User talk:AKinderWorld

Welcome!

Hello, AKinderWorld, and welcome to Wikipedia! Thank you for your contributions. I hope you like the place and decide to stay. Here are a few links to pages you might find helpful:

You may also want to complete the Wikipedia Adventure, an interactive tour that will help you learn the basics of editing Wikipedia. You can visit the Teahouse to ask questions or seek help.

Please remember to sign your messages on talk pages by typing four tildes (~~~~); this will automatically insert your username and the date. If you need help, check out Wikipedia:Questions, ask me on my talk page, or ask for help on your talk page, and a volunteer should respond shortly. Again, welcome! MoonyTheDwarf (Braden N.) (talk) 21:01, 5 November 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Teahouse talkback: you've got messages!

Hello, AKinderWorld. Your question has been answered at the Teahouse Q&A board. Feel free to reply there!
Please note that all old questions are archived after 2-3 days of inactivity. Message added by DES ^(talk)_{DESiegel Contribs} 03:51, 6 November 2019 (UTC). (You can remove this notice at any time by removing the {{teahouse talkback}} template).[reply]

Signing in articles

While it is important that you sign comments on talk and discussion pages with four tildes (~~~~), it is even more important that you do not do this in article text. This distinction can be confusing, and the best of us can make mistakes over it. I am taking about this edit. I have already removed the signature, so thee is nothing for you to do except remember the point.

Another point to remember, one does not normally use <ref>...</ref> tas in edit summaries, as they do not produce footnotes there. Not a major problem, however. DES ^(talk)_{DESiegel Contribs} 22:47, 6 November 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Blocked as meatpuppet

The article was created by a blocked paid editor sockfarm. You have acted as a meatpuppet but I think you have a undeclared conflict of interest. "My class is reviewing two other subjects and they have no issues or discussions to learn from. This one seems to keep giving us several research opportunities." (diff) Garbage. You need to explain the conflict of interest.
— Berean Hunter (talk) 20:43, 7 November 2019 (UTC)[reply]

This user's unblock request has been reviewed by an administrator, who declined the request. Other administrators may also review this block, but should not override the decision without good reason (see the blocking policy).

AKinderWorld (block log • active blocks • global blocks • contribs • deleted contribs • filter log • creation log • change block settings • unblock • checkuser (log))

Request reason:

I do not know ANY editor OR ANY subject of an article or in draft on Wikipedia. I had no interest in becoming involved in Wikipedia beyond satisfying a history class assignment. 'Be apart of something historic' and while some students are writing about their time helping a political candidate and others on helping a protest develop, I chose to be involved with a Wikipedia article. The FIRST learning lesson, Nichelle Rodriguez, just so happened to show (in the first two lines) the worst examples the people editing on this site. My small group of classmates took a few minutes to understand the background we read and I followed directions and went into 'teahouse'. My first post was not to KEEP the Nichelle Rodriguez draft. It was actually a comment. I then changed it to KEEP. It was DESiegel who helped me in my learning to navigate and brought to my attention that I could see that article through. I still am in shock that I am blocked and the first two editors commenting on that draft are not. I have NO COI!!

Decline reason:

Having reviewed the evidence, including the CU evidence, I am inclined to agree with User:Berean Hunter; you are not being honest about your relationship with Nichelle Rodriguez. Yunshui ^雲 _水 08:33, 8 November 2019 (UTC)[reply]

If you want to make any further unblock requests, please read the guide to appealing blocks first, then use the {{unblock}} template again. If you make too many unconvincing or disruptive unblock requests, you may be prevented from editing this page until your block has expired. Do not remove this unblock review while you are blocked.

"The FIRST learning lesson, Nichelle Rodriguez, just so happened to show (in the first two lines) the worst examples the people editing on this site." Please explain how you found this draft.
You may email me with details about your class assignment and where you are enrolled. See my talk page and click on the "This user can be reached by email" link at the top of the page.
— Berean Hunter (talk) 00:35, 8 November 2019 (UTC)[reply]

What is your email? I will be most happy to email Wikipedia admin but most certainly will not communicate off of this site. Why am I blocked again? Because I asked about a blocked user? That is a very interesting subject to new users. And for some subjects that earn an article, the paid aspect is, I am sure, quite real. You asked how I found the page.... EASY! I was simply clicking into several subjects, editor profiles and learning how talk pages work. The only thing that stopped all of us was 'banned for payment', second is the promotional aspect and then to the levels of corrections... THEN to the comments from editors that were, I felt, biased and a strange place to direct the comments once you read the draft. AKinderWorld (talk) 01:13, 8 November 2019 (UTC)[reply]

See my talk page and click on the "This user can be reached by email" link in the red box at the top of the page.
— Berean Hunter (talk) 01:27, 8 November 2019 (UTC)[reply]

I said above that "You may email me with details about your class assignment and where you are enrolled" but you didn't send me that. Try again, please.
— Berean Hunter (talk) 02:45, 8 November 2019 (UTC)[reply]

I've received two emails from you but no information as I have asked. I'm not answering your questions...you are answering mine. I'll respond if you follow directions.
— Berean Hunter (talk) 02:57, 8 November 2019 (UTC)[reply]

I've received your emails but they contained insult and lies. You lied to DESiegel because you are an undeclared COI and tried to lie to me when asked about it. Tell you what, you contact Arbcom to appeal my block. I've placed my documentation concerning you where other checkusers may see it on the checkuser wiki here.
— Berean Hunter (talk) 05:17, 8 November 2019 (UTC)[reply]