User talk:Abhishek aradhya

Ways to improve Aradhya

Hi, I'm Bfpage. Abhishek aradhya, thanks for creating Aradhya!

I've just tagged the page, using our page curation tools, as having some issues to fix. Nice job on the article. I encourage you to keep on editing because this article has the potential of being even better.

Best regards,

The tags can be removed by you or another editor once the issues they mention are addressed. If you have questions, you can leave a comment on my talk page. Or, for more editing help, talk to the volunteers at the Teahouse. bpage (talk) 18:14, 18 July 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Speedy deletion nomination of Aradhya

If this is the first article that you have created, you may want to read the guide to writing your first article.
You may want to consider using the Article Wizard to help you create articles.

A tag has been placed on Aradhya, requesting that it be deleted from Wikipedia. This has been done under two or more of the criteria for speedy deletion, by which articles can be deleted at any time, without discussion. If the page meets any of these strictly-defined criteria, then it may be soon be deleted by an administrator. The reasons it has been tagged are:

It is an article with no content whatsoever, or whose contents consist only of external links, a "See also" section, book references, category tags, template tags, interwiki links, a rephrasing of the title, or an attempt to contact the subject of the article. (See section A3 of the criteria for speedy deletion.) Wikipedia has standards for the minimum necessary information to be included in short articles; you can see these at Wikipedia:Stub. Also please note that articles must be on notable subjects and should provide references to reliable sources that verify their content.
It appears to be about something made up, and it does not indicate how or why the subject is important or significant: that is, why an article about that subject should be included in an encyclopedia. (See section A11 of the criteria for speedy deletion.)

If you think this page should not be deleted for this reason, you may contest the nomination by visiting the page and clicking the button labelled "Contest this speedy deletion". This will give you the opportunity to explain why you believe the page should not be deleted. However, be aware that once a page is tagged for speedy deletion, it may be removed without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag from the page yourself, but do not hesitate to add information in line with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines. If the page is deleted, and you wish to retrieve the deleted material for future reference or improvement, then please contact the deleting administrator, or if you have already done so, you can place a request here. KCVelaga _{☚╣✉╠☛} 06:26, 23 October 2015 (UTC)[reply]

September 2016

Please stop your disruptive editing. If you continue to vandalize Wikipedia, as you did at Idea Cellular, you may be blocked from editing. —SpacemanSpiff 06:30, 16 September 2016 (UTC) Ass hole[reply]

Jio

Hello Abhishek aradhya, see here. Regards --Serols (talk) 15:39, 16 September 2016 (UTC)[reply]

You may be blocked from editing without further warning the next time you vandalize Wikipedia, as you did with this edit to Yaduveer Krishnadatta Chamaraja Wadiyar. ArglebargleIV (talk) 03:03, 17 September 2016 (UTC)[reply]

September 2016

Please stop your disruptive editing. If you continue to vandalize pages by deliberately introducing incorrect information, as you did at BMW, you may be blocked from editing. Your change was unexplained and unsourced. If this is not a deliberate factual error, you must cite a source and always provide an edit summary which properly explains your changes. Murph9000 (talk) 11:19, 18 September 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Hello. Thank you for your contributions to Wikipedia.

When editing Wikipedia, there is a field labeled "Edit summary" below the main edit box. It looks like this:

Edit summary (Briefly describe your changes)

Please be sure to provide a summary of every edit you make, even if you write only the briefest of summaries. The summaries are very helpful to people browsing an article's history.

Edit summary content is visible in:

Please use the edit summary to explain your reasoning for the edit, or a summary of what the edit changes. Thanks! Murph9000 (talk) 11:21, 18 September 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Managing a conflict of interest

Hello, Abhishek aradhya. We welcome your contributions, but if you have an external relationship with the people, places, or things you have written about in the article Jio, you may have a conflict of interest (COI). Editors with a COI may be unduly influenced by their connection to the topic, and it is important when editing Wikipedia articles that such connections be completely transparent. See the conflict of interest guideline and FAQ for organizations for more information. In particular, we ask that you please:

avoid editing or creating articles related to you and your family, friends, school, company, club, or organization, as well as any competing companies' projects or products;
instead, you are encouraged to propose changes on the Talk pages of affected article(s) (see the {{request edit}} template);
when discussing affected articles, disclose your COI (see WP:DISCLOSE);
avoid linking to the Wikipedia article or to the website of your organization in other articles (see WP:SPAM);
exercise great caution so that you do not violate Wikipedia's content policies.

In addition, you must disclose your employer, client, and affiliation with respect to any contribution for which you receive, or expect to receive, compensation (see WP:PAID).

Please take a few moments to read and review Wikipedia's policies regarding conflicts of interest, especially those pertaining to neutral point of view, sourcing and autobiographies. Employees[1] of a company should not be editing its article, articles relating to their competitors, or industry areas where it would be possible to insert bias towards your company. Your unexplained edits, many lacking sources, create a major problem for this article and all of the articles within the same industry that you have been editing. Please read the conflict of interest policy closely, as you are in violation of it. Murph9000 (talk) 11:32, 18 September 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Adding to Murph's wise comments. If you still want to add some constructive content to the page that are supported by reliable sources, please raise them on the article's Talk page. We all will be glad to help you out. But, please, refrain from adding data yourself (to this article) since you have claimed to be an employee of the company. I hope you follow this sincere request. Best, Nairspecht (talk) (work) 13:17, 18 September 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Proposed deletion of Aradhya

The article Aradhya has been proposed for deletion because of the following concern:

I'm not seeing any significant and/or non-trivial coverage in any reliable source (books, scholarly dissertations et al), to justify a standalone article.

While all constructive contributions to Wikipedia are appreciated, pages may be deleted for any of several reasons.

You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the {{proposed deletion/dated}} notice, but please explain why in your edit summary or on the article's talk page.

Please consider improving the page to address the issues raised. Removing {{proposed deletion/dated}} will stop the proposed deletion process, but other deletion processes exist. In particular, the speedy deletion process can result in deletion without discussion, and articles for deletion allows discussion to reach consensus for deletion. ~ Winged Blades^Godric 15:50, 7 June 2018 (UTC)[reply]