User talk:Aaron Pepin

Image copyright problem with Image:BachToccataBWV540W10945.gif

Thanks for uploading Image:BachToccataBWV540W10945.gif. However, the image may soon be deleted unless we can determine the copyright holder and copyright status. The Wikimedia Foundation is very careful about the images included in Wikipedia because of copyright law (see Wikipedia's Copyright policy).

The copyright holder is usually the creator, the creator's employer, or the last person who was transferred ownership rights. Copyright information on images is signified using copyright templates. The three basic license types on Wikipedia are open content, public domain, and fair use. Find the appropriate template in Wikipedia:Image copyright tags and place it on the image page like this: {{TemplateName}}.

Please signify the copyright information on any other images you have uploaded or will upload. Remember that images without this important information can be deleted by an administrator.

This is an automated notice by OrphanBot. If you have questions about copyright tagging of images, post on Wikipedia talk:Image copyright tags or User talk:Carnildo/images. 11:26, 23 February 2006 (UTC)

Image copyright problem with Image:Organ34.pdf

Thanks for uploading Image:Organ34.pdf. The image has been identified as not specifying the copyright status of the image, which is required by Wikipedia's policy on images. If you don't indicate the copyright status of the image on the image's description page, using an appropriate copyright tag, it may be deleted some time in the next seven days. If you have uploaded other images, please verify that you have provided copyright information for them as well.

For more information on using images, see the following pages:

This is an automated notice by OrphanBot. For assistance on the image use policy, see User talk:Carnildo/images. 15:30, 23 March 2006 (UTC)[reply]

Image copyright problem with Image:Organ35.pdf

Thanks for uploading Image:Organ35.pdf. The image has been identified as not specifying the copyright status of the image, which is required by Wikipedia's policy on images. If you don't indicate the copyright status of the image on the image's description page, using an appropriate copyright tag, it may be deleted some time in the next seven days. If you have uploaded other images, please verify that you have provided copyright information for them as well.

For more information on using images, see the following pages:

This is an automated notice by OrphanBot. For assistance on the image use policy, see User talk:Carnildo/images. 10:32, 25 March 2006 (UTC)[reply]

Image copyright problem with Image:Organ37.pdf

Thanks for uploading Image:Organ37.pdf. The image has been identified as not specifying the copyright status of the image, which is required by Wikipedia's policy on images. If you don't indicate the copyright status of the image on the image's description page, using an appropriate copyright tag, it may be deleted some time in the next seven days. If you have uploaded other images, please verify that you have provided copyright information for them as well.

For more information on using images, see the following pages:

This is an automated notice by OrphanBot. For assistance on the image use policy, see Wikipedia:Image legality questions. 13:22, 27 March 2006 (UTC)[reply]

Image Tagging Image:Bwv 540 2.gif

This media may be deleted.

Thanks for uploading Image:Bwv 540 2.gif. I notice the 'image' page currently doesn't specify who created the content, so the copyright status is unclear. If you have not created this media yourself then there needs to be an argument why we have the right to use the media on Wikipedia (see copyright tagging below). If you have not created the media yourself then it needs to be specified where it was found, i.e., in most cases link to the website where it was taken from, and the terms of use for content from that page.

If the media also doesn't have a copyright tag then one should be added. If you created/took the picture, audio, or video then the {{GFDL-self}} tag can be used to release it under the GFDL. If you believe the media qualifies as fair use, consider reading fair use, and then use a tag such as {{Non-free fair use in|article name}} or one of the other tags listed at Wikipedia:Image copyright tags#Fair_use. See Wikipedia:Image copyright tags for the full list of copyright tags that you can use.

If you have uploaded other media, consider checking that you have specified their source and copyright tagged them, too. You can find a list of 'image' pages you have edited by clicking on the "my contributions" link (it is located at the very top of any Wikipedia page when you are logged in), and then selecting "Image" from the dropdown box. Note that any unsourced and untagged images will be deleted one week after they have been uploaded, as described on criteria for speedy deletion. If you have any questions please ask them at the Image legality questions page. Thank you. Sherool (talk) 08:42, 1 April 2006 (UTC)[reply]

Image Tagging for Image:Toccata_540.GIF

Thanks for uploading Image:Toccata_540.GIF. The image has been identified as not specifying the source and creator of the image, which is required by Wikipedia's policy on images. If you don't indicate the source and creator of the image on the image's description page, it may be deleted some time in the next seven days. If you have uploaded other images, please verify that you have provided source information for them as well.

For more information on using images, see the following pages:

This is an automated notice by OrphanBot. For assistance on the image use policy, see Wikipedia:Image legality questions. 13:53, 2 April 2006 (UTC)[reply]

Image copyright problem with Image:TOCCATA_FUGA_BWV540-1.gif

Thanks for uploading Image:TOCCATA_FUGA_BWV540-1.gif. The image has been identified as not specifying the copyright status of the image, which is required by Wikipedia's policy on images. If you don't indicate the copyright status of the image on the image's description page, using an appropriate copyright tag, it may be deleted some time in the next seven days. If you have uploaded other images, please verify that you have provided copyright information for them as well.

For more information on using images, see the following pages:

This is an automated notice by OrphanBot. For assistance on the image use policy, see Wikipedia:Image legality questions. 11:12, 5 April 2006 (UTC)[reply]

Image copyright problem with Image:Weissenfels.jpg

Thanks for uploading Image:Weissenfels.jpg. The image has been identified as not specifying the copyright status of the image, which is required by Wikipedia's policy on images. If you don't indicate the copyright status of the image on the image's description page, using an appropriate copyright tag, it may be deleted some time in the next seven days. If you have uploaded other images, please verify that you have provided copyright information for them as well.

For more information on using images, see the following pages:

This is an automated notice by OrphanBot. For assistance on the image use policy, see Wikipedia:Media copyright questions. 20:13, 19 April 2006 (UTC)[reply]

Image copyright problem with Image:Toccata 540.GIF

Thanks for uploading Image:Toccata 540.GIF. However, the image may soon be deleted unless we can determine the copyright holder and copyright status. The Wikimedia Foundation is very careful about the images included in Wikipedia because of copyright law (see Wikipedia's Copyright policy).

The copyright holder is usually the creator, the creator's employer, or the last person who was transferred ownership rights. Copyright information on images is signified using copyright templates. The three basic license types on Wikipedia are open content, public domain, and fair use. Find the appropriate template in Wikipedia:Image copyright tags and place it on the image page like this: {{TemplateName}}.

Please signify the copyright information on any other images you have uploaded or will upload. Remember that images without this important information can be deleted by an administrator. If you have any questions, feel free to contact me, or ask them at the Media copyright questions page. Thank you. Pagra shtak 03:48, 21 April 2006 (UTC)[reply]

Image copyright problem with Image:Bwv540_(c)luquet.mid

Thanks for uploading Image:Bwv540_(c)luquet.mid. The image has been identified as not specifying the copyright status of the image, which is required by Wikipedia's policy on images. If you don't indicate the copyright status of the image on the image's description page, using an appropriate copyright tag, it may be deleted some time in the next seven days. If you have uploaded other images, please verify that you have provided copyright information for them as well.

For more information on using images, see the following pages:

This is an automated notice by OrphanBot. For assistance on the image use policy, see Wikipedia:Media copyright questions. 11:59, 11 May 2006 (UTC)[reply]

License tagging for Image:Fvj jason makeup.jpg

Thanks for uploading Image:Fvj jason makeup.jpg. Wikipedia gets thousands of images uploaded every day, and in order to verify that the images can be legally used on Wikipedia, the source and copyright status must be indicated. Images need to have an image tag applied to the image description page indicating the copyright status of the image. This uniform and easy-to-understand method of indicating the license status allows potential re-users of the images to know what they are allowed to do with the images.

For more information on using images, see the following pages:

This is an automated notice by OrphanBot. If you need help on selecting a tag to use, or in adding the tag to the image description, feel free to post a message at Wikipedia:Media copyright questions. 21:10, 12 February 2007 (UTC)

Jason talk

If you are referring to the film page, I removed them because they are unencyclopedic for a movie article. Apparently there wasn't enough consensus with regards to the deletion of a list of deaths, so you can find all your deaths here: List of deaths in the Friday the 13th series. BIGNOLE (Question?) (What I do) 12:39, 12 March 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Unencyclopedic because they don't hold any value in a list form. The concept is notable, because F13 has had its run-in with the MPAA for every film, minus the first one, but there is no value in just listing every death in every film. Wikipedia should not be a substitute for watching the film. There was already a recent AfD on that List article, and there was not enough votes either way to determine what would happen to it, so it reverted back to what it is. As for the boxes, see Wikipedia:Userboxes. It should explain how to create your own, if not then just come back and I'll show you. BIGNOLE (Question?) (What I do) 13:07, 12 March 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Not the appropriate place to ask, but to answer you, you could probably find all your needs at [1]

It generally has a lot of information. A lot of information that wouldn't be relevant to an encyclopedia, but to the more diehard fans. BIGNOLE (Question?) (What I do) 16:57, 12 March 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Do you have a hyper link to it? BIGNOLE (Contact me) 16:37, 13 April 2007 (UTC)[reply]

I'll look at it, and try to help with it. I don't think that I'll have time to be anything more than a helpful hand to it. I'm not that familiar with the rules of Wikia either, but I want to say that it's less restrictive than Wikipedia, at least for content sake. It's something that you'll have to do some research one. I'm still busy with fixing this article, and the Jason character himself. I'm finally gotten to the end of the second book, so I should be able to start getting Jason focus info for that here soon. BIGNOLE (Contact me) 16:44, 13 April 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Wow, I hope you are good with HTML. lol. If you are unsure how to proceed, I would suggest going to some of the other Wikia's and asking for some help, preferably one that appears to be well formatted. BIGNOLE (Contact me) 16:58, 13 April 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Personally, I like Jason better. BIGNOLE (Contact me) 20:27, 1 May 2007 (UTC)[reply]

There was a change in the Film article guidelines. Cast sections are no longer mandatory, and tables are just about outlawed nowadays (unless it is really the best possible option). Halloween and Jaws don't use cast sections, and they are featured. The way I'm working on the article in my sandbox, we won't need it because I have an entire section devoted to "Casting", which will also include some of the minor characters that aren't mentioned in the plot. BIGNOLE (Contact me) 19:26, 15 May 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Your edits to FLCL episodes

Thanks for your links to videos of FLCL episodes; however, these videos are on Youtube in violation of copyright, and according to WP:EL should not be included in Wikipedia articles. I've reverted those additions. Thanks, -- Docether 13:55, 4 April 2007 (UTC)[reply]

User page

Have at whatever you like. Just make sure you change the name to yours, and attribute SlimVirgin. BIGNOLE (Contact me) 17:13, 11 May 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Oh, forgot to answer you last question. Type 4 tildes, that's (~) this key...minus the parantheses of course. Hold shift and press the button to the left of the number 1 key. If you type it 4 times, then you get your name and date. If you type it 3 times then you just get your name; 5 times you just get a date. So, at least do it 3 times, and try and remember not to do it 5 times. BIGNOLE (Contact me) 17:16, 11 May 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Seriously, Jew Tube?

Welcome to Wikipedia. We invite everyone to contribute constructively to the encyclopedia. However, the external links you added to the page Article do not comply with our guidelines for external links. Wikipedia is not a mere directory of links; nor should it be used for advertising or promotion. Since Wikipedia uses nofollow tags, external links do not alter search engine rankings. If you feel the link should be added to the article, then please discuss it on the article's talk page before reinserting it. Please take a look at the welcome page to learn more about contributing to this encyclopedia. Thank you. Ichormosquito 17:07, 15 May 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Copyright violation in Jason Moore

Hello, this is a message from an automated bot. A tag has been placed on Jason Moore, by another Wikipedia user, requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia. The tag claims that it should be speedily deleted because Jason Moore is unquestionably copyright infringement, and no assertion of permission has been made.

To contest the tagging and request that administrators wait before possibly deleting Jason Moore, please affix the template {{hangon}} to the page, and put a note on its talk page. If the article has already been deleted, see the advice and instructions at WP:WMD. Feel free to contact the bot operator if you have any questions about this or any problems with this bot, bearing in mind that this bot is only informing you of the nomination for speedy deletion; it does not perform any nominations or deletions itself. --Android Mouse Bot 2 17:51, 19 May 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Hey--you left a note on my talk page and the article's talk page about the speedy delete request. I think you need to add the hang-on tag to the article page itself in order to slow down the process. Addere 21:54, 19 May 2007 (UTC)[reply]

I don't control the bot and I'm not an admin. I've nominated the article for deletion because of the copyright violation. I just looked at the page again. I think you need to put the hang-on tag on the article page rather than on the talk page. Another thing to consider is to re-write the article. That's likely to take less time than waiting on the BBC to respond to your query. Addere 22:03, 19 May 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Yes much better--and very quick work. I've removed the speedy request, done some copy-editing, and added some categories. Addere 22:57, 19 May 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Image:Toccata 540.GIF

Hi. When you uploaded Image:Toccata 540.GIF, you did not specify complete source and copyright information. Another user subsequently tagged it with {{GFDL-presumed}} and, for some time, it has existed on Wikipedia under the assumption that you created the image and you agreed to license it under the GFDL. This assumption, however well-meaning, is not legally sufficient and the tag is being phased out. Images using it are being deleted.

This image has been tagged for deletion and will be deleted in one week if adequate copyright information is not provided.

If you, personally, are the author of this content, meaning that you took the photograph yourself or you created the chart yourself (and it does not use any clipart that you did not create), please retag the image with a free image copyright tag that correctly describes your licensing intentions, usually {{GFDL-self}} or {{PD-self}}. Please also make sure if you have not already done so that you write a good description of what the image depicts, when you took the photo, and other important details. This will allow Wikipedia to continue using the image.

If you did not create the image or if it is derived from the copyrighted works of others, please keep in mind that most images on the internet are copyrighted and are not suitable for use on Wikipedia. Wikipedia respects the copyrights of others and does not use images unless we know that they have been freely licensed. Any creative work is automatically copyrighted, even if it lacks a copyright notice. Unless the copyright holder has specifically disclaimed their rights to the image and released it under the GFDL or another compatible license, we cannot use it. If you did not create the image, and cannot make the image compliant with Wikipedia:Non-free content, simply do nothing and it will be deleted in a week. All other non-free images must follow these rules.

Please feel free to contact me on my talk page or leave a message at Wikipedia:Media copyright questions with any questions you may have. Thank you. Aksibot 07:44, 3 June 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Disputed fair use rationale for Image:Freak out.jpg

Thanks for uploading Image:Freak out.jpg. However, there is a concern that the rationale you have provided for using this image under "fair use" may be invalid. Please read the instructions at Wikipedia:Non-free content carefully, then go to the image description page and clarify why you think the image qualifies for fair use. Using one of the templates at Wikipedia:Fair use rationale guideline is an easy way to ensure that your image is in compliance with Wikipedia policy, but remember that you must complete the template. Do not simply insert a blank template on an image page.

If it is determined that the image does not qualify under fair use, it will be deleted within a couple of days according to our criteria for speedy deletion. If you have any questions please ask them at the media copyright questions page. Thank you.BetacommandBot 20:14, 5 November 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Image:42764977_slasherweapon203.jpg listed for deletion

An image or media file that you uploaded or altered, Image:42764977_slasherweapon203.jpg, has been listed at Wikipedia:Images and media for deletion. Please see the discussion to see why this is (you may have to search for the title of the image to find its entry), if you are interested in it not being deleted. Thank you. Nv8200p talk 15:22, 9 February 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Image:Organ36.pdf listed for deletion

An image or media file that you uploaded or altered, Image:Organ36.pdf, has been listed at Wikipedia:Images and media for deletion. Please see the discussion to see why this is (you may have to search for the title of the image to find its entry), if you are interested in it not being deleted. Thank you. Do you want to opt out of receiving this notice? Rettetast (talk) 22:27, 4 May 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Your mom

Aaron Pepin’s Worst movie ever awards-

Pulse (Full of cliché’s, a stupid/predictable plot, lame acting, etc.)

Meet the Spartans (Not funny, absolutely NO story, and the humor is just a poor man’s version of Family Guy’s parody techniques, and an insult to good statistical movies; simply a cheap cash-in of current films at the time.)

Halloween: Resurrection (Disappointment to horror fans everywhere. Ridden with stupid, pop-characters, this film is aimed towards (and written by) people who don’t know s**t about real horror, or good movies)

Spice World (I don’t remember much about this movie, but I remember how pointless, and sellout it was. But hell, the sPiCe GuRlZ don’t care about selling out, do they?)

And the winner is… MEET THE SPARTANS

“These Spartans have more hair on their Chests than they do brains In their heads.”

“Meet the Spartans,” epitomizes, embodies, and is nothing short of the title- “a flat-out embarrassment.” This film was an embarrassment to the viewers; an embarrassment to the writers, an embarrassment to the innocent films being “parodied” (destroyed, actually,) an embarrassment to the random pop-culture references, and an embarrassment to the already embarrassing franchise. The franchise has already released a movie known as “disaster movie.” I’m just glad I didn’t waste my money on that movie like I did this. I was with my ex the day Meet the Spartans came out, (I’m not going to put the film title in quotes, it doesn’t deserve to) and, originally as planned, were going to watch the very good film “Sweeny Todd.” But due to some “divine intervention,” we decided to view “Meet the Spartans,” ohh, I mean, meet the Spartans, instead. Now, I have heard of these other films (Date Movie, Epic Movie, etc.) and had no idea that this film was created, I mean, thrown together by the same people who made the aforementioned, so I had no idea what I was in for. Never before had I felt like walking out of a movie theater. I actually got up at one point, but I was like “nah.” I wish I did. (Spoilers ahead, not that it matters…) Now for the story… Hmmmm…. I find it very hard to review a film that has no point, but I’ll give it a try. Take the very basics of the “300,” storyline, add random 2008-2009 pop-culture references at any standout, or memorable point in the movie that coincides with the “300,” film, and there you go. The epic battle that happened in “300” was degraded into a dance off, and a “your-mom-off.” The giant beast that brought the Spartans in “300” to a halt is now a giant robot that displays Chris Crocker going “leave Brittany alone!” on a screen. The robot is stopped because it travels too far and gets unplugged… You read it right…

Yes, I know the “film” was dumb, and it is pointless to review a stupid film as such, but THIS film was so devoid of any logic, comprehension, or direction that it makes films like “Ballistick, Ecks vs. Sever” (I don’t care if I spelt that right) seem like a aesthetic, and artistic masterpiece in comparison, and even the most rudimentary senses of humor or comprehension seems too much for these hacks.

As for the DVD, don’t get it. You didn’t see it in theaters, too bad, it’s your benefit; don’t ruin your chances now. My parents bought it for like, fifteen f***ing bucks. I told them they could have spent that money on something more useful and meaningful, such as pet rocks, fruit rollup printers, snuggies, a shamwow, more cigarettes, etc. There are like, two things I can think of that you can get out of the Meet the Spartans DVD: it can work as a drinking game; whenever something stupid happens, you and your buddies have to take a sip of beer, you would be guaranteed completely f***ing s**tfaced the next day. It can also serve as a Frisbee, so you can spend time with your family. So for the love of god (I’m atheist… )-: ) do not get this movie. In the name of all good movies, download “Meet the Spartans” illegally, burn DVD copies, and give them to all your friends, because every cent you give to these guys, the more movies they will make, and the more society crumbles.

Of course, I’m having my ball sack lashed at by my peers as they read this, defending this movie. One of them out of nowhere even said Vida Guerra “isn’t that hot.” It’s a shame.

ArbCom 2019 election voter message

Hello! Voting in the 2019 Arbitration Committee elections is now open until 23:59 on Monday, 2 December 2019. All eligible users are allowed to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once.

The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.

If you wish to participate in the 2019 election, please review the candidates and submit your choices on the voting page. If you no longer wish to receive these messages, you may add {{NoACEMM}} to your user talk page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 00:06, 19 November 2019 (UTC)[reply]

ArbCom 2020 Elections voter message

Hello! Voting in the 2020 Arbitration Committee elections is now open until 23:59 (UTC) on Monday, 7 December 2020. All eligible users are allowed to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once.

The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.

If you wish to participate in the 2020 election, please review the candidates and submit your choices on the voting page. If you no longer wish to receive these messages, you may add {{NoACEMM}} to your user talk page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 01:29, 24 November 2020 (UTC)[reply]

ArbCom 2021 Elections voter message

Hello! Voting in the 2021 Arbitration Committee elections is now open until 23:59 (UTC) on Monday, 6 December 2021. All eligible users are allowed to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once.

The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.

If you wish to participate in the 2021 election, please review the candidates and submit your choices on the voting page. If you no longer wish to receive these messages, you may add {{NoACEMM}} to your user talk page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 00:07, 23 November 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Andreas Bach Book moved to draftspace

An article you recently created, Andreas Bach Book, is not suitable as written to remain published. It needs more citations from reliable, independent sources. (?) Information that can't be referenced should be removed (verifiability is of central importance on Wikipedia). I've moved your draft to draftspace (with a prefix of "Draft:" before the article title) where you can incubate the article with minimal disruption. When you feel the article meets Wikipedia's general notability guideline and thus is ready for mainspace, please click on the "Submit your draft for review!" button at the top of the page. Onel5969 ^{TT me} 13:45, 2 January 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Concern regarding Draft:Andreas Bach Book

Hello, Aaron Pepin. This is a bot-delivered message letting you know that Draft:Andreas Bach Book, a page you created, has not been edited in at least 5 months. Drafts that have not been edited for six months may be deleted, so if you wish to retain the page, please edit it again or request that it be moved to your userspace.

If the page has already been deleted, you can request it be undeleted so you can continue working on it.

Thank you for your submission to Wikipedia. FireflyBot (talk) 22:02, 5 December 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Your draft article, Draft:Andreas Bach Book

Hello, Aaron Pepin. It has been over six months since you last edited the Articles for Creation submission or Draft page you started, "Andreas Bach Book".

In accordance with our policy that Wikipedia is not for the indefinite hosting of material deemed unsuitable for the encyclopedia mainspace, the draft has been deleted. When you plan on working on it further and you wish to retrieve it, you can request its undeletion. An administrator will, in most cases, restore the submission so you can continue to work on it.

Thanks for your submission to Wikipedia, and happy editing. Liz ^{Read! Talk!} 21:42, 5 January 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Your draft article, Draft:Andreas Bach Book

Hello, Aaron Pepin. It has been over six months since you last edited the Articles for Creation submission or Draft page you started, "Andreas Bach Book".

In accordance with our policy that Wikipedia is not for the indefinite hosting of material deemed unsuitable for the encyclopedia mainspace, the draft has been deleted. When you plan on working on it further and you wish to retrieve it, you can request its undeletion. An administrator will, in most cases, restore the submission so you can continue to work on it.

Thanks for your submission to Wikipedia, and happy editing. Liz ^{Read! Talk!} 22:28, 10 December 2023 (UTC)[reply]