User talk:MusicFans2221

Welcome!

Hello, ATORecords, and welcome to Wikipedia! Thank you for your contributions.

I noticed that one of the first articles you edited was Draft:Slow Dancer (Simon Okely), which appears to be dealing with a topic with which you may have a conflict of interest. In other words, you may find it difficult to write about that topic in a neutral and objective way, because you are, work for, or represent, the subject of that article. Your recent contributions may have already been undone for this very reason.

To reduce the chances of your contributions being undone, you might like to draft your revised article before submission, and then ask me or another editor to proofread it. See our help page on userspace drafts for more details. If the page you created has already been deleted from Wikipedia, but you want to save the content from it to use for that draft, don't hesitate to ask anyone from this list and they will copy it to your user page.

One rule we do have in connection with conflicts of interest is that accounts used by more than one person will unfortunately be blocked from editing. Wikipedia generally does not allow editors to have usernames which imply that the account belongs to a company or corporation. If you have a username like this, you should request a change of username or create a new account. (A name that identifies the user as an individual within a given organization may be OK.)

In addition, you must disclose your employer, client, and affiliation with respect to any contribution for which you receive, or expect to receive, compensation (see WP:PAID).

Here are some pages that you might find helpful:

The plain and simple conflict of interest guide
The five pillars of Wikipedia
Contributing to Wikipedia
Tutorial
How to edit a page and How to develop articles
How to create your first article (using the Article Wizard if you wish)
Simplified Manual of Style

I hope you enjoy editing here and being a Wikipedian! Please sign your messages on talk pages using four tildes (~~~~); this will automatically insert your username and the date. If you need help, check out Wikipedia:Questions, ask me on my talk page, or ask your question on this page and then place {{Help me}} before the question. Again, welcome! Dlohcierekim (talk) 23:27, 12 October 2017 (UTC)[reply]

WP:paid

I'm going to soft block this account in a moment. Without laying on an official warning, I would like you to read WP:paid and make the appropriate disclosure if you are being paid to edit Wikipedia, broadly construed. I will lay on the COI warning as I did not yet do so.Dlohcierekim (talk) 23:30, 12 October 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Managing a conflict of interest

Hello, ATORecords. We welcome your contributions, but if you have an external relationship with the people, places, or things you have written about in the article Draft:Slow Dancer (Simon Okely), you may have a conflict of interest (COI). Editors with a COI may be unduly influenced by their connection to the topic, and it is important when editing Wikipedia articles that such connections be completely transparent. See the conflict of interest guideline and FAQ for organizations for more information. In particular, we ask that you please:

avoid editing or creating articles related to you and your family, friends, school, company, club, or organization, as well as any competing companies' projects or products;
instead, you are encouraged to propose changes on the Talk pages of affected article(s) (see the {{request edit}} template);
when discussing affected articles, disclose your COI (see WP:DISCLOSE);
avoid linking to the Wikipedia article or to the website of your organization in other articles (see WP:SPAM);
exercise great caution so that you do not violate Wikipedia's content policies.

In addition, you must disclose your employer, client, and affiliation with respect to any contribution which forms all or part of work for which you receive, or expect to receive, compensation (see WP:PAID).

Please take a few moments to read and review Wikipedia's policies regarding conflicts of interest, especially those pertaining to neutral point of view, sourcing and autobiographies.

Also please note that editing for the purpose of advertising, publicising, or promoting anyone or anything is not permitted. To be clear, the present version is not promotional as such. There does appear to be a conflict of interest. Dlohcierekim (talk) 23:31, 12 October 2017 (UTC)[reply]

October 2017

Welcome to Wikipedia. Because we have a policy against usernames which give the impression that the account represents a group, organization or website, I have blocked this account; please take a moment to create a new account with a username that represents only yourself as an individual and which complies with our username policy or request a change of username.

You should also read our conflict of interest guideline and be aware that promotional editing is not acceptable regardless of the username you choose.

If your username does not represent a group, organization or website, you may appeal this username block by adding the text {{unblock|reason=Your reason here ~~~~}} at the bottom of your talk page.

You may simply create a new account, but you may prefer to change your username to one that complies with our username policy, so that your past contributions are associated with your new username. If you would prefer to change your username, you may appeal this username block by adding the text {{unblock-un|new username|reason=Your reason here ~~~~}} at the bottom of your talk page. Thank you. Dlohcierekim (talk) 23:32, 12 October 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Draft:Slow Dancer (Simon Okely) concern

Hi there, I'm HasteurBot. I just wanted to let you know that Draft:Slow Dancer (Simon Okely), a page you created, has not been edited in 5 months. The Articles for Creation space is not an indefinite storage location for content that is not appropriate for articlespace.

If your submission is not edited soon, it could be nominated for deletion. If you would like to attempt to save it, you will need to improve it.

You may request Userfication of the content if it meets requirements.

If the deletion has already occured, instructions on how you may be able to retrieve it are available at WP:REFUND/G13.

Thank you for your attention. HasteurBot (talk) 01:40, 13 March 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Draft:Slow Dancer (Simon Okely) concern

Hi there, I'm HasteurBot. I just wanted to let you know that Draft:Slow Dancer (Simon Okely), a page you created, has not been edited in 5 months. The Articles for Creation space is not an indefinite storage location for content that is not appropriate for articlespace.

If your submission is not edited soon, it could be nominated for deletion. If you would like to attempt to save it, you will need to improve it.

You may request Userfication of the content if it meets requirements.

If the deletion has already occured, instructions on how you may be able to retrieve it are available at WP:REFUND/G13.

Thank you for your attention. HasteurBot (talk) 01:34, 13 April 2018 (UTC)[reply]

This user's unblock request has been reviewed by an administrator, who declined the request. Other administrators may also review this block, but should not override the decision without good reason (see the blocking policy).

MusicFans2221 (block log • active blocks • global blocks • contribs • deleted contribs • filter log • creation log • change block settings • unblock • checkuser (log))

Request reason:

I'm trying to create a wiki page, not promoting anything:) ATORecords (talk) 20:50, 6 May 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Decline reason:

Given that Simon Okely is managed by ATO Records, you've clearly been violating WP:USERNAME and almost certainly have been violating WP:COI, WP:PAID, and WP:PROMO. Yamla (talk) 20:56, 6 May 2019 (UTC)[reply]

If you want to make any further unblock requests, please read the guide to appealing blocks first, then use the {{unblock}} template again. If you make too many unconvincing or disruptive unblock requests, you may be prevented from editing this page until your block has expired. Do not remove this unblock review while you are blocked.

This user's unblock request has been reviewed by an administrator, who accepted the request.

MusicFans2221 (block log • active blocks • global blocks • contribs • deleted contribs • filter log • creation log • change block settings • unblock • checkuser (log))

Request reason:

I am not a promotional account as my username has no relation to any organization. I do not feel I am breaking userguidelines. MusicFans2221 (talk) 15:49, 15 July 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Accept reason:

Thank you for renaming. Given the connection mentioned on your talk page between Simon Okely and ATO Records, please read and heed WP:PAID and WP:COI. Thanks Dlohcierekim (talk) 16:35, 15 July 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Your submission at Articles for creation: Nick Hakim (July 26)

Your recent article submission to Articles for Creation has been reviewed! Unfortunately, it has not been accepted at this time. The reason left by StudiesWorld was:

Thank you for your submission, but the subject of this article already exists in Wikipedia. You can find it and improve it at Nick Hakim instead.

Please check the submission for any additional comments left by the reviewer. You are encouraged to edit the submission to address the issues raised and resubmit when they have been resolved.

If you would like to continue working on the submission, go to Draft:Nick Hakim and click on the "Edit" tab at the top of the window.
If you now believe the draft cannot meet Wikipedia's standards or do not wish to progress it further, you may request deletion. Please go to Draft:Nick Hakim, click on the "Edit" tab at the top of the window, add "{{db-self}}" at the top of the draft text and click the blue "publish changes" button to save this edit.
If you do not make any further changes to your draft, in 6 months, it will be considered abandoned and may be deleted.
If you need any assistance, you can ask for help at the Articles for creation help desk, on the reviewer's talk page or use Wikipedia's real-time chat help from experienced editors.

StudiesWorld (talk) 17:43, 26 July 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Hello, MusicFans2221! Having an article declined at Articles for Creation can be disappointing. If you are wondering why your article submission was declined, please post a question at the Articles for creation help desk. If you have any other questions about your editing experience, we'd love to help you at the Teahouse, a friendly space on Wikipedia where experienced editors lend a hand to help new editors like yourself! See you there! StudiesWorld (talk) 17:43, 26 July 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Hi, and thank you for your contributions to Wikipedia. It appears that you tried to give Draft:Nick Hakim a different title by copying its content and pasting either the same content, or an edited version of it, into Nick Hakim. This is known as a "cut-and-paste move", and it is undesirable because it splits the page history, which is legally required for attribution. Instead, the software used by Wikipedia has a feature that allows pages to be moved to a new title together with their edit history.

In most cases, once your account is four days old and has ten edits, you should be able to move an article yourself using the "Move" tab at the top of the page (the tab may be hidden in a dropdown menu for you). This both preserves the page history intact and automatically creates a redirect from the old title to the new. If you cannot perform a particular page move yourself this way (e.g. because a page already exists at the target title), please follow the instructions at requested moves to have it moved by someone else. Also, if there are any other pages that you moved by copying and pasting, even if it was a long time ago, please list them at Wikipedia:Requests for history merge. Thank you. StudiesWorld (talk) 17:45, 26 July 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Speedy deletion nomination of File:Nickhakim.jpg

A tag has been placed on File:Nickhakim.jpg requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia. This has been done under section F9 of the criteria for speedy deletion, because the file appears to be a blatant copyright infringement. For legal reasons, we cannot accept copyrighted text or images taken from other web sites or printed material, and as a consequence, your addition will most likely be deleted. Wikipedia takes copyright violations very seriously and persistent violators will be blocked from editing.

If the image belongs to you, and you want to allow Wikipedia to use it — which means allowing other people to use it for any reason — then you must verify that externally by one of the processes explained at Wikipedia:Donating copyrighted materials. The same holds if you are not the owner but have their permission. If you are not the owner and do not have permission, see Wikipedia:Requesting copyright permission for how you may obtain it. You might want to look at Wikipedia's copyright policy for more details, or ask a question here.

If you think this page should not be deleted for this reason, you may contest the nomination by visiting the page and clicking the button labelled "Contest this speedy deletion". This will give you the opportunity to explain why you believe the page should not be deleted. However, be aware that once a page is tagged for speedy deletion, it may be deleted without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag from the page yourself, but do not hesitate to add information in line with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines. Whpq (talk) 14:38, 13 August 2019 (UTC)[reply]

AfC notification: Draft:Eric Burton has a new comment

I've left a comment on your Articles for Creation submission, which can be viewed at Draft:Eric Burton. Thanks! Robert McClenon (talk) 04:44, 9 January 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Your submission at Articles for creation: Eric Burton (January 9)

Your recent article submission to Articles for Creation has been reviewed! Unfortunately, it has not been accepted at this time. The reason left by JavaHurricane was:

This submission's references do not show that the subject qualifies for a Wikipedia article—that is, they do not show significant coverage (not just passing mentions) about the subject in published, reliable, secondary sources that are independent of the subject (see the guidelines on the notability of people). Before any resubmission, additional references meeting these criteria should be added (see technical help and learn about mistakes to avoid when addressing this issue). If no additional references exist, the subject is not suitable for Wikipedia.

Please check the submission for any additional comments left by the reviewer. You are encouraged to edit the submission to address the issues raised and resubmit when they have been resolved.

If you would like to continue working on the submission, go to Draft:Eric Burton and click on the "Edit" tab at the top of the window.
If you now believe the draft cannot meet Wikipedia's standards or do not wish to progress it further, you may request deletion. Please go to Draft:Eric Burton, click on the "Edit" tab at the top of the window, add "{{Db-g7}}" at the top of the draft text and click the blue "publish changes" button to save this edit.
If you do not make any further changes to your draft, in 6 months, it will be considered abandoned and may be deleted.
If you need any assistance, or have experienced any untoward behavior associated with this submission, you can ask for help at the Articles for creation help desk, on the reviewer's talk page or use Wikipedia's real-time chat help from experienced editors.

Java Hurricane 07:02, 9 January 2021 (UTC)[reply]

AfC notification: Draft:Eric Burton has a new comment

I've left a comment on your Articles for Creation submission, which can be viewed at Draft:Eric Burton. Thanks! Robert McClenon (talk) 03:27, 13 January 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Your submission at Articles for creation: Eric Burton has been accepted

Eric Burton, which you submitted to Articles for creation, has been created.

Congratulations, and thank you for helping expand the scope of Wikipedia! We hope you will continue making quality contributions.

The article has been assessed as Start-Class, which is recorded on its talk page. Most new articles start out as Stub-Class or Start-Class and then attain higher grades as they develop over time. You may like to take a look at the grading scheme to see how you can improve the article.

Since you have made at least 10 edits over more than four days, you can now create articles yourself without posting a request. However, you may continue submitting work to Articles for creation if you prefer.

If you have any questions, you are welcome to ask at the help desk. Once you have made at least 10 edits and had an account for at least four days, you will have the option to create articles yourself without posting a request to Articles for creation.

If you would like to help us improve this process, please consider leaving us some feedback.

Thanks again, and happy editing!

Robert McClenon (talk) 23:19, 26 January 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Eric Burton

MusicFans2221, Eric Burton has no notability outside of Black Pumas, and this article literally contains exactly the same information as the Black Pumas article. We don't normally have separate articles for members of bands unless they have an established solo career or have played in other notable bands. Why do you think this deserves a separate article that just duplicates the other one? Richard3120 (talk) 15:52, 12 February 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Hey Richard,

I think Eric Burton deserves his own wiki page because he's a prominent musician- and he's the face of the band. He's performed and been interviewed by many great interviewers, like James Corden, and has a big following independent of the band. As he's such an individual person, I think he should definitely get his own page. If folks like Chris Martin get their own wiki page and have only played with Coldplay, then I don't see why this is very different.

MusicFans2221 (talk) 01:25, 23 February 2021 (UTC)[reply]

The thing is that Chris Martin is notable outside of Coldplay – he's made solo records, he's appeared on records by other artists, he's noted for his philanthropic gestures, and his famous marriage to Gwyneth Paltrow... and none of this is related to his work with Coldplay. The key question here is: is Eric Burton famous for anything outside of Black Pumas, and is there anything that would go in a solo article that isn't already in the Black Pumas article? If the answer is no, then all we're doing is effectively making a duplicate of what's in the Black Pumas article. Where is the proof that he is an individual person, as you state? Just being interviewed alone without Adrian Quesada is not proof of this. WP:BANDMEMBER states that a separate article is only necessary when the band member has shown notability outside of the band they are in. Richard3120 (talk) 02:10, 23 February 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Point noted - Eric has also had a credited role in the Keira Knightley/Mark Ruffalo film "Begin Again" where he performed an original song, and has been featured in a PBS Music Spotlight https://www.pbs.org/video/music-spotlight-eric-burton-friends/ and was the focus of a small 2014 documentary 'A Song Can Save Your Life' https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=s-mboDNhiqc. I think he really deserves his own page at this point! Happy to go in and edit to change the wording so it doesn't look like the Black Pumas page as much.

His bandmate Adrian is also a well-known musician, having played with Grammy-winning Grupo Fantasma and in Prince's band. (waiting for that approval!)

Your submission at Articles for creation: Adrian Quesada (May 29)

Your recent article submission to Articles for Creation has been reviewed! Unfortunately, it has not been accepted at this time. The reason left by Robert McClenon was:

This submission's references do not show that the subject qualifies for a Wikipedia article—that is, they do not show significant coverage (not just passing mentions) about the subject in published, reliable, secondary sources that are independent of the subject (see the guidelines on the notability of music-related topics). Before any resubmission, additional references meeting these criteria should be added (see technical help and learn about mistakes to avoid when addressing this issue). If no additional references exist, the subject is not suitable for Wikipedia.

The comment the reviewer left was:

This draft does not appear to indicate which of the musical notability criteria is satisfied. If at least one of the criteria is satisfied, please revise this draft appropriately, with a reliable source, if necessary stating on the talk page which criterion is met, and resubmit.

You may ask for advice about the musical notability criteria at the Teahouse.

It does not appear that the subject satisfies any of the musical notability criteria individually. This draft may be resubmitted with an explanation, in AFC comments or on the draft talk page, of what musical notability criterion is satisfied. (Do not merely add references.)

This draft has been declined because of notability concerns. This draft should be resubmitted by addressing the notability concerns in AFC comments or on the talk page of the draft. Do not resubmit this draft without explaining how it satisfies a notability criterion. Do not simply add references, or make minor changes, without explaining how it satisfies a notability criterion.

This does not mean that the subject of the draft has been found not to be notable. It does mean that this draft, as written, does not establish notability. Notability should be established in the text of the draft, as well as by references.

You may ask for advice about the notability criteria at the Teahouse.

Please check the submission for any additional comments left by the reviewer. You are encouraged to edit the submission to address the issues raised and resubmit when they have been resolved.

If you would like to continue working on the submission, go to Draft:Adrian Quesada and click on the "Edit" tab at the top of the window.
If you now believe the draft cannot meet Wikipedia's standards or do not wish to progress it further, you may request deletion. Please go to Draft:Adrian Quesada, click on the "Edit" tab at the top of the window, add "{{Db-g7}}" at the top of the draft text and click the blue "publish changes" button to save this edit.
If you do not make any further changes to your draft, in 6 months, it will be considered abandoned and may be deleted.
If you need any assistance, or have experienced any untoward behavior associated with this submission, you can ask for help at the Articles for creation help desk, on the reviewer's talk page or use Wikipedia's real-time chat help from experienced editors.

Robert McClenon (talk) 02:53, 29 May 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Concern regarding Draft:Adrian Quesada

Hello, MusicFans2221. This is a bot-delivered message letting you know that Draft:Adrian Quesada, a page you created, has not been edited in at least 5 months. Drafts that have not been edited for six months may be deleted, so if you wish to retain the page, please edit it again or request that it be moved to your userspace.

If the page has already been deleted, you can request it be undeleted so you can continue working on it.

Thank you for your submission to Wikipedia. FireflyBot (talk) 03:02, 29 October 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Your draft article, Draft:Adrian Quesada

Hello, MusicFans2221. It has been over six months since you last edited the Articles for Creation submission or Draft page you started, "Adrian Quesada".

In accordance with our policy that Wikipedia is not for the indefinite hosting of material deemed unsuitable for the encyclopedia mainspace, the draft has been deleted. If you plan on working on it further and you wish to retrieve it, you can request its undeletion. An administrator will, in most cases, restore the submission so you can continue to work on it.

Thanks for your submission to Wikipedia, and happy editing. Liz ^{Read! Talk!} 03:06, 29 November 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Hi! Can you please restore this? Thank you! x MusicFans2221 (talk) 02:55, 26 March 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Adrian Quesada

Hi, I wrote and published an article about Adrian Quesada. (New record sounds amazing!) Your article was declined because it was more about Black Pumas than Adrian Quesdada. I write a lot of music articlces - if you need help in the future leave a message on my talk page! JSFarman (talk) 17:05, 6 April 2022 (UTC)[reply]