Jump to content

User talk:ACForce2020

Page contents not supported in other languages.
From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia

ACForce2020, you are invited to the Teahouse!

[edit]
Teahouse logo

Hi ACForce2020! Thanks for contributing to Wikipedia.
Be our guest at the Teahouse! The Teahouse is a friendly space where new editors can ask questions about contributing to Wikipedia and get help from experienced editors like Cordless Larry (talk).

Visit the Teahouse
We hope to see you there!

Delivered by HostBot on behalf of the Teahouse hosts

16:03, 23 June 2020 (UTC)


Welcome!

[edit]

Hello, ACForce2020, and welcome to Wikipedia! Thank you for your contributions.

I noticed that one of the first articles you edited appears to be dealing with a topic with which you may have a conflict of interest. In other words, you may find it difficult to write about that topic in a neutral and objective way, because you are, work for, or represent, the subject of that article. Your recent contributions may have already been undone for this very reason.

To reduce the chances of your contributions being undone, you might like to draft your revised article before submission, and then ask me or another editor to proofread it. See our help page on userspace drafts for more details. If the page you created has already been deleted from Wikipedia, but you want to save the content from it to use for that draft, don't hesitate to ask anyone from this list and they will copy it to your user page.

One rule we do have in connection with conflicts of interest is that accounts used by more than one person will unfortunately be blocked from editing. Wikipedia generally does not allow editors to have usernames which imply that the account belongs to a company or corporation. If you have a username like this, you should request a change of username or create a new account. (A name that identifies the user as an individual within a given organization may be OK.)

In addition, if you receive, or expect to receive, compensation for any contribution you make, you must disclose your employer, client, and affiliation to comply with our terms of use and our policy on paid editing.

Here are some pages that you might find helpful:

I hope you enjoy editing here and being a Wikipedian! Please sign your messages on talk pages using four tildes (~~~~); this will automatically insert your username and the date. If you need help, check out Wikipedia:Questions, ask me on my talk page, or ask your question on this page and then place {{Help me}} before the question. Again, welcome! HickoryOughtShirt?4 (talk) 18:01, 23 June 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Dormskirk

[edit]

Dormskirk Hello I was wondering if it was ok that I'm adding this HQ ---, on the inf bde pages, I haven't seen any of the regional points of commands, so I was putting them there, is that alright?

Apologies - I have only just seen this. Please feel free with adding the extra information but please ensure it is fully referenced (please see my comments below). Thanks. Dormskirk (talk) 16:58, 10 July 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Speedy deletion

[edit]

Are you sure that you want to put up Régiment Bourbonnaise for speedy deletion? Speedy deletion is usually for articles that are listed here: WP:GCSD. If you want you can put up the article back for speedy deletion but I would not advise doing so if the article meets notability and you are just doing so to improve upon it and reinstate it later. Regards, Field Marshal Aryan (talk) 05:39, 29 June 2020 (UTC)[reply]

To be honest I'm not sure, there are too many small issues which I'm just noticing now.

Orphaned non-free image File:Compagnies Franches de la Marine Drummer.jpg

[edit]
⚠
⚠

Thanks for uploading File:Compagnies Franches de la Marine Drummer.jpg. The image description page currently specifies that the image is non-free and may only be used on Wikipedia under a claim of fair use. However, the image is currently not used in any articles on Wikipedia. If the image was previously in an article, please go to the article and see why it was removed. You may add it back if you think that that will be useful. However, please note that images for which a replacement could be created are not acceptable for use on Wikipedia (see our policy for non-free media).

Note that any non-free images not used in any articles will be deleted after seven days, as described in section F5 of the criteria for speedy deletion. Thank you. --B-bot (talk) 02:41, 30 June 2020 (UTC)[reply]

[edit]

Hi. Thank you for your recent edits. An automated process has detected that when you recently edited Régiment de Bourbonnaise, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Siege of Charleroi (check to confirm | fix with Dab solver). Such links are usually incorrect, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of unrelated topics with similar titles. (Read the FAQ • Join us at the DPL WikiProject.)

It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot (talk) 06:10, 30 June 2020 (UTC)[reply]

[edit]

Hello, and welcome to Wikipedia! We welcome and appreciate your contributions, such as Régiment de Bourbonnaise, but we regretfully cannot accept copyrighted text or images from either web sites or printed works. This article appears to contain work copied from http://kronoskaf.com/syw/index.php?title=Bourbonnais_Infanterie, and therefore to constitute a violation of Wikipedia's copyright policies. The copyrighted text has been or will soon be deleted. While we appreciate contributions, we must require all contributors to understand and comply with our copyright policy. Wikipedia takes copyright violations very seriously, and persistent violators are liable to be blocked from editing.

If you believe that the article is not a copyright violation, or if you have permission from the copyright holder to release the content freely under license allowed by Wikipedia, then you should do one of the following:

It may also be necessary for the text to be modified to have an encyclopedic tone and to follow Wikipedia article layout. For more information on Wikipedia's policies, see Wikipedia's policies and guidelines.

See Wikipedia:Declaration of consent for all enquiries for a template of the permissions letter the copyright holder is expected to send.

If you would like to begin working on a new version of the article you may do so at this temporary page. Leave a note at Talk:Régiment de Bourbonnaise saying you have done so and an administrator will move the new article into place once the issue is resolved.

Thank you, and please feel welcome to continue contributing to Wikipedia. Happy editing! The website's info page states the content is released under the GNU Free Documentation License only, which is not a compatible license by itself. — Diannaa (talk) 19:11, 30 June 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Hello Diannaa, I don't know if this means anything, but I found this on their website on privacy policy "Except where otherwise specified, all text added to Project Seven Years War is available for reuse under the terms of the GFDL.".
Diannaa I emailed the comptroller of the kronoskaf website, and I got this email (I can provide an image if needed): "Most of our articles and illustrations are published under the GNU FDL license (http://www.kronoskaf.com/fdl.txt). Basically it means that if you intend to use them for non-commercial purpose (like Wikipedia), you can re-publish or modify them as you wish as long as proper credit is made for each text and each image used."
Sorry, I never received the ping because you did not sign your post. GFDL alone is not a compatible license. CC-by-SA is also required. Please see Wikipedia:FAQ/Copyright#Can I add something to Wikipedia that I got from somewhere else? for more information on compatible licenses and how to provide attribution.— Diannaa (talk) 11:28, 7 September 2020 (UTC)[reply]
[edit]

An automated process has detected that you recently added links to disambiguation pages.

Army of the Alps (check to confirm | fix with Dab solver)
added a link pointing to Avian
List of units and formations of the British Army 2020 (check to confirm | fix with Dab solver)
added a link pointing to Army Air Corps

(Opt-out instructions.) --DPL bot (talk) 06:36, 7 July 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Headquarters South West (United Kingdom)

[edit]

Hi - Please can you make sure that all the regional orbat information you are adding is properly referenced. In particular please can you add a source to Headquarters South West (United Kingdom). Many thanks. Dormskirk (talk) 16:56, 10 July 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Will do, though do you need refs for every unit?
Per WP:V, WP:CITE and WP:RS anything you cannot you cannot source should be removed. You have added quite a lot of material to a number of articles on regional formations so please either add the citations or remove the material. Thanks. Dormskirk (talk) 21:02, 10 July 2020 (UTC)[reply]
I'll fix that, sorry about that.
No problem. I have removed some material for now: please just make sure that, when you add material in, you also add the source that you got it from at the same time. Best wishes. Dormskirk (talk) 23:14, 10 July 2020 (UTC)[reply]
Yeah I'm adding the references now, thanks for that. I'll also fix the main page over at the units and formations part. Dormskirk if you would like to check it now, so I can get a reference if that's what you need?
Hi - The article Headquarters South West (United Kingdom) is now much better referenced - thanks for that. However I actually think it is just a bit too detailed now: for instance I don't think we need all the sub-units of Headquarters Larkhill Garrison, or of the Land Warfare Centre, or of Headquarters Bovington Garrison or of the Defence College of Technical Training. In my opinion good prose is much better than lengthy orbats: see WP:PROSE. I would also change all the remaining redlinks to blacklinks: the Joint CBRN Medical Facility is just notable enough to justify an article of its own: so, in my view, WP:REDNO applies. I hope that helps. Best wishes. Dormskirk (talk) 00:25, 11 July 2020 (UTC)[reply]
Ok I think I know what you mean, I'll see what I can do.
Looks good. Many thanks. Dormskirk (talk) 09:35, 11 July 2020 (UTC)[reply]
No problem, I'm kinda new, so haven't quite got everything down to scratch.

Image without license

[edit]

Unspecified source/license for File:1 Military Intelligence Brigade Flash.png

[edit]

Thanks for uploading File:1 Military Intelligence Brigade Flash.png. The image has been identified as not specifying the copyright status of the image, which is required by Wikipedia's policy on images. Even if you created the image yourself, you still need to release it so Wikipedia can use it. If you don't indicate the copyright status of the image on the image's description page, using an appropriate copyright tag, it may be deleted some time after the next seven days. If you made this image yourself, you can use copyright tags like {{PD-self}} (to release all rights), {{self|cc-by-sa-4.0}} (to require that you be credited), or any tag here - just go to the image, click edit, and add one of those. If you have uploaded other images, please verify that you have provided copyright information for them as well.

For more information on using images, see the following pages:

This is an automated notice by MifterBot. For assistance on the image use policy, see Wikipedia:Media copyright questions. NOTE: Once you correct this, please remove the tag from the image's page. --MifterBot (Talk • Contribs • Owner) 18:45, 12 July 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Proposed deletion of Régiment de Dauphiné (disambiguation)

[edit]
Notice

The article Régiment de Dauphiné (disambiguation) has been proposed for deletion because of the following concern:

orphan dab with no Wikipedia ambiguity to disambiguate

While all constructive contributions to Wikipedia are appreciated, pages may be deleted for any of several reasons.

You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the {{proposed deletion/dated}} notice, but please explain why in your edit summary or on the article's talk page.

Please consider improving the page to address the issues raised. Removing {{proposed deletion/dated}} will stop the proposed deletion process, but other deletion processes exist. In particular, the speedy deletion process can result in deletion without discussion, and articles for deletion allows discussion to reach consensus for deletion. JHunterJ (talk) 11:17, 13 July 2020 (UTC)[reply]

[edit]

An automated process has detected that when you recently edited Guards Armoured Division, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Irish Guard (check to confirm | fix with Dab solver).

(Opt-out instructions.) --DPL bot (talk) 06:12, 14 July 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Music??

[edit]

Dormskirk Hello, I was wondering if the music lists and such was ok to add, since I know many of the battalions of the RRS and other regiments have strong musical links. Is this maybe redundant, or ok?

I think the key issues to consider here are notability (or lack of it) and undue weight: military units are primarily fighting forces not music performers but I think a couple of lines on music is would be OK. Best wishes. Dormskirk (talk) 22:04, 16 July 2020 (UTC)[reply]
So just the Charge, Quick March, Slow March, and General Salute? Those are the 'typical marches'.
Yes, that sounds fine. Best wishes. Dormskirk (talk) 23:28, 16 July 2020 (UTC)[reply]

In-Line Refs

[edit]

Dormskirk Hello I'm working on a sandbox: User:ACForce2020/sandbox1 and before I trasnfer some of the information over, I have a question. Should I provide the references for those units which aren't on the army website, or are those not needed when a general ref are given?

Hi - The general rule is that a reference need to be "inline" but it does not matter what the source is providing it is "reliable" (see WP:RS) so it does not need to be the army website. Best wishes. Dormskirk (talk) 17:37, 23 July 2020 (UTC)[reply]
Hello again, if you wouldn't mind checking here: Légion de Conflans in the references, I have the actual title, and noted [in french] added. I'm sorry to ask you, since it seems you focus on British stuff, and not a lot of people do the Royal French era.
Looks good. Best wishes. Dormskirk (talk) 16:45, 31 July 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Language Barrier

[edit]

Dormskirk Hello again, I have a quick question, as far as foreign reference materiel (in another language), should I put the title in English or the native name? For example, Historie de l'ancienne infanterie Français or History of the Ancient French Infantry.

Hi - It might be helpful to include both (i.e. the English version in brackets). Best wishes. Dormskirk (talk) 17:54, 30 July 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Social media references

[edit]

Hi @ACForce2020: Don't use social media as a reference. scope_creepTalk 17:28, 28 July 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Speedy deletion nomination of Category:Legions of the French Army

[edit]

A tag has been placed on Category:Legions of the French Army requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia. This has been done under section C1 of the criteria for speedy deletion, because the category has been empty for seven days or more and is not a disambiguation category, a category redirect, a featured topics category, under discussion at Categories for discussion, or a project category that by its nature may become empty on occasion.

If you think this page should not be deleted for this reason, you may contest the nomination by visiting the page and clicking the button labelled "Contest this speedy deletion". This will give you the opportunity to explain why you believe the page should not be deleted. However, be aware that once a page is tagged for speedy deletion, it may be deleted without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag from the page yourself, but do not hesitate to add information in line with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines.

This message was automatically delivered by QEDKbot. 08:54, 2 August 2020 (UTC)[reply]
[edit]

An automated process has detected that when you recently edited List of units and formations of the British Army 2020, you added links pointing to the disambiguation pages Catterick and Cottesmore.

(Opt-out instructions.) --DPL bot (talk) 06:40, 3 August 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Tidworth

[edit]

Hi - I see you have move the article entitled Tidworth Camp to Tidworth Garrison. My understanding is that the military installation at Tidworth is still known as Tidworth Camp, and together with Bulford Camp, they form a Garrison known as "Tidworth and Bulford" Garrison (or in military parlance "Tid N' Bul"). See evidence dated 2018 here. In general articles should not be moved without a discussion and in any case there would be a very large number of incoming links to adjust and this has not been done yet. Best wishes. Dormskirk (talk) 10:05, 23 August 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Hi, that's strange, since what I've seen on the British Army website, for instance here: RRF, they show the barracks part of "Tidworth Garrison". They could be mistaken, I'm not 100% sure, but I'll check out the talk pages next time, I honestly didn't even think about that..
Hi - Thanks for that. It may be that the MoD is itself confused on the point and varies the terminology with different announcements. Best wishes. Dormskirk (talk) 14:06, 23 August 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Normandy Barracks

[edit]

Hallo, You moved the redirect, saying "There are 3 Normandy barracks in England.", but you didn't really solve the problem because you left Normandy Barracks redirecting to Normandy Barracks, Leconfield and then to Defence School of Transport. I've now made a disambiguation page which fixes the problem (though only found two in England, one in Germany - is there another?) PamD 07:01, 24 August 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Hi, sorry about that, and yes there is Normandy in Leconfield, a Normandy in Aldershot, and a New Normandy in Aldershot.. I'll check out that issue.
[edit]

An automated process has detected that when you recently edited Order of battle of the Battle of Long Island, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page New York.

(Opt-out instructions.) --DPL bot (talk) 06:05, 26 August 2020 (UTC)[reply]

[edit]

An automated process has detected that when you recently edited Battle of Thomas Creek, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Georgia.

(Opt-out instructions.) --DPL bot (talk) 06:21, 4 September 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Speedy deletion nomination of 337th Military Intelligence Battalion

[edit]

Hello ACForce2020,

I wanted to let you know that I just tagged 337th Military Intelligence Battalion for deletion, because it seems to be copied from another source, probably infringing copyright.

If you feel that the article shouldn't be deleted and want more time to rewrite it in your own words, you can contest this deletion, but don't remove the speedy deletion tag from the top.

You can leave a note on my talk page if you have questions. Thanks!

Message delivered via the Page Curation tool, on behalf of the reviewer.

John B123 (talk) 22:38, 4 September 2020 (UTC)[reply]

John B123 Uhm what? I used citations and referenced the source, yes it is copied but I used my proper citations and referencing.

September 2020

[edit]
NinjaRobotPirate I'm sorry, what just happened?

Speedy deletion nomination of Order of Battle during the Siege of Boston

[edit]

If this is the first article that you have created, you may want to read the guide to writing your first article.

You may want to consider using the Article Wizard to help you create articles.

Hello, and welcome to Wikipedia. This is a notice that Order of Battle during the Siege of Boston, a page that you created, has been tagged for deletion. This has been done under two or more of the criteria for speedy deletion, by which pages can be deleted at any time, without discussion. If the page meets any of these strictly-defined criteria, then it may soon be deleted by an administrator. The reasons it has been tagged are:

If you think this page should not be deleted for this reason, you may contest the nomination by visiting the page and clicking the button labelled "Contest this speedy deletion". This will give you the opportunity to explain why you believe the page should not be deleted. However, be aware that once a page is tagged for speedy deletion, it may be deleted without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag from the page yourself, but do not hesitate to add information in line with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines. If the page is deleted, and you wish to retrieve the deleted material for future reference or improvement, then please contact the deleting administrator, or if you have already done so, you can place a request here. Scorpions13256 (talk) 09:57, 7 September 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Speedy deletion nomination of Category:1749 establishments in France

[edit]

A tag has been placed on Category:1749 establishments in France requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia. This has been done under section C1 of the criteria for speedy deletion, because the category has been empty for seven days or more and is not a disambiguation category, a category redirect, a featured topics category, under discussion at Categories for discussion, or a project category that by its nature may become empty on occasion.

If you think this page should not be deleted for this reason, you may contest the nomination by visiting the page and clicking the button labelled "Contest this speedy deletion". This will give you the opportunity to explain why you believe the page should not be deleted. However, be aware that once a page is tagged for speedy deletion, it may be deleted without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag from the page yourself, but do not hesitate to add information in line with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines. Liz Read! Talk! 14:39, 24 October 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Speedy deletion nomination of Category:1778 disestablishments in France

[edit]

A tag has been placed on Category:1778 disestablishments in France requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia. This has been done under section C1 of the criteria for speedy deletion, because the category has been empty for seven days or more and is not a disambiguation category, a category redirect, a featured topics category, under discussion at Categories for discussion, or a project category that by its nature may become empty on occasion.

If you think this page should not be deleted for this reason, you may contest the nomination by visiting the page and clicking the button labelled "Contest this speedy deletion". This will give you the opportunity to explain why you believe the page should not be deleted. However, be aware that once a page is tagged for speedy deletion, it may be deleted without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag from the page yourself, but do not hesitate to add information in line with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines. Liz Read! Talk! 14:42, 24 October 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Speedy deletion nomination of Category:Armies of the Continental Army

[edit]

A tag has been placed on Category:Armies of the Continental Army requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia. This has been done under section C1 of the criteria for speedy deletion, because the category has been empty for seven days or more and is not a disambiguation category, a category redirect, a featured topics category, under discussion at Categories for discussion, or a project category that by its nature may become empty on occasion.

If you think this page should not be deleted for this reason, you may contest the nomination by visiting the page and clicking the button labelled "Contest this speedy deletion". This will give you the opportunity to explain why you believe the page should not be deleted. However, be aware that once a page is tagged for speedy deletion, it may be deleted without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag from the page yourself, but do not hesitate to add information in line with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines. Liz Read! Talk! 14:46, 24 October 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Speedy deletion nomination of Category:Artillery battalions of the French Army

[edit]

A tag has been placed on Category:Artillery battalions of the French Army requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia. This has been done under section C1 of the criteria for speedy deletion, because the category has been empty for seven days or more and is not a disambiguation category, a category redirect, a featured topics category, under discussion at Categories for discussion, or a project category that by its nature may become empty on occasion.

If you think this page should not be deleted for this reason, you may contest the nomination by visiting the page and clicking the button labelled "Contest this speedy deletion". This will give you the opportunity to explain why you believe the page should not be deleted. However, be aware that once a page is tagged for speedy deletion, it may be deleted without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag from the page yourself, but do not hesitate to add information in line with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines. Liz Read! Talk! 14:47, 24 October 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Speedy deletion nomination of Category:Chasseurs à Pied battalions of the Ancien Régime

[edit]

A tag has been placed on Category:Chasseurs à Pied battalions of the Ancien Régime requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia. This has been done under section C1 of the criteria for speedy deletion, because the category has been empty for seven days or more and is not a disambiguation category, a category redirect, a featured topics category, under discussion at Categories for discussion, or a project category that by its nature may become empty on occasion.

If you think this page should not be deleted for this reason, you may contest the nomination by visiting the page and clicking the button labelled "Contest this speedy deletion". This will give you the opportunity to explain why you believe the page should not be deleted. However, be aware that once a page is tagged for speedy deletion, it may be deleted without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag from the page yourself, but do not hesitate to add information in line with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines. Liz Read! Talk! 14:50, 24 October 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Speedy deletion nomination of Category:Colonial regiments of the Ancien Régime

[edit]

A tag has been placed on Category:Colonial regiments of the Ancien Régime requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia. This has been done under section C1 of the criteria for speedy deletion, because the category has been empty for seven days or more and is not a disambiguation category, a category redirect, a featured topics category, under discussion at Categories for discussion, or a project category that by its nature may become empty on occasion.

If you think this page should not be deleted for this reason, you may contest the nomination by visiting the page and clicking the button labelled "Contest this speedy deletion". This will give you the opportunity to explain why you believe the page should not be deleted. However, be aware that once a page is tagged for speedy deletion, it may be deleted without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag from the page yourself, but do not hesitate to add information in line with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines. Liz Read! Talk! 14:51, 24 October 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Speedy deletion nomination of Category:Demi-Brigades of the French Army

[edit]

A tag has been placed on Category:Demi-Brigades of the French Army requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia. This has been done under section C1 of the criteria for speedy deletion, because the category has been empty for seven days or more and is not a disambiguation category, a category redirect, a featured topics category, under discussion at Categories for discussion, or a project category that by its nature may become empty on occasion.

If you think this page should not be deleted for this reason, you may contest the nomination by visiting the page and clicking the button labelled "Contest this speedy deletion". This will give you the opportunity to explain why you believe the page should not be deleted. However, be aware that once a page is tagged for speedy deletion, it may be deleted without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag from the page yourself, but do not hesitate to add information in line with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines. Liz Read! Talk! 14:57, 24 October 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Speedy deletion nomination of Category:Departments of the Continental Army

[edit]

A tag has been placed on Category:Departments of the Continental Army requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia. This has been done under section C1 of the criteria for speedy deletion, because the category has been empty for seven days or more and is not a disambiguation category, a category redirect, a featured topics category, under discussion at Categories for discussion, or a project category that by its nature may become empty on occasion.

If you think this page should not be deleted for this reason, you may contest the nomination by visiting the page and clicking the button labelled "Contest this speedy deletion". This will give you the opportunity to explain why you believe the page should not be deleted. However, be aware that once a page is tagged for speedy deletion, it may be deleted without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag from the page yourself, but do not hesitate to add information in line with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines. Liz Read! Talk! 14:58, 24 October 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Speedy deletion nomination of Category:Emigrated regiments of the French Army

[edit]

A tag has been placed on Category:Emigrated regiments of the French Army requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia. This has been done under section C1 of the criteria for speedy deletion, because the category has been empty for seven days or more and is not a disambiguation category, a category redirect, a featured topics category, under discussion at Categories for discussion, or a project category that by its nature may become empty on occasion.

If you think this page should not be deleted for this reason, you may contest the nomination by visiting the page and clicking the button labelled "Contest this speedy deletion". This will give you the opportunity to explain why you believe the page should not be deleted. However, be aware that once a page is tagged for speedy deletion, it may be deleted without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag from the page yourself, but do not hesitate to add information in line with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines. Liz Read! Talk! 14:59, 24 October 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Speedy deletion nomination of Category:Light cavalry regiments of the Ancien Régime

[edit]

A tag has been placed on Category:Light cavalry regiments of the Ancien Régime requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia. This has been done under section C1 of the criteria for speedy deletion, because the category has been empty for seven days or more and is not a disambiguation category, a category redirect, a featured topics category, under discussion at Categories for discussion, or a project category that by its nature may become empty on occasion.

If you think this page should not be deleted for this reason, you may contest the nomination by visiting the page and clicking the button labelled "Contest this speedy deletion". This will give you the opportunity to explain why you believe the page should not be deleted. However, be aware that once a page is tagged for speedy deletion, it may be deleted without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag from the page yourself, but do not hesitate to add information in line with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines. Liz Read! Talk! 15:04, 24 October 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Speedy deletion nomination of Category:Volunteer regiments of the Ancien Régime

[edit]

A tag has been placed on Category:Volunteer regiments of the Ancien Régime requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia. This has been done under section C1 of the criteria for speedy deletion, because the category has been empty for seven days or more and is not a disambiguation category, a category redirect, a featured topics category, under discussion at Categories for discussion, or a project category that by its nature may become empty on occasion.

If you think this page should not be deleted for this reason, you may contest the nomination by visiting the page and clicking the button labelled "Contest this speedy deletion". This will give you the opportunity to explain why you believe the page should not be deleted. However, be aware that once a page is tagged for speedy deletion, it may be deleted without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag from the page yourself, but do not hesitate to add information in line with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines. UnitedStatesian (talk) 21:13, 24 October 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Speedy deletion nomination of Category:Military units and formations of France in the Haitian Revolution

[edit]

A tag has been placed on Category:Military units and formations of France in the Haitian Revolution requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia. This has been done under section C1 of the criteria for speedy deletion, because the category has been empty for seven days or more and is not a disambiguation category, a category redirect, a featured topics category, under discussion at Categories for discussion, or a project category that by its nature may become empty on occasion.

If you think this page should not be deleted for this reason, you may contest the nomination by visiting the page and clicking the button labelled "Contest this speedy deletion". This will give you the opportunity to explain why you believe the page should not be deleted. However, be aware that once a page is tagged for speedy deletion, it may be deleted without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag from the page yourself, but do not hesitate to add information in line with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines. UnitedStatesian (talk) 22:09, 24 October 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Orphaned non-free image File:Cleveland ACF.jpeg

[edit]
⚠
⚠

Thanks for uploading File:Cleveland ACF.jpeg. The image description page currently specifies that the image is non-free and may only be used on Wikipedia under a claim of fair use. However, the image is currently not used in any articles on Wikipedia. If the image was previously in an article, please go to the article and see why it was removed. You may add it back if you think that that will be useful. However, please note that images for which a replacement could be created are not acceptable for use on Wikipedia (see our policy for non-free media).

Note that any non-free images not used in any articles will be deleted after seven days, as described in section F5 of the criteria for speedy deletion. Thank you. --B-bot (talk) 02:29, 25 October 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Speedy deletion nomination of Category:Military units and formations disestablished in 1756

[edit]

A tag has been placed on Category:Military units and formations disestablished in 1756 requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia. This has been done under section C1 of the criteria for speedy deletion, because the category has been empty for seven days or more and is not a disambiguation category, a category redirect, a featured topics category, under discussion at Categories for discussion, or a project category that by its nature may become empty on occasion.

If you think this page should not be deleted for this reason, you may contest the nomination by visiting the page and clicking the button labelled "Contest this speedy deletion". This will give you the opportunity to explain why you believe the page should not be deleted. However, be aware that once a page is tagged for speedy deletion, it may be deleted without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag from the page yourself, but do not hesitate to add information in line with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines. Liz Read! Talk! 15:02, 25 October 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Speedy deletion nomination of Category:Military units and formations disestablished in 1758

[edit]

A tag has been placed on Category:Military units and formations disestablished in 1758 requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia. This has been done under section C1 of the criteria for speedy deletion, because the category has been empty for seven days or more and is not a disambiguation category, a category redirect, a featured topics category, under discussion at Categories for discussion, or a project category that by its nature may become empty on occasion.

If you think this page should not be deleted for this reason, you may contest the nomination by visiting the page and clicking the button labelled "Contest this speedy deletion". This will give you the opportunity to explain why you believe the page should not be deleted. However, be aware that once a page is tagged for speedy deletion, it may be deleted without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag from the page yourself, but do not hesitate to add information in line with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines. Liz Read! Talk! 15:04, 25 October 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Speedy deletion nomination of Category:Military units and formations disestablished in 1761

[edit]

A tag has been placed on Category:Military units and formations disestablished in 1761 requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia. This has been done under section C1 of the criteria for speedy deletion, because the category has been empty for seven days or more and is not a disambiguation category, a category redirect, a featured topics category, under discussion at Categories for discussion, or a project category that by its nature may become empty on occasion.

If you think this page should not be deleted for this reason, you may contest the nomination by visiting the page and clicking the button labelled "Contest this speedy deletion". This will give you the opportunity to explain why you believe the page should not be deleted. However, be aware that once a page is tagged for speedy deletion, it may be deleted without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag from the page yourself, but do not hesitate to add information in line with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines. Liz Read! Talk! 15:05, 25 October 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Speedy deletion nomination of Category:Military units and formations disestablished in 1762

[edit]

A tag has been placed on Category:Military units and formations disestablished in 1762 requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia. This has been done under section C1 of the criteria for speedy deletion, because the category has been empty for seven days or more and is not a disambiguation category, a category redirect, a featured topics category, under discussion at Categories for discussion, or a project category that by its nature may become empty on occasion.

If you think this page should not be deleted for this reason, you may contest the nomination by visiting the page and clicking the button labelled "Contest this speedy deletion". This will give you the opportunity to explain why you believe the page should not be deleted. However, be aware that once a page is tagged for speedy deletion, it may be deleted without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag from the page yourself, but do not hesitate to add information in line with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines. Liz Read! Talk! 15:06, 25 October 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Speedy deletion nomination of Category:Military units and formations disestablished in 1786

[edit]

A tag has been placed on Category:Military units and formations disestablished in 1786 requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia. This has been done under section C1 of the criteria for speedy deletion, because the category has been empty for seven days or more and is not a disambiguation category, a category redirect, a featured topics category, under discussion at Categories for discussion, or a project category that by its nature may become empty on occasion.

If you think this page should not be deleted for this reason, you may contest the nomination by visiting the page and clicking the button labelled "Contest this speedy deletion". This will give you the opportunity to explain why you believe the page should not be deleted. However, be aware that once a page is tagged for speedy deletion, it may be deleted without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag from the page yourself, but do not hesitate to add information in line with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines. Liz Read! Talk! 15:07, 25 October 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Speedy deletion nomination of Category:Military units and formations established in 1743

[edit]

A tag has been placed on Category:Military units and formations established in 1743 requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia. This has been done under section C1 of the criteria for speedy deletion, because the category has been empty for seven days or more and is not a disambiguation category, a category redirect, a featured topics category, under discussion at Categories for discussion, or a project category that by its nature may become empty on occasion.

If you think this page should not be deleted for this reason, you may contest the nomination by visiting the page and clicking the button labelled "Contest this speedy deletion". This will give you the opportunity to explain why you believe the page should not be deleted. However, be aware that once a page is tagged for speedy deletion, it may be deleted without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag from the page yourself, but do not hesitate to add information in line with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines. Liz Read! Talk! 15:11, 25 October 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Speedy deletion nomination of Category:Military units and formations of France in the Seven Years' War

[edit]

A tag has been placed on Category:Military units and formations of France in the Seven Years' War requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia. This has been done under section C1 of the criteria for speedy deletion, because the category has been empty for seven days or more and is not a disambiguation category, a category redirect, a featured topics category, under discussion at Categories for discussion, or a project category that by its nature may become empty on occasion.

If you think this page should not be deleted for this reason, you may contest the nomination by visiting the page and clicking the button labelled "Contest this speedy deletion". This will give you the opportunity to explain why you believe the page should not be deleted. However, be aware that once a page is tagged for speedy deletion, it may be deleted without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag from the page yourself, but do not hesitate to add information in line with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines. Liz Read! Talk! 15:18, 25 October 2020 (UTC)[reply]

File:1 Military Intelligence Brigade Flash.png listed for discussion

[edit]

A file that you uploaded or altered, File:1 Military Intelligence Brigade Flash.png, has been listed at Wikipedia:Files for discussion. Please see the discussion to see why it has been listed (you may have to search for the title of the image to find its entry). Feel free to add your opinion on the matter below the nomination.

This bot DID NOT nominate any file(s) for deletion; please refer to the page history of each individual file for details. Thanks, FastilyBot (talk) 01:01, 15 November 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Speedy deletion nomination of Category:Artillery regiments of the Ancien Régime

[edit]

A tag has been placed on Category:Artillery regiments of the Ancien Régime indicating that it is currently empty, and is not a disambiguation category, a category redirect, a featured topics category, under discussion at Categories for discussion, or a project category that by its nature may become empty on occasion. If it remains empty for seven days or more, it may be deleted under section C1 of the criteria for speedy deletion.

If you think this page should not be deleted for this reason you may contest the nomination by visiting the page and clicking the button labelled "Contest this speedy deletion". This will give you the opportunity to explain why you believe the page should not be deleted. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag from the page yourself. Liz Read! Talk! 17:40, 18 August 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Speedy deletion nomination of Category:Legions of the Ancien Régime

[edit]

A tag has been placed on Category:Legions of the Ancien Régime indicating that it is currently empty, and is not a disambiguation category, a category redirect, a featured topics category, under discussion at Categories for discussion, or a project category that by its nature may become empty on occasion. If it remains empty for seven days or more, it may be deleted under section C1 of the criteria for speedy deletion.

If you think this page should not be deleted for this reason you may contest the nomination by visiting the page and clicking the button labelled "Contest this speedy deletion". This will give you the opportunity to explain why you believe the page should not be deleted. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag from the page yourself. Liz Read! Talk! 17:49, 18 August 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Retrieved from "https://en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=User_talk:ACForce2020&oldid=1044007804"