User talk:Abzeronow
Thanks for 2018 in public domain
[edit]Generally, I'm thanking for your edits in 2018 in public domain.--Maher27777 (talk) 21:10, 19 October 2017 (UTC)
Draft:Whom God Hath Joined (Bennett) concern
[edit]Hi there, I'm HasteurBot. I just wanted to let you know that Draft:Whom God Hath Joined (Bennett), a page you created, has not been edited in 5 months. The Articles for Creation space is not an indefinite storage location for content that is not appropriate for articlespace.
If your submission is not edited soon, it could be nominated for deletion. If you would like to attempt to save it, you will need to improve it.
You may request Userfication of the content if it meets requirements.
If the deletion has already occured, instructions on how you may be able to retrieve it are available at WP:REFUND/G13.
Thank you for your attention. HasteurBot (talk) 01:31, 26 April 2018 (UTC)
Your draft article, Draft:Whom God Hath Joined (Bennett)
[edit]
Hello, Abzeronow. It has been over six months since you last edited the Articles for Creation submission or Draft page you started, "Whom God Hath Joined".
In accordance with our policy that Wikipedia is not for the indefinite hosting of material deemed unsuitable for the encyclopedia mainspace, the draft has been nominated for deletion. If you plan on working on it further, or editing it to address the issues raised if it was declined, simply and remove the {{db-afc}}, {{db-draft}}, or {{db-g13}} code.
If your submission has already been deleted by the time you get there, and you wish to retrieve it, you can request its undeletion by following the instructions at this link. An administrator will, in most cases, restore the submission so you can continue to work on it.
Thanks for your submission to Wikipedia, and happy editing. HasteurBot (talk) 02:00, 26 May 2018 (UTC)
- Hello Abzeronow -- sorry about reverting your earlier edit to this article; I didn't realise it was by the draft creator, and out of context it looked like nonsense, but I now realise that you were trying to expand the plot summary. Are you intending to work on this further? The novel is clearly notable and I found a good source in Google Books [1]. Espresso Addict (talk) 16:09, 29 May 2018 (UTC)
- Yes, I do intend on working on it further. I've read the novel twice. Just haven't found the time to really finish the plot summary. Abzeronow (talk) 17:55, 1 June 2018 (UTC)
A cup of coffee for you!
[edit]
|
Thank you for your many edits to 2019 in public domain. I also thanked you on the talk page of that article. Your work here makes you the most requested, published, accessed, and consulted authority on this topic. You are signalling an important social issue at a time when it is less popular, but the people who are seeking information on this topic are reading your work now.
I believe in the importance of what you are doing and thank you for the time and effort you put into developing this article. I hope you are enjoying yourself in Wikipedia - I see that you are fairly new here. I wish that I could offer more, but if my small comment or support can help with any project of yours, ping me and I will give it. Thanks. Blue Rasberry (talk) 15:38, 10 November 2018 (UTC) |
About the creation of the page 2021 in public domain?
[edit]A page about the authors that Will be enter in public domain in January 1, 2021 is a important page to the Wikipedia and this page doesn’t exist and it’s related about writers and scientists that was died in 1950 in the countries that the copyright length is life + 70 years after the death of the author and 1970 in the countries that the copyright length is life + 50 years after the death of the author. - 201.52.229.251 (talk) 07:38, 19 November 2018 (UTC).
Exemple: Authors that died in 1950 will be enter in public domain in January 1, 2021 in the countries that the copyright length is life + 70 years after the death of the author. - 201.52.229.251 (talk) 07:48, 19 November 2018 (UTC)
- Yes, that will be an important year for the public domain in Life + 70 countries as George Orwell and Edgar Rice Burroughs among others enter the public domain. The page will be eventually created (I might create it myself after New Years), so be patient. Abzeronow (talk) 11:54, 19 November 2018 (UTC)
ArbCom 2018 election voter message
[edit]
Hello, Abzeronow. Voting in the 2018 Arbitration Committee elections is now open until 23.59 on Sunday, 2 December. All users who registered an account before Sunday, 28 October 2018, made at least 150 mainspace edits before Thursday, 1 November 2018 and are not currently blocked are eligible to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once.
The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.
If you wish to participate in the 2018 election, please review the candidates and submit your choices on the voting page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 18:42, 19 November 2018 (UTC)
ArbCom 2018 election voter message
[edit]Hello, Abzeronow. Voting in the 2018 Arbitration Committee elections is now open until 23.59 on Sunday, 3 December. All users who registered an account before Sunday, 28 October 2018, made at least 150 mainspace edits before Thursday, 1 November 2018 and are not currently blocked are eligible to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once.
The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.
If you wish to participate in the 2018 election, please review the candidates and submit your choices on the voting page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 18:42, 19 November 2018 (UTC)
Your submission at Articles for creation: Raoul Korty has been accepted
[edit]
The article has been assessed as C-Class, which is recorded on the article's talk page. You may like to take a look at the grading scheme to see how you can improve the article.
You are more than welcome to continue making quality contributions to Wikipedia. If your account is more than four days old and you have made at least 10 edits you can create articles yourself without posting a request. However, you may continue submitting work to Articles for Creation if you prefer.
- If you have any questions, you are welcome to ask at the help desk.
- If you would like to help us improve this process, please consider .
Thank you for helping improve Wikipedia!
K.e.coffman (talk) 07:57, 12 December 2018 (UTC)Create the page 2011 in public domain please.
[edit]There were works and authors that entered in public domain in 2011. - 191.205.248.228 (talk) 16:10, 13 December 2018 (UTC).
- I'll start working on that in January 2019. Abzeronow (talk) 18:37, 21 December 2018 (UTC)
- It is very barebones but I created the page. Will add more as the month goes on. Abzeronow (talk) 17:19, 1 January 2019 (UTC)
File:Alec_Balwin_phone_call_to_daughter_Ireland.ogg
[edit]Thank you for voting to “keep” the item Bunnies959 (talk) 12:50, 30 March 2019 (UTC)
Create the page 2022 in public domain please.
[edit]In 2022, works of authorship of people whose died 1951 will be enter in public domain in January 1, 2022 in the countries which the copyright lenght Life + 70 years after the death of the author and this year is very important and notable books will be enter in public domain. 191.205.248.228 (talk) 17:55, 23 August 2019 (UTC).
About the creation of the page 2022 in public domain?
[edit]The page doesn’t exist yet and the page is related with authors whose died in 1951 in the countries which the copyright lenght is Life + 70 years after the death of the author and related with the authors whose died in 1971 in the countries which the copyright lenght is Life + 50 years after the death of the author and the page is very important.
191.181.216.10 (talk) 01:38, 27 August 2019 (UTC)
Hello, Abzeronow. It has been over six months since you last edited the Articles for Creation submission or draft page you started, Draft:Whom God Hath Joined (Bennett).
In accordance with our policy that Wikipedia is not for the indefinite hosting of material deemed unsuitable for the encyclopedia mainspace, the draft has been deleted. If you plan on working on it further and you wish to retrieve it, you can request its undeletion by following the instructions at this link. An administrator will, in most cases, restore the submission so you can continue to work on it. — JJMC89 (T·C) 04:16, 20 September 2019 (UTC)
A new methodology for public domain articles
[edit]To make the lists useful, and in reasonable size, I suggest:
- I think we should omit US authors, since, in USA, copyright duration depends on date of publication, not on author’s life. We should instead write some examples of works that entered public domain.
- In the Life+70 list, we should put only authors belong to countries that apply Life+70 laws (like European countries). Likewise, in the Life+50 list, we should put only authors belong to countries that apply Life+50 laws (like Canada, Egypt, etc.).--Maher27777 (talk) 20:12, 18 October 2019 (UTC)
- While I see that proposed methodology would be more useful for Commons, I think European editors would probably appreciate seeing that for example, Margaret Mitchell's novel Gone with the Wind will have its European copyrights expire on January 1, 2020. As far as the second suggestion, we'd exclude Spain and India from appearing on these pages again because those don't have a Life + 70 or Life + 50 terms for the near future and in my opinion, it's not worth creating Life + 80 or Life + 60 lists to just include Spain or India. I am willing to be more selective of the US and UK authors that I put on these lists since I would like to reduce the anglocentric bias of English wikipedia as much as possible, but I'd need good criteria to narrow down which US or UK authors to include or exclude. @Maher27777: Abzeronow (talk) 18:09, 29 October 2019 (UTC)
About the creation of the page 2022 in public domain?
[edit]The page is very import because in January 1st, 2022 author who died in 1951 will be enter in public domain in the countries which the copyright lenght is Life+70 years of the death of the author and no one administrator answered my discussion abuou 2022 in public domain.
191.205.248.228 (talk) 17:56, 25 October 2019 (UTC).
- I see no rush to create it. I'm still working on filling in 2021 in public domain, and there is plenty of time between now and 2022 to create and fill out that page. Check with me after the New Year. Abzeronow (talk) 17:59, 29 October 2019 (UTC)
Rhapsody in Blue
[edit]Is Rhapsody in Blue protected by Music Modernization Act? that is, it will enter public domain in 2025!--Maher27777 (talk) 06:54, 5 November 2019 (UTC)
- It is. I'll clarify that I mean the earliest sheet music for it: https://imslp.org/wiki/Rhapsody_in_Blue_(Gershwin%2C_George) Abzeronow (talk) 15:16, 6 November 2019 (UTC)
ArbCom 2019 election voter message
[edit] | Hello! Voting in the 2019 Arbitration Committee elections is now open until 23:59 on Monday, 2 December 2019. All eligible users are allowed to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once.
The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail. If you wish to participate in the 2019 election, please review the candidates and submit your choices on the voting page. If you no longer wish to receive these messages, you may add |
Images moved from en.Wikipedia to Commons
[edit]Thanks for fixing the German Reed image licensing. In my experience, User:Fastily (among others) moves numerous images from en.Wikipedia to Commons and gives them inadequate licenses. Then he has the images deleted from en.Wikipedia. Then, someone on Commons notices that the images there do not have adequate licensing and has them deleted from Commons, and they are lost to the encyclopedia. -- Ssilvers (talk) 01:22, 13 January 2020 (UTC)
Crestes the page 2022 in public domain please!!!
[edit]We are in 2020 and the next new year’s eve is 2022.
And in 2022 author such Henry de Vere Stacpoole, Andre Gide, Eddie Collins and Warner Baxter will be enter in the public domain.
201.52.227.193 (talk) 16:23, 16 January 2020 (UTC).
About the Creative of the page 2022 in public domain.
[edit]This is a important year to the works published by author who died in the year 1951 in the countries that the copyright lenght is Life + 70 years. - 201.52.227.193 (talk) 21:43, 3 March 2020 (UTC).
About the creation of the page 2022 in public domain.
[edit]We are in 2020, which means that the current next year’s eve is 2021.
The next new year’s eve is 2022 and in January 1st, 2022 works created by author who died in 1951 will br enter in public domain and this page doesn’t yet created - 201.52.227.193 (talk) 10:15, 28 March 2020 (UTC).
ArbCom 2020 Elections voter message
[edit] | Hello! Voting in the 2020 Arbitration Committee elections is now open until 23:59 (UTC) on Monday, 7 December 2020. All eligible users are allowed to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once.
The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail. If you wish to participate in the 2020 election, please review the candidates and submit your choices on the voting page. If you no longer wish to receive these messages, you may add |
Tod Browning
[edit]Dear Abzeronow - Thank you for restoring the images on the Tod Browning article. Most of the images were gratuitously removed by the Commons establishment. My efforts to enlist their support was met with "I'm to busy" excuses. Their demands to "prove" the legitimacy were issued like bench warrants.
I suspect, but not certain, that the disciplinary reaction was influenced by my User Page postings, parodies of Emily Dickinson and Wiki Administrators. That, in itself, is perhaps gratifying. --38.80.237.251 (talk) 17:53, 5 April 2022 (UTC)
- 1926 works entering the public domain made it easier to restore those. Next year, the 1927 images should be restored as well. (I believe I added them so admins at Commons will undelete them on New Years without any intervention on my part. I'll restore to images to the articles once they're restored to Commons). Abzeronow (talk) 15:45, 6 April 2022 (UTC)
You may note, however, that a number of images that I posted with Commons were not deleted, although they date well after 1927, even on those articles that they made other wholesale deletions. Wikipedia is peppered with thousands of images that Commons sees fit to leave unmolested. It is a pity that the images deleted from the Tod Browning article, especially those dealing with Freaks (1932), could not have been legitimized. Nothing very savory here. --50.227.224.56 (talk) 17:18, 8 April 2022 (UTC)
ArbCom 2022 Elections voter message
[edit]Hello! Voting in the 2022 Arbitration Committee elections is now open until 23:59 (UTC) on Monday, 12 December 2022. All eligible users are allowed to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once.
The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.
If you wish to participate in the 2022 election, please review the candidates and submit your choices on the voting page. If you no longer wish to receive these messages, you may add {{NoACEMM}} to your user talk page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 01:31, 29 November 2022 (UTC)
The Salvation Hunters (1925)
[edit]Thank you restoring the images to this article. The seminal work by Sternberg. Did you know that the female protagonist, Georgia Hale was selected by Charlie Chaplin to star opposite him in The Gold Rush (1925), based on her performance alone? CerroFerro (talk) 16:44, 26 February 2023 (UTC)
- No, I did not know that, but it definitely was a pleasure to request undeletion for those images. It definitely sounds like a film I should watch one of these days. Abzeronow (talk) 16:48, 26 February 2023 (UTC)
- Can you tell me on what basis the images were originally deleted? Just curious. CerroFerro (talk) 16:25, 5 March 2023 (UTC)
- They were this DR, C:Commons:Deletion requests/Files uploaded by CerroFerro. Actually, I see a few more photos I can request undeletion on now (my UDR request was before 1927 works entered the public domain in the US). Abzeronow (talk) 16:35, 5 March 2023 (UTC)
- If you would be so kind, please proceed with the other undeletions.
- As to Charlie Chaplin and Georgia Hale, a book was recently written about their professional relationship on the set of The Gold Rush, Charlie Chaplin: Intimate Close-Ups (1995). Just discovered this myself. Best Regards. CerroFerro (talk) 17:13, 5 March 2023 (UTC)
- Undeletion of 1927 files and a 1925 file is complete. I added the Undelete in 2024 for The Last Command files so those should be restored next year without any action from me (unless I become an administrator on Commons in the meantime). I've heard Children of Divorce is a great film and helping to restore a now-free image of Gary Cooper and Clara Bow feels good. Abzeronow (talk) 16:54, 8 March 2023 (UTC)
- They were this DR, C:Commons:Deletion requests/Files uploaded by CerroFerro. Actually, I see a few more photos I can request undeletion on now (my UDR request was before 1927 works entered the public domain in the US). Abzeronow (talk) 16:35, 5 March 2023 (UTC)
- Can you tell me on what basis the images were originally deleted? Just curious. CerroFerro (talk) 16:25, 5 March 2023 (UTC)
Hi Abzeronow: I have seen the following permission message on hundreds of images available at Wiki Commons, even when the image was created less than 95 years ago. How is the legitimacy determined for these photos? --CerroFerro (talk) 13:54, 15 March 2023 (UTC)
- Usually the renewal database is checked for titles or authors matching descriptions and if they aren't found in the renewal database, that is how the nonrenewal of published works from 1928 to 1963 would be checked. Artwork seems to be trickier to do that for though. As previously mentioned, next year all the 1928 files that you uploaded will get undeleted and in time, the other files will also get undeleted. Film stills would fall under the film's copyright, and usually the copyrights for films were renewed (URAA restored the copyright of foreign films that had their US copyrights lapse and obviously some films were not renewed, those are usually well-known for not having their copyright renewed). Abzeronow (talk) 15:55, 15 March 2023 (UTC)
Your submission at Articles for creation: Sumner H. Lark has been accepted
[edit]Congratulations, and thank you for helping expand the scope of Wikipedia! We hope you will continue making quality contributions.
The article has been assessed as Start-Class, which is recorded on its talk page. Most new articles start out as Stub-Class or Start-Class and then attain higher grades as they develop over time. You may like to take a look at the grading scheme to see how you can improve the article.
If you have any questions, you are welcome to ask at the help desk. Once you have made at least 10 edits and had an account for at least four days, you will have the option to create articles yourself without posting a request to Articles for creation.
If you would like to help us improve this process, please consider .
Thanks again, and happy editing!
S0091 (talk) 17:50, 3 May 2023 (UTC)Women in Red
[edit]Hi there, Abzeronow, and welcome to Women in Red. It's good to see you are interested in covering women from the 1920s. When you feel ready to create your first biography of a woman, you might find it useful to look through our Ten Simple Rules. Please let me know if you run into any difficulties or need assistance. Happy editing!--Ipigott (talk) 08:47, 4 May 2023 (UTC)
- I've started writing an article on Florence Brevoort Kane, an American sculptor who was deaf, in my sandbox. I'll probably finish it sometime this weekend or next week. I'll probably check out if I can find articles about her on Newspapers.com this weekend too. Abzeronow (talk) 19:04, 4 May 2023 (UTC)
- That sounds good. Let me know when you would like me to take a look.--Ipigott (talk) 07:19, 5 May 2023 (UTC)
I have sent you a note about a page you started
[edit]Hello, Abzeronow. Thank you for your work on Florence Brevoort Kane. User:Netherzone, while examining this page as a part of our page curation process, had the following comments:
Thank you for creating this article on a woman sculptor, It looks great! Just wondering if there may be images of her early work that are out of copyright that could be added to the article?
To reply, leave a comment here and begin it with {{Re|Netherzone}}. Please remember to sign your reply with ~~~~. (Message delivered via the Page Curation tool, on behalf of the reviewer.)
Netherzone (talk) 17:28, 13 May 2023 (UTC)
- @Netherzone:, yes, I could upload a photo of a bust she made in 1923 of James K. Hackett. I'll do it locally to Wikipedia since it was made in France and I'm unsure if France would be considered country of origin. I'll do that shortly. Abzeronow (talk) 17:35, 13 May 2023 (UTC)
- Great! The French copyright laws do seem complicated based on the info found here: List of countries' copyright lengths. Netherzone (talk) 18:32, 13 May 2023 (UTC)
Women in Red - June 2023
[edit]
See also:
Tip of the month:
Other ways to participate:
|
--Lajmmoore (talk) 09:14, 28 May 2023 (UTC) via MassMessaging
AfC notification: Draft:Azouaou Mammeri has a new comment
[edit]Women in Red July 2023
[edit]
Tip of the month:
Other ways to participate:
|
--Lajmmoore (talk) 07:42, 27 June 2023 (UTC) via MassMessaging
Your submission at Articles for creation: Azouaou Mammeri has been accepted
[edit]Congratulations, and thank you for helping expand the scope of Wikipedia! We hope you will continue making quality contributions.
The article has been assessed as Start-Class, which is recorded on its talk page. Most new articles start out as Stub-Class or Start-Class and then attain higher grades as they develop over time. You may like to take a look at the grading scheme to see how you can improve the article.
If you have any questions, you are welcome to ask at the help desk. Once you have made at least 10 edits and had an account for at least four days, you will have the option to create articles yourself without posting a request to Articles for creation.
If you would like to help us improve this process, please consider .
Thanks again, and happy editing!
gobonobo + c 04:27, 2 July 2023 (UTC)Women in Red 8th Anniversary
[edit]|
|
Women in Red 8th Anniversary |
| In July 2015 around 15.5% of the English Wikipedia's biographies were about women. As of July 2023, 19.61% of the English Wikipedia's biographies are about women. That's a lot of biographies created in the effort to close the gender gap. Happy 8th Anniversary! Join us for some virtual cake and add comments or memories and please keep on editing to close the gap! |
--Lajmmoore (talk) 11:00, 18 July 2023 (UTC) via MassMessaging
Women in Red August 2023
[edit]
See also:
Tip of the month:
Other ways to participate:
|
--Lajmmoore (talk) 19:24, 28 July 2023 (UTC) via MassMessaging
September 2023 at Women In Red
[edit]
Tip of the month:
Other ways to participate:
|
--Victuallers (talk) 16:49, 25 August 2023 (UTC) via MassMessaging
Women in Red October 2023
[edit]
See also
Tip of the month:
Other ways to participate:
|
--Lajmmoore (talk) 10:51, 29 September 2023 (UTC) via MassMessaging
Women in Red - November 2023
[edit]
See also Tip of the month:
Other ways to participate:
|
--Lajmmoore (talk) 08:21, 26 October 2023 (UTC) via MassMessaging
Women in Red December 2023
[edit]
Tip of the month:
Other ways to participate:
|
--Lajmmoore (talk) 20:22, 27 November 2023 (UTC) via MassMessaging
ArbCom 2023 Elections voter message
[edit]Hello! Voting in the 2023 Arbitration Committee elections is now open until 23:59 (UTC) on Monday, 11 December 2023. All eligible users are allowed to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once.
The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.
If you wish to participate in the 2023 election, please review the candidates and submit your choices on the voting page. If you no longer wish to receive these messages, you may add {{NoACEMM}} to your user talk page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 00:50, 28 November 2023 (UTC)
Women in Red January 2024
[edit] 
Announcement
Tip of the month:
Other ways to participate:
|
Women in Red February 2024
[edit]
Announcement
Tip of the month:
Other ways to participate:
|
--Lajmmoore (talk 20:07, 28 January 2024 (UTC) via MassMessaging
Women in Red March 2024
[edit]
Announcements
Tip of the month:
Other ways to participate:
|
--Lajmmoore (talk 20:21, 25 February 2024 (UTC) via MassMessaging
Women in Red April 2024
[edit]
Announcements
Tip of the month:
Other ways to participate:
|
--Lajmmoore (talk 19:41, 30 March 2024 (UTC) via MassMessaging
CommonsDelinker & such
[edit]Greetings: Back in March of 2022 you restored an image to The Exquisite Sinner (1926), for which I thank you. Do you have a moment to check a number of images that were Delinked back in 2019 at The Case of Lena Smith. Are these eligible for re-posting? Lord Such&Such (talk) 18:45, 13 April 2024 (UTC)
- 1929 film, it will definitely be restored next year. Abzeronow (talk) 18:52, 13 April 2024 (UTC)
As an alternate method, can I use Wikipedia, not Commons, to create and post an image, like this, for example: https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/File:The_Spider%27s_House,_by_Paul_Bowles._Random_House_first_edition,_1955.jpg --Lord Such&Such (talk) 20:00, 16 April 2024 (UTC)
Women in Red May 2024
[edit]
Announcements from other communities
Tip of the month:
Other ways to participate:
|
--Lajmmoore (talk 06:16, 28 April 2024 (UTC) via MassMessaging
Women in Red June 2024
[edit]
Announcements from other communities
Tip of the month:
Other ways to participate:
|
--Lajmmoore (talk 07:03, 23 May 2024 (UTC) via MassMessaging
Women in Red July 2024
[edit]
Announcements from other communities
Tip of the month:
Other ways to participate:
|
--Lajmmoore (talk 14:26, 30 June 2024 (UTC) via MassMessaging
Women in Red August 2024
[edit]
Announcements from other communities
Tip of the month:
Other ways to participate:
|
--Lajmmoore (talk 19:55, 25 July 2024 (UTC) via MassMessaging
September 2024 at Women in Red
[edit]
Online events:
Announcements from other communities
Tip of the month:
Other ways to participate:
|
--Rosiestep (talk) 18:55, 26 August 2024 (UTC) via MassMessaging
Women in Red October 2024
[edit]
Online events:
Announcements from other communities
Tip of the month:
Other ways to participate:
|
--Lajmmoore (talk 08:03, 29 September 2024 (UTC) via MassMessaging
Women in Red November 2024
[edit]
Online events:
Announcements from other communities
Tip of the month:
Other ways to participate:
|
--Lajmmoore (talk 20:44, 29 October 2024 (UTC) via MassMessaging
Unblock review on Wikimedia Commons
[edit]Hi Abzeronow, do you have administrator rights on Wikimedia Commons? If so, may I please a request on the unblock of my Wikimedia Commons? My apologies for making a request on Wikipedia instead of Wikimedia Commons. I can't post or do anything on there because I'm blocked, so I flipped on to here. I want to ask you to take a review at the unblock of my account on Wikimedia Commons, I was blocked by Taivo for 1 month again due to copyright reasons. I have explained everything in my Commons user talk page at the very last bottom when you scroll down to the unblock review. Please review it and unblock me. Because I have pledged to not further upload copyright violations. Here's the link to this. https://commons.m.wikimedia.org/wiki/User_talk:KhantWiki#/editor/41 KhantWiki (talk) 18:47, 6 November 2024 (UTC)
- I have told KhantWiki not to use Wikipedia to contact editors in relation to matters applying to Commons. He has talk page access on Commons. JBW (talk) 19:41, 6 November 2024 (UTC)
- Thank you, JBW. I don't think the user knew that contacting editors on Wikipedia about matters on Commons is frowned upon. Abzeronow (talk) 19:45, 6 November 2024 (UTC)
- My apologies to you both JBW and Abzeronow, I have not been aware that it is frowned upon contacting editors on Wikipedia, I have no choice to do because I am blocked access to comment on user talk pages on Wikimedia Commons. KhantWiki (talk) 20:21, 6 November 2024 (UTC)
- For future reference, KhantWiki, I can be contacted by email on Commons. Abzeronow (talk) 20:29, 6 November 2024 (UTC)
- Thank you very much Abzeronow, also to JBW, I didn't really know that and I'm not really aware that editors do frowned upon users who are contacting them on Wikipedia with stuff related to Wikimedia Commons. If so, I apologize if my actions are inappropriate. I was blocked talk page access on contacting editors there. And yes I would like to contact you by email, if that's appropriate. Once again I'm sorry about my actions. I don't have any problems on Wikipedia, not at all, I didn't commit any vandalism or things that affect Wikipedia, since it's free of copyright here, it's easy for me to avoid problems. Only on Wikimedia Commons, I have lots of problems due to copyright. KhantWiki (talk) 20:40, 6 November 2024 (UTC)
- For future reference, KhantWiki, I can be contacted by email on Commons. Abzeronow (talk) 20:29, 6 November 2024 (UTC)
- My apologies to you both JBW and Abzeronow, I have not been aware that it is frowned upon contacting editors on Wikipedia, I have no choice to do because I am blocked access to comment on user talk pages on Wikimedia Commons. KhantWiki (talk) 20:21, 6 November 2024 (UTC)
- Thank you, JBW. I don't think the user knew that contacting editors on Wikipedia about matters on Commons is frowned upon. Abzeronow (talk) 19:45, 6 November 2024 (UTC)