beards (talk) 13:19, 15 February 2022 (UTC)[reply]

@Graham Beards I might want to point the user's edits before the block from 17 January [2] [3] [4]. The user seems to consider the term [and being] gay derogatory, and looks like back at it again with the edit at Gay — DaxServer (t · c) 13:32, 15 February 2022 (UTC)[reply]

I would recommend to take this over to WP:ANI, especially because of this edit. Vacant0 (talk) 13:48, 15 February 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Just what ANI doesn't need. I noticed the same thing. See below.--Bbb23 (talk) 14:02, 15 February 2022 (UTC)[reply]

... Aca1291 (talk) 13:39, 15 February 2022 (UTC)[reply]

February 2022

You have been blocked indefinitely from editing for persistently making disruptive edits.

If you think there are good reasons for being unblocked, please read the guide to appealing blocks, then add the following text below the block notice on your talk page: {{unblock|reason=Your reason here ~~~~}}. Bbb23 (talk) 14:01, 15 February 2022 (UTC)[reply]

h

z Aca1291 (talk) 07:40, 17 February 2022 (UTC)[reply]

2015 Serbian local elections moved to draftspace

An article you recently created, 2015 Serbian local elections, is not suitable as written to remain published. It needs citations from reliable, independent sources. (?) Information that can't be referenced should be removed (verifiability is of central importance on Wikipedia). I've moved your draft to draftspace (with a prefix of "Draft:" before the article title) where you can incubate the article with minimal disruption. When you feel the article meets Wikipedia's general notability guideline and thus is ready for mainspace, please click on the "Submit your draft for review!" button at the top of the page. John B123 (talk) 20:07, 24 February 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Speedy deletion nomination of Category:2015 elections in Serbia

A tag has been placed on Category:2015 elections in Serbia indicating that it is currently empty, and is not a disambiguation category, a category redirect, a featured topics category, under discussion at Categories for discussion, or a project category that by its nature may become empty on occasion. If it remains empty for seven days or more, it may be deleted under section C1 of the criteria for speedy deletion.

If you think this page should not be deleted for this reason you may contest the nomination by visiting the page and clicking the button labelled "Contest this speedy deletion". This will give you the opportunity to explain why you believe the page should not be deleted. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag from the page yourself. Liz ^{Read! Talk!} 06:14, 25 February 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Concern regarding Draft:Pazin Decisions

Hello, Aca1291. This is a bot-delivered message letting you know that Draft:Pazin Decisions, a page you created, has not been edited in at least 5 months. Drafts that have not been edited for six months may be deleted, so if you wish to retain the page, please edit it again or request that it be moved to your userspace.

If the page has already been deleted, you can request it be undeleted so you can continue working on it.

Thank you for your submission to Wikipedia. FireflyBot (talk) 13:01, 25 April 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Concern regarding Draft:Ljubo Drndić

Hello, Aca1291. This is a bot-delivered message letting you know that Draft:Ljubo Drndić, a page you created, has not been edited in at least 5 months. Drafts that have not been edited for six months may be deleted, so if you wish to retain the page, please edit it again or request that it be moved to your userspace.

If the page has already been deleted, you can request it be undeleted so you can continue working on it.

Thank you for your submission to Wikipedia. FireflyBot (talk) 13:01, 25 April 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Concern regarding Draft:Varaždin Cathedral

Hello, Aca1291. This is a bot-delivered message letting you know that Draft:Varaždin Cathedral, a page you created, has not been edited in at least 5 months. Drafts that have not been edited for six months may be deleted, so if you wish to retain the page, please edit it again or request that it be moved to your userspace.

If the page has already been deleted, you can request it be undeleted so you can continue working on it.

Thank you for your submission to Wikipedia. FireflyBot (talk) 12:01, 26 April 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Concern regarding Draft:Aleksinac Valley

Hello, Aca1291. This is a bot-delivered message letting you know that Draft:Aleksinac Valley, a page you created, has not been edited in at least 5 months. Drafts that have not been edited for six months may be deleted, so if you wish to retain the page, please edit it again or request that it be moved to your userspace.

If the page has already been deleted, you can request it be undeleted so you can continue working on it.

Thank you for your submission to Wikipedia. FireflyBot (talk) 17:01, 29 April 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Concern regarding Draft:2021 Serbian protests

Hello, Aca1291. This is a bot-delivered message letting you know that Draft:2021 Serbian protests, a page you created, has not been edited in at least 5 months. Drafts that have not been edited for six months may be deleted, so if you wish to retain the page, please edit it again or request that it be moved to your userspace.

If the page has already been deleted, you can request it be undeleted so you can continue working on it.

Thank you for your submission to Wikipedia. FireflyBot (talk) 10:01, 30 April 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Your draft article, Draft:Aleksinac Valley

Hello, Aca1291. It has been over six months since you last edited the Articles for Creation submission or Draft page you started, "Aleksinac Valley".

In accordance with our policy that Wikipedia is not for the indefinite hosting of material deemed unsuitable for the encyclopedia mainspace, the draft has been deleted. If you plan on working on it further and you wish to retrieve it, you can request its undeletion. An administrator will, in most cases, restore the submission so you can continue to work on it.

Thanks for your submission to Wikipedia, and happy editing. Liz ^{Read! Talk!} 22:29, 27 May 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Concern regarding Draft:Katunitsa

Hello, Aca1291. This is a bot-delivered message letting you know that Draft:Katunitsa, a page you created, has not been edited in at least 5 months. Drafts that have not been edited for six months may be deleted, so if you wish to retain the page, please edit it again or request that it be moved to your userspace.

If the page has already been deleted, you can request it be undeleted so you can continue working on it.

Thank you for your submission to Wikipedia. FireflyBot (talk) 12:05, 11 June 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Speedy deletion of Draft:Katunitsa

If this was the first article that you created, you may want to read the guide to writing your first article.
You may want to consider using the Article Wizard to help you create articles.

Hello, and welcome to Wikipedia. This is a notice that the page you created, Draft:Katunitsa, was deleted as a test page under section G2 of the criteria for speedy deletion. Please use the sandbox for any other tests you want to do. Take a look at the welcome page if you would like to learn more about contributing to our encyclopedia.

Please do not recreate the material without addressing these concerns, but do not hesitate to add information in line with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines. If you think this page should not have been deleted for this reason, or you wish to retrieve the deleted material for future reference or improvement, then please contact the deleting administrator, or if you have already done so, you can place a request here. Liz ^{Read! Talk!} 04:07, 9 July 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Concern regarding Draft:2015 Serbian local elections

Hello, Aca1291. This is a bot-delivered message letting you know that Draft:2015 Serbian local elections, a page you created, has not been edited in at least 5 months. Drafts that have not been edited for six months may be deleted, so if you wish to retain the page, please edit it again or request that it be moved to your userspace.

If the page has already been deleted, you can request it be undeleted so you can continue working on it.

Thank you for your submission to Wikipedia. FireflyBot (talk) 21:01, 27 July 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Your draft article, Draft:2015 Serbian local elections

Hello, Aca1291. It has been over six months since you last edited the Articles for Creation submission or draft page you started, "2015 Serbian local elections".

In accordance with our policy that Wikipedia is not for the indefinite hosting of material deemed unsuitable for the encyclopedia mainspace, the draft has been nominated for deletion. If you plan on working on it further, or editing it to address the issues raised if it was declined, simply edit the submission and remove the {{db-afc}}, {{db-draft}}, or {{db-g13}} code.

If your submission has already been deleted by the time you get there, and you wish to retrieve it, you can request its undeletion by following the instructions at this link. An administrator will, in most cases, restore the submission so you can continue to work on it.

Thank you for your submission to Wikipedia! Hey man im josh (talk) 20:09, 24 August 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Blocked for sockpuppetry

You have been blocked indefinitely from editing for abusing multiple accounts per the evidence presented at Wikipedia:Sockpuppet investigations/Aca1291. Note that multiple accounts are allowed, but not for illegitimate reasons, and any contributions made while evading blocks or bans may be reverted or deleted.

If you think there are good reasons for being unblocked, please review Wikipedia's guide to appealing blocks, then add the following text to the bottom of your talk page: {{unblock|reason=Your reason here ~~~~}}. UtherSRG (talk) 23:36, 11 November 2024 (UTC)[reply]