User talk:Abhijeet Sinha Sinha

Abhijeet Sinha Sinha, you are invited to the Teahouse

Hi Abhijeet Sinha Sinha! Thanks for contributing to Wikipedia. Please join other people who edit Wikipedia at the Teahouse! The Teahouse is a friendly space on Wikipedia where new editors can ask questions about contributing to Wikipedia and get help from peers and experienced editors. I hope to see you there! Benzband (I'm a Teahouse host)

Visit the Teahouse

This message was delivered automatically by your friendly neighborhood HostBot (talk) 01:40, 8 October 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Welcome

Hello, Abhijeet Sinha Sinha, and welcome to Wikipedia! Thank you for your contributions.

I notice that one of the first articles you created was Wikipedia talk:Articles for creation/Abhijeet Sinha, which appears to be an article about yourself. This is a common mistake made by new Wikipedians—as this is an encyclopedia, we wouldn't expect to have an article about every contributor. Your user page, however, is a great place to write about yourself, making sure to stay within user page guidelines. Just click your user name at the top of the screen when you are logged in, and edit it normally.

The page you created about yourself may well be deleted from the encyclopedia. If it is deleted and you wish to retrieve its contents, don't hesitate to ask anyone from this list and they will copy it to your user page.

If you are stuck, and looking for help, please come to the New contributors' help page, where experienced Wikipedians can answer any queries you have! Or, you can just type {{helpme}} on your user page, and someone will show up shortly to answer your questions. Here are a few other good links for newcomers:

I hope you enjoy editing here and being a Wikipedian! Please sign your name on talk pages using four tildes (~~~~); this will automatically produce your name and the date. If you have any questions, check out Wikipedia:Where to ask a question or ask me on my talk page. Again, welcome! SarahStierch (talk) 07:40, 22 October 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Your submission at Articles for creation

Thank you for your recent submission to Articles for Creation. Your article submission has been reviewed. Unfortunately, it has not been accepted at this time. Please view your submission to see the comments left by the reviewer. You are welcome to edit the submission to address the issues raised, and resubmit once you feel they have been resolved.

If you would like to continue working on the submission, you can find it at Wikipedia talk:Articles for creation/Abhijeet Sinha.
To edit the submission, click on the "Edit" tab at the top of the window.
If you need any assistance, you can ask for help at the Articles for creation help desk, or on the reviewer's talk page. Please remember to link to the submission!
You can also get live chat help from experienced editors.

Thank you for your contributions to Wikipedia! SarahStierch (talk) 07:40, 22 October 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Corruption in India

Hi, Abhijeet Sinha Sinha. Wikipedia is not a reliable source so it cannot be used to support content addition. Using an article that was declined at AFC almost a month ago is a complete non-starter. Please read WP:Identifying reliable sources. Tiderolls 19:46, 22 November 2012 (UTC)[reply]

In response to your feedback

Why don't you edit your article then?

Skamecrazy123 (talk) 01:24, 15 January 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Teahouse talkback: you've got messages!

Hello, Abhijeet Sinha Sinha. Your question has been answered at the Teahouse Q&A board. Feel free to reply there!
Please note that all old questions are archived after 2-3 days of inactivity. Message added by NtheP (talk) 21:52, 20 January 2013 (UTC). (You can remove this notice at any time by removing the {{teahouse talkback}} template).[reply]

The Teahouse Turns One!

It's been an exciting year for the Teahouse and you were a part of it. Thanks so much for visiting, asking questions, sharing answers, being friendly and helpful, and just keeping Teahouse an awesome place. You can read more about the impact we're having and the reflections of other guests and hosts like you. Please come by the Teahouse to celebrate with us, and enjoy this sparkly cupcake badge as our way of saying thank you. And, Happy Birthday!

	Teahouse First Birthday Badge
	Awarded to everyone who participated in the Wikipedia Teahouse during its first year! To celebrate the many hosts and guests we've met and the nearly 2000 questions asked and answered during this excellent first year, we're giving out this tasty cupcake badge. Earn more badges at: Teahouse Badges

--Ocaasi and the rest of the Teahouse Team 22:46, 27 February 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Congrats... You created your Teahouse profile!

Welcome!

	Welcome to the Teahouse Badge
	Awarded to editors who have introduced themselves at the Wikipedia Teahouse. Guest editors with this badge show initiative and a great drive to learn how to edit Wikipedia. Earn more badges at: Teahouse Badges

Ocaasi^{t | c} 16:14, 4 March 2013 (UTC)[reply]

March 2013

Please do not write or add to an article about yourself, as you apparently did at Abhijeet Sinha. Creating an autobiography is strongly discouraged – see our guideline on writing autobiographies. If you create such an article, it may be deleted. If what you have done in life is genuinely notable and can be verified according to our policy for articles about living people, someone else will probably create an article about you sooner or later (see Wikipedians with articles). If you wish to add to an existing article about yourself, please propose the changes on its talk page. Please understand that this is an encyclopedia and not a personal web space or social networking site. If your article has already been deleted, please see: Why was my page deleted?, and if you feel the deletion was an error, please discuss it with the deleting administrator. Thank you. AllyD (talk) 20:48, 24 March 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Hello, I'm UncleBubba. I wanted to let you know that I undid one or more of your recent contributions to Social science because it appeared to be promotional. Advertising and using Wikipedia as a "soapbox" are against Wikipedia policy and not permitted. Take a look at the welcome page to learn more about Wikipedia. Thank you. — UncleBubba ^{( T @ C )} 12:57, 25 March 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Thank you for your contributions. Please remember to mark your edits as "minor" only if they truly are minor edits. In accordance with Help:Minor edit, a minor edit is one that the editor believes requires no review and could never be the subject of a dispute. Minor edits consist of things such as typographical corrections, formatting changes or rearrangement of text without modification of content. Additionally, the reversion of clear-cut vandalism and test edits may be labeled "minor". Thank you. — UncleBubba ^{( T @ C )} 12:58, 25 March 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Speedy deletion nomination of Abhijeet Sinha

If this is the first article that you have created, you may want to read the guide to writing your first article.
You may want to consider using the Article Wizard to help you create articles.

A tag has been placed on Abhijeet Sinha requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia. This has been done under section G12 of the criteria for speedy deletion, because the article or image appears to be a clear copyright infringement. For legal reasons, we cannot accept copyrighted text or images borrowed from other web sites or printed material, and as a consequence, your addition will most likely be deleted. You may use external websites as a source of information, but not as a source of sentences. This part is crucial: say it in your own words. Wikipedia takes copyright violations very seriously and persistent violators will be blocked from editing.

If the external website or image belongs to you, and you want to allow Wikipedia to use the text or image — which means allowing other people to modify it — then you must verify that externally by one of the processes explained at Wikipedia:Donating copyrighted materials. If you are not the owner of the external website or image but have permission from that owner, see Wikipedia:Requesting copyright permission. You might want to look at Wikipedia's policies and guidelines for more details, or ask a question here.

If you think this page should not be deleted for this reason, you may contest the nomination by visiting the page and clicking the button labelled "Click here to contest this speedy deletion". This will give you the opportunity to explain why you believe the page should not be deleted. However, be aware that once a page is tagged for speedy deletion, it may be removed without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag from the page yourself, but do not hesitate to add information in line with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines. reddogsix (talk) 20:56, 24 March 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Your contributed article, Wikipedia talk:Articles for creation/Abhijeet Sinha

If this is the first article that you have created, you may want to read the guide to writing your first article.
You may want to consider using the Article Wizard to help you create articles.

Hello, I noticed that you recently created a new page, Wikipedia talk:Articles for creation/Abhijeet Sinha. First, thank you for your contribution; Wikipedia relies solely on the efforts of volunteers such as you. Unfortunately, the page you created covers a topic on which we already have a page – Abhijeet Sinha. Because of the duplication, your article has been tagged for speedy deletion. Please note that this is not a comment on you personally and we hope you will continue helping to improve Wikipedia. If the topic of the article you created is one that interests you, then perhaps you would like to help out at Abhijeet Sinha – you might like to discuss new information at the article's talk page.

If you think the article you created should remain separate, you may contest the nomination by visiting the page and clicking the button labelled "Click here to contest this speedy deletion". This will give you the opportunity to explain why you believe the page should not be deleted. However, be aware that once a page is tagged for speedy deletion, it may be removed without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag from the page yourself, but do not hesitate to add information in line with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines. If the page is deleted, and you wish to retrieve the deleted material for future reference or improvement, you can place a request here. Additionally if you would like to have someone review articles you create before they go live so they are not nominated for deletion shortly after you post them, allow me to suggest the article creation process and using our search feature to find related information we already have in the encyclopedia. Try not to be discouraged. Wikipedia looks forward to your future contributions. — CactusWriter ^(talk) 23:02, 24 March 2013 (UTC)[reply]

User Page

Hello, and welcome to Wikipedia I noticed that your user page may not meet Wikipedia's user page guideline -- in particular, please read about Excessive unrelated content and Pages that look like articles. User pages which do not meet the guidelines will be listed for deletion. If you believe that your user page does not violate our guideline, please leave a note on this page. Alternatively you may add {{Db-userreq}} to the top of the page in question and an administrator will delete it, or you can simply edit the page so that it meets Wikipedia's user page guideline. Thank you. — CactusWriter ^(talk) 17:42, 25 March 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Proposed deletion of ASSAR

The article ASSAR has been proposed for deletion because of the following concern:

This article fails notability criteria for organizations per both WP:ORG and WP:GNG -- appears to be only one person's website, all text is sourced to and copied from that single website, and a search found no independent reliable sources.

While all constructive contributions to Wikipedia are appreciated, content or articles may be deleted for any of several reasons.

You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the {{proposed deletion/dated}} notice, but please explain why in your edit summary or on the article's talk page.

Please consider improving the article to address the issues raised. Removing {{proposed deletion/dated}} will stop the proposed deletion process, but other deletion processes exist. In particular, the speedy deletion process can result in deletion without discussion, and articles for deletion allows discussion to reach consensus for deletion. — CactusWriter ^(talk) 18:02, 25 March 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Welcome to Wikipedia. Please do not remove Articles for deletion notices from articles, or remove other people's comments in Articles for deletion debates, as you did with ASSAR. Otherwise, it may be difficult to create consensus. If you oppose the deletion of an article, please comment at the respective page instead. Thank you. ChrisHodgesUK (talk) 17:28, 27 March 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Talkback

Hello, Abhijeet Sinha Sinha. You have new messages at ChrisHodgesUK's talk page.
Message added 17:42, 27 March 2013 (UTC). You can remove this notice at any time by removing the {{Talkback}} or {{Tb}} template.[reply]

ChrisHodgesUK (talk) 17:42, 27 March 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Nomination of ASSAR for deletion

A discussion is taking place as to whether the article ASSAR is suitable for inclusion in Wikipedia according to Wikipedia's policies and guidelines or whether it should be deleted.

The article will be discussed at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/ASSAR until a consensus is reached, and anyone is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on high-quality evidence and our policies and guidelines.

Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion notice from the top of the article. — CactusWriter ^(talk) 18:44, 27 March 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Your use of multiple Wikipedia accounts

Hi. An editor has opened an investigation into sockpuppetry by you. Sockpuppetry is the use of more than one Wikipedia account, which contravenes community policy. The investigation is being held at Wikipedia:Sockpuppet investigations/Abhijeet Sinha Sinha, where the editor who opened the investigation has presented their evidence. Please make sure you make yourself familiar with the guide to responding to investigations, and then feel free to offer your own evidence or to submit comments that you wish to be considered by the Wikipedia administrator who decides the result of the investigation. If you have been using multiple accounts (in a manner contrary to Wikipedia policy), please go to the investigation page and admit to it now. Leniency is usually shown to those who promise not to do so again, or who did so unwittingly, but the abuse of multiple accounts is taken very seriously by the Wikipedia community.

AllyD (talk) 09:48, 30 March 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Blocked for sockpuppetry

This account has been blocked from editing for a period of 1 week for sock puppetry per evidence presented at Wikipedia:Sockpuppet investigations/Abhijeet Sinha Sinha. Note that multiple accounts are allowed, but using them for illegitimate reasons is not. Once the block has expired, you're welcome to make useful contributions. If you believe that this block was in error, and you would like to be unblocked, you may appeal this block by adding the text {{unblock|Your reason here ~~~~}} below, but you should read the guide to appealing blocks first. Someguy1221 (talk) 09:56, 30 March 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Unblock blocked of both accounts are not justified under sock puppetry both were the editor/author's account. Author was new to Wikipedia & selected first account's username similar to the subjects name on which he was writing, which was indicated as mistake by other editors, as this similarity may lead to a perception of AUTO-BIOGRAPHY. To avoid this misinterpretation new account was created by author. I was about to clear it when I received information of Wikipedia:Sockpuppet investigations/Abhijeet Sinha Sinha but it got blocked within hours before I do. I welcome blocking of old account with in appropriate user name but blocking of new account which was created as suggested by Wikipedian & its guidelines is not justified and like keeping the author mute and away from discussion to WP:DEMOLISH his articles. — Preceding unsigned comment added by Abhijeet Sinha Sinha (talk • contribs) 11:54, 30 March 2013‎‎

The sockpuppet investigation and subsequent block of your accounts was not opened until March 30. That was a full day after you began using both accounts alternately to edit ASSAR and a deletion debate. This was a clear violation of WP:ILLEGIT. Also, it appears that you were fine with continuing to use this account everyday for an entire week after the username policy was pointed out to you -- but then decided to create a new name only after the AFD was opened -- and continued to cast !votes with the old account. Sorry, but your explanation does not jibe with your actions. — CactusWriter ^(talk) 18:04, 31 March 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Accepted but its clearly visible that Wikipedia:Sock puppetry|sock puppetry]] investigation was opened by AllyD (talk) on 09:48, 30 March 2013 (UTC)where I was advised to admit of I own both accounts but my ID was blocked within 8 minutes on 09:56, 30 March 2013 (UTC) by by Someguy1221 (talk). I was not given time to respond or submit my evidence or comments to Wikipedia administrator who decides the result of the investigation. Leniency is usually shown to those who promise not to do so again, or who did so unwittingly both are applicable in my case and moreover I am not against blocking. I am welcoming the blocking of my old account but there is no point of being biased or prejudiced in hurry and ignoring (NPOV).

Disambiguation link notification for April 12

Hi. Thank you for your recent edits. Wikipedia appreciates your help. We noticed though that when you edited List of women's rights activists, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Ind (check to confirm | fix with Dab solver). Such links are almost always unintended, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of "Did you mean..." article titles. Read the FAQ • Join us at the DPL WikiProject.

It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot (talk) 09:33, 12 April 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Final warning

Abhijeet Sinha Sinha, you have been notified repeatedly that articles about yourself or your personal website are inappropriate for Wikipedia. These articles have been deleted. Self Promotion is incompatible with an encyclopedia and a violation of neutral point-of-view. You are welcome to contribute to Wikipedia so long as you abide by our core policies -- but if you continue to insert your name into mainspace articles as you just did again at List of women's rights activists, then you will be blocked from editing as a disruptive single purpose account. — CactusWriter ^(talk) 18:24, 12 April 2013 (UTC)[reply]