User talk:Abdulmalik795

Welcome!

Hello, Abdulmalik795, and welcome to Wikipedia! I hope you like the place and decide to stay. Unfortunately, one or more of the pages you created, such as User:Abdulmalik795, may not conform to some of Wikipedia's guidelines, and may not be retained.

There's a page about creating articles you may want to read called Your first article. If you are stuck, and looking for help, please come to the Teahouse, where experienced Wikipedians can answer any queries you have! Or, you can just type {{help me}} on this page, followed by your question, and someone will show up shortly to answer your questions. Here are a few other good links for newcomers:

I hope you enjoy editing here and being a Wikipedian! Please sign your name on talk pages using four tildes (~~~~); this will automatically produce your name and the date. If you have any questions, check out Wikipedia:Questions or ask me on my talk page. Again, welcome! Cahk (talk) 10:48, 6 November 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Speedy deletion nomination of User:Abdulmalik795

A tag has been placed on User:Abdulmalik795 requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia. This has been done under section U5 of the criteria for speedy deletion, because the page appears to consist of writings, information, discussions, and/or activities not closely related to Wikipedia's goals. Please note that Wikipedia is not a free web hosting service. Under the criteria for speedy deletion, such pages may be deleted at any time.

If you think this page should not be deleted for this reason, you may contest the nomination by visiting the page and clicking the button labelled "Contest this speedy deletion". This will give you the opportunity to explain why you believe the page should not be deleted. However, be aware that once a page is tagged for speedy deletion, it may be deleted without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag from the page yourself, but do not hesitate to add information in line with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines. If the page is deleted, and you wish to retrieve the deleted material for future reference or improvement, then please contact the deleting administrator, or if you have already done so, you can place a request here. Cahk (talk) 10:48, 6 November 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Speedy deletion nomination of Draft:SmartBuyGlasses Optical Limited

If this is the first article that you have created, you may want to read the guide to writing your first article.
You may want to consider using the Article Wizard to help you create articles.

A tag has been placed on Draft:SmartBuyGlasses Optical Limited, requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia. This has been done under section G11 of the criteria for speedy deletion, because the page seems to be unambiguous advertising which only promotes a company, group, product, service, person, or point of view and would need to be fundamentally rewritten in order to become encyclopedic. Please read the guidelines on spam and Wikipedia:FAQ/Organizations for more information.

If you think this page should not be deleted for this reason, you may contest the nomination by visiting the page and clicking the button labelled "Contest this speedy deletion". This will give you the opportunity to explain why you believe the page should not be deleted. However, be aware that once a page is tagged for speedy deletion, it may be deleted without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag from the page yourself, but do not hesitate to add information in line with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines. If the page is deleted, and you wish to retrieve the deleted material for future reference or improvement, then please contact the deleting administrator. Natureium (talk) 19:20, 10 November 2018 (UTC)[reply]

COI

You have an obvious conflict of interest and you must declare it. If you work directly or indirectly for an organisation, or otherwise are acting on its behalf, you are very strongly discouraged from attempting to write an article at all. If you are paid directly or indirectly by the organisation you are writing about, you are required by the Wikimedia Terms of Use to disclose your employer, client and affiliation. You can post such a mandatory disclosure to your user page at User:Abdulmalik795. The template {{Paid}} can be used for this purpose – e.g. in the form: {{paid|user=Abdulmalik795|employer=InsertName|client=InsertName}}. If you are being compensated, please provide the required disclosure. Note that editing with a COI is discouraged, but permitted as long as it is declared. Concealing a COI can lead to a block. Please do not edit further until you respond to this message.

Also read the following regarding writing an article

you must provide independent verifiable sources to enable us to verify the facts and show that it meets the notability guidelines. Sources that are not acceptable include those linked to the organisation, press releases, YouTube, IMDB, social media and other sites that can be self-edited, blogs, websites of unknown or non-reliable provenance, and sites that are just reporting what the organisation claims or interviewing its management. Note that references should be in-line so we can tell what fact each is supporting, and should not be bare urls
The notability guidelines for organisations and companies have been updated. The primary criteria has five components that must be evaluated separately and independently to determine if it is met:

significant coverage in
independent,
multiple,
reliable,
secondary sources.

Note that an individual source must meet all four criteria to be counted towards notability.

you must write in a non-promotional tone. Articles must be neutral and encyclopaedic.
there shouldn't be any url links in the article, only in the "References" or "External links" sections.
you must not copy text from elsewhere. Copyrighted text is not allowed in Wikipedia, as outlined in this policy. That applies even to pages created by you or your organisation, unless they state clearly and explicitly that the text is public domain. We require that text posted here can be used, modified and distributed for any purpose, including commercial; text is considered to be copyright unless explicitly stated otherwise. There are ways to donate copyrighted text to Wikipedia, as described here; please note that simply asserting on the talk page that you are the owner of the copyright, or you have permission to use the text, isn't sufficient.

Before attempting to write an article again, please make sure that the topic meets the notability criteria linked above, and check that you can find independent third party sources. Also read Your first article. You must also reply to the COI request above Jimfbleak - talk to me? 19:40, 10 November 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Speedy deletion nomination of Kwame Christian Esq., M.A.

If this is the first article that you have created, you may want to read the guide to writing your first article.
You may want to consider using the Article Wizard to help you create articles.

A tag has been placed on Kwame Christian Esq., M.A., requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia. This has been done under section G11 of the criteria for speedy deletion, because the page seems to be unambiguous advertising which only promotes a company, group, product, service, person, or point of view and would need to be fundamentally rewritten in order to become encyclopedic. Please read the guidelines on spam and Wikipedia:FAQ/Organizations for more information.

If you think this page should not be deleted for this reason, you may contest the nomination by visiting the page and clicking the button labelled "Contest this speedy deletion". This will give you the opportunity to explain why you believe the page should not be deleted. However, be aware that once a page is tagged for speedy deletion, it may be deleted without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag from the page yourself, but do not hesitate to add information in line with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines. If the page is deleted, and you wish to retrieve the deleted material for future reference or improvement, then please contact the deleting administrator. ~ Amkgp 💬 03:49, 27 June 2020 (UTC)[reply]

June 2020

You have been blocked indefinitely from editing for advertising or self-promoting in violation of the conflict of interest and notability guidelines.

If you think there are good reasons for being unblocked, please read the guide to appealing blocks, then add the following text below the block notice on your talk page: {{unblock|reason=Your reason here ~~~~}}. Seraphimblade ^{Talk to me} 04:53, 27 June 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Blocked for editing

This user's unblock request has been reviewed by an administrator, who declined the request. Other administrators may also review this block, but should not override the decision without good reason (see the blocking policy).

Abdulmalik795 (block log • active blocks • global blocks • contribs • deleted contribs • filter log • creation log • change block settings • unblock • checkuser (log))

Request reason:

"You have been blocked indefinitely from editing for advertising or self-promoting in violation of the conflict of interest and notability guidelines. If you think there are good reasons for being unblocked, please read the guide to appealing blocks, then add the following text below the block notice on your talk page: {{unblock|reason=Your reason here [[User:Abdulmalik795|Abdulmalik795]] ([[User talk:Abdulmalik795#top|talk]]) 10:55, 1 July 2020 (UTC)}}. Seraphimblade Talk to me 04:53, 27 June 2020 (UTC)" That was the message I saw when I created a page, I was blocked for spamming and advertising but the page I created was neither for spamming or advertising purpose, it was on a neutral tone. Kindly help me unlock my account thanks.

Decline reason:

Your contributions to SmartBuyGlasses Optical Limited were blatant spam. Your contributions to Kwame Christian were also inappropriate. I looked at a number of edits from this account and they all appeared to be violating WP:COI, WP:PROMO, and likely, WP:PAID. If you think your marketing material is appropriate here, you are very much mistaken. Yamla (talk) 11:02, 1 July 2020 (UTC)[reply]

If you want to make any further unblock requests, please read the guide to appealing blocks first, then use the {{unblock}} template again. If you make too many unconvincing or disruptive unblock requests, you may be prevented from editing this page until your block has expired. Do not remove this unblock review while you are blocked.

Alright, I accept my mistake as a newbie, we learn everyday, I will try to learn more about WP:PROMO and WP:PAID. Can you Please unblock me? Abdulmalik795 (talk) 11:13, 1 July 2020 (UTC)[reply]

It doesn't seem like that would be a good idea. So, no, I have no intention of unblocking you. You are free to make a new unblock request, but you'll need to be a lot more honest about your previous edits. --Yamla (talk) 11:18, 1 July 2020 (UTC)[reply]

For example, I know you've been offering your services for hire, but attempted to mislead us in your unblock request... that won't work. Unless you fully and completely address your violations of WP:COI and WP:PAID, you'll have no chance here. Be careful, you'll likely only get one more chance, having squandered multiple previous opportunities to do the right thing. --Yamla (talk) 11:20, 1 July 2020 (UTC)[reply]

I have been honest with you, I am not trying to mislead you, you are the first person I turn to and I wish you can help me, I will subject myself to you, you can ask me any questions and I will answer politely. I was given a draft to upload that's all. Please help me. Abdulmalik795 (talk) 11:48, 1 July 2020 (UTC)[reply]

What's the possible way out please. Abdulmalik795 (talk) 11:49, 1 July 2020 (UTC)[reply]

The only possible way out is to be fully and completely honest. Who gave you a draft to upload? Why did they give this draft to you? How did this work come to you? What exactly (exactly, specifically) is your relationship to the people and companies you have written about? --Yamla (talk) 12:18, 1 July 2020 (UTC)[reply]

-Who gave you a draft to upload? The owner of the page, Kwame Christian, he is a professor and a mediator. -Why did they give this draft to you? He said he want to have a Wikipedia page. - How did this work come to you? I am a freelance writer. -What exactly (exactly, specifically) is your relationship to the people and companies you have written about? No relationship whatsoever. Abdulmalik795 (talk) 12:25, 1 July 2020 (UTC)[reply]

We aren't interested in you engaging in paid editing. If you can convince another admin that you understand and will start to abide by WP:COI, WP:PAID, and WP:PROMO, and if you tell us what you'll write about instead, you are free to request an unblock. You'll all but certainly need to agree to refrain from all future freelancer.com gigs. --Yamla (talk) 12:51, 1 July 2020 (UTC)[reply]

I will abide by WP:COI WP:PAID and WP:PROMO. Please

Abdulmalik795 (talk) 12:58, 1 July 2020 (UTC)[reply]

This user's unblock request has been reviewed by an administrator, who declined the request. Other administrators may also review this block, but should not override the decision without good reason (see the blocking policy).

Abdulmalik795 (block log • active blocks • global blocks • contribs • deleted contribs • filter log • creation log • change block settings • unblock • checkuser (log))

Request reason:

I was blocked indefinitely for more than a month because I created a page, I have learn my lesson, I know what's wrong and I feel remouseful, please I will like to be considered. Abdulmalik795 (talk) 17:26, 13 August 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Decline reason:

As noted, you won't be unblocked to continue to make paid edits or edits that violate WP:COI. If there are topics you want to edit about for which you have no connection at all, please tell what those might be. I am declining your request. 331dot (talk) 07:58, 14 August 2020 (UTC)[reply]

If you want to make any further unblock requests, please read the guide to appealing blocks first, then use the {{unblock}} template again. If you make too many unconvincing or disruptive unblock requests, you may be prevented from editing this page until your block has expired. Do not remove this unblock review while you are blocked.

Calm down, I did not say that I want to continue to edit paid edit. I just want to be unblock, I'm new, I can know it all ata once. Abdulmalik795 (talk) 21:23, 15 August 2020 (UTC)[reply]

I was blocked indefinitely for more than a month because I created a page, I have learn my lesson, I know what's wrong and I feel remouseful, please I will like to be considered. Abdulmalik795 (talk) 16:53, 4 September 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Block fore editing.

This user's unblock request has been reviewed by an administrator, who declined the request. Other administrators may also review this block, but should not override the decision without good reason (see the blocking policy).

Abdulmalik795 (block log • active blocks • global blocks • contribs • deleted contribs • filter log • creation log • change block settings • unblock • checkuser (log))

Request reason:

Although my account is 2 years old but I am a newbie to editing, I created a page recently and I was blocked indefinitely. I will like to be considered, I have learn my lesson and i have read and understand about Wikipedia notability. I request to be unblock in order to add more verified information to Wikipedia. Thanks. Abdulmalik795 (talk) 16:58, 4 September 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Decline reason:

Per below. MER-C 17:55, 4 September 2020 (UTC)[reply]

If you want to make any further unblock requests, please read the guide to appealing blocks first, then use the {{unblock}} template again. If you make too many unconvincing or disruptive unblock requests, you may be prevented from editing this page until your block has expired. Do not remove this unblock review while you are blocked.

As you are unwilling to follow the instructions you've been given, and as you tried to mislead us as to the nature of your edits, I am revoking talk page access to prevent you wasting any more of our time. --Yamla (talk) 17:35, 4 September 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Your ability to edit this talk page has been revoked as an administrator has identified your talk page edits as inappropriate and/or disruptive.

(block log • active blocks • global blocks • autoblocks • contribs • deleted contribs • abuse filter log • creation log • change block settings • unblock • checkuser (log))

If you think there are good reasons why you should be unblocked, you should read the guide to appealing blocks, then contact administrators by submitting a request to the Unblock Ticket Request System. If the block is a CheckUser or Oversight block, was made by the Arbitration Committee or to enforce an arbitration decision (arbitration enforcement), or is unsuitable for public discussion, you should appeal to the Arbitration Committee.
Please note that there could be appeals to the unblock ticket request system that have been declined leading to the post of this notice.