User talk:A Raider Like Indiana/Archives/2007/March

BJJ article

Please check the BJJ talk page.

What am I looking for? A Raider Like Indiana 00:01, 12 March 2007 (UTC)

The bjj page is currently being spammed with false information ascribing the origin of BJJ to Tenjin Shinyo Ryu and so on, I am attempting to revert it to before this campaign of removal of the mention of Judo but honestly don't know the revert command and am a rank amateur at this wiki thing. Any help would be appreciated but please don't revert it to that terrible version again.

For the revert edit, It was marked as vandalism so I rolled it back to a recent version. I was unaware of its condition. I did not read it closely. I will change it back to its previous state. For the talk page; Ill see what I can do. For a quick tip, you can begin by registering and joining Wikipedia. And always put your signature after you comment in a talk page. A Raider Like Indiana 00:12, 12 March 2007 (UTC)

Thanks for the tips and help. —The preceding unsigned comment was added by 65.60.134.62 (talk) 00:17, 12 March 2007 (UTC).

No problem. A Raider Like Indiana 00:20, 12 March 2007 (UTC)

An Edit.

I assume in this edit you're not reverting me, are you? I guess you were reverting some things that were added before my edit. Acalamari 02:12, 20 March 2007 (UTC)

Thanks; I just wanted to confirm you weren't reverting me. I thought that the information was wrong too. Acalamari 22:04, 20 March 2007 (UTC)

Redwolf

Someone changed his userpage without his consent; I was changing it back to his last revision when you reverted me. --69.144.234.146 00:50, 28 March 2007 (UTC)

Excuse me, but I will not be ignored. I've more experience on Wikipedia in my pinky than you have in your entire body, so don't think you can ignore me just because I'm not logged in. --69.144.234.146 00:56, 28 March 2007 (UTC)

Sorry, I didn't get the new messages bar for some reason. --69.144.234.146 00:57, 28 March 2007 (UTC)

No problem. I just thought you deleted it and then ignored me for a moment because the new messages bar was being glitchy. --69.144.234.146 01:06, 28 March 2007 (UTC)