User talk:A860629a

A860629a, you are invited to the Teahouse!

Hi A860629a! Thanks for contributing to Wikipedia.
Be our guest at the Teahouse! The Teahouse is a friendly space where new editors can ask questions about contributing to Wikipedia and get help from experienced editors like 78.26 (talk).

Visit the Teahouse

We hope to see you there!

Delivered by HostBot on behalf of the Teahouse hosts

16:05, 21 April 2018 (UTC)

Do not remove headers from category pages when they are up for discussion

Welcome to Wikipedia. Please do not remove Categories for discussion notices from category pages, or remove other people's comments in Categories for discussion debates, as you did with Category:Scripts defuncted. Otherwise, it may be difficult to create consensus. If you oppose the deletion, merger, or renaming of a category, please comment at the respective page instead. Thank you. —C.Fred (talk) 01:40, 5 May 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Please do not remove Categories for discussion notices from category pages or remove other people's comments in Categories for discussion pages, as you did with Wikipedia:Categories for discussion/Log/2018 May 4. Doing so won't stop the discussion from taking place. You are, however, welcome to comment about the proposed deletion on the appropriate page. You cannot prevent the renaming of the category just by deleting the discussion. You must let the discussion run its course. —C.Fred (talk) 02:11, 5 May 2018 (UTC)[reply]

By creating Category:Defunct writing systems‎ and moving the pages from Category:Scripts defuncted into that category, you have now created an even bigger mess. I think you are trying to help, but you are inadvertently making things worse. Please do not create any new categories or hand-move things from one category to another. —C.Fred (talk) 15:51, 5 May 2018 (UTC)[reply]

May 2018

Wikipedia's technical logs indicate that this user account has been or may be used abusively. It has been blocked indefinitely from editing to prevent abuse.

Note that multiple accounts are allowed, but not for illegitimate reasons, and any contributions made while evading blocks or bans may be reverted or deleted.
If you think there are good reasons why you should be unblocked, you should review the guide to appealing blocks, and then appeal your block by adding the following text below this notice: {{unblock|Your reason here ~~~~}}. Note that anything you post in your unblock request will be public, so you may alternatively use the Unblock Ticket Request System to submit an appeal if it contains information that must be private.

Administrators: Checkusers have access to confidential system logs not accessible by the public or by administrators due to the Wikimedia Foundation's privacy policy. You must not loosen or remove this block, or issue an IP block exemption, without consulting with a checkuser or the Arbitration Committee. Administrators who undo checkuser blocks without permission from a checkuser or the Arbitration Committee may be summarily desysopped.

Drmies (talk) 17:33, 5 May 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Category:Obsolete writing systems has been nominated for renaming

Category:Obsolete writing systems has been nominated for renaming. A discussion is taking place to decide whether this proposal complies with the categorization guidelines. If you would like to participate in the discussion, you are invited to add your comments at the category's entry on the categories for discussion page. Thank you. Treetoes023 (talk) 19:07, 23 October 2023 (UTC)[reply]