User talk:Aaron north/Archive 3
GOCE elections
[edit]Greetings from the Guild of Copy Editors
  Elections are currently underway for our inaugural Guild coordinators. The voting period will run for 14 days: 00:01 UTC, Friday 1 December – 23:59 UTC, Tuesday 14 December. All GOCE members in good standing, as well as past participants of any of the Guild's Backlog elimination drives, are eligible to vote. There are six candidates vying for four positions. The candidate with the highest number of votes will become the Lead Coordinator, therefore, your vote really matters! Cast your vote today. |
Sent on behalf of the Guild of Copy Editors via SMasters using AWB on 01:07, 1 December 2010 (UTC)
November 2010 Backlog Elimination Drive Conclusion
[edit]| Greetings from the Guild of Copy Editors Backlog Elimination Drive!
We have reached the end of our fourth backlog elimination drive. Thanks to all who participated. Stats 
Barnstars If you copy edited at least 4,000 words, you qualify for a barnstar. If you participated in the September 2010 backlog elimination drive, you may have earned roll-over words (more details can be found here). These roll-over words count as credit towards earning barnstars, except for leaderboard awards. We will be delivering these barnstars within the next couple of weeks. Our next drive is scheduled for January 2011. In the meantime, please consider helping out at the Wikification drive or any of the other places where help with backlogs is needed. Thank you for participating in the last 2010 backlog elimination drive! We look forward to seeing you in January! Your drive coordinators –The UtahraptorTalk to me/Contributions, S Masters (talk), and Diannaa (Talk) |
Delivered by MessageDeliveryBot on behalf of WikiProject Guild of Copy Editors at 23:22, 2 December 2010 (UTC).
GOCE Barnstar
[edit]
|
The Cleanup Barnstar | |
| This Cleanup Barnstar is awarded to Aaron north for participation in the November 2010 GOCE Backlog Elimination drive. Thank you for participating! Diannaa (Talk) 23:45, 2 December 2010 (UTC) |
Wait, what?
[edit]You closed a GAR as keep when there were non-free sound files in the article without rationales, when the issue had been pointed out, claiming that the issue was resolved? Have I missed something? J Milburn (talk) 17:10, 22 December 2010 (UTC)
- There were fair-use rationales. You were right that the audio files needed to satisfy criteria 6a, but I and another reviewer believed it did. The GAR was up for over 6 weeks, 3 and a half of which without any serious debate or disagreement. At worst it could have been closed as no consensus (which means it keeps GA), but as the GAR had stalled out it needed to be closed and there did not seem to be a compelling argument or consensus to delist. Aaron north (T/C) 23:52, 22 December 2010 (UTC)
- There were not rationales for that use, there were rationales for other uses. Please refamiliarise yourself with the non-free content criteria- NFCC#10c requires "The name of each article (a link to each article is also recommended) in which fair use is claimed for the item, and a separate, specific fair-use rationale for each use of the item, as explained at Wikipedia:Non-free use rationale guideline." Sorry if it seems I'm drumming out the point, but a recent disagreement showed that the distiction is not as clear as I thought it was. The article really should have been delisted- the misuse of the sound files was a serious problem whether or not someone disagreed that it was, and it was something that had not been fixed, and was not even under discussion. This is all academic now, but I think it's worth pointing out anyway. J Milburn (talk) 11:29, 27 December 2010 (UTC)
- I also don't want to come off as contentious here, because I believe I may not understand what you are trying to say. I believe both audio files in the article satisfy NFCC#10c. the article links to the file page, which in turn links back to the article. The music copyright license template is there, as well as a filled-out rationale for the use of the clip, which seems consistent with why it is included in the article. For the sake of comparison, I refer to David Bowie, which may be considered a peer article of sorts to Pink Floyd. This article was promoted to FA very recently, and contains audio files with fair use rationales. (the "David Bowie - Space Oddity.ogg" file, for example) Aside from perhaps more detail on the source and a slightly better explanation, I did not notice a significant difference between the presumably-accepted rationale used in the audio files for that recently-promoted FA article, and the rationales used for the audio files in Pink Floyd. If there's something I'm not noticing here, please feel free to point it out. Aaron north (T/C) 07:41, 29 December 2010 (UTC)
- Yeah, the two on the page now do- at the time of closing, there were around ten on the page, most of which did not satisfy 10c, as the rationales they did have were for other articles. As I say, this is all academic now, but it's worth pointing out in case it comes up again. J Milburn (talk) 12:21, 29 December 2010 (UTC)
- You are right, I just looked back at an old version of the article when it was kept and some of the sound files did not have a decent rationale beyond "to illustrate the article", which is clearly insufficient. At a minimum the editors should have been told to improve the rationale to prevent the article from losing GA-status. As you say, it is academic now, because someone cleaned the article up after-the-fact to comply with the GA standard. In the future I will pay closer attention to the rationale for all image and sound files. Thank you. Aaron north (T/C) 01:35, 30 December 2010 (UTC)
- Thanks for the barnstar, I'm glad you learnt something. It's nice to have people reacting positively to our NFCC for a change :) J Milburn (talk) 01:42, 30 December 2010 (UTC)
- You are right, I just looked back at an old version of the article when it was kept and some of the sound files did not have a decent rationale beyond "to illustrate the article", which is clearly insufficient. At a minimum the editors should have been told to improve the rationale to prevent the article from losing GA-status. As you say, it is academic now, because someone cleaned the article up after-the-fact to comply with the GA standard. In the future I will pay closer attention to the rationale for all image and sound files. Thank you. Aaron north (T/C) 01:35, 30 December 2010 (UTC)
- Yeah, the two on the page now do- at the time of closing, there were around ten on the page, most of which did not satisfy 10c, as the rationales they did have were for other articles. As I say, this is all academic now, but it's worth pointing out in case it comes up again. J Milburn (talk) 12:21, 29 December 2010 (UTC)
- I also don't want to come off as contentious here, because I believe I may not understand what you are trying to say. I believe both audio files in the article satisfy NFCC#10c. the article links to the file page, which in turn links back to the article. The music copyright license template is there, as well as a filled-out rationale for the use of the clip, which seems consistent with why it is included in the article. For the sake of comparison, I refer to David Bowie, which may be considered a peer article of sorts to Pink Floyd. This article was promoted to FA very recently, and contains audio files with fair use rationales. (the "David Bowie - Space Oddity.ogg" file, for example) Aside from perhaps more detail on the source and a slightly better explanation, I did not notice a significant difference between the presumably-accepted rationale used in the audio files for that recently-promoted FA article, and the rationales used for the audio files in Pink Floyd. If there's something I'm not noticing here, please feel free to point it out. Aaron north (T/C) 07:41, 29 December 2010 (UTC)
- There were not rationales for that use, there were rationales for other uses. Please refamiliarise yourself with the non-free content criteria- NFCC#10c requires "The name of each article (a link to each article is also recommended) in which fair use is claimed for the item, and a separate, specific fair-use rationale for each use of the item, as explained at Wikipedia:Non-free use rationale guideline." Sorry if it seems I'm drumming out the point, but a recent disagreement showed that the distiction is not as clear as I thought it was. The article really should have been delisted- the misuse of the sound files was a serious problem whether or not someone disagreed that it was, and it was something that had not been fixed, and was not even under discussion. This is all academic now, but I think it's worth pointing out anyway. J Milburn (talk) 11:29, 27 December 2010 (UTC)
GOCE Year-end Report
[edit]Season's Greetings from the Guild of Copy Editors
 We have reached the end of the year, and what a year it has been! The Guild of Copy Editors was full of activity, and we achieved numerous important milestones in 2010. Read all about these in the Guild's 2010 Year-End Report.
Get your copy of the Guild's 2010 Year-End Report here
On behalf of the Guild, we take this opportunity to wish you Season's Greetings and Happy New Year. See you in 2011!
– Your Coordinators: S Masters (lead), Diannaa, The Utahraptor, and Tea with toast. |
Sent on behalf of the Guild of Copy Editors using AWB on 06:03, 31 December 2010 (UTC)
GOCE drive news
[edit]| Guild of Copy Editors January 2011 backlog elimination drive
Greetings from the Guild of Copy Editors January 2011 Backlog elimination drive! The drive is halfway over, so here are some mid-drive stats. 
 So far, 43 people have signed up for this drive. Of these, 25 have participated. If you signed up for the drive but haven't participated yet, it's not too late! Try to copy edit at least a few articles. Remember, if you have rollover words from the last drive, you will lose them if you do not participate in this drive. If you haven't signed up for the drive yet, you can sign up now.
We have eliminated two months from the backlog – January and February 2009. One of our goals is to eliminate as many months as possible from the 2009 backlog. Please help us reduce the size of this part of the backlog if you haven't already. Another goal is to reduce the entire backlog by 10%, or by 515 articles. Currently, we have eliminated 375 articles from the queue, so if each participant copy edits four more articles, we will reach that goal. Thank you for participating in the January 2011 drive. We anticipate it will be another big success! Your drive coordinators –S Masters (talk), Diannaa (Talk), The UtahraptorTalk to me, and Tea with toast (Talk) |
Delivered by MessageDeliveryBot on behalf of WikiProject Guild of Copy Editors at 19:36, 16 January 2011 (UTC).
Joran van der Sloot
[edit]Hello, thank you for your past GA review of Joran van der Sloot. I was not opposed to your instability assessment as the case was a top headline in the news at the time. However, the case appears to have ground to a halt and it has also since been revealed that Peru has the right to detain a suspect for questioning for 18 months (!) and does not guarantee the right to a speedy trial. As there appears to be no stability problems to content disputes, would you be opposed if I resubmitted this for GA review though it may be years before the commencement of a trial? I would be happy to take it for a round through WP:PR if you prefer. Cheers. KimChee (talk) 19:12, 28 January 2011 (UTC)
- I would not be opposed to a resubmission. I quickly researched this and you appear to be correct, this could take an extraordinary amount of time (by american standards) before a significant update is made. Given that it may take over a year before a trial even begins, the argument that the article is "unstable" is harder to defend. I cant re-review it since I was involved in the first review, but I will add a comment to my review summarizing this. Also, the next reviewer may decide to fail it anyway for the same reason or may decide to hold/fail it for other reasons since I didn't give it a full review, but given the circumstances, I no longer believe you should be forced to wait until the conclusion of the trial. If this article were to be judged a good article before the trial though, it will need to be kept up-to-date under the good article criteria when the story does develop further or it may lose GA status on a reassessment. Aaron north (T/C) 03:25, 29 January 2011 (UTC)
- Understood. Thank you! KimChee (talk) 03:42, 29 January 2011 (UTC)
Lantau Island
[edit]Hi Aaron. Sorry to have unintentionally left a GOCE tag on the Lantau Island article. Thank you for correcting it. Bests. --- (Bob) Wikiklrsc (talk) 01:10, 1 February 2011 (UTC)
January barnstar
[edit]
|
The Modest Barnstar | |
| This barnstar is awarded to Aaron north for copy editing articles totalling over 4000 words in the January GOCE Backlog elimination drive. Thank you for participating! Diannaa (Talk) 16:59, 4 February 2011 (UTC) |
GOCE January Backlog elimination drive conclusion
[edit]| Guild of Copy Editors January 2011 Backlog elimination drive
Greetings from the January 2011 Backlog elimination drive! We have reached the end of the month and the end of another successful drive; thanks to all who participated.
If you copy edited at least 4,000 words, you qualify for a barnstar. If you participated in the November 2010 Backlog elimination drive, you may have earned roll-over words (more details can be found here). These roll-over words count as credit towards earning barnstars, except for leaderboard awards. We will be delivering the barnstars within the next couple of weeks. Thank you for participating in this year's first Backlog elimination drive! We hope to see you in March. Your drive coordinators –S Masters (talk), Diannaa (talk), The Utahraptor (talk), and Tea with toast (talk) |
Delivered by MessageDeliveryBot on behalf of WikiProject Guild of Copy Editors at 14:47, 5 February 2011 (UTC).
March 2011 Backlog Elimination Drive
[edit]Hi. On behalf of the Guild of Copy Editors, I am inviting you to sign up for our March Backlog Elimination Drive. Win a barnstar! It's fun. --Diannaa (Talk) 01:17, 28 February 2011 (UTC)
Liberty Radio
[edit]Re a comment of yours to 82.111.219.194: "Please stop your disruptive editing. If you continue to blank out or remove portions of page content, templates or other materials from Wikipedia, as you did at Liberty Radio, you may be blocked from editing. Aaron north (T/C) 14:01, 19 October 2010 (UTC)". Please have a look at the Liberty Radio page; there have continued to be a great many unexplained edits to this page by this user which remove correct and referenced material. I have just reverted a swathe of them, and added some referenced material. Pol098 (talk) 15:37, 18 March 2011 (UTC)
James A. Garfield
[edit]Hello. Could you copy edit the James A. Garfield article for GA review? Thanks. Cmguy777 (talk) 19:44, 21 April 2011 (UTC)
GOCE drive newsletter
[edit]The Guild of Copy Editors – May 2011 Backlog Elimination Drive The Guild of Copy Editors invite you to participate in the May 2011 Backlog Elimination Drive, a month-long effort to reduce the backlog of articles that require copy-editing. The drive began on May 1 at 00:00 (UTC) and will end on May 31 at 23:59 (UTC). The goals of this backlog elimination drive are to eliminate as many articles as possible from the 2009 backlog and to reduce the overall backlog by 15%. ! NEW ! In an effort to encourage the final elimination of all 2009 articles, we will be tracking them on the leaderboard for this drive. Awards and barnstars We look forward to meeting you on the drive! Your GOCE coordinators: SMasters, Diannaa, Tea with toast, Chaosdruid, and Torchiest |
You are receiving a copy of this newsletter as you are a member of the Guild of Copy Editors, or have participated in one of our drives. If you do not wish to receive future newsletters, please add you name here. Sent on behalf of the Guild of Copy Editors using AWB on 06:59, 4 May 2011 (UTC)
GOCE elections
[edit]| Greetings from the Guild of Copy Editors
Elections are currently underway for our Guild coordinators. The voting period will run for 14 days and ends on June 30, 23:59 UTC. All GOCE members in good standing, as well as past participants of any of the Guild's Backlog elimination drives, are eligible to vote. The candidate with the highest number of votes will become the Lead Coordinator, therefore, your vote really matters! There is also a referendum to appoint a Coordinator Emeritus. Cast your vote today. |
Sent on behalf of the Guild of Copy Editors using AWB on 07:39, 19 June 2011 (UTC)
GOCE drive invitation
[edit]| Greetings from the Guild of Copy Editors
The latest GOCE backlog elimination drive is under way! It began on 1 July and so far 18 people have signed up to help us reduce the number of articles in need of copyediting. This drive will give a 50% bonus for articles edited from the GOCE requests page. Although we have cleared the backlog of 2009 articles there are still 3,935 articles needing copyediting and any help, no matter how small, would be appreciated. We are appealing to all GOCE members, and any other editors who wish to participate, to come and help us reduce the number of articles needing copyediting, as well as the backlog of requests. If you have not signed up yet, why not take a look at the current signatories and help us by adding your name and copyediting a few articles. Barnstars will be given to anyone who edits more than 4,000 words, with special awards for the top 5 in the categories: "Number of articles", "Number of words", and "Number of articles of over 5,000 words". |
Sent on behalf of the Guild of Copy Editors using AWB on 08:42, 3 July 2011 (UTC)
GOCE drive newsletter
[edit]| Invitation from the Guild of Copy Editors
The Guild of Copy Editors invites you to participate in their September 2011 Backlog elimination drive, a month-long effort to reduce the size of the copy editing backlog. The drive will begin on September 1 at 00:00 (UTC) and will end on September 30 at 23:59 (UTC). We will be tracking the number of 2010 articles in the backlog, as we want to copy edit as many of those as possible. Please consider copy editing an article that was tagged in 2010. Barnstars will be given to anyone who edits more than 4,000 words, with special awards for the top 5 in the categories "Number of articles", "Number of words", and "Number of articles of over 5,000 words". See you at the drive! – Your drive coordinators: Diannaa, Chaosdruid, The Utahraptor, Slon02, and SMasters. |
Sent on behalf of the Guild of Copy Editors using AWB on 15:57, 21 August 2011 (UTC)
GOCE drive newsletter
[edit]| Invitation from the Guild of Copy Editors
The Guild of Copy Editors invites you to participate in their November 2011 Backlog elimination drive, a month-long effort to reduce the size of the copy edit backlog. The drive begins on November 1 at 00:00 (UTC) and ends on November 30 at 23:59 (UTC). We will be tracking the number of 2010 articles (and specifically will be targeting the oldest three months), as we want to copy edit as many of these as possible. Barnstars will be awarded to anyone who copy edits more than 4,000 words, and special awards will be given to the top 5 in the following categories: "Number of articles", "Number of words", and "Number of articles of over 5,000 words". We hope to see you there! – Your drive coordinators: Diannaa, Chaosdruid, The Utahraptor, Slon02, and SMasters. |
Sent on behalf of the Guild of Copy Editors using AWB on 00:36, 29 October 2011 (UTC)
GOCE drive newsletter
[edit]| Greetings from the Guild of Copy Editors
Elections are currently underway for our third tranche of Guild coordinators. The voting period will run for 14 days: 00:01 UTC, 16 December – 23:59 UTC, 31 December. All GOCE members, as well as past participants of any of the Guild's Backlog elimination drives, are eligible to vote. There are five candidates vying for four positions. Your vote really matters! Cast your vote today. |
Sent on behalf of the Guild of Copy Editors using AWB on 10:14, 21 December 2011 (UTC)
GOCE 2011 Year-End Report
[edit]| Guild of Copy Editors 2011 Year-End Report
We have reached the end of the year, and what a year it has been! The Guild of Copy Editors was full of activity, and we achieved numerous important milestones in 2011. Read all about these in the Guild's 2011 Year-End Report.
Get your copy of the Guild's 2011 Year-End Report here
On behalf of the Guild, we take this opportunity to wish you Season's Greetings and Happy New Year. We look forward to your support in 2012! – Your 2011 Coordinators: Diannaa (lead), The Utahraptor, and Slon02 and SMasters (emeritus). |
Sent on behalf of the Guild of Copy Editors using AWB on 05:41, 2 January 2012 (UTC)
GOCE 2011 Year-End Report
[edit]| Guild of Copy Editors 2011 Year-End Report
We have reached the end of the year, and what a year it has been! The Guild of Copy Editors was full of activity, and we achieved numerous important milestones in 2011. Read all about these in the Guild's 2011 Year-End Report.
Get your copy of the Guild's 2011 Year-End Report here
On behalf of the Guild, we take this opportunity to wish you Season's Greetings and Happy New Year. We look forward to your support in 2012! – Your 2011 Coordinators: Diannaa (lead), The Utahraptor, and Slon02 and SMasters (emeritus). |
Sent on behalf of the Guild of Copy Editors using AWB on 07:41, 2 January 2012 (UTC)
GOCE March copy edit drive
[edit]| Invitation from the Guild of Copy Editors
The Guild of Copy Editors invites you to participate in their March 2012 Backlog elimination drive, a month-long effort to reduce the size of the copy edit backlog. The drive begins on March 1 at 00:00 (UTC) and ends on March 31 at 23:59 (UTC). Our goal for the drive will be to eliminate the remaining 2010 articles from the queue. Barnstars will be awarded to anyone who copy edits more than 4,000 words, and special awards will be given to the top 5 in the following categories: "Number of articles", "Number of words", and "Number of articles of over 5,000 words". We hope to see you there! – Your drive coordinators: Dank, Diannaa, Stfg, and Coordinator emeritus SMasters. 19:25, 20 February 2012 (UTC) To discontinue receiving GOCE newsletters, please remove your name from our mailing list. |
GOCE March drive newsletter
[edit] Guild of Copy Editors March 2012 backlog elimination drive update
 Greetings from the Guild of Copy Editors March 2012 Backlog elimination drive! Here's the mid-drive newsletter. Participation: We have had 58 people sign up for this drive so far, which compares favorably with our last drive, and 27 have copy-edited at least one article. If you have signed up but have not yet copy-edited any articles, please consider doing so. Every bit helps! If you haven't signed up yet, it's not too late. Join us! Progress report: Our target of completing the 2010 articles has almost been reached, with only 56 remaining of the 194 we had at the start of the drive. The last ones are always the most difficult, so thank you if you are able to help copy-edit any of the remaining articles. We have reduced the total backlog by 163 articles so far. Special thanks: Special thanks to Stfg, who has been going through the backlog and doing some preliminary vetting of the articles—removing copyright violations, doing initial clean-up, and nominating some for deletion. This work has helped make the drive a more pleasant experience for all our volunteers. Your drive coordinators – Dianna (talk), Stfg (talk), and Dank (talk)To discontinue receiving GOCE newsletters, please remove your name from our mailing list. |
GOCE March drive wrap-up
[edit]| Guild of Copy Editors March 2012 backlog elimination drive
Greetings from the Guild of Copy Editors March 2012 Backlog elimination drive! This is the most successful drive we have had for quite a while. Here is your end-of-drive wrap-up newsletter. Participation Of the 70 people who signed up for this drive, 40 copy-edited at least one article. Thanks to all who participated! Special acknowledgement goes out to Lfstevens, who did over 200 articles, most of them in the last third of the drive, and topped all three leaderboard categories. You're a superstar! Stfg and others have been pre-checking the articles for quality and conformance to Wikipedia guidelines; some have been nominated for deletion or had some preliminary clean-up done to help make the copy-edit process more fun and appealing. Thanks to all who helped get those nasty last few articles out of the target months. Progress report During this drive we were successful in eliminating our target months—October, November, and December 2010—from the queue, and have now eliminated all the 2010 articles from our list. We were able to complete 500 articles this month! End-of-drive results and barnstar information can be found here. When working on the backlog, please keep in mind that there are options other than copy-editing available; some articles may be candidates for deletion, or may not be suitable for copy-editing at this time for other reasons. The {{GOCEreviewed}} tag can be placed on any article you find to be totally uneditable, and you can nominate for deletion any that you discover to be copyright violations or completely unintelligible. If you need help deciding what to do, please contact any of the coordinators. Thank you for participating in the March 2012 drive! All contributions are appreciated. Our next copy-edit drive will be in May. Your drive coordinators – Dianna (Talk), Stfg (Talk), and Dank (talk)To discontinue receiving GOCE newsletters, please remove your name from our mailing list. |
Welcome message
[edit]Hi AAron, thank you for the welcome message. I think I used to have a wikipedia account once, but I don't remember what it was. Unfortunately, I don't have the time to contribute much to wikipedia, but I do some edits if I stumble upon something which is in dire need of fixing.
-Sela — Preceding unsigned comment added by 76.98.250.79 (talk) 19:04, 21 April 2012 (UTC)
Cheers
[edit]Thanks for the revert, a more leading remark was made at ani. Cheers for that. Murry1975 (talk) 20:09, 21 April 2012 (UTC)
GOCE May copy edit drive
[edit]| Invitation from the Guild of Copy Editors
The Guild of Copy Editors invites you to participate in their May 2012 Backlog elimination drive, a month-long effort to reduce the size of the copy edit backlog. The drive begins on May 1 at 00:00 (UTC) and ends on May 31 at 23:59 (UTC). Our goal for the drive will be to eliminate January, February, and March 2011 from the queue. Barnstars will be awarded to anyone who copy edits more than 4,000 words, and special awards will be given to the top 5 in the following categories: "Number of articles", "Number of words", and "Number of articles of over 5,000 words". We hope to see you there! – Your drive coordinators: Dank, Diannaa, and Stfg. To discontinue receiving GOCE newsletters, please remove your name from our mailing list. EdwardsBot (talk) 18:11, 22 April 2012 (UTC) |
GOCE May mid-drive newsletter
[edit]Guild of Copy Editors May 2012 backlog elimination drive mid-drive newsletter
 Participation: Out of 49 people signed up for this drive so far, 26 have copy-edited at least one article. It's a smaller group than last drive, but we're making good progress. If you've signed up but haven't yet copy-edited any articles, please consider doing so. Every bit helps! If you haven't signed up yet, it's not too late. Join us! Progress report: We're on track to meet our targets for the drive, largely due to the efforts of Lfstevens and the others on the leaderboard. Thanks to all. We have reduced our target group of articles—January, February, and March 2011—by over half, and it looks like we will achieve that goal. Good progress is being made on the overall backlog as well, with over 500 articles copy-edited during the drive so far. The total backlog currently sits at around 3200 articles. Hall of Fame: GOCE coordinator Diannaa was awarded a spot in the GOCE Hall of Fame this month! She has copy-edited over 1567 articles during these drives, and surpassed the 1,000,000-word mark on May 5. On to the second million! – Your drive coordinators: Dank, Diannaa and Stfg >>> Sign up now <<<
To discontinue receiving GOCE newsletters, please remove your name from our mailing list. Newsletter delivered by EdwardsBot (talk) 14:10, 15 May 2012 (UTC) |
GOCE May drive wrap-up
[edit]| Guild of Copy Editors May 2012 backlog elimination drive wrap-up
Participation: Out of 54 people who signed up this drive, 32 copy-edited at least one article. Last drive's superstar, Lfstevens, again stood out, topping the leader board in all three categories and copy-editing over 700 articles. Thanks to all who participated! Final results, including barnstars awarded, are available here. Progress report: We were once again successful in our primary goal—removing the oldest three months from the backlog—while removing 1166 articles from the queue, the second-most in our history. The total backlog currently sits at around 2600 articles, down from 8323 when we started out just over two years ago. Coodinator election: The six-month term for our third tranche of Guild coordinators will be expiring at the end of June. We will be accepting nominations for the fourth tranche of coordinators, who will also serve a six-month term. Nominations will open starting on June 5. For complete information, please have a look at the election page. – Your drive coordinators: Dank, Diannaa, and Stfg To discontinue receiving GOCE newsletters, please remove your name from our mailing list. Newsletter delivered by EdwardsBot (talk) 15:10, 3 June 2012 (UTC)
|
GOCE July 2012 Copy Edit Drive
[edit]| Invitation from the Guild of Copy Editors
The Guild of Copy Editors invites you to participate in their July 2012 Backlog elimination drive, a month-long effort to reduce the size of the copy edit backlog. The drive begins on July 1 at 00:00 (UTC) and ends on July 31 at 23:59 (UTC). Our goals are to eliminate the articles tagged in April, May and June 2011 from the queue and to complete all requests placed before the end of June. Barnstars will be awarded to anyone who copy edits more than 4,000 words, and special awards will be given to the top 6 in the following categories: "Number of articles", "Number of words", "Number of articles of over 5,000 words", "Number of articles tagged in April–June 2011", and "Longest article". We hope to see you there! – Your drive coordinators: Dank, Diannaa and Stfg. To discontinue receiving GOCE newsletters, please remove your name from our mailing list. Newsletter delivered by EdwardsBot (talk) 18:40, 21 June 2012 (UTC) |
GOCE July 2012 mid-drive newsletter
[edit]| Guild of Copy Editors July 2012 backlog elimination drive mid-drive newsletter
Participation: Out of 37 people signed up for this drive so far, 25 have copy-edited at least one article. It's a smaller group than last drive, but we're making good progress. If you've signed up but haven't yet copy-edited any articles, every bit helps; if you haven't signed up yet, it's not too late. Join us! Progress report: We're almost on track to meet our targets for the drive. Great work, guys. We have reduced our target group of articles—May, June, and July 2011—by about 40%, and the overall backlog has been reduced by 264 articles so far, to around 2500 articles. Copy Edit of the Month: Starting in August, your best copy-editing work of the month will be eligible for fabulous prizes! See here for details. – Your drive coordinators: Stfg, Allens, and Torchiest. >>> Sign up now <<<
To discontinue receiving GOCE newsletters, please remove your name from our mailing list. Newsletter delivered by EdwardsBot (talk) 16:20, 15 July 2012 (UTC) |
GOCE July drive wrap-up
[edit]| Guild of Copy Editors July 2012 backlog elimination drive wrap-up
Participation: Out of 45 people who signed up this drive, 31 have copy-edited at least one article. Lfstevens continues to carry most of the weight, having edited 360 articles and over a quarter of a million words already. Thanks to all who have participated! Final results, including barnstars awarded, will be available early in August here. Progress report: We are once again very close to achieving in our primary goal—removing the oldest three months from the backlog. Only 35 such articles remain at press time. The total backlog currently sits at under 2400 articles, down from 8323 when we started out over two years ago. We are just two articles away from completing all requests made before July 2012 (both are in progress). Copy Edit of the Month: Starting in August, you'll be able to submit your best copy-editing work for palaver, praise, and prizes. See here for details. – Your drive coordinators: Stfg, Allens, and Torchiest. To discontinue receiving GOCE newsletters, please remove your name from our mailing list. Newsletter delivered by EdwardsBot (talk) 23:45, 27 July 2012 (UTC)
|
WikiProject Good Articles Recruitment Centre
[edit] So for those who haven't heard about the Recruitment Centre yet, you may be wondering why there is a Good article icon with a bunch of stars around it (to the right). The answer? WikiProject Good articles will be launching a Recruitment Centre very soon! The centre will allow all users to be taught how to review Good article nominations by experts just like you! However, in order for the Recruitment Centre to open in the first place, we need some volunteers:
If you have any questions please do not hesitate to contact me. I look forward to seeing this program bring new reviewers to the Good article community and all the positive things it will bring along. A message will be sent out to all recruiters regarding the date when the Recruitment Centre will open when it is determined. The message will also contain some further details to clarify things that may be a bit confusing.--Dom497 (talk) This message was sent out by --EdwardsBot (talk) 14:46, 9 June 2013 (UTC) |