User talk:Abledoc

Welcome!

Welcome to Wikipedia, Abledoc! I am LouriePieterse and have been editing Wikipedia for quite some time. I just wanted to say hi and welcome you to Wikipedia! If you have any questions, feel free to leave me a message on my talk page or by typing {{helpme}} at the bottom of this page. I love to help new users, so don't be afraid to leave a message! I hope you like the place and decide to stay. Here are some pages that you might find helpful:

I hope you enjoy editing here and being a Wikipedian! Oh yeah, I almost forgot, when you post on talk pages you should sign your name on talk pages using four tildes (~~~~); that should automatically produce your username and the date after your post. If you need help, check out Wikipedia:Questions, ask me on my talk page, or place {{helpme}} on your talk page and ask your question there. Again, welcome!

LouriePieterse (talk) 10:24, 12 June 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Improving Immunology Articles

Hi Abledoc, I am simply an editor who thinks some of the immunology articles on Wikipedia are far from complete and the quality can be easily improved. I'd love to do it all by myself, but it'd be even better to do it in a team, to be more efficient as well as to get a wider viewpoints (from the medical, molecular and cellular viewpoints for example). If you are interested, please go to here and just start editing. The purpose of the page (it's a new page) is simply to get everyone together and collaborate, as to ensure there's editors for different topics. I look forward to working with you soon, any help would be greatly appreciated. Kinkreet^{~♥moshi moshi♥~} 01:03, 6 May 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Category:Sainik School Kazhakootam alumni has been nominated for discussion

Category:Sainik School Kazhakootam alumni, which you created, has been nominated for possible deletion, merging, or renaming. A discussion is taking place to see if it abides with the categorization guidelines. If you would like to participate in the discussion, you are invited to add your comments at the category's entry on the categories for discussion page. Thank you. Redrose64 (talk) 08:26, 10 August 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Academic journal articles

Hi, I see that you created some stubs on academic journals. Some helpful tips on how to expand these to more complete articles (that actually show that these journals are notable) can be found here. --Randykitty (talk) 13:21, 23 August 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Yes, I see that there are a lot of missing things on wikipedia and the first step is to create a stub and then work on stuff later on. Is there a simpler primer on editing journal pages. Abledoc (talk) 16:37, 25 August 2016 (UTC)[reply]

With just a few minutes more, it's possible to create much more than a one-line stub (such as this one). Please see our journal article writing guide (which contains, a.o., pre-formatted references to independent sources, to show that a particular journal actually is notable). Hope this helps. --Randykitty (talk) 09:39, 2 November 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Thanks. Yes, it is a work in progress. I will be updating them further when I can get reliable links and references to what I will add later. As I have realised, there is no point in adding information (even where I know them to be accurate from having witnessed some of these close hand, without public documentation.

Correcting article name

If you realise an article is at the wrong title, as with Japanese College of Rheumatology, please don't just create a duplicate at the right title as you did at Japan College of Rheumatology. Use the "Move" tab to move the article to the new title, or use the Request Move process if necessary. I'll try to unpick the muddle here. PamD 22:59, 24 August 2016 (UTC)[reply]

ThanksAbledoc (talk) 14:54, 25 August 2016 (UTC)[reply]

CfD process

Next time you wish to nominate a category for deletion, please follow Wikipedia:Categories_for_discussion#HOWTO. This instruction looks more complicated than it actually is. Step 1 = check beforehand. Step 2 = put the right template on the category page. Step 3 = add the nomination to the discussion pages. Thank you. Marcocapelle (talk) 05:20, 1 September 2016 (UTC)[reply]

September 2016

Hello. Thank you for your contributions to Wikipedia.

When editing Wikipedia, there is a field labeled "Edit summary" below the main edit box. It looks like this:

Edit summary (Briefly describe your changes)

Please be sure to provide a summary of every edit you make, even if you write only the briefest of summaries. The summaries are very helpful to people browsing an article's history.

Edit summary content is visible in:

Please use the edit summary to explain your reasoning for the edit, or a summary of what the edit changes. Thanks! 220 of ^Borg 10:51, 24 September 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Speedy deletion nomination of Community Oriented Program for Control Of Rheumatic Diseases

If this is the first article that you have created, you may want to read the guide to writing your first article.
You may want to consider using the Article Wizard to help you create articles.

A tag has been placed on Community Oriented Program for Control Of Rheumatic Diseases requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia. This has been done under section A7 of the criteria for speedy deletion, because the article appears to be about an organization or company, but it does not credibly indicate how or why the subject is important or significant: that is, why an article about that subject should be included in an encyclopedia. Under the criteria for speedy deletion, such articles may be deleted at any time. Please read more about what is generally accepted as notable.

If you think this page should not be deleted for this reason, you may contest the nomination by visiting the page and clicking the button labelled "Contest this speedy deletion". This will give you the opportunity to explain why you believe the page should not be deleted. However, be aware that once a page is tagged for speedy deletion, it may be removed without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag from the page yourself, but do not hesitate to add information in line with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines. If the page is deleted, and you wish to retrieve the deleted material for future reference or improvement, then please contact the deleting administrator. Wiki Pancake ^{✉ 📖} 12:51, 3 November 2016 (UTC)[reply]

November 2016

Welcome to Wikipedia. It might not have been your intention, but you recently removed maintenance templates from Wikipedia. When removing maintenance templates, please be sure to either resolve the problem that the template refers to, or give a valid reason for the removal in the edit summary. If this was a mistake, don't worry, as your removal of this template has been reverted. Take a look at the welcome page to learn more about contributing to this encyclopedia, and if you would like to experiment, please use the sandbox. Thank you. Wiki Pancake ^{✉ 📖} 13:08, 3 November 2016 (UTC)[reply]

The page I was editing, where I was painstakingly adding references were wiped by your edit. I try to save edits every five minutes. People are not robots to create a perfect page in one shot. I keep saving to see how the edits look before proceeding further. I have not yet finished with the page. I am in the process of adding a news reference. At least have the courtesy of googling something before and wait for some time before taking the sword. Wikipedia pages linked to things from the third world are insignificant while all nonsense from the first world (that is why its is first world, I see) in insignificant

First, make sure to sign your message with four tidles (~~~~). Second, where I was painstakingly adding references were wiped by your edit isn't an excuse when your article isn't in draft space/your sandbox. This should clarify People are not robots to create a perfect page in one shot. If you can't create an article that doesn't meet the notability guideline in "one or two shots", create the article in the draft space, i.e. Draft:Community Oriented Program for Control Of Rheumatic Diseases. Removing maintaince templates are strictly against the rules. Please keep this in mind. Lastly, please read up on Wikipedia:Edit Conflict to deal with the The page I was editing, where I was painstakingly adding references were wiped by your edit. remarks. See my talk page for more information, but if you have any questions, feel free to contact me there. Happy editing, Wiki Pancake ^{✉ 📖} 13:17, 3 November 2016 (UTC)[reply]

How do you create a draft Abledoc (talk) 13:19, 3 November 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Just as simple as creating an article, but if you can add in refs and info into your current state, then there's no need to create a draft; It'll stay at stub class. Read up on WP:NOTABILITY, and if you believe your article passes the criteria, feel free to remove my maintaince template. Cheers, Wiki Pancake ^{✉ 📖} 13:24, 3 November 2016 (UTC)[reply]

I've replaced my template with an old one, as you wish. Wiki Pancake ^{✉ 📖} 13:29, 3 November 2016 (UTC)[reply]

There you go. This will prevent editors from AfD/CSDing the article. Please note that this template will be remove if not edited/expanded for some time. Wiki Pancake ^{✉ 📖} 13:31, 3 November 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Abledoc, to avoid interference when you create a new article, use your sandbox or draft space. There you can work without interruption until an article is ready for prime time. Hope this helps. --Randykitty (talk) 13:56, 3 November 2016 (UTC)[reply]

@Randykitty Thanks. BTW, I have a doubt, why are peer reviewed journal articles not considered a basis for significance. Shouldnt those who review articles at least google something before dismissing something. How can something that is in the title of 70+ journal article be not of significance. I think there should be guidance regarding this and wikipedia rules amended.

The article topic isn't what I'm not considering notable; it's the lack of content and sources. Infoboxes are a good method to summarize the article. The article can be put at stub-class but this does not mean that it is considered notable. Your article currently is okay, and has been put at stub-class. Also, external links are not allowed, please remove them from your article. You can cite it as a footnote. (Btw, Pinging with a simple "@" won't work; you have to use the

{{ping|USERNAME}}

template to ping the user. Happy editing, Wiki Pancake ^{✉ 📖} 14:34, 4 November 2016 (UTC)[reply]

@WikiPancake: I dont know how to create the Infobox. There are no easy way to add footnotes or references like adding an endnote reference. It takes much more time to create a reference element by element. Is there a quicker way of doing it. I will have to study some similar pages with Infobox and their structure. Now I will not be active for at least a month. Two conferences coming up, first at DC and then at Kochi Abledoc (talk) 18:34, 5 November 2016 (UTC)[reply]

ProveIt is a very simple way of referencing -- as it creates the template for you, and all you have to do is enter the required info (not all). You can enable it in the "Gadgets" section of your preferences section. As for infoboxes, simply read up on Infoboxes. If you have any more questions, asking them at the teahouse will give you a quick and specific reply. Happy editing, Wiki Pancake 11:51, 6 November 2016 (UTC)[reply]

ArbCom Elections 2016: Voting now open!

Hello, Abledoc. Voting in the 2016 Arbitration Committee elections is open from Monday, 00:00, 21 November through Sunday, 23:59, 4 December to all unblocked users who have registered an account before Wednesday, 00:00, 28 October 2016 and have made at least 150 mainspace edits before Sunday, 00:00, 1 November 2016.

The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.

If you wish to participate in the 2016 election, please review the candidates' statements and submit your choices on the voting page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 22:08, 21 November 2016 (UTC)[reply]

ArbCom 2017 election voter message

Hello, Abledoc. Voting in the 2017 Arbitration Committee elections is now open until 23.59 on Sunday, 10 December. All users who registered an account before Saturday, 28 October 2017, made at least 150 mainspace edits before Wednesday, 1 November 2017 and are not currently blocked are eligible to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once.

The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.

If you wish to participate in the 2017 election, please review the candidates and submit your choices on the voting page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 18:42, 3 December 2017 (UTC)[reply]

ArbCom 2018 election voter message

Hello, Abledoc. Voting in the 2018 Arbitration Committee elections is now open until 23.59 on Sunday, 2 December. All users who registered an account before Sunday, 28 October 2018, made at least 150 mainspace edits before Thursday, 1 November 2018 and are not currently blocked are eligible to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once.

The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.

If you wish to participate in the 2018 election, please review the candidates and submit your choices on the voting page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 18:42, 19 November 2018 (UTC)[reply]

ArbCom 2018 election voter message

Hello, Abledoc. Voting in the 2018 Arbitration Committee elections is now open until 23.59 on Sunday, 3 December. All users who registered an account before Sunday, 28 October 2018, made at least 150 mainspace edits before Thursday, 1 November 2018 and are not currently blocked are eligible to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once.

The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.

If you wish to participate in the 2018 election, please review the candidates and submit your choices on the voting page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 18:42, 19 November 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Aasheesh Pittie moved to draftspace

An article you recently created, Aasheesh Pittie, is not suitable as written to remain published. It needs more citations from reliable, independent sources. (?) Information that can't be referenced should be removed (verifiability is of central importance on Wikipedia). I've moved your draft to draftspace (with a prefix of "Draft:" before the article title) where you can incubate the article with minimal disruption. When you feel the article meets Wikipedia's general notability guideline and thus is ready for mainspace, please click on the "Submit your draft for review!" button at the top of the page. Ts12rAc^{talk to me} 17:29, 31 January 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Response: Aasheesh Pittie is among the most important people living today in Indian Ornithology. What he has done in the last few decaces (bringing people together, creating bibliography that is now searchable, and publishing Indian Birds is the modern equivalent of Allan Octavian Hume who is known as the "Pope of Indian Ornithology". While Europeans who shot or purchased birds not only birds named after them but are immmortalised in Wikipedia. Notability standards of western organisations like Wikipedia is clearly biased against asians and brown people.

Your submission at Articles for creation: Aasheesh Pittie (February 2)

Your recent article submission to Articles for Creation has been reviewed! Unfortunately, it has not been accepted at this time. The reasons left by Dan arndt were:

This submission's references do not show that the subject qualifies for a Wikipedia article—that is, they do not show significant coverage (not just passing mentions) about the subject in published, reliable, secondary sources that are independent of the subject (see the guidelines on the notability of people). Before any resubmission, additional references meeting these criteria should be added (see technical help and learn about mistakes to avoid when addressing this issue). If no additional references exist, the subject is not suitable for Wikipedia.

The content of this submission includes material that does not meet Wikipedia's minimum standard for inline citations. Please cite your sources using footnotes. For instructions on how to do this, please see Referencing for beginners. Thank you.

The comment the reviewer left was:

Fails WP:ANYBIO, lacks any reliable secondary sources or references.

Please check the submission for any additional comments left by the reviewer. You are encouraged to edit the submission to address the issues raised and resubmit when they have been resolved.

If you would like to continue working on the submission, go to Draft:Aasheesh Pittie and click on the "Edit" tab at the top of the window.
If you now believe the draft cannot meet Wikipedia's standards or do not wish to progress it further, you may request deletion. Please go to Draft:Aasheesh Pittie, click on the "Edit" tab at the top of the window, add "{{Db-g7}}" at the top of the draft text and click the blue "publish changes" button to save this edit.
If you do not make any further changes to your draft, in 6 months, it will be considered abandoned and may be deleted.
If you need any assistance, or have experienced any untoward behavior associated with this submission, you can ask for help at the Articles for creation help desk, on the reviewer's talk page or use Wikipedia's real-time chat help from experienced editors.

Dan arndt (talk) 08:22, 2 February 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Hello, Abledoc! Having an article declined at Articles for Creation can be disappointing. If you are wondering why your article submission was declined, please post a question at the Articles for creation help desk. If you have any other questions about your editing experience, we'd love to help you at the Teahouse, a friendly space on Wikipedia where experienced editors lend a hand to help new editors like yourself! See you there! Dan arndt (talk) 08:22, 2 February 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Your submission at Articles for creation: Aasheesh Pittie (February 2)

Your recent article submission to Articles for Creation has been reviewed! Unfortunately, it has not been accepted at this time. The reason left by Theroadislong was:

This submission's references do not show that the subject qualifies for a Wikipedia article—that is, they do not show significant coverage (not just passing mentions) about the subject in published, reliable, secondary sources that are independent of the subject (see the guidelines on the notability of people). Before any resubmission, additional references meeting these criteria should be added (see technical help and learn about mistakes to avoid when addressing this issue). If no additional references exist, the subject is not suitable for Wikipedia.

Please check the submission for any additional comments left by the reviewer. You are encouraged to edit the submission to address the issues raised and resubmit when they have been resolved.

If you would like to continue working on the submission, go to Draft:Aasheesh Pittie and click on the "Edit" tab at the top of the window.
If you now believe the draft cannot meet Wikipedia's standards or do not wish to progress it further, you may request deletion. Please go to Draft:Aasheesh Pittie, click on the "Edit" tab at the top of the window, add "{{Db-g7}}" at the top of the draft text and click the blue "publish changes" button to save this edit.
If you do not make any further changes to your draft, in 6 months, it will be considered abandoned and may be deleted.
If you need any assistance, or have experienced any untoward behavior associated with this submission, you can ask for help at the Articles for creation help desk, on the reviewer's talk page or use Wikipedia's real-time chat help from experienced editors.

Theroadislong (talk) 09:24, 2 February 2022 (UTC)[reply]

ArbCom 2022 Elections voter message

Hello! Voting in the 2022 Arbitration Committee elections is now open until 23:59 (UTC) on Monday, 12 December 2022. All eligible users are allowed to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once.

The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.

If you wish to participate in the 2022 election, please review the candidates and submit your choices on the voting page. If you no longer wish to receive these messages, you may add {{NoACEMM}} to your user talk page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 00:36, 29 November 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Concern regarding Draft:Aasheesh Pittie

Hello, Abledoc. This is a bot-delivered message letting you know that Draft:Aasheesh Pittie, a page you created, has not been edited in at least 5 months. Drafts that have not been edited for six months may be deleted, so if you wish to retain the page, please edit it again or request that it be moved to your userspace.

If the page has already been deleted, you can request it be undeleted so you can continue working on it.

Thank you for your submission to Wikipedia. FireflyBot (talk) 02:01, 2 December 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Your draft article, Draft:Aasheesh Pittie

Hello, Abledoc. It has been over six months since you last edited the Articles for Creation submission or Draft page you started, "Aasheesh Pittie".

In accordance with our policy that Wikipedia is not for the indefinite hosting of material deemed unsuitable for the encyclopedia mainspace, the draft has been deleted. When you plan on working on it further and you wish to retrieve it, you can request its undeletion. An administrator will, in most cases, restore the submission so you can continue to work on it.

Thanks for your submission to Wikipedia, and happy editing. Liz ^{Read! Talk!} 01:21, 2 January 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Nomination of Indian Rheumatology Association for deletion

A discussion is taking place as to whether the article Indian Rheumatology Association is suitable for inclusion in Wikipedia according to Wikipedia's policies and guidelines or whether it should be deleted.

The article will be discussed at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Indian Rheumatology Association until a consensus is reached, and anyone, including you, is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on high-quality evidence and our policies and guidelines.

Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion notice from the top of the article until the discussion has finished.

WikiOriginal-9 (talk) 03:26, 13 November 2023 (UTC)[reply]