User talk:Aadarshashutosh

Welcome to The Wikipedia Adventure!

Hi Aadarshashutosh! We're so happy you wanted to play to learn, as a friendly and fun way to get into our community and mission. I think these links might be helpful to you as you get started.

-- 15:22, Monday, September 9, 2019 (UTC)

Mission 1	Mission 2	Mission 3	Mission 4	Mission 5	Mission 6	Mission 7
Say Hello to the World	An Invitation to Earth	Small Changes, Big Impact	The Neutral Point of View	The Veil of Verifiability	The Civility Code	Looking Good Together

Get Help

About The Wikipedia Adventure | Hang out in the Interstellar Lounge

How can I protect my page against editing.Ashuraaz23 (talk) 04:49, 19 August 2019 (UTC)Ashuraaz23[reply]

A barnstar for you!

	The Original Barnstar
	Good Work, Keep Up! Ashuraaz23 (talk) 05:09, 19 August 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Protection against other user editing

How to protect your user page from being edited by another user. Ashuraaz23 (talk) 05:45, 19 August 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Edits at Indrahdanu

Please note that your edits at Indradhanu qualify as original research which is not permitted as per Wikipedia policy. Please provide reliable sources. Facebook may not qualify as a reliable source. --Tamravidhir (talk) 07:00, 12 September 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Please also read WP:SELFSOURCE. --Tamravidhir (talk) 07:02, 12 September 2019 (UTC)[reply]

I also note that you have a conflict of interest with regards to the article. --Tamravidhir (talk) 07:04, 12 September 2019 (UTC)[reply]

September 2019

Please do not add or change content, as you did at List of highest-grossing films in India, without citing a reliable source. Please review the guidelines at Wikipedia:Citing sources and take this opportunity to add references to the article. Thank you.

 Hi, I'm confused about what you're saying about source, I did cite the source in the source column of List of highest-grossing films in India. meowmeow \S-) (talk) 00:34, 18 September 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Sacnilk.com is a non-reliable source. Panda619 (talk) 00:46, 18 September 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Thanks! I was unaware of this fact. I'll keep that in mind. meowmeow \S-) (talk) 00:51, 18 September 2019 (UTC)[reply]

This is your talk page

As you have probably seen, I have deleted your "other" user talk page and moved the content that was there over to here. The reason is simply that the other account doesn't exist and therefore redirecting your page there was not appropriate. (neither is giving yourself a barnstar, for that matter) If you wish to change your account name you can do so through the rename process and, once that is done, the now-deleted userpage you had at the alternate name can be restored, bt it simply isn't appropriate to have your pages redirect to an account that does not exist. Beeblebrox (talk) 22:59, 17 September 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Hi, Beeblebrox. Thanks for informing me, I did request a change of username. However, that was denied and i was unable or wasn't aware of the redirect.
I am hoping that i can restore the content (not the user id) of my redirect page, on this id. It took me hours to do that, [When i got a barnstar, i didn't know what i was doing with that, i only found out later that i did something stupid.]
Thanks! meowmeow \S-) (talk) 00:29, 18 September 2019 (UTC)[reply]

I just restored it to move it here, but now I see you already started reconstructing it. I can just replace it with the finished version if you'd like. Beeblebrox (talk) 17:14, 18 September 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Thanks, but i'm gonna stick with current. meowmeow \S-) (talk) 17:50, 18 September 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Your submission at Articles for creation: Young Scientist Programme (January 11)

Your recent article submission to Articles for Creation has been reviewed! Unfortunately, it has not been accepted at this time. The reason left by Theroadislong was:

This submission appears to read more like an advertisement than an entry in an encyclopedia. Encyclopedia articles need to be written from a neutral point of view, and should refer to a range of independent, reliable, published sources, not just to materials produced by the creator of the subject being discussed. This is important so that the article can meet Wikipedia's verifiability policy and the notability of the subject can be established. If you still feel that this subject is worthy of inclusion in Wikipedia, please rewrite your submission to comply with these policies.

Please check the submission for any additional comments left by the reviewer. You are encouraged to edit the submission to address the issues raised and resubmit when they have been resolved.

If you would like to continue working on the submission, go to Draft:Young Scientist Programme and click on the "Edit" tab at the top of the window.
If you now believe the draft cannot meet Wikipedia's standards or do not wish to progress it further, you may request deletion. Please go to Draft:Young Scientist Programme, click on the "Edit" tab at the top of the window, add "{{db-self}}" at the top of the draft text and click the blue "publish changes" button to save this edit.
If you do not make any further changes to your draft, in 6 months, it will be considered abandoned and may be deleted.
If you need any assistance, you can ask for help at the Articles for creation help desk, on the reviewer's talk page or use Wikipedia's real-time chat help from experienced editors.

Theroadislong (talk) 15:11, 11 January 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Hello, Aadarshashutosh! Having an article declined at Articles for Creation can be disappointing. If you are wondering why your article submission was declined, please post a question at the Articles for creation help desk. If you have any other questions about your editing experience, we'd love to help you at the Teahouse, a friendly space on Wikipedia where experienced editors lend a hand to help new editors like yourself! See you there! Theroadislong (talk) 15:11, 11 January 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Your draft article, Draft:Indradhanu

Hello, Aadarshashutosh. It has been over six months since you last edited the Articles for Creation submission or Draft page you started, "Indradhanu".

In accordance with our policy that Wikipedia is not for the indefinite hosting of material deemed unsuitable for the encyclopedia mainspace, the draft has been nominated for deletion. If you plan on working on it further, or editing it to address the issues raised if it was declined, simply edit the submission and remove the {{db-afc}}, {{db-draft}}, or {{db-g13}} code.

If your submission has already been deleted by the time you get there, and you wish to retrieve it, you can request its undeletion by following the instructions at this link. An administrator will, in most cases, restore the submission so you can continue to work on it.

Thank you for your submission to Wikipedia! Lapablo (talk) 14:02, 1 March 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Your draft article, Draft:Academics at IIT Delhi

Hello, Aadarshashutosh. It has been over six months since you last edited the Articles for Creation submission or Draft page you started, "Academics at IIT Delhi".

In accordance with our policy that Wikipedia is not for the indefinite hosting of material deemed unsuitable for the encyclopedia mainspace, the draft has been nominated for deletion. If you plan on working on it further, or editing it to address the issues raised if it was declined, simply edit the submission and remove the {{db-afc}}, {{db-draft}}, or {{db-g13}} code.

If your submission has already been deleted by the time you get there, and you wish to retrieve it, you can request its undeletion by following the instructions at this link. An administrator will, in most cases, restore the submission so you can continue to work on it.

Thank you for your submission to Wikipedia! UnitedStatesian (talk) 21:22, 14 March 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Your draft article, Draft:Dhruv Rathee

Hello, Aadarshashutosh. It has been over six months since you last edited the Articles for Creation submission or Draft page you started, "Dhruv Rathee".

In accordance with our policy that Wikipedia is not for the indefinite hosting of material deemed unsuitable for the encyclopedia mainspace, the draft has been nominated for deletion. If you plan on working on it further, or editing it to address the issues raised if it was declined, simply edit the submission and remove the {{db-afc}}, {{db-draft}}, or {{db-g13}} code.

If your submission has already been deleted by the time you get there, and you wish to retrieve it, you can request its undeletion by following the instructions at this link. An administrator will, in most cases, restore the submission so you can continue to work on it.

Thank you for your submission to Wikipedia! JMHamo (talk) 10:49, 26 May 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Your draft article, Draft:Young Scientist Programme

Hello, Aadarshashutosh. It has been over six months since you last edited the Articles for Creation submission or Draft page you started, "Young Scientist Programme".

In accordance with our policy that Wikipedia is not for the indefinite hosting of material deemed unsuitable for the encyclopedia mainspace, the draft has been nominated for deletion. If you plan on working on it further, or editing it to address the issues raised if it was declined, simply edit the submission and remove the {{db-afc}}, {{db-draft}}, or {{db-g13}} code.

If your submission has already been deleted by the time you get there, and you wish to retrieve it, you can request its undeletion by following the instructions at this link. An administrator will, in most cases, restore the submission so you can continue to work on it.

Thank you for your submission to Wikipedia! UnitedStatesian (talk) 05:02, 29 July 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Your submission at Articles for creation: Young Scientist Programme has been accepted

Young Scientist Programme, which you submitted to Articles for creation, has been created.

Congratulations, and thank you for helping expand the scope of Wikipedia! We hope you will continue making quality contributions.

The article has been assessed as Start-Class, which is recorded on its talk page. Most new articles start out as Stub-Class or Start-Class and then attain higher grades as they develop over time. You may like to take a look at the grading scheme to see how you can improve the article.

Since you have made at least 10 edits over more than four days, you can now create articles yourself without posting a request. However, you may continue submitting work to Articles for creation if you prefer.

If you have any questions, you are welcome to ask at the help desk. Once you have made at least 10 edits and had an account for at least four days, you will have the option to create articles yourself without posting a request to Articles for creation.

If you would like to help us improve this process, please consider leaving us some feedback.

Thanks again, and happy editing!

Devonian Wombat (talk) 03:12, 26 September 2020 (UTC)[reply]