User talk:AaCBrown

Cliff Asness

Good job on the Asness article, but I deleted the resume-type stuff mainly because it bothered the heck out of me to see that tag on top.

P.S. I'm a fan of your book Red-Blooded Risk. exeunt (talk) 10:38, 11 November 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Nomination of David Kabiller for deletion

A discussion is taking place as to whether the article David Kabiller is suitable for inclusion in Wikipedia according to Wikipedia's policies and guidelines or whether it should be deleted.

The article will be discussed at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/David Kabiller until a consensus is reached, and anyone is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on high-quality evidence and our policies and guidelines.

Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion notice from the top of the article. scope_creep 21:25, 23 August 2014 (UTC)

October 2014

Hello, I'm BracketBot. I have automatically detected that your edit to David Kabiller may have broken the syntax by modifying 1 "()"s. If you have, don't worry: just edit the page again to fix it. If I misunderstood what happened, or if you have any questions, you can leave a message on my operator's talk page.

List of unpaired brackets remaining on the page:

International Institute for Nanotechnology]] <ref>http://www.iinano.org/executive-council) IIN Executive Council, accessed October 19, 2014</ref>

It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, BracketBot (talk) 15:19, 19 October 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Speedy deletion nomination of International institute for nanotechnology

Hello AaCBrown,

I wanted to let you know that I just tagged International institute for nanotechnology for deletion, because the article doesn't clearly say why the subject is important enough to be included in an encyclopedia.

If you feel that the article shouldn't be deleted and want more time to work on it, you can contest this deletion, but please don't remove the speedy deletion tag from the top.

You can leave a note on my talk page if you have questions. Vanjagenije (talk) 17:13, 19 October 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Talkback

Hello, AaCBrown. You have new messages at Vanjagenije's talk page.
Message added 11:55, 21 October 2014 (UTC). You can remove this notice at any time by removing the {{Talkback}} or {{Tb}} template.[reply]

Vanjagenije (talk) 11:55, 21 October 2014 (UTC)[reply]

ArbCom elections are now open!

Hi,
You appear to be eligible to vote in the current Arbitration Committee election. The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to enact binding solutions for disputes between editors, primarily related to serious behavioural issues that the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the ability to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail. If you wish to participate, you are welcome to review the candidates' statements and submit your choices on the voting page. For the Election committee, MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 13:59, 24 November 2015 (UTC)[reply]

AQR Capital Management

Hi Aaron,

I went a bit crazy editing the AQR page. I realized that in one of my edits I deleted your contribution on 13F filings and called it "nonsense." D'oh! While undoubtedly true that some investors look at AQR's 13F filings, I doubt that many do and so I deleted it. I hope you understand. You can add it back in if you disagree--I won't object.

I made a few other changes, including changing AQR's legal structure from LP to LLC (LLC is listed on the website and the firm's Form ADV Part 2A). There's an AQR Group LP (which I assume you're a partner in) that owns the LLC.

I plan to create a history section and I'd appreciate if you vet it for accuracy.

exeunt (talk) 19:55, 20 March 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Proposed deletion of Eric Weinstein

The article Eric Weinstein has been proposed for deletion because of the following concern:

Has been raising notability concerns, with several suggestions for deletion, for five years now, and no sign of improvement.

While all constructive contributions to Wikipedia are appreciated, content or articles may be deleted for any of several reasons.

You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the {{proposed deletion/dated}} notice, but please explain why in your edit summary or on the article's talk page.

Please consider improving the article to address the issues raised. Removing {{proposed deletion/dated}} will stop the proposed deletion process, but other deletion processes exist. In particular, the speedy deletion process can result in deletion without discussion, and articles for deletion allows discussion to reach consensus for deletion. Sleety Dribble (talk) 22:57, 18 August 2016 (UTC)[reply]

ArbCom Elections 2016: Voting now open!

Hello, AaCBrown. Voting in the 2016 Arbitration Committee elections is open from Monday, 00:00, 21 November through Sunday, 23:59, 4 December to all unblocked users who have registered an account before Wednesday, 00:00, 28 October 2016 and have made at least 150 mainspace edits before Sunday, 00:00, 1 November 2016.

The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.

If you wish to participate in the 2016 election, please review the candidates' statements and submit your choices on the voting page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 22:08, 21 November 2016 (UTC)[reply]

ArbCom 2017 election voter message

Hello, AaCBrown. Voting in the 2017 Arbitration Committee elections is now open until 23.59 on Sunday, 10 December. All users who registered an account before Saturday, 28 October 2017, made at least 150 mainspace edits before Wednesday, 1 November 2017 and are not currently blocked are eligible to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once.

The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.

If you wish to participate in the 2017 election, please review the candidates and submit your choices on the voting page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 18:42, 3 December 2017 (UTC)[reply]