User talk:Aaloo tikoo

August 2020

Welcome to Wikipedia. We appreciate your contributions, but in one of your recent edits to Balghar, it appears that you have added original research, which is against Wikipedia's policies. Original research refers to material—such as facts, allegations, ideas, and personal experiences—for which no reliable, published sources exist; it also encompasses combining published sources in a way to imply something that none of them explicitly say. Please be prepared to cite a reliable source for all of your contributions. You can have a look at the tutorial on citing sources. Thank you. Materialscientist (talk) 11:41, 5 August 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Please do not add or significantly change content without citing verifiable and reliable sources, as you did with this edit to National Law School of India University. Before making any potentially controversial edits, it is recommended that you discuss them first on the article's talk page. Please review the guidelines at Wikipedia:Citing sources and take this opportunity to add references to the article. Materialscientist (talk) 11:46, 5 August 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Please stop your disruptive editing. If you continue to violate Wikipedia's neutral point of view policy by adding commentary and your personal analysis into articles, as you did at Balghar, you may be blocked from editing. - Arjayay (talk) 11:49, 5 August 2020 (UTC)[reply]

August 2020

Hello, and welcome to Wikipedia. This is a message letting you know that one or more of your recent edits to Talal Akbar Bugti has been undone by an automated computer program called ClueBot NG.

ClueBot NG makes very few mistakes, but it does happen. If you believe the change you made was constructive, please read about it, report it here, remove this message from your talk page, and then make the edit again.
For help, take a look at the introduction.
The following is the log entry regarding this message: Talal Akbar Bugti was changed by Aaloo tikoo (u) (t) ANN scored at 0.952502 on 2020-08-29T06:38:39+00:00

Thank you. ClueBot NG (talk) 06:38, 29 August 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Please refrain from making unconstructive edits to Wikipedia, as you did at Balach Marri. Your edits continue to appear to constitute vandalism and have been automatically reverted.

If you would like to experiment, please use the sandbox. Note that human editors do monitor recent changes to Wikipedia articles, and administrators have the ability to block users from editing if they repeatedly engage in vandalism.
ClueBot NG makes very few mistakes, but it does happen. If you believe the change you made should not have been considered as unconstructive, please read about it, report it here, remove this warning from your talk page, and then make the edit again.
If you need help, please see our help pages, and if you can't find what you are looking for there, please feel free to place {{Help me}} on your talk page and someone will drop by to help.
The following is the log entry regarding this warning: Balach Marri was changed by Aaloo tikoo (u) (t) ANN scored at 0.922466 on 2020-08-29T06:46:31+00:00

Thank you. ClueBot NG (talk) 06:46, 29 August 2020 (UTC)[reply]

October 2020

Please stop your disruptive editing. If you continue to add unsourced or poorly sourced content, as you did at Dogra, you may be blocked from editing. - Arjayay (talk) 13:44, 11 October 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Hello, I'm Kautilya3. I noticed that you recently removed content from Gulmarg without adequately explaining why. In the future, it would be helpful to others if you described your changes to Wikipedia with an accurate edit summary. If this was a mistake, don't worry; the removed content has been restored. If you would like to experiment, please use your sandbox. If you think I made a mistake, or if you have any questions, you can leave me a message on my talk page. Thanks. Kautilya3 (talk) 13:51, 11 October 2020 (UTC)[reply]

ARBIPA sanctions alert

This is a standard message to notify contributors about an administrative ruling in effect. It does not imply that there are any issues with your contributions to date.

You have shown interest in India, Pakistan, and Afghanistan. Due to past disruption in this topic area, a more stringent set of rules called discretionary sanctions is in effect. Any administrator may impose sanctions on editors who do not strictly follow Wikipedia's policies, or the page-specific restrictions, when making edits related to the topic.

For additional information, please see the guidance on discretionary sanctions and the Arbitration Committee's decision here. If you have any questions, or any doubts regarding what edits are appropriate, you are welcome to discuss them with me or any other editor.

Kautilya3 (talk) 14:04, 11 October 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Deceptive marking of non-minor edits as minor edits

I noticed that you have marked every edit you have made to Wikipedia as minor; and none of them were. This behaviour is deceptive. Stop it.

"Minor edit" has a very specific definition on Wikipedia – it refers only to superficial edits that could never be the subject of a dispute, such as typo corrections or reverting obvious vandalism. Any edit that changes the meaning of an article is not a minor edit, even if it only concerns a single word. Please see Help:Minor edit for more information. Thank you.-- Toddy1 (talk) 07:58, 28 April 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Blocked as a sockpuppet

You have been blocked indefinitely from editing for abusing multiple accounts as a sockpuppet of User:Masoom shafi per the evidence presented at Wikipedia:Sockpuppet investigations/Masoom shafi. Note that multiple accounts are allowed, but not for illegitimate reasons, and any contributions made while evading blocks or bans may be reverted or deleted.

If you think there are good reasons for being unblocked, please read the guide to appealing blocks, then add the following text below the block notice on your talk page: {{unblock|reason=Your reason here ~~~~}}. --Blablubbs (talk) 10:19, 10 October 2021 (UTC)[reply]