User talk:AbdulRahman14

A barnstar for you!

	The Minor barnstar
	Thanks for adding useful info. to Al-Ahly S.C. page Zo3a (talk) 18:15, 10 October 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Al-Ahly S.C.

I noticed some of your edits on Al Ahly's article and I just wanted to make you aware that I proposed that the article be renamed to Al Ahly S.C. (without the dash between Al and Ahly). I was hoping to get some input from Ahly fans and Egyptians in general, since you're probably better qualified to make the call. Please see the discussion here and provide your input. TonyStarks (talk) 09:06, 23 May 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Thank you!

Hi. Thank you for your recent edits. Wikipedia appreciates your help. It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot (talk) 08:54, 30 November 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Thank you

Hi. Thank you for your recent edits. Wikipedia appreciates your help. Thanks, DPL bot (talk) 08:57, 7 March 2014 (UTC) [reply]

This blocked user is asking that his block be reviewed on the Unblock Ticket Request System:

AbdulRahman14 (block log • active blocks • global blocks • autoblocks • contribs • deleted contribs • abuse filter log • creation log • change block settings • unblock • checkuser (log))

UTRS appeal #20008 was submitted on Dec 09, 2017 18:27:47. This review is now closed.

--UTRSBot (talk) 18:27, 9 December 2017 (UTC)[reply]

December 2017

Wikipedia's technical logs indicate that this user account has been or may be used abusively. It has been blocked indefinitely from editing to prevent abuse.

Note that multiple accounts are allowed, but not for illegitimate reasons, and any contributions made while evading blocks or bans may be reverted or deleted.
If you think there are good reasons why you should be unblocked, you should review the guide to appealing blocks, and then appeal your block by adding the following text below this notice: {{unblock|Your reason here ~~~~}}. Note that anything you post in your unblock request will be public, so you may alternatively use the Unblock Ticket Request System to submit an appeal if it contains information that must be private.

Administrators: Checkusers have access to confidential system logs not accessible by the public or by administrators due to the Wikimedia Foundation's privacy policy. You must not loosen or remove this block, or issue an IP block exemption, without consulting with a checkuser or the Arbitration Committee. Administrators who undo checkuser blocks without permission from a checkuser or the Arbitration Committee may be summarily desysopped.

~ Rob₁₃^Talk 16:32, 10 December 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Nomination of Abdulrahman Elsamni for deletion

A discussion is taking place as to whether the article Abdulrahman Elsamni is suitable for inclusion in Wikipedia according to Wikipedia's policies and guidelines or whether it should be deleted.

The article will be discussed at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Abdulrahman Elsamni until a consensus is reached, and anyone is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on high-quality evidence and our policies and guidelines.

Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion notice from the top of the article. -- RoySmith (talk) 15:49, 17 December 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Proposed deletion of Ahmed Galal (footballer)

The article Ahmed Galal (footballer) has been proposed for deletion because of the following concern:

I have struggled to find solid references in English - maybe there are some in other languages - to support the notability of this sportsman

While all constructive contributions to Wikipedia are appreciated, pages may be deleted for any of several reasons.

You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the {{proposed deletion/dated}} notice, but please explain why in your edit summary or on the article's talk page.

Please consider improving the page to address the issues raised. Removing {{proposed deletion/dated}} will stop the proposed deletion process, but other deletion processes exist. In particular, the speedy deletion process can result in deletion without discussion, and articles for deletion allows discussion to reach consensus for deletion.

This bot DID NOT nominate any of your contributions for deletion; please refer to the history of each individual page for details. Thanks, FastilyBot (talk) 10:00, 12 November 2024 (UTC)[reply]