User talk:A 10 fireplane/Archive 1

Archive 1

Welcome!

Hello, A 10 fireplane, and welcome to Wikipedia! Thank you for your contributions. I hope you like the place and decide to stay. Here are a few links to pages you might find helpful:

• Introduction and Getting started
• Contributing to Wikipedia
• The five pillars of Wikipedia
• How to edit a page and How to develop articles
• How to create your first article
• Simplified Manual of Style

You may also want to complete the Wikipedia Adventure, an interactive tour that will help you learn the basics of editing Wikipedia. You can visit the Teahouse to ask questions or seek help.

Please remember to sign your messages on talk pages by typing four tildes (~~~~); this will automatically insert your username and the date. If you need help, check out Wikipedia:Questions, ask me on my talk page, or , and a volunteer should respond shortly. Again, welcome! JarrahTree 14:12, 13 April 2018 (UTC)

Thanks, I will definitely check out all the resources you have given. I really appreciate it :) A 10 fireplane (talk) 14:22, 13 April 2018 (UTC)

Just be aware that some projects have as much good intro info as do some of the links above -

Military History

Ships

were the 'greats' about 7 years ago - they ruled the waves and air at the time - however with various shifts things move - it is well worth getting a handle on the variations that some projects have in ideas about scope and MOS and so on - it is all great fun! (discovering things) JarrahTree 14:30, 13 April 2018 (UTC)

Got it, thanks again A 10 fireplane (talk) 14:34, 13 April 2018 (UTC)

Welcome to Milhist!

Hello and welcome to the Military history WikiProject! As you may have guessed, we're a group of editors working to improve Wikipedia's coverage of topics related to military history.

A few features that you might find helpful:

• Our navigation box points to most of the useful pages within the project.
• The announcement and open task box is updated very frequently. You can watchlist it if you are interested, or you can add it directly to your user page by copying the following: {{WPMILHIST Announcements}}.
• Important discussions take place on the project's main discussion page; it is highly recommended that you watchlist it.
• The project has several departments, which handle article quality assessment, detailed article and content review, writing contests, and article logistics.
• We have a number of task forces that focus on specific topics, nations, periods, and conflicts.
• We've developed a set of guidelines that cover article structure and content, template use, categorization, and many other issues of interest.
• If you're looking for something to work on, there are many articles that need attention, as well as a number of review alerts.
• If you would like to receive the project's monthly newsletter, The Bugle, please sign up here.

If you have any questions, please don't hesitate to ask any of the project coordinators or any other experienced member of the project, and we'll be happy to help you. Again, welcome, and we are looking forward to seeing you around! Peacemaker67 (click to talk to me) 00:29, 14 April 2018 (UTC)

Thank you I'm glad to be apart of it :) A 10 fireplane (talk) 16:13, 16 April 2018 (UTC)

Per your request, item repaired.

I repaired the infobox for you on USS Oregon (BB-3), but wanted to show you where the answer was. Template:Infobox ship career under Custom Fields near the bottom. When you have trouble with a template check its document page. I find them by searching,

   template:(name)   

Thanks for the reason to learn something new today! ---> Darryl.P.Pike (talk) 22:01, 16 April 2018 (UTC)

No problem, thanks for fixing it, ok I'll check there thanks :) A 10 fireplane (talk) 13:22, 17 April 2018 (UTC)

Wikipedia:WikiProject Aircraft

Thanks for signing up for this project. It is a very busy and active project with lots going on and we can always use more help and especially a fresh set of eyes. If you haven't done so already you might want to add Wikipedia talk:WikiProject Aircraft to your watch list as this is where much of the background discussion occurs. You may also want to watch Wikipedia:New articles (Aircraft) as this is where newly created articles get listed for peer review. Having a look over these new articles is a great way to get a feel for how things are done on the project and also most new articles need reviewing anyway. If you have any questions you can leave me a note or post at Wikipedia talk:WikiProject Aircraft, either way you will get a quick response. - Ahunt (talk) 20:07, 2 May 2018 (UTC)

@Ahunt: awesome thanks great to be apart of it, I'm glad to help out and share my knowledge, I will definitely add them to my watch list A 10 fireplane (talk) 13:29, 3 May 2018 (UTC)

Teahouse talkback: you've got messages!

Hello, A 10 fireplane/Archive 1. Your question has been answered at the Teahouse Q&A board. Feel free to reply there!
Please note that all old questions are archived after 2-3 days of inactivity. Message added by DES ^(talk)_{DESiegel Contribs} 20:40, 17 May 2018 (UTC). (You can remove this notice at any time by removing the {{teahouse talkback}} template).

USS Toledo (SSN-769)

Hi, I realize you're new here, but typically questions about articles are posted on the article's talk page, not user talk pages. I know I prefer that and that's why I specifically requested as such, clearly at the top of my talk page. Your question has been moved to the article talk page and addressed there. FYI - ^theWOLFchild 18:32, 23 May 2018 (UTC)

Ok, sorry, thank you A 10 fireplane (talk) 23:15, 23 May 2018 (UTC)

Your thread has been archived

Hi A 10 fireplane! You created a thread called How do I 'lock' editing on a page? at Wikipedia:Teahouse, but it has been archived because there was no discussion for a few days. You can still find the archived discussion here. If you have any additional questions that weren't answered then, please create a new thread. Delivered by Muninnbot, an automated account. You can opt out of future notifications by placing {{bots|deny=Muninnbot}} (ban this bot) or {{nobots}} (ban all bots) on your user talk page. Muninnbot (talk) 19:01, 24 May 2018 (UTC)

Your thread has been archived

Hi A 10 fireplane! You created a thread called Adding information at Wikipedia:Teahouse, but it has been archived because there was no discussion for a few days. You can still find the archived discussion here. If you have any additional questions that weren't answered then, please create a new thread. Archival by Lowercase sigmabot III, notification delivery by Muninnbot, both automated accounts. You can opt out of future notifications by placing {{bots|deny=Muninnbot}} (ban this bot) or {{nobots}} (ban all bots) on your user talk page. Muninnbot (talk) 19:02, 18 July 2018 (UTC)

Wikiproject Military history coordinator election nominations open

Nominations for the upcoming project coordinator election are now open. A team of up to ten coordinators will be elected for the next year. The project coordinators are the designated points of contact for issues concerning the project, and are responsible for maintaining our internal structure and processes. They do not, however, have any authority over article content or editor conduct, or any other special powers. More information on being a coordinator is available here. If you are interested in running, please sign up here by 23:59 UTC on 14 September! Voting doesn't commence until 15 September. If you have any questions, you can contact any member of the coord team. Cheers, MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 00:54, 1 September 2018 (UTC)

Milhist coordinator election voting has commenced

G'day everyone, voting for the 2018 Wikiproject Military history coordinator tranche is now open. This is a simple approval vote; only "support" votes should be made. Project members should vote for any candidates they support by 23:59 (UTC) on 28 September 2018. Thanks, MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 00:35, 15 September 2018 (UTC)

Milhist coordinator election voting has commenced

G'day everyone, voting for the 2018 Wikiproject Military history coordinator tranche is now open. This is a simple approval vote; only "support" votes should be made. Project members should vote for any candidates they support by 23:59 (UTC) on 28 September 2018. Thanks, MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 06:22, 15 September 2018 (UTC) Note: the previous version omitted a link to the election page, therefore you are receiving this follow up message with a link to the election page to correct the previous version. We apologies for any inconvenience that this may have caused.

How do I install twinkle?

I went to my preferences and added then saved twinkle but don't know if it worked or where to find it. I would like to use it to easily revert acts of vandalism A 10 fireplane (talk) 18:58, 25 September 2018 (UTC)

You should have a new "TW" tab with a drop-down menu at the top, between "More" and the search bar (at least if you use the default Vector skin; otherwise I'd look somewhere near wherever page moves are located in the other skins). Huon (talk) 19:06, 25 September 2018 (UTC)

@Huon: thank you

Have your say!

Hi everyone, just a quick reminder that voting for the WikiProject Military history coordinator election closes soon. You only have a day or so left to have your say about who should make up the coordination team for the next year. If you have already voted, thanks for participating! If you haven't and would like to, vote here before 23:59 UTC on 28 September. Thanks, MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 03:29, 26 September 2018 (UTC)

Your thread has been archived

Hi A 10 fireplane! You created a thread called Twinkle at Wikipedia:Teahouse, but it has been archived because there was no discussion for a few days. You can still find the archived discussion here. If you have any additional questions that weren't answered then, please create a new thread. Archival by Lowercase sigmabot III, notification delivery by Muninnbot, both automated accounts. You can opt out of future notifications by placing {{bots|deny=Muninnbot}} (ban this bot) or {{nobots}} (ban all bots) on your user talk page. Muninnbot (talk) 19:02, 29 September 2018 (UTC)

Wikipedia:WikiProject Aircraft/Engines

Thanks for signing up for this project. As you can see from the rather short list of participants we can always use more help and especially a fresh set of eyes. If you haven't done so already you might want to add Wikipedia talk:WikiProject Aircraft/Engines to your watch list as this is where the background discussion occurs. You may also want to watch Wikipedia:New articles (Aircraft) as this is where newly created articles get listed for peer review, including engine articles. Having a look over these new articles is a great way to get a feel for how things are done on the project and also most new articles need reviewing anyway. If you have any questions you can leave me a note or post at Wikipedia talk:WikiProject Aircraft or Wikipedia talk:WikiProject Aircraft/Engines, either way you will get a quick response. - Ahunt (talk) 01:44, 25 October 2018 (UTC)

@Ahunt: thank you, I will definitely. Glad to help out in any way A 10 fireplane (talk) 03:27, 25 October 2018 (UTC)

- Ahunt (talk) 12:26, 25 October 2018 (UTC)

How do I upload images

I have some photos from another website, how do I upload them and make sure I don't violate copyright? A 10 fireplane (talk) 16:23, 25 October 2018 (UTC)

Most of the time, photos you find on another website are considered copyrighted unless you can provide specific evidence that they are in the public domain (documented as being published in the U.S. before 1922, for instance). You can also upload photos that have a credible indication of being licensed in a way that is compatible with Wikipedia, even though they are copyrighted. The whole subject is complicated and you are right to be cautious.

To get started with uploading, you first need to realize that the photos will be hosted at Wikimedia Commons rather than on the English Wikipedia itself. My best advice is go to c:Commons:First steps and follow their instructions. Wikimedia Commons is a separate organization, different rules, different admins (mostly) than English Wikipedia, though both are under the umbrella of the Wikimedia Foundation. — jmcgnh^{(talk) (contribs)} 16:54, 25 October 2018 (UTC)

@Jmcgnh: thank you, one more question. If the photos where taken by an employee of the US Navy then aren't they in the public domain? A 10 fireplane (talk) 17:00, 25 October 2018 (UTC)

An employee of the U.S. Navy, taking photos as part of their job as a photographer for the navy, is creating photos that are inherently in the public domain. But the employee's snapshots at home while off from work would not generally fall into the public domain. But I'm an amateur at photo copyright stuff. The better experts are at Commons, so you should be asking them for clarifications. — jmcgnh^{(talk) (contribs)} 17:13, 25 October 2018 (UTC)

@Jmcgnh: ok awesome thank you A 10 fireplane (talk) 17:23, 25 October 2018 (UTC)

Ban vs Block

Thanks fror your warning on User talk:Kandikkozhi. Please note, as you posted there, that there is a difference between a Ban and a Block. User was blocked. -- Alexf^(talk) 14:32, 30 October 2018 (UTC)

@Alexf: no problem, thank you for brinning this to my attention. I will use the correct terms from now on A 10 fireplane (talk) 14:46, 30 October 2018 (UTC)

Grammar

Hi, A 10 fireplane, and thanks for your contributions, but are you deliberately spelling 'grammar' incorrectly in your edit summaries (and on your user page), and the 'Some times' on your user page? Regards JACKINTHEBOX • ^TALK 02:04, 16 November 2018 (UTC)

@JackintheBox: OML I hadn't realized autofill was doing this (the 'grammer' issue) the 'some times' was my bad. I'll change my autofill to correctly spell grammar. Thank you for bringing this to my attention A 10 fireplane (talk) 02:18, 16 November 2018 (UTC)

Creating a page under "template"

How do I create a template page? A 10 fireplane (talk) 19:46, 28 November 2018 (UTC)

I believe the information you are looking for is at Help:Template. Please reopen this help request if you have further questions. —KuyaBriBri^Talk 21:07, 28 November 2018 (UTC)

@Kuyabribri: Thank you A 10 fireplane (talk) 21:25, 28 November 2018 (UTC)

Nominations now open for "Military historian of the year" and "Military history newcomer of the year" awards

Nominations for our annual Military historian of the year and Military history newcomer of the year awards are open until 23:59 (GMT) on 15 December 2018. Why don't you nominate the editors who you believe have made a real difference to the project in 2018? MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 02:26, 3 December 2018 (UTC)

Nominating a draft for deleation

How do I nominate a draft for deleation? A 10 fireplane ^{Imform me} 17:54, 4 December 2018 (UTC)

Deleting a draft

Did you mean to archive your question before it could be answered?

Anyway, if it's your own draft, meaning you were the only contributor to the draft, you can request speedy deletion by placing {{db-author}} at the top and saving it. It will usually be deleted by an admin in a few minutes, but sometimes it may take a while longer or they may decline your request because other editors have made contributions to the draft.

If it's someone else's draft, the venue for deletion is Miscellany for Deletion (or is that "Discussion"). Using Twinkle is the easiest way to do this, since doing it manually requires a number of steps. You have to give a valid policy-based reason for the deletion and a discussion will generally ensue that may take a week or more to come to a conclusion. — jmcgnh^{(talk) (contribs)} 18:56, 4 December 2018 (UTC)

@Jmcgnh: yes sir I figured it out, using Twinkle thank you none the less A 10 fireplane ^{Imform me} 19:10, 4 December 2018 (UTC)

Pending changes reviewer granted

Hello. Your account has been granted the "pending changes reviewer" userright, allowing you to review other users' edits on pages protected by pending changes. The list of articles awaiting review is located at Special:PendingChanges, while the list of articles that have pending changes protection turned on is located at Special:StablePages.

Being granted reviewer rights neither grants you status nor changes how you can edit articles. If you do not want this user right, you may ask any administrator to remove it for you at any time.

See also:

• Wikipedia:Reviewing pending changes, the guideline on reviewing
• Wikipedia:Pending changes, the summary of the use of pending changes
• Wikipedia:Protection policy#Pending changes protection, the policy determining which pages can be given pending changes protection by administrators.
  

 Swarm  talk  02:32, 5 December 2018 (UTC)

@Swarm: Thank you A 10 fireplane ^{Imform me} 02:39, 5 December 2018 (UTC)

Disguised Toast Edit Approval

Hey, I just wanted to let you know that this edit you approved was vandalism. I have undid the changes and I though you would like to know. LakesideMiners^{My Talk Page} 18:50, 5 December 2018 (UTC)

@LakesideMiners:My bad! I will be more careful from now on and only approve subjects I know a lot about A 10 fireplane ^{Imform me} 20:13, 5 December 2018 (UTC)

Userbox organization

Hey, I noticed your "My Wikiprojects" userboxes were a bit unorganized. I've made an example edit in case you want to organize them. It took me forever to figure out how to do that lol. I reverted myself, but hopefully you can see what I did so that you can organize your own userboxes however you want. Let me know if you have any questions, on this or anything else. Regards,  Swarm  talk  09:36, 6 December 2018 (UTC)

Thank you, yes I've been meaning to fix that for a while A 10 fireplane ^{Imform me} 12:48, 6 December 2018 (UTC)

User with a name violation

Where do I report a User with a Username violation? A 10 fireplane ^{Imform me} 18:05, 11 December 2018 (UTC)

Most violations of the wp:Username policy can be reported at WP:Usernames for administrator attention. Please read those two pages before reporting someone. —AntiCompositeNumber (talk) 18:13, 11 December 2018 (UTC)

@AntiCompositeNumber: Thank you A 10 fireplane ^{Imform me} 18:15, 11 December 2018 (UTC)

Voting now open for "Military historian of the year" and "Military history newcomer of the year" awards

Voting for our annual Military historian of the year and Military history newcomer of the year awards is open until 23:59 (GMT) on 30 December 2018. Why don't you vote for the editors who you believe have made a real difference to Wikipedia's coverage of military history in 2018? MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 02:16, 16 December 2018 (UTC)

Your thread has been archived

Hi A 10 fireplane! You created a thread called Anonymous Account at Wikipedia:Teahouse, but it has been archived because there was no discussion for a few days. You can still find the archived discussion here. If you have any additional questions that weren't answered then, please create a new thread. Archival by Lowercase sigmabot III, notification delivery by Muninnbot, both automated accounts. You can opt out of future notifications by placing {{bots|deny=Muninnbot}} (ban this bot) or {{nobots}} (ban all bots) on your user talk page. Muninnbot (talk) 19:03, 16 December 2018 (UTC)

Changing Signature

Hello, I am considering changing my Signature to something seasonal but I'd assume that constantly changing your signature is against Wikipedia policies as it would get confusing. Is changing my signature frequency against policy? A 10 fireplane ^{Imform me} 01:27, 22 December 2018 (UTC)

There is no policy against changing signatures frequently, although I would personally recommend not to change it too often (it could become confusing). Happy holidays! Vermont (talk) 03:20, 22 December 2018 (UTC)

(edit conflict)

As long as your signature meets the signature guidelines, which it appears your proposed seasonal signature does, there is no reason why you can't change it from time to time. Changing it frequently might be considered, if not disruptive, at least a potential sign of NOTHERE, though. — jmcgnh^{(talk) (contribs)} 03:29, 22 December 2018 (UTC)

@Vermont:@Jmcgnh:ok, even tho its not against policy I wont change it. Don't want to confuse anyone. Merry Christmas A 10 fireplane ^{Imform me} 20:50, 22 December 2018 (UTC)

Rollback granted

Hi A 10 fireplane. After reviewing your request for "rollbacker", I have enabled rollback on your account. Keep in mind these things when going to use rollback:

• Getting rollback is no more momentous than installing Twinkle.
• Rollback should be used to revert clear cases of vandalism only, and not good faith edits.
• Rollback should never be used to edit war.
• If abused, rollback rights can be revoked.
• Use common sense.

If you no longer want rollback, contact me and I'll remove it. Also, for some more information on how to use rollback, see Wikipedia:Administrators' guide/Rollback (even though you're not an admin). I'm sure you'll do great with rollback, but feel free to leave me a message on my talk page if you run into troubles or have any questions about appropriate/inappropriate use of rollback. Thank you for helping to reduce vandalism. Happy editing!  ~~Swarm~~  {talk}  03:52, 13 January 2019 (UTC)

@Swarm:Awesome thank you, no more requests like this [1] A 10 fireplane ^{Imform me} 05:49, 13 January 2019 (UTC)

Invitation

Greetings, you are invited to join Association of Wikipedians Who Dislike Clash of Civilizations in Wikipedia. To join the association, add your name to the list here. To indicate your membership of the association, you may care to add the following template on your userpage	Association of Wikipedians Who Dislike Clash of Civilizations in Wikipedia
{{AWWDCCW}} {{AWWDCCW}} {{User wikipedia/AWWDCCW}} {{User wikipedia/AWWDCCW}} {{User:TheStrayDog/COC}} {{User:TheStrayDog/COC}}

--PATH SLOPU ^(Talk) 13:51, 21 January 2019 (UTC)

Your submission at Articles for creation: USCGC Kathrine Walker (WLM-552) (January 23)

Your recent article submission to Articles for Creation has been reviewed! Unfortunately, it has not been accepted at this time. The reason left by Gbawden was:  The comment the reviewer left was: Please check the submission for any additional comments left by the reviewer. You are encouraged to edit the submission to address the issues raised and resubmit when they have been resolved.

• If you would like to continue working on the submission, go to Draft:USCGC Kathrine Walker (WLM-552) and click on the "Edit" tab at the top of the window.
• If you now believe the draft cannot meet Wikipedia's standards or do not wish to progress it further, you may request deletion. Please go to Draft:USCGC Kathrine Walker (WLM-552), click on the "Edit" tab at the top of the window, add "{{db-self}}" at the top of the draft text and click the blue "publish changes" button to save this edit.
• If you need any assistance, you can ask for help at the Articles for creation help desk or on the reviewer's talk page.
• You can also use Wikipedia's real-time chat help from experienced editors.

Gbawden (talk) 09:45, 23 January 2019 (UTC)

Re: Dusty587789897234897 (talk · contribs)

Hi! Just a small note in case you missed the AIV reply, since this user is blanking a test template, this is not actually vandalism. I have removed the warnings on their talk page. Cheers! -- Luk ^talk 15:04, 30 January 2019 (UTC)

@Luk:Ok I assumed that blanking the template was un-allowed, thank you for explaining A 10 fireplane ^{Imform me} 15:07, 30 January 2019 (UTC)

Your submission at Articles for creation: USCGC Katherine Walker (WLM-552) has been accepted

USCGC Katherine Walker (WLM-552), which you submitted to Articles for creation, has been created.
The article has been assessed as Stub-Class, which is recorded on the article's talk page. You may like to take a look at the grading scheme to see how you can improve the article.

You are more than welcome to continue making quality contributions to Wikipedia. You may wish to consider registering an account so you can create articles yourself.

• If you have any questions, you are welcome to ask at the help desk.
• If you would like to help us improve this process, please consider .

Thank you for helping improve Wikipedia!

Chetsford (talk) 00:51, 1 February 2019 (UTC)

Your submission at Articles for creation: USCGC Ida Lewis (WLM-551) has been accepted

USCGC Ida Lewis (WLM-551), which you submitted to Articles for creation, has been created.
The article has been assessed as Stub-Class, which is recorded on the article's talk page. You may like to take a look at the grading scheme to see how you can improve the article.

You are more than welcome to continue making quality contributions to Wikipedia. If your account is more than four days old and you have made at least 10 edits you can create articles yourself without posting a request. However, you may continue submitting work to Articles for Creation if you prefer.

• If you have any questions, you are welcome to ask at the help desk.
• If you would like to help us improve this process, please consider .

Thank you for helping improve Wikipedia!

Chetsford (talk) 20:14, 1 February 2019 (UTC)

Bassmint Productions/Soul Intent

I'm D.J. Butter Fingers, this is my history. What is on here, as far as when Soul Intent was formed, as well as some past members, is incorrect. The previous info that was on here 5 years ago was almost completely false, which is why I changed it, and since that time, it's been edited to death, with everyone adding things that are factually wrong or removing things that are factually correct. What I'm trying to do is put it back to some form that I had it 5 years ago. DJbuttehfingiz111 (talk) 17:57, 7 February 2019 (UTC)

@DJbuttehfingiz111: please note we have strict policies about editing articles that you are personally connected too. A 10 fireplane ^{Imform me} 18:07, 7 February 2019 (UTC)

Admittedly

i did admittedly edit the article GStreamer but the edit was very minor and i am also very new to editing wikipedia. i did read your comment and will try harder to follow the guidelines next time. — Preceding unsigned comment added by Nevanom (talk • contribs) 18:34, 11 February 2019 (UTC)

@Nevanom:No problem at all, I was there too. Editing Wikipedia can be complicated. I have left some links below you might find useful

• Introduction and Getting started
• Contributing to Wikipedia
• The five pillars of Wikipedia
• How to edit a page and How to develop articles
• How to create your first article
• Simplified Manual of Style

Please don't hesitate if you have any questions A 10 fireplane ^{Imform me} 18:38, 11 February 2019 (UTC)

@A 10 fireplane: you were here too? you sound like an expert. it doesn't look that easy, yes. let's hope i'll learn. thanks for the links. — Preceding unsigned comment added by Nevanom (talk • contribs) 19:23, 11 February 2019 (UTC)

@Nevanom: No problem, I remember trying to learn the basics of editing, kinda hard at at first. Also please remember to sign your messages on talk pages by typing four tildes (~~~~); this will automatically insert your username and the date. A 10 fireplane ^{Imform me} 19:27, 11 February 2019 (UTC)

@A 10 fireplane: thanks for the tip. Nevanom (talk) 21:44, 11 February 2019 (UTC)

@Nevanom:No problem, please let me know if there's anything I can do A 10 fireplane ^{Imform me} 21:46, 11 February 2019 (UTC)

@A 10 fireplane: it looks like my change has been reversed, anyways but i still insist on it being being wrong. as far as i know, FLV is a container format and not a compression format but looks like it's listed here Media Formats alongside other compression formats as a compression format. Nevanom (talk) 21:56, 11 February 2019 (UTC)

@Nevanom:I see what your saying, I removed FLV from the article. If you notice the difference in our edits the two "[" on either side provide a link to another article. In your first edit you accidentally removed them from the other link. Its no problem at all and if you would like some help learning how to edit I would be glad to teach you what I know. A 10 fireplane ^{Imform me} 22:03, 11 February 2019 (UTC)

@A 10 fireplane:i mostly just spotted the part about FLV. i'm surprised you can note such small differences. i still don't see how different my original change was but may be with time i'll get used to and start noting such things. furthermore, it doesn't really matter now as my edit has been made and may be in the best way possible, with your guidance. i'd rather not bother you to help learn how to edit, i am pretty sure i'll learn little by little. with time i'll be at least good enough may be not an expert. Nevanom (talk) 22:12, 11 February 2019 (UTC)

@Nevanom:I assure you I'm not an expert, I still make mistakes all the time that other editors help me fix. And it wouldn't be a bother at all. It would be a honor to help you learn. If you ever need anything don't hesitate to ask A 10 fireplane ^{Imform me} 00:10, 12 February 2019 (UTC)

re: contribution undone

Hi A 10 fireplane, thank you for letting me know that my change was reverted. I made the change because there was a small but significant typo on the page (should be 71% not 1%, according to the paper it refers to). I'm not sure what the protocol is here. I just made my account today to fix this one thing and am completely lost. Would you mind telling me how I can get the page corrected if I cannot change it myself? Thanks again! Bogoam (talk) 21:48, 12 February 2019 (UTC)

@Bogoam: Ahh I see what your saying, in the future it would be helpful if you could leave an edit summary stating it was a typo. Whenever your changing something that big after just creating an account it rases some alarms since we have a lot of vandals here. I have fixed the article. If you have any other questions or would like some help learning how to edit I would be glad to offer assistance A 10 fireplane ^{Imform me} 00:28, 13 February 2019 (UTC)

@A 10 fireplane: Okay I see, will remember that for next time thanks. Thank you so much for your help! Bogoam (talk) 15:15, 13 February 2019 (UTC)

@Bogoam:No problem, again please don't hesitate if you have anymore questions A 10 fireplane ^{Imform me} 15:17, 13 February 2019 (UTC)

Re: the office “dinner party”

Hi, I have a reliable source for the change I made, but was unsure about link formatting. Thank you for the help links - I will read up on the guidelines and resubmit. Reyofsunshine (talk) 04:27, 14 February 2019 (UTC)

@Reyofsunshine:No Problem, what you do is add <ref>YOUR REFERENCE HERE</ref> and that will property add it A 10 fireplane ^{Imform me} 14:50, 14 February 2019 (UTC)

Should I Roleback?

There have been 3 recent edits to Yaffa Eliach by the same editor. All 3 are removing imformation, the editors reasoning is that the imformation is biased/ or has personal attacks. As far as I can see there isn't any personal attacks or biased imformation. Should I Roleback the edits? A 10 fireplane ^{Imform me} 18:20, 19 February 2019 (UTC)

He broke the death template by mistake, but he was acting in a constructive direction - the article has become a WP:COATRACK for rather fringe Polish nationalists attacks on her personal story - that was not related to her rather notable academic career (her Wapo obit has the 10k of text you reverted... In one line). It was not vandalism - though possibly it would have been challenged.Icewhiz (talk) 19:55, 19 February 2019 (UTC)

@Icewhiz: so should I un-do my revert? A 10 fireplane ^{Imform me} 19:57, 19 February 2019 (UTC)

I would not have marked it as minor. Up to you - FWIW - it probably would have been challenged. Lets see if he goes to talk.Icewhiz (talk) 20:02, 19 February 2019 (UTC)

@Icewhiz: Sounds like a plan, I left a message on the users talkpage asking for clarification. If not I could start a discussion on the articles talkpage. A 10 fireplane ^{Imform me} 20:05, 19 February 2019 (UTC)

Talkback

Hello, A 10 fireplane. You have new messages at Jebcubed's talk page.
Message added 19:46, 19 February 2019 (UTC). You can remove this notice at any time by removing the {{Talkback}} or {{Tb}} template.

Jeb³_{Talk at me here} 19:46, 19 February 2019 (UTC)

WP:UAA reports on users with no edits

Generally, there is no reason to report usernames with no edits whatsoever. Per WP:UAAI: "Wait until the user edits. Do not report a user that hasn't edited unless they are clearly a vandal. We do not want to welcome productive editors with a report at UAA, nor do we want to waste our time dealing with accounts that may never be used." The exceptions are obvious hate speech or names that attack a living person/Wikipedia editor, those are blockable even without any edits, but other run-of-the-mill violations need not be reported unless and until they at least attempt to edit, and you should be able to clearly explain what the problem is if it is not immediately evident.

For whatever reason, every day dozens, if not hundreds of accounts are created that never make one single edit. It is our responsibility as admins to conscientiously review every report a user makes at UAA, so we have to check for contribs, deleted contribs, and tripping of the edit filter for every one of these reports, only to find out there's nothing there and therefore no problem to be solved. That's time that could be spent doing more productive things, but you basically obligate admins to do it by making such reports. Beeblebrox (talk) 23:55, 20 February 2019 (UTC)

@Beeblebrox: I understand not wanting to waste admins time, if a user had a blatant username violation it seams the most logical thing for me would be to report them. However I don't want to cause any disruption. But are you saying you wouldn't want me to report a user (I report today) with the name "GAy Boig" just because there where no edits? A 10 fireplane ^{Imform me} 00:02, 21 February 2019 (UTC)

Yes. Only the very worst of the worst usernames merit a block when they have not even attempted to edit. Hate speech, attacking specific living persons or Wikipedia users, that sort of thing should be reported no matter what, but something more marginal like this should not be reported if they have not edited. What is offensive is of course very much a matter of perspective and opinion, but this probably isn't blockable even if they do edit. People are allowed to self-identify as gay if they want to. Beeblebrox (talk) 00:07, 21 February 2019 (UTC)

@Beeblebrox: Alright I got ya, thanks for clarifying A 10 fireplane ^{Imform me} 00:14, 21 February 2019 (UTC)

Response from User talk:Brainiac245

I figure a stricter warning will discourage users from vandalizing more. Brainiac245 (talk) 19:43, 22 February 2019 (UTC)

@Brainiac245:While this is true it could also discourage good faith editors. Its your choice but personally I would only use level 3's in obvious cases of vandalism A 10 fireplane ^{Imform me} 19:46, 22 February 2019 (UTC)

re my edit

hi sorry if you didn't like my edit. i'm new here and wikipedia asked me to edit chueshov page. (b. 1979) is standard usage for born in 1979. but if you don't like it, that's fine. --Avilon14 (talk) 17:47, 28 February 2019 (UTC)

@Avilon14:While I doubt Wikipedia asked you to edit, we normally use Born in 1979 rather than b. 1997. Just so you know A 10 fireplane ^{Imform me} 19:52, 28 February 2019 (UTC)

What to do

hey, I edited Mrs. Benson's page to include an updated biography. I see that it was reverted back, and I'm wondering what steps I need to take to update her biography to a more recent and accurate portrayal. I also want to add a headshot. — Preceding unsigned comment added by Joe-scott11 (talk • contribs) 19:23, 11 February 2019 (UTC)

@Joe-scott11:hello, I've noticed other editors have reverted your recent edits (after the 1 I did) what steps I recommend would be providing a link to a reliable source. And as for the photo that would be fine. A 10 fireplane ^{Imform me} 20:00, 28 February 2019 (UTC)

Treatment of newcomers

Hi! I think you were too hard on the newbie at Restroom Access Act and you really could have added the dead link tag yourself, especially since the newcomer pointed out the problem. Sjö (talk) 17:19, 18 March 2019 (UTC)

@Sjö:While yes Aec49 was trying to say a link was dead it was still a disruptive edit as so I warned as one. However I see what you are saying, my bad A 10 fireplane ^{Imform me} 17:24, 18 March 2019 (UTC)

/* Legacy */ "Human" instead of "people".

Hi,

I don't know if I should talk in Serbian, but I'll continue in English. The edit I made was to change the translation of "ljudi" from "people", to "human". In my opinion, the intent of the original text was to identify the ability of "we", the Serbian people, to forgive, as human beings. The word "people" has no place there, it would mean that the original is questioning the existence of "we" as people, which makes no sense in the context. The focus is on the ability to forgive.

Best regards,

Dusan Milanov — Preceding unsigned comment added by Dusanmilanov (talk • contribs) 14:34, 20 March 2019 (UTC)

@Dusanmilanov: thank you for explaining your edit, that makes sense. I will undo my revert A 10 fireplane ^{Imform me} 14:39, 20 March 2019 (UTC)

Topicon

Hello, I am trying to create a topicon to show my alternate account and have read Template:Top icon/doc but still am unable to successfully create it. My trys are on my sandbox. Please if you know what I am doong incorrectly let me know. A 10 fireplane ^{Imform me} 16:09, 20 March 2019 (UTC)

 Fixed in your sandbox RhinosF1^(chat)_{(status)(contribs)} 16:36, 20 March 2019 (UTC)

@RhinosF1: Awesome thank you A 10 fireplane ^{Imform me} 17:00, 20 March 2019 (UTC)

Wallingford Bridge

The number of arches making up Wallingford Bridge is 19, just this morning I counted them. There are 16 arches visible on the north side and 19 on the south. I can also sight https://thames.me.uk/s01330.htm which also states 19 arches. On checking I can say that there isn't room for 22 arches. Some sources state 17, others historically state 19. Only Wikipedia states incorrectly 22. — Preceding unsigned comment added by Mercator1953 (talk • contribs) 15:02, 21 March 2019 (UTC)

@Mercator1953:I have updated the imformation and added your provided reference A 10 fireplane ^{Imform me} 15:58, 21 March 2019 (UTC)

reply

It was not test edit that I made to Glossary of graph theory terms recently.

adjacent means 

'The relation between two vertices that are both endpoints of the same edge'

and incident means

1. The relation between an edge and one of its endpoints.[2] 2. Two edges are said to be incident if they share a vertex. (cf. adjacent)

Word 'walk' at W section, It is correct to write an incident because it mentions two edges.  — Preceding unsigned comment added by Younghaha (talk • contribs) 14:54, 22 March 2019 (UTC) 

@Younghaha: Fixed A 10 fireplane ^{Imform me} 15:22, 22 March 2019 (UTC)

A barnstar for you!

	The Original Barnstar
	First ;) ♠Vami_IV†♠ 11:32, 28 March 2019 (UTC)

@Vami IV: thank you so much, means a lot A 10 fireplane ^{Imform me} 13:48, 29 March 2019 (UTC)

A barnstar for you

		The Userpage Barnstar
		Hi greetings, this is for your hard work for creating a beautiful and attractive userpage. PATH SLOPU (Talk) 10:44, 1 April 2019 (UTC)

@Path slopu: thank you so much , aside from fighting vandals creating a welcoming and helpful userpage was my other task A 10 fireplane ^{Imform me} 13:17, 1 April 2019 (UTC)

hi and in regards to Christie Hsiao

hi — Preceding unsigned comment added by HChristie1027 (talk • contribs) 13:59, 3 April 2019 (UTC)

Hello @HChristie1027: and welcome to Wikipedia. Please note that I have left 3 warnings on your user talk page asking why you have repeatedly removed imformation without explaining why. If you would explain your edit I would be happy to discuss them A 10 fireplane ^{Imform me} 14:40, 3 April 2019 (UTC)

in regards to Christie Hsiao

Hi A 10 fireplane, for Privacy and accuracy purposes, please do not keep reverting back Christie Hsiao's birthday. Thank you. — Preceding unsigned comment added by HChristie1027 (talk • contribs) 17:49, 3 April 2019 (UTC)

@HChristie1027:What privacy reason would that be? Other users have also reverted your edits. A 10 fireplane ^{Imform me} 17:56, 3 April 2019 (UTC)

Your signature

Hi, please change the incorrect spelling 'imform' to 'inform' in your signature. Thanks JACKINTHEBOX • ^TALK 08:14, 21 April 2019 (UTC)

 Done A 10 fireplane ^{Inform me} 03:38, 23 April 2019 (UTC)

WP:Huggle

Hi, as you now have rollback privileges, you might be interested in downloading the Huggle tool to revert vandalism much quicker than ever before (unless you're already using it!). However it's important to read Huggle's manual to familiarise yourself with its controls and features before you start using it. Regards, JACKINTHEBOX • ^TALK 08:20, 21 April 2019 (UTC)

thanks for the suggestion but I have already looked into Huggle and am not interested A 10 fireplane ^{Inform me} 03:38, 23 April 2019 (UTC)

Your 'autofill'

Hi, at User talk:A 10 fireplane/Archive 1#Grammar you mentioned to me last November that you use an 'autofill' when editing Wikipedia. However, I suggest to stop using it altogether, as it seems to do more harm than good to your spelling/grammar. For instance, in your talk page archive I spotted over a dozen spelling/grammatical errors in your messages, several of which persist repeatedly throughout the page, e.g. using 'its' when 'it's' should be used; using 'your' when 'you're' should be used; using 'imformation' instead of 'information' (which must be due to the 'autofill'). Also, please be careful not to make obvious typos such as 'brinning' and 'deleation'. In this edit you wrote 'awnsered' and 'awnsers', also due to your faulty autofill. Regards, JACKINTHEBOX • ^TALK 09:05, 21 April 2019 (UTC)

Also, be sure to use an apostrophe when indicating possession, e.g. article's instead of articles, admins' instead of admins (the apostrophe goes after the 's' when the noun is plural, unless the plural form of the noun does not add an 's', e.g. people's, sheep's, data's, women's). JACKINTHEBOX • ^TALK 09:08, 21 April 2019 (UTC)

• @JackintheBox:Autofill refers to a replacement of a misspelled word. I am not responsible for it and nor do I control it. The 'grammar' issue was it, however all the mistakes on my talk archive are me. Out of the 200+ editors I have come across you are the only one to ever comment on it. Making me think that you would like me to spend more time writing a simple "I have read you comment" messages than actually contributing to Wikipedia. A 10 fireplane ^{Inform me} 03:38, 23 April 2019 (UTC)

That was certainly not my intention. The reason I brought it up was to suggest how you could reduce the number of spelling/grammatical errors when contributing to Wikipedia. Such errors could potentially reduce the encyclopædia’s quality and may confuse other users/readers, even when it’s a talk page message. Also, I don’t know if it was intentional, but you wrote ‘you’ in the above comment instead of ‘your’, and ‘messages’ in plural instead of singular. JACKINTHEBOX • ^TALK 05:22, 25 April 2019 (UTC)

I have no problem with you finding typos and grammatical errors—which I'm barely seeing—in A10F's edits, but if the edits aren't in the article namespace, I don't see any imperative reason to do so. By the way, due to the background color of this page, the blue links are hurting my eyes. —RainFall 06:12, 25 April 2019 (UTC)

@JackintheBox: Oh ok thank you for explaining. I have always had trouble with spelling, especially online. I will try to cut down on the number of typos I have. Sorry for sounding defensive above A 10 fireplane ^{Inform me} 13:51, 25 April 2019 (UTC)

All is well! JACKINTHEBOX • ^TALK 14:14, 25 April 2019 (UTC)

@JackintheBox: Happy Editing A 10 fireplane ^{Inform me} 14:56, 25 April 2019 (UTC)

• @RainFall: This is actually the second time it has been brought to my attention, I will fix it A 10 fireplane ^{Inform me} 13:51, 25 April 2019 (UTC)
  •  Fixed please let me know if it is still hard to see A 10 fireplane ^{Inform me} 13:55, 25 April 2019 (UTC)

Backlog Banzai

In the month of September, Wikiproject Military history is running a project-wide edit-a-thon, Backlog Banzai. There are heaps of different areas you can work on, for which you claim points, and at the end of the month all sorts of whiz-bang awards will be handed out. Every player wins a prize! There is even a bit of friendly competition built in for those that like that sort of thing. Sign up now at Wikipedia:WikiProject Military history/September 2019 Backlog Banzai to take part. For the coordinators, Peacemaker67 (click to talk to me) 08:17, 22 August 2019 (UTC)

Wikiproject Military history coordinator election nominations open

Nominations for the upcoming project coordinator election are now open. A team of up to ten coordinators will be elected for the next year. The project coordinators are the designated points of contact for issues concerning the project, and are responsible for maintaining our internal structure and processes. They do not, however, have any authority over article content or editor conduct, or any other special powers. More information on being a coordinator is available here. If you are interested in running, please sign up here by 23:59 UTC on 14 September! Voting doesn't commence until 15 September. If you have any questions, you can contact any member of the coord team. Cheers, Peacemaker67 (click to talk to me) 02:37, 1 September 2019 (UTC)

Milhist coordinator election voting has commenced

G'day everyone, voting for the 2019 Wikiproject Military history coordinator tranche is now open. This is a simple approval vote; only "support" votes should be made. Project members should vote for any candidates they support by 23:59 (UTC) on 28 September 2018. Thanks, Peacemaker67 (click to talk to me) 03:37, 15 September 2019 (UTC)

Wikiproject Military history coordinator election half-way mark

G'day everyone, the voting for the XIX Coordinator Tranche is at the halfway mark. The candidates have answered various questions, and you can check them out to see why they are running and decide whether you support them. Project members should vote for any candidates they support by 23:59 (UTC) on 28 September 2018. Thanks, Peacemaker67 (click to talk to me) 07:36, 22 September 2019 (UTC)

2019 US Banknote Contest

	US Banknote Contest
	November-December 2019
There are an estimated 30,000 different varieties of United States banknotes, yet only a fraction of these are represented on Wikimedia Commons in the form of 2D scans. Additionally, Colonial America, the Confederate States, the Republic of Texas, multiple states and territories, communities, and private companies have issued banknotes that are in the public domain today but are absent from Commons. In the months of November and December, WikiProject Numismatics will be running a cross-wiki upload-a-thon, the 2019 US Banknote Contest. The goal of the contest is to increase the number of US banknote images available to content creators on all Wikimedia projects. Participants will claim points for uploading and importing 2D scans of US banknotes, and at the end of the contest all will receive awards. Whether you want to claim the Gold Wiki or you just want to have fun, all are invited to participate. If you do not want to receive invitations to future US Banknote Contests, follow the instructions here

Sent by ZLEA at 23:30, 19 October 2019 (UTC) via MediaWiki message delivery (talk)

Warning added, Screenshot added, Logo added, Some URLs Updated

It was not an unconstructive edit. It was a Warning so people did not get a virus. Also, I added a screenshot and logo (witch for some reason di not show up but were definitely there in the code) and proper redirect links to the web archiver (archive.org) so people could see what the site use to look like and read there shutdown msg. and as I said in the "What did you change" section this was the first time editing a WIKI so I'm still learning the system.

NightFuryTrainer (talk) 15:06, 31 October 2019 (UTC)

@NightFuryTrainer: Hello, I think you are mistaken. I have not reverted any of your edits nor have I ever edited GazoPa. I have looked over your edits and I think they where in good faith. I would suggest taking your edits to the articles talk page. Please if you have any questions about this or anything concerning Wikipedia please don't hesitate to ask me A 10 fireplane ^{Inform me} 17:05, 31 October 2019 (UTC)

ArbCom 2019 election voter message

Hello! Voting in the 2019 Arbitration Committee elections is now open until 23:59 on Monday, 2 December 2019. All eligible users are allowed to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once. The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail. If you wish to participate in the 2019 election, please review the candidates and submit your choices on the voting page. If you no longer wish to receive these messages, you may add {{NoACEMM}} to your user talk page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 00:23, 19 November 2019 (UTC)

Google Code-In 2019 is coming - please mentor some documentation tasks!

Hello,

Google Code-In, Google-organized contest in which the Wikimedia Foundation participates, starts in a few weeks. This contest is about taking high school students into the world of opensource. I'm sending you this message because you recently edited a documentation page at the English Wikipedia.

I would like to ask you to take part in Google Code-In as a mentor. That would mean to prepare at least one task (it can be documentation related, or something else - the other categories are Code, Design, Quality Assurance and Outreach) for the participants, and help the student to complete it. Please sign up at the contest page and send us your Google account address to google-code-in-admins@lists.wikimedia.org, so we can invite you in!

From my own experience, Google Code-In can be fun, you can make several new friends, attract new people to your wiki and make them part of your community.

If you have any questions, please let us know at google-code-in-admins@lists.wikimedia.org.

Thank you!

--User:Martin Urbanec (talk) 21:59, 23 November 2019 (UTC)

Merry Christmas!

Merry Christmas and a Prosperous 2020!

Hello A 10 fireplane, may you be surrounded by peace, success and happiness on this seasonal occasion. Spread the WikiLove by wishing another user a Merry Christmas and a Happy New Year, whether it be someone you have had disagreements with in the past, a good friend, or just some random person. Sending you heartfelt and warm greetings for Christmas and New Year 2020. Happy editing, JACKINTHEBOX • TALK 07:59, 23 December 2019 (UTC) Spread the love by adding {{subst:Seasonal Greetings}} to other user talk pages.

@JackintheBox: Thank you!! Same to you, looking forward to editing along side you in 2020!! A 10 fireplane ^{Inform me} 20:00, 6 January 2020 (UTC)

Archive 1