User talk:Aayushsthares

May 2022

Hello, I'm Lol1VNIO. I wanted to let you know that I reverted one of your recent contributions—specifically this edit to Neeta Dhungana—because it did not appear constructive. If you would like to experiment, please use the sandbox. If you have any questions, you can ask for assistance at the Help desk. Thanks. ~~ lol1VNIO (I made a mistake? talk to me • contribs) 07:22, 29 May 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Hello again. If you want to insult me, create actual sections. My masochist side would greatly appreciate it. Thank you. ~~ lol1VNIO (I made a mistake? talk to me • contribs) 09:05, 29 May 2022 (UTC); edited 09:33, 29 May 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Please refrain from making unconstructive edits to Wikipedia, as you did at Neeta Dhungana. Your edits continue to appear to constitute vandalism and have been automatically reverted.

If you would like to experiment, please use the sandbox. Note that human editors do monitor recent changes to Wikipedia articles, and administrators have the ability to block users from editing if they repeatedly engage in vandalism.
ClueBot NG makes very few mistakes, but it does happen. If you believe the change you made should not have been considered as unconstructive, please read about it, report it here, remove this warning from your talk page, and then make the edit again.
If you need help, please see our help pages, and if you can't find what you are looking for there, please feel free to place {{Help me}} on your talk page and someone will drop by to help.
The following is the log entry regarding this warning: Neeta Dhungana was changed by Aayushsthares (u) (t) ANN scored at 0.937242 on 2022-05-29T07:25:12+00:00

Thank you. ClueBot NG (talk) 07:25, 29 May 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Please stop your disruptive editing. If you continue to vandalize Wikipedia, as you did with this edit to Neeta Dhungana, you may be blocked from editing. Serols (talk) 07:25, 29 May 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Your recent editing history shows that you are currently engaged in an edit war; that means that you are repeatedly changing content back to how you think it should be, when you have seen that other editors disagree. To resolve the content dispute, please do not revert or change the edits of others when you are reverted. Instead of reverting, please use the talk page to work toward making a version that represents consensus among editors. The best practice at this stage is to discuss, not edit-war. See the bold, revert, discuss cycle for how this is done. If discussions reach an impasse, you can then post a request for help at a relevant noticeboard or seek dispute resolution. In some cases, you may wish to request temporary page protection.

Being involved in an edit war can result in you being blocked from editing—especially if you violate the three-revert rule, which states that an editor must not perform more than three reverts on a single page within a 24-hour period. Undoing another editor's work—whether in whole or in part, whether involving the same or different material each time—counts as a revert. Also keep in mind that while violating the three-revert rule often leads to a block, you can still be blocked for edit warring—even if you do not violate the three-revert rule—should your behavior indicate that you intend to continue reverting repeatedly. Fade258 (talk) 08:51, 29 May 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Hello, I'm Fade258. I wanted to let you know that one or more of your recent contributions to Neeta Dhungana have been undone because they did not appear constructive. If you would like to experiment, please use your sandbox. If you have any questions, you can ask for assistance at the Teahouse. Thanks. Fade258 (talk) 08:55, 29 May 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Notice of edit warring noticeboard discussion

Hello. This message is being sent to inform you that there is currently a discussion involving you at Wikipedia:Administrators' noticeboard/Edit warring regarding a possible violation of Wikipedia's policy on edit warring. The thread is Wikipedia:Administrators' noticeboard/Edit warring#User:Aayushsthares reported by User:Fade258 (Result: ). Thank you. Fade258 (talk) 08:53, 29 May 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Please!

Hi, Please stop this harassment and vandalic edits upon users talk pages. If you have any questions then ask them. Fade258 (talk) 09:15, 29 May 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Whatwill you do? Aayushsthares (talk) 09:16, 29 May 2022 (UTC)[reply]

If you continue this then you will be blocked from editing Wikipedia. Fade258 (talk) 09:23, 29 May 2022 (UTC)[reply]

May 2022

You have been blocked indefinitely from editing because it appears that you are not here to build an encyclopedia.

If you think there are good reasons for being unblocked, please read the guide to appealing blocks, then add the following text below the block notice on your talk page: {{unblock|reason=Your reason here ~~~~}}. Alex Bakharev (talk) 09:31, 29 May 2022 (UTC)[reply]